Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: King kong analysis
Based on the original, classic film of King Kong made in 1933 we are shown a whole new side of cinematography and the world renowned CGI special effects throughout the king Kong film we all know and love today made in 2005. We as the viewers were conceded yet to another action, and drama filled film by the high class New Zealand director Peter Jackson, In the film we are portrayed the four main characters of Naomi Watts as Ann Darrow, Jack Black as Carl Denham, Adrien Brody as Jack Driscoll and of course the CGI edited gorilla of King Kong played by Andy Serkis.
In the film we see a money hungry director of Carl Denham looking for fame in the big league and decides he needs to prove his skill of to the world by visiting the notorious Skull Island to prove that it is no ordinary Island. His crew and him voyage from New York City to the Skull Island to film his up and coming movie. Accompanying him are Jack Driscoll the main playwriting, Ann Darrow the actress , along with the rest of the ship's crew and extras, On their arrival at the Island, Ann is soon departed from the crew and kidnapped by King Kong a humongous gorilla. On the rescue for Ann, several characters are killed, whilst encountering Human size insects, dinosaurs and many more. Little do they know Ann has created a special relationship
…show more content…
The Internet Movie Database (IMDb) rated King Kong a high score of 7.3, King Kongs cast, director, crew and Sound and special effects team all went on to win overall three Oscar awards, thirty eight other awards and totaling at seventy one nominations. Despite King Kong have a very tragic and sad ending, there were countless action scenes, ongoing adventures and of course the gripping drama portrayed throughout the film and will consequently go down in history for the best movie made in its
Water for Elephants. By Sara Gruen and Richard LaGravanese. Dir. Francis Lawrence. Perf. Robert Pattinson, Reese Witherspoon, Christoph Waltz. Fox 2000 Pictures, 2011. Film.
Classic stories remain a classic because they convey a message which appeals to people of multiple generations despite changes in society. King Kong was released in print in 1932, a year prior to its release in Hollywood, as a part of the film’s advance marketing. The public of this generation easily accepted the story’s racist, colonialist, and sexist themes. Today, literary critics such as Cynthia Erb view the novel and film as representation of the early 30s and thus a resource to understand the cultural context of the times. In particular, King Kong provides a window through which a modern audience can understand and interpret racism of the 1930s.
CSI: Crime Scene Investigation was introduced to viewers in October 2000. Since that time, the franchise has added two versions in major metropolitan areas, now addressing crime scenarios in Las Vegas, Miami and New York City. Based on the most recent Nielsen ratings for primetime television shows, the CSI franchise claimed approximately 35 million viewers during the 2010 – 2011 viewing season. The popularity of forensic science drama on television has led officers of the court to voice opinions that there is a “CSI effect” which alters the juror pools and outcomes of criminal trial proceedings. The differences between made for television fiction and actual crime solving are many and when jurors consider themselves pseudo-experts those lines may get blurred in the courtroom.
The film is quite gruesome and brutal in some parts. It is a film with
The pristine 1933 King Kong was constructed as a movie: to convey a story to entertain an audience. Peter Jackson’s 2005 remake took the substructure for King Kong and expanded upon it in virtually every way in order to “make again” the astoundment of the original for a modern-day audience. Audiences received the first King Kong very well. The stop-motion sequences of Kong were astounding for their time and the movie grossed over $90,000 in its beginning weekend. In order to bank upon its prosperity again, sequels were made and thus in 1976 a remake was made to amend upon the original. Paramount updated the movie to color, altered the story, and cast Jeff Bridges, a widely popular actor of the time, as the lead actor. Although the movie received stirred reviews, it did exceptionally well in the box office and tripled Paramount’s initial budget for the motion picture. Even though the movie wasn’t “as good” as the original, audiences still paid money to view it because of that hope that they would feel like they once did when they visually perceived the first King Kong. The remake add...
News. ""Kong" Score Tossed Out at 11th Hour."" Film Score Monthly 10.6 (2005): 6. IIMP. Web. 6 Dec. 2010.
The original film was made to educate the coarse, unenlightened masses. The great thing about the original film is that the gorilla is dealt with and addressed and even teaches us a valuable lesson about humanity and race. The new film doesn’t even try.
Dark City, directed by Alex Proya, is a sci-fi thriller full of visually extravagant and atmospheric special effects. The film illustrates a metropolis where its human inhabitants are always engulfed in the nightlife darkness because the sun does not exist. The city is controlled by extraterrestrials known as the Strangers, who disguise themselves as humans and are devoted to researching the human race via manipulation and experimentation. Dark City has a shadowy tone and comic book feel, which is reflected by all the film elements used by Proya. Working with the gloomy visuals, peculiar audio, abnormal camera angles and with many other filming techniques, Proya allows the audience to recognize that the film is dark in its nature. A critical factor of portraying this message is the mise-en-scene. Proya uses mise-en-scene to construct meaning, keep the audience off guard, and to generate a response by allowing them to empathize with the emotions of the characters.
With the help of superb editing, sound, mise en scene, and cinematography, this film cannot be topped. The fist scene of the movie creates an atmosphere that helps the viewer know that he/she will enjoy this wonderful classic. Throughout the movie there are surprises and fun that makes this a movie that people will want to watch again and again. Gene Kelly said it best when he said, "Dignity, always dignity. " That is what this movie has from beginning to end, dignity.
Its amazing right how directors have this amazing story to be told that comes from their head. Well this director went a different way to filming this, some of the most major scenes in this film were improvised, cool !huh ?Yea I couldn’t even believe it that the director Neill Blomkamp thought it would be better because then it’ll feel more real. His viewers would get a sense of realness in his movie. Talk about realness he also interviews real interviewers for his film.
Dir. Stanley Kubrick. Prod. Stanley Kubrick, Victor Lyndon, and Ken Adam. By Stanley Kubrick, Terry Southern, Peter George, Gilbert Taylor, Anthony Harvey, and Laurie Johnson. Perf. Peter Sellers, George C. Scott, Sterling Hayden, Keenan Wynn, Slim Pickens, and James Earl Jones. BLC, 1963. DVD.
I thought that the Lion King was a very good film to watch for all
Few movies have been panned by critics but widely accepted by viewers across the nation. National Treasure is one of them. Even after receiving sub par reviews including only two stars from Roger Ebert, National Treasure won over the public, earning almost $350 million worldwide. Even though the movie is under the Walt Disney Company and has a PG rating, this movie is not just for children. Superb acting and action from beginning to end will keep people of all ages glued to their seat as they follow one man’s quest for a hidden treasure.
That award went to the film’s DP, Robert Elswit, an American journeyman who has shot dozens of films in his career (“The Best Cinematography”). The camera work throughout the movie was excellent at showing all of the different points of view. The camera would be behind the actor and show the viewer what the actor is looking at, or what is happening to the actor. The sound effects of the movie were also great. The way that Daniel slapped Eli and the sound it made is an example of how the camera work and the sound effects combined to make the movie seem so realistic. Another example of this combination of camera work and sound that was great was the part in the movie where the gas shot out from the ground and burned down the tower that Daniel and his workers built. The music in the movie was phenomenal. The way the music slowly began as either Daniel or Eli were confronting each other, or when there was a silent scene with only the music
...n (Director) mistakenly seems to believe can carry the whole film. On the strength "based on a true story", he has rejected attention-grabbing characters, an imaginative plot, and unforgettable villains.