Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of Greek culture in Kievan Rus
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impact of Greek culture in Kievan Rus
While often overlooked, the early history of the Eastern Slavs creates an essential aspect of the rise of the Kievan state. These people, who broke from the western and southern Slavic groups, largely influenced the rise of the Kievan state and in turn the rise of Russia. The impact of various cultures including the Greeks, Khazars, and Scythians led to the cultural revolution which allowed for an established state to be possible in the once tribal area. The rise of the Kievan state came from immense cultural impact, strong political ties, and a desire for a resilient economy.
In order to discuss the rise of Kiev, it is essential for us to explore their early history before the rule of the Varangians. The early Eastern Slavs were located largely around the North shore of the Black Sea and the Southern steppe. Their location had them in heavily forested land where it was hard to farm due to lack of open fields. As a result of these deep woods, the Slavs developed a practice known as ‘slash and burn agriculture’. However, this method of agriculture exhausted the soil because they continually used the same fields for years. Because of this the Eastern Slavs had to continually move around and burn all the trees around them to make room for new fields. This can explain the reason the Eastern Slavs expanded so rapidly across Eastern Europe from the Dneiper to Pomerania. The Eastern Slavs did not yet have an official state; rather they were divided amongst familial tribes; the earliest tribal centers included Novgorod and Kiev.
It is also important for us to discuss the cultural influences felt by the Eastern Slavs in the era before Kiev. Among the influences the Slavs were subjected to in this early period were the Scythi...
... middle of paper ...
...ion in between the two empires allowed for the economic situation in Kiev to become one of envy among surrounding states and tribes.
Although it is hard for us to ever say for sure the exact nature of the development of the Kievan state or the direct nature of the history of the early Eastern Slavs. However, we are able to make inferences and theories from the evidence presented to us from the Black Sea to the southern steppe. It is important for us to understand that the nations that gave cultural, political, and economic standing to the Kievan state did not directly link to the rise of the Kievan state. They did, however, aid in the process of establishing a powerful enough tribe to unite multiple tribes as one. The history of the early Eastern Slavs is one which should be continually studied and analysed to understand the founding of the Kievan state.
The seventeenth century was undeniably a period of great division, war and turmoil for Hungary. After the events of the previous century, Hungary remained divided into three distinct areas. The largest was Ottoman Hungary, under the direct control of Constantinople, which encompassed the south and south-east of Hungary. Second, there was the Eastern Hungarian Kingdom founded by János Zápolyai in 1526, who after the defeat of the Hungarian forces at the First Battle of Mohács sought the support of Sultan Suleiman I to be crowned King of Hungary by a rival faction of the nobility and became the Sultan’s vassal. After 1571, with the coronation of István Báthory, this Kingdom became the Principality of Transylvania which was semi-autonomous with Habsburgs and Ottomans vying for control. Lastly there was Royal Hungary, the only part of Hungary still under Habsburg control in this period. It consisted of the western and north-western areas that had been secured by Ferdinand I after being declared King of Hungary by the pro-Habsburg part of the noblity in 1526. This division remained the status quo into the seventeenth century. In this essay, it will be argued that due to this division the Habsburgs found it impossible to consolidate power in Hungary as well as a variety of other factors such as, confessional divisions in Hungary opposed to the Catholic dynasty, Habsburg priorities resting in religious conflict in Germany and securing influence in the Mediterranean from Ottoman and French fleets, Habsburg involvement in the Thirty Years War and the revived Franco-Ottoman Alliance. All these factors together ensured that the Habsburg would not gain control of Hungary until 1699.
In the second half of the nineteenth century, after almost 30 years of general calm, the Polish people once again began protesting Russian rule. Meetings were held and discussions raged about reforms and emancipatio...
Vsevolod Yaroslavych ruled Kiev from 1078 to 1093. Monomakh became active in the politics of Kiev, helping his father and uncle Izyaslav I, who ruled Kiev intermittently between 1054 and 78, defeat his cousins (8). While his father was alive, Monomakh ruled the Smolensk principality from 1067 to 1125 and the Chernihiv principality from 1078 to 94. He also participated in diplomatic missions, and successfully led 13 military campaigns. After his father’s death in 1093, Monomakh was named the prince of the southern town Pereyaslavl in 1094, but not Kiev (1). He supported his cousin Sviatopolk II Iziaslavych being named the grand duke of Kiev, as he wished to avoid warfare among the Princes of Russia (6). Although Pereyaslavl was the major land Monomakh ruled over, he also controlled Rostov, Suzdal, and other Northern provinces. He founded several towns in these lands, one of which was his namesake, Vladimir, which later became the capital of Russia (9). He gained popularity as a result of his successful campaigns in both 1103 and 1111 against the Cumans, who were nomadic invaders always posing a threat to Russian lands (6). Monomakh gained rule of Kiev after both Sviatopolk died in 1113 and the Kiev Uprising of 1113, being named the grand prince of Kiev, or Yaroslav The Wise, until his death on May 19th, 1125.
The Mongols were a fierce people who conquered many lands under the strong leadership of Genghis and Kublai Khan. From their origins in Asia to the growth of their empire that stretched from the Pacific Ocean to Eastern Europe, their inspiration of Europe lasted for centuries. Both good and bad things came from them, but overall, their reign was for the betterment of European culture. The advancements Europe made within the 1200’s could not have been accomplished without the successes of the Mongol Empire.
Slave families had a tendency to be unstable, due to the nature of the institution of slav...
"The Flow of History." FC44: The Byzantine Empire (c.500-1025) -. N.p., n.d. Web. 04 Apr. 2014. .
...l liberties, supreme monarch rule, and ultimately a poor quality of life. In the end, the political factor responsible for the revolution was the people's discontent with Tsar Nicholas II and the way he ruled, socially the factor responsible for revolution was the people's desire for basic civil liberties which had not been granted by the monarch rulers, and economically the people wished to improve the quality of their life, working conditions, and job output.
Barendse, R.J. “The Feudal Mutation: Military and Economic Transformations of the Ethnosphere in the Tenth to Thirteenth Centuries.” Journal of World History 14, no. 4 (2003): 503-529. EBSCOhost (accessed April 8, 2014).
Overall this paper shows what it means to be a woman in steppe and how they overcome daily as well as far problems with their intelligence. In regard to this, I want people to understand that women were just as important and talented as men in 13th century and after. No author should have the right to cover these amazing women in their work no matter what their ideals are, where they grew up and what they eat.
Hobson, J. M., 2004. The Eastern Origins of Western Civilisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 57
The history of Bulgaria is primarily influenced by one major factor: its location. The crossroad location of Bulgaria between Asia and Europe led to several clashes between the native tribes and tribes crossing over the region. This led to the eventual settling down of some the tribes like Slavs and Bulgars in the region which led to the development of classical history of Bulgaria. Tribes
I am the leader of a relatively unknown nomadic tribe looking to leave a mark on the world. Traveling across Asia into Europe, I stumble across the ruins of the Mongol campaign. I finally arrive at the Second Bulgarian Empire, although they are currently in chaos, I realize that invading Bulgaria would make my tribe visible to others. Despite its current struggles, the Second Bulgarian Empire was incredibly prosperous from 1185 – 1241 CE(Dimitrov). The Second Bulgarian Empire was at its peak during the reign of Ivan Asen (D’Souza). During the reign of Ivan Asen, trade was regulated in a way that ensured that Bulgaria actively traded (Dimitrov). After the death of Ivan Asen, Bulgaria started losing much of its territory (“The Second Bulgarian
Russia culture is very different from any other culture that I have ever read about. This is a country that is dominated by males. Males actually run the county of Russia. The men are so dominated that every Russian women dream is to be married and have a family with these men. Russia is known for its poor society. In the book Sakharov he mentions how he moved from one place to another. He first was in Moscow’s larger apartments with his family. In this apartment there were six families. With thin the six families they had to share the kitchen and the bathroom. Then he states that he moved into a very old house and in this old house there was a leaking ceiling. With in this house there were still six families that shared everything. (Sakharov 24-25)
It surfaced into the spotlight within a matter of days, after the Ukraine crisis that seemed to go on forever with the death toll’s increase and the continuing crimes against humanity; it happened. Russia made the move for Crimea, arguably one of many more to come, which will ultimately reinstate its place as an international superpower and a force to be reckoned with. To understand the events that led to this geopolitical decisions it is important to look into the history of the peninsula and later look at the repercussions it holds for the future. According to Taylor the Romans and Greek Empires initially referred it to as “Taurica”, and Crimea the name from which is commonly known today originates from the Tartars, which Taylor explains to be “ a Turkic ethnic group that emerged during the Crimean Khanate.” Edward Allsworth explains that the name is believed to mean “fortress” or “stronghold” mainly due to its rough landscape.
In the years leading up to the revolution, Russia had been involved in a series of wars. The Crimean war, The Russo-Turkish war, The Russo-Japanese war and the First World War. Russia had been defeated in all except the war with Turkey and its government and economy had the scars to prove it. A severe lack of food and poor living conditions amongst the peasant population led firstly to strikes and quickly escalated to violent riots. Tsar Nicholas II ruled Russia with an iron hand while much of Europe was moving away from the monarchical system of rule. All lands were owned by the Tsar’s family and Nobel land lords while the factories and industrial complexes were owned by the capitalists’. There were no unions or labour laws and the justice system had made almost all other laws in favour of the ruling elite. Rents and taxes were often unaffordable, while the gulf between workers and the ruling elite grew ever wider.