More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on institutional discrimination
Essay on institutional discrimination
The effects of discrimination and those who inflict discrimination
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Defense of Affirmative Action: A Response to Kenneth Himma
In Kenneth Himma’s paper “Discrimination and Disidentifcication”, the author argues for the necessity of a false start to offset the centuries of oppression and the lingering institutional barriers still present as a result of this era. Himma’s argument which argues that for publically funded institutions it is morally permissible to give advantages based on both sex and gender. The authors’ argument answers a series of questions ranging from if affirmative action violates a right to how the concept of affirmative action can serve to fix many underlying societal issues. Himma bases his argument on the False Start Principle. “FSP is based on the rationale that presuppose individual
…show more content…
In this case, the quotas or additional points given to a minority applicant to a college would be impermissible. The False Start Defense can be used in this case to argue for the permissibility and proving that Rawls argument does not apply in this case. EOP argues that everyone should be on an equal playing field when it comes and the obstacles should be equal as well. This defense is valid for many cases where there are actual quantifiable obstacles be it physical or legally such as laws preventing a person from doing an action such as entering colleges at all. Legal discrimination is the most applicable case for the equal opportunity defense but in the case of affirmative action this would not apply. For example, consider the example of the false start defense once again. A car backfires, the runner starts a fraction of a second early and subsequently wins. It is morally permissible to compensate the rest of the false start or disqualify the runner. Disqualifying the runner is the equivalent action for the Equal Opportunity defense there are rules set in place to ensure each runner has an equal chance to win. Rawls argument is based on the idea that rules that are only in place for one specific group of …show more content…
Himma argues on the basis of the FSD being morally permissible but does not acknowledge if the argument is wrong in itself. Although there has been quantifiable damage cause by institutional sexism and racism, Himma neglects to defend the False Start Defense on the idea of inflicting the same harm on white males that race and gender based minority group’s face. The False Start defense bases its argument on the idea that because there have been barriers put in place for disadvantage groups the same should be done for white males. The two wrongs fallacy is when a person attempts to justify an action against another person because the other person did take or would take the same action against him or her. If this were the case Himma’s argument would be undeniable morally reprehensible but that is not the case. The two wrongs fallacy is based on the equality of all the individuals involved but as Himma states it is undeniable that the barriers in place put minority groups at a disadvantage. The main objection is that although minority groups have been put at a disadvantage it is still morally impermissible to apply the same treatment on white males. I argue that the necessity of the two wrongs fallacy is based on the idea of true equality. This equality is
Taylor, Keeanga-Yamahtta. "Civil Rights and Civil Wrongs: Racism in America Today."International Socialist Review Online November-December.32 (2003): n. pag.ISReview.org. International Socialist Organization. Web. 07 Dec. 2013. .
Affirmative Action Question: Newton and Wasserstrom seem to disagree about whether affirmative action is a form of reverse discrimination. Explain how each arrives at their position about whether or not affirmative action is similar to or different from discriminatory laws of the Jim Crow era
What began as a movement in the mid-1970s, is a theory that deals with the interconnectedness of racism and the legal system. Critical Race Theory is a concept created in law schools in the United States during a time when “heady advances of the civil rights era of the 1960s had stalled and, in many respects, were being rolled back” (Delgado et al. 4). The theory now encompasses its ideals into three main “features:”
After long years of suffering, degradation, and different sorts of discrimination which the disadvantaged group of people had experienced, the “Affirmative Action Law” was finally passed and enforced for the very first time on September 24, 1965. The central purpose of the Affirmative Action Law is to combat racial inequality and to give equal civil rights for each citizen of the United States, most especially for the minorities. However, what does true equality mean? Is opportunity for everyone? In an article entitled, “None of this is fair”, the author, Mr. Richard Rodriguez explains how his ethnicity did not become a hindrance but instead, the law became beneficial. However, Mr. Richard Rodriguez realized the unfairness of the “Affirmative Action” to people who are more deserving of all the opportunities that were being offered to him. Through Mr. Rodriguez’s article, it will demonstrates to the reader both favorable, and adverse reaction of the people to the Affirmative Action, that even though the program was created with the intention to provide equality for each and every citizen, not everyone will be pleased, contented, and benefit from the law.
What has changed since the collapse of Jim Crow has less to do with the basic structure of our society than with the language we use to justify it. In the era of colorblindness, it is no longer socially permissible to use race, explicitly, as a justification for discrimination, exclusion, and social contempt. So we don’t. Rather than directly rely on race, we use the criminal justi...
majority, does not advance the cause of minorities in a meaningful way, and needs to be
Over the past 15 years tremendous awareness has been raised around this and programs of preferential treatment emerged. These programs ensured equal rights for people of color and females in the work place, allowing for them to apply for executive level positions and earn the same amount of money, benefits, and prestige as a white male ensuring equality for all race and sex. Lisa Newton argues that, “reverse discrimination does not advance but actually undermines equality because it violates the concept of equal justice under law for all citizens. In addition, to this theoretical objection to reverse discrimination, Newton opposes it because she believes it raises insoluble problems.” Among them are determining what groups have been sufficiently discriminated against in the past to deserve preferred treatment in the present and determining the degree of reverse discrimination that will be compensatory. Newton outlines the importance of ensuring her argument is recognized as logically distinct from the condition of justice in the political sense. She begins her argument for reverse discrimination as unjustified by addressing the “simple justice” claim requiring that we favor women and blacks in employment and education opportunities. Since women and blacks were unjustly excluded from such opportunities for so many years in the not so distant past, however when employers and schools favor women and blacks, the same injustice is done. This reverse discrimination violates the public equality which defines citizenship and destroys the rule of law for the areas in which these favors are granted. To the extent that we adopt a program of discrimination, reverse or otherwise, justice in the political sense is destroyed, and none of us, specifically affected or no is a citizen, as bearers of rights we are all petitioners
Today there is considerable disagreement in the country over Affirmative Action with the American people. MSNBC reported a record low in support for Affirmative Action with 45% in support and 45% opposing (Muller, 2013). The affirmative action programs have afforded all genders and races, exempting white males, a sense of optimism and an avenue to get the opportunities they normally would not be eligible for. This advantage includes admission in colleges or hiring preferences with public and private jobs; although Affirmative Action has never required quotas the government has initiated a benefits program for the schools and companies that elect to be diversified. The advantages that are received by the minorities’ only take into account skin color, gender, disability, etc., are what is recognized as discriminatory factors. What is viewed as racism to the majority is that there ar...
Affirmative Action Affirmative action can be defined as action taken to compensate for past unfairness in the education of minorities. The current system of affirmative action allows universities to admit applicants from certain ethnic and minority groups with lower credentials. The main purpose of affirmative action is to produce a diverse campus population that is comparable to today's society. The use of race as a facto by which someone is admitted to college in the long run will compromise the quality of the university. Implicating affirmative action to solve the problem of diversity on today's campuses has lead to the creation of problems.
In the United States, racial discrimination has a lengthy history, dating back to the biblical period. Racial discrimination is a term used to characterize disruptive or discriminatory behaviors afflicted on a person because of his or her ethnic background. In other words, every t...
Discrimination has always been there between blacks and whites. Since the 1800s where racial issues and differences started flourishing till today, we can still find people of different colors treated unequally. “[R]acial differences are more in the mind than in the genes. Thus we conclude superiority and inferiority associated with racial differences are often socially constructed to satisfy the socio-political agenda of the dominant group”(Heewon Chang,Timothy Dodd;2001;1).
In our society today it is very sad but racism still occurs. If we banish Affirmative Action policies across the board we no longer protect woman, minorities and certain persons in specific socio-economic classes that would normally not get the benefit of the doubt since “odds” it seems are considerably stacked against them. In the case Grutter v. Bollinger it is said that Affirmative Action is no longer a he...
Institutional racism is defined in the National Association of Social Workers (NASW) as “the manifestation of racism in social systems and institutions. It is the social, economic, educational, and political forces or policies that operate to foster discriminatory outcomes. It is the combination of policies, practices, or procedures embedded in bureaucratic structure that systematically lead to unequal outcomes for groups of people”(2007). In other words, policy and practices intentionally or unintentionally favor one group or put a racial group at a
Racist and racism are provocative words in American society. To some, they become curse words. They are descriptive words of reality that cannot be denied. Some people believe that race is the primary determinant of human abilities and capacities and behave as if racial differences produce inherent superiorities. People of color are often injured by these judgements and actions whether they are directly or indirectly racist. Just as individuals can act in racist ways, so can institutions. Institutions can be overtly or inherently racist. Institutions can also injure people. The outcome is nonetheless racist, if not intentional (Randall).
Affirmative action has been the topic of debate for many years. It has been controversial because it has been said to be a form of reverse discrimination. This paper will discuss the purpose behind affirmative action, as well as, its various strengths and weaknesses. Also, this paper will look at the following issues surrounding affirmative action such as the incompetency myth ( are companies hiring less qualified people?), the impact on employment (what has changed in the work place?), the impact on women (how have their lives changed?) and the impact on employment law (what documents back up affirmative action?). Lastly, a discussion of affirmative action on an international scale, and what international documents have to say about the topic. The purpose of this paper is to bring to light all the issues, and then make an educated statement of whether affirmative action is a worthwhile activity or if there is a better solution.