Keeping Kmart and Target Financially Alive

This goal of this analysis is to shadow some light on K-Mart and Target and with the help of extensive research. In this analysis we can find out what each company can do, where they lack and what has to be done in order to keep the company profitable and alive. Thus, we will try to look at the Target wholly and then it will identify a successful business strategy and thus show that the strategy has moved the Target into one of such leaders in the industry. When we will take a look at K-Mart and then we will move on the identification of a failed business strategy and then show that the strategy has been holding this company at the back. After that we will try to perform a cross- case analysis by contrasting and comparing the case studies on the points of difference and the parity. This will help us in looking at a side by side difference of a SWOT analysis and also the five force analysis.

Case study 1: Target Co.

The first Target store had been opened in the year 1962 in the suburb of Roseville, Minneapolis with a tough focus on the easy shopping at a competitive amount of discount prices. In the year 2013 in which the Target remains very committed for providing an easy shopping experience for the guests by delivering the distinctive merchandise and the outstanding value. The Target currently has been the second largest retailer in America with Target.com and it is ranked as the mostly visited retail web sites (Target Co, 2013).

The Target currently has about24 stores in Canada and about 1784 stores in the U.S. The Target has over team members which are over 16000 who work in a team in order to act as a bridge in between the stores and the suppliers. Worldwide the Target is around 365000 ...

... middle of paper ...

... which both has is the capitalizing of the emerging markets. And the similarity in the threats to them is the US economy.

The differences are that Target has a positive perception of customers and also Kmart does not have a good brand strategy. The opportunity available to Target is that they can expand in Pharmacy business.

Conclusion

We can see that Target is successful due to its good brand strategy and thus in order to keep up the success the company must change their strategies and branding so that they can match the needs and the wants of the customers. Even when the companies have a lot of similarities still the differences are greater. Kmart took decisions at a late point and still struggling to capitalize on the opportunities and Target has been active always to capture opportunities and overcome its weaknesses.