Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Entering international markets
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The title of the article I chose is “Why Target failed in Canada”. The article details the issues the retail chain sustained as it tried to place its first global presence in Canada. Much of what occurred stemmed from a CEO and management team that was unable to foresee the issues that would develop from entering the Canadian marketplace. It was havoc from the very beginning. The first questionable issue was that the retailer decided to open 124 stores in Canada in a matter of one year. This overblown idea of having so many stores open up in a short amount of time would eventually lead to the additional issues that caused the retailer to have its first global downfall. The retailer purchased the leases of a discount chain in Canada that had …show more content…
an unorthodox layout that Target tried to conform to. Unfortunately, Target didn’t get the demographics of the middle class that the retailer was used to obtaining in the United States. Other issues the retailer faced were an already saturated Walmart presence and a lack of stocked shelves due to its overambitious amount of store fronts and poor inventory planning. Any company looking to expand must take in consideration the positive and negative impact that the business will encounter.
In order for Target to have been successful, first and foremost, the retailer should have known that they would not be able to beat their competitor, Walmart, in a price war. That alone, is a losing battle. So, a higher quality of products, fewer locations, and a better understanding of Canadian tastes could have propelled the retailer into establishing, for the long term, a profitable global presence with our Canadian neighbors.
The Canadians and Target both lost out on opportunities that could have excelled them both in distinct ways. For the Canadians, Targets poor attempt at going global costs Canadians their jobs when the retailer had to close its stores. The retailer also is looked upon negatively for having expectations of going global that were well beyond their reach and executed poorly.
Fortunate for Walmart, the competition of another retailer was nothing for Walmart which had a Canadian presence for over twenty years prior to Target’s abrupt entry. Walmart continues to maintain a steady and moderate sales growth in
…show more content…
Canada. Here are a few of the many ethical challenges facing a global business that are not present in a domestic business. The first challenge would be the barriers that would occur in communication among the various languages. Second, making sure wages in other countries are acceptable and reasonable by assuring that a living wage is warranted. Next, laws in other countries are different from our domestic laws and knowing the difference is important. Many countries still associate with bribery, which is something no business or corporation wants to be caught up in. Lastly, being aware of the working conditions where that business operates is up to standards. The number one priority of any business operating in foreign land is to assure that the treatment of workers is fair, especially with cases of child labor being discovered in many countries. Regarding ethics, I don’t believe an organization can operate ethically overall while having different standards of ethics around the world. In my opinion, I believe the scandals that surfaced are too much for many of the companies to handle and it puts a scar on their reputation. In conclusion, I feel globalization can benefit a company significantly.
Especially those that do e-business. Many small businesses start out and struggle to survive the first year with saturated markets or being shut down due to shopping malls or Walmarts popping up everywhere. If a company can establish themselves online and provide a product that can influence those outside of our borders, then many can sustain themselves for the long-term. In Target’s case, I had no idea they were not more globally situated in other countries. I think those responsible for the expansion into Canada were too quick to penetrate a market that was not readily accepting of Target’s overall performance. Unfortunately, many of the errors the retailer encountered could have been avoided. If another attempt is made at going global, Canadian Target should be a valuable lesson of what should be
avoided. http://fortune.com/2015/01/15/target-canada-fail/
The success of Wal-Mart is so great, that many people believe that Wal-Mart is becoming a monopsony . Suppliers are forced to deal with Wal-Mart because of the large percentage of sales at Wal-Mart cash registers. As such, Wal-Mart also has the ability to dictate prices of the goods it receives from the suppliers. Every day, more and more retail stores close their doors for good because Wal-Mart controls such a huge margin of the retail sector.
Target’s first foreign store investment was in Canada; American stores look to Canada as their first foreign investment because the differences between the two countries are relatively minor. Other stores that have expanded to Canada include Wal-Mart, and Sears, each of these companies proved to be prosperous in Canada. Canada is one of the wealthiest countries in the world and is dominated by the service industry, Wawa would have no trouble fitting into the culture Canada has and dominating the market as they do here, in the United States. After reading about Canada and Wawa, we have realized this move could only benefit Wawa and help their reputation and build their company.
As I have outlined in the charts below, there are various similarities and differences between Wal-Mart and Target. Wal-Mart is Target’s primary competitor, and vice versa. Wal-Mart has a strong market presence in its global markets and has a diverse range of products and services that are affordable and available in stock. Target, on the other hand, does not have a strong market presence or efficient product supply; however, Target’s physical environment and innovative products further the brand’s image and value. Unfortunately, Target and Wal-Mart are both e-commerce laggards with major competitors such as Amazon. Target faces complications with their pricing strategies and their product availability, which hinders their strength when competing
Target has not changed its business model to adapt to the modern-day changes in the retail business. Compared to its rivals, Walmart is planning to open more than 200 small stores as compared to just eight small stores within a year.
Target has many competitors in the market, and the level of competition is highly intense. Some of its main rivals are Wal-Mart stores, Home Depot and Costco Wholesale Corp. All of them produce similar products as well as offer almost the same services to their consumers. Naturally, the organization would need a strategy that helps it to stand out and to distinguish it from its competitors, thus, Target 's positioning was based on more than just pricing; it combined quality and style. This was the differentiation strategy that have always been applied since the launch of the organization.
A positive to expanding to Canada is that Canadian shoppers are similar to American shoppers, ideally making this a good target market for growth (Fiorletta, 2015). In an interview regarding expansion in Canada, CO-CEO Walter Rob said, “Our efforts in Canada are part of the effort to grow.” “We think the opportunity for fresh, healthy foods is larger now that it’s ever been”. “And we intend to grow as fast as we have ever grown — 40 new stores next year, 42-44 for the following year.” “That’s 10% square footage growth on top of 15 million square feet of retail we already have.” “People have said maybe we should stop our growth.” “I said, no, we are not going to do that because our strategy is working.” “There’s no reason to stop.” “There’s every reason to keep going.” (Vieira,
Such level of importance creates a highly competitive environment, and currently 71.5% market share is dominated by the top three major players: Loblaw Canada Ltd., Sobeys and Metro, all canadian companies. The attractiveness of the retail segment brought international competition, and in 2005 the giant Wal-Mart entered the market, being then the second big american company in the Canadian reatil industry,
Target, a high-end discount department store, hoped to continue expanding and adding to the company’s 1,752 stores, by purchasing 200 Zellers stores, located in Canada. One of Target’s, longtime goals was to expand into Canada , and after a decade, the company took a jump across the border (Shaw, 2011). Because many thousand Canadians hold a Red Card, Target’s reward card, Target assumed this would be a successful expansion, increasing the amount of US brands that encompass Canada’s market. Target spent a year converting the Zeller stores, altering and renovating them to transform them into Target Canada, a subsidiary of Target (Shaw, 2011). They opened 124 stores in locations all over Canada, hiring back only one percent of the former Zellers employees, desiring to make a fresh start for the department store chain (Target Refused Zellers Workers).
This report will be based on the Target Corporation, and will consist of two sections: 1) long-term financing policy and capital structure, and 2) an acquisition analysis. The first section will include: Target's most recent long-term financing decision; an analysis of the economic, business, and competitive background in which the financing occurred; Target's book value and market value; possible changes that would occur to Target's finance policy and capital structure if it was forced to consider re-organization and bankruptcy strategies; and finally discuss Target's international investment and financing opportunities, as well as foreign exchange risks.
Opportunities: Target has an opportunity to leverage its strength to overcome some of its weakness.
Target has problems in the area of Human relations because of their training methods; in not hiring people who have unions. This is an example of discrimination, not by color but by what a person has, which is a union. The question that comes up is; how can this motive people to apply for a job at Target? Also Target has issues with boosting morale in their company especially after letting go about 2,000 employees. MPR news reported in March of this year, that “1,700 employees are out of work. Another 1,400 open positions will go unfilled” (Cox, 2015). A problem such as these layoffs and it being reported affects the way current employees as well as applicants view the corporation. In the MPR news article an employee
1. The Discount Department Store. Target prefers to be called as the latter instead of just department store. Expect more, pay less. With this tagline, the customers expect to purchase more items and pay the least amount possible. Not like other retail industries like its competitor Kmart and Wal-Mart, Target maintains retail value in terms of product offerings. They are known in their designer’s items in clothes, exclusive beauty products, categorized and functional goods, and seasonal offerings. It also sells the greatest number of gift cards among its rival business.
Target is one of the America’s top retailers, but still has a few things that can be improved upon before it can overtake its top competitor. Although Target may not be the top ranked retailer at the moment, it’s not hard to see why this company has stood the tests of time and continues to thrive today.
The purpose of this presentation is to provide a comparative analysis of business activities of two well-known representatives of the US retail industry, Target and Walmart. My research is focused on a business strategy of these largest and most experienced American merchandising companies; particularly, on their activities in Canada. Based on the data collected from the various sources, I would like to detect, analyze, and demonstrate the obvious causes that have lead to a catastrophic failure of Target in its unsuccessful attempt to win a Canadian market.
Moreover, After WTO ruling, the United States and Canada are acting against each other. In the meantime, US threatened to take action against Canadian steel, wood products, textiles etc. Finally, an agreement done, that prevents trade crisis where Canada removed most of its barriers in split-run magazines. Now, only 11% of the magazines sold in Canada are domestic, remaining 89% are foreign precisely