Kant's Second Formulation Of The Categorical Imperative

600 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: 3 formulations of Kant's categorical imperative

Do not utilize others for your own personal needs,” is a simple rephrasing of Kant's second formulation of the categorical imperative. The categorical imperative is Kant's statement of a moral law, which should be followed by a rational being without any exceptions. The main premise of the this argument is that each rational being should be able to follow some type of higher law, which produces moral worth. Kant first wishes to provide a distinction between person and things, and this distinction is the basis for the second formulation of the categorical imperative. Moral worth determines the motive behind the action; Kant uses this to formulate the categorical imperative. Using others is not morally correct and adds up to no moral worth. Kant does not claim that using a person as mean is incorrect, but using the person merely as means is wrong. Kant also states that “rational nature exists as an …show more content…

A person utilizes a person without there being anything morally wrong. However one example we could test out would be if the person that is being used as a mean knows they are being used; nonetheless they allow it, for in the end it will help themselves. For example a child ask for a loan from his parents; the parents knowing the probability of repayment is really low still allow themselves to be used as a mean by the child. The parents may not receive anything from it right away, so a person could say they are being used although in the long run one might say that the parents are doing this for themselves because they want to be known as good parents. This example completely defies the categorical imperative, since the parents have full acknowledgment of what is going on. Therefore the formulation is compromised because both, the parents and child, are using each other as mean; however there is an end to this for both parties receive something

Show More
Related

  • Analysis Of The Meditations By Rene Descartes

    1003 Words  | 3 Pages

    Human beings are tempted. One is generally in a conflict between the realm or morality and immorality. At times, one disregards reason as the intended result was not what one wanted. One can conclude that reason is justified in situations where one expects to be treated morally and will treat others morally. Essentially, Kant expects all human beings to be able to reason. Reason is the justification to morality. One who reasons asserts the beliefs of morality. One can conclude that reason is absolute. Immorality is based on one’s personal desires. Reason cannot be coincided with immorality, since each party is not treated morally. Reason is universal, since each individual expects to be treated morally and will treat others morally. It is applicable to all entities. The Categorical Imperative establishes the ideal that one should act from maxims that are universalized. This ideal leads to the Formula of Humanity; individuals of morality seek to live under the law in which one’s self-worth is protected. One should act from maxims in which order is applicable to

    Read More

  • Mill’s Objection to Kant’s Moral Theory

    1356 Words  | 3 Pages

    Kant argued that the Categorical Imperative (CI) was the test for morally permissible actions. The CI states: I must act in such a way that I can will that my maxim should become a universal law. Maxims which fail to pass the CI do so because they lead to a contradiction or impossibility. Kant believes this imperative stems from the rationality of the will itself, and thus it is necessary regardless of the particular ends of an individual; the CI is an innate constituent of being a rational individual. As a result, failure ...

    Read More

  • Kant's Second Analogy

    4263 Words  | 9 Pages

    In the Second Analogy, Kant argues that we must presuppose, a priori, that each event is determined to occur by some preceding event in accordance with a causal law. Although there have been numerous interpretations of this argument, we have not been able to show that it is valid. In this paper, I develop my own interpretation of this argument. I borrow an insight offered by Robert Paul Wolff. In Kant's argument, our need to presuppose that the causal determination of each event rests not upon our need to impose a 'necessary' and 'irreversible' temporal order upon representations of the states of an object, as Kant is usually interpreted, but upon our need to generate a comprehensive representation that includes a certain a priori conception of events in the world around us. Although the argument I attribute to Kant is valid, it cannot compel the Humean skeptic to accept the necessity of presupposing the causal determination of each event: Kant has not successfully responded to Hume in the Second Analogy.

    Read More

  • Kant's Categorical Argument

    1063 Words  | 3 Pages

    would be unfair to use the one to the side as a means to save the

    Read More

  • How Does Kant Treat Animals

    849 Words  | 2 Pages

    Kant view animals as “mere means” (Kant, 239) because he believes animals has no self consciousness and they cannot judge decisions by their interest. Animals cannot think rationally and logically in a same way as humans so he excluded animals from the moral community where we solely respect those who have rational autonomy and respect their rights. Kant classified human beings and animals differently. He believes that animals are viewed as values or price for human purpose use because animals only behave responding only to their inclination even though they are sentient, and their values are dependent on our human desire only.

    Read More

  • Kant's Formula Of Humanity Essay

    754 Words  | 2 Pages

    Central to Kant’s postulate is that an agent who ends his own life treats himself merely as a means to fleeing his misfortunes. This action, in Kant’s view, contradicts the second variant of the categorical imperative, which stipulates that human beings are ends in themselves because a human being differs from a mere “thing” (4:429.18). In the second illustration, here, Kant argues against using people merely as a means. He uses the example of making false promises to a lender, thus using him as an instrumental object to achieve a further end. This, Kant remarks, is contradictory to the principle of treating humanity as an end in itself. Kant’s main argument here is that rational beings ought to be respected. Third, (example 3) Kant explicates that, as rational beings, our capacities for greater perfection” are a distinctive part of us and it is the purpose of “nature with regard to humanity in our subject”. Consequently, duty to one’s self demands that we nurture our talents. Humanity, argues Kant, will still be sustained if we fail to develop our given talents; however this will not promote its flourishing. Fourth, on the last illustration, Kant claims that our end pursuit, as rational beings, is happiness – we all naturally wish to be happy. Consequently, as a duty to others, we are to promote the happiness of other rational

    Read More

  • Kant vs. Mill: Human Rights and Utilitarianism

    1725 Words  | 4 Pages

    Kant’s moral philosophy is built around the formal principles of ethics rather than substantive human goods. He begins by outlining the principles of reasoning that can be equally expected of all rational persons regardless of their individual desires or partial interests. It creates an ideal universal community of rational individuals who can collectively agree on the moral principles for guiding equality and autonomy. This is what forms the basis for contemporary human rig...

    Read More

  • Case Analysis: Case Study: If Looks Could Kill

    1269 Words  | 3 Pages

    When applying Kant’s theory one also has to take into account the two aspects in determining what exactly the right thing in any situation is. They include universality and respect for persons. Universality states that you must “act only on that maxim which you can at the same time will to be a universal law”(Manias). Respect for person’s states that one must “act so that you treat humanity, weather in your own person or that of another; always as an end and never as a means only” (Manias). With this being said one must apply both of these to any option they are

    Read More

  • Three Formulations of the Categorical Imperative

    1530 Words  | 4 Pages

    In Kant’s book, Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, Kant talks about the three formulations of the categorical imperative. By these formulations, he describes his idea of organizing the moral principle for all rational beings. Kant also talks about the principles of humanity, rational ends, and the “realm of ends” which are constituted by the autonomous freedom of rational beings.

    Read More

  • Kant 's Three Propositions Of Morality

    1593 Words  | 4 Pages

    In Foundation of the Metaphysics of Morals Immanuel Kant presents three propositions of morality. In this paper I am going to explain the first proposition of morality that Kant states. Then I will assert a possible objection to Kant’s proposition by utilizing an example he uses known as the sympathetic person. Lastly, I will show a defense Kant could use against the possible objection to his proposition.

    Read More

  • Immanuel Kant's Categorical Imperatives

    1908 Words  | 4 Pages

    In Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, Immanuel Kant makes the argument that one must always develop their natural talents in accordance with what he calls the categorical imperative. Although compelling, his argument is lacking in practicality and is not in accordance with a modern understanding of psychology and the human mind.

    Read More

  • The Metaphysics of Morals by Immanuel Kant

    674 Words  | 2 Pages

    Kant first mentions his categorical imperative when talking about it in relation to universal law. He writes, “I should never act except in such a way that I can also will that my maxim should become a universal law” (Kant 14). What he means by this is that he should never act in a way that is harmful to other. His actions must apply to everyone and always result in good.

    Read More

  • Kant's Categorical Imperative

    363 Words  | 1 Pages

    Kant’s moral theory grounded in a categorical imperative is that it is “a requirement of reason that applies to us regardless of what we care about” (Kant, 107). Another words, we must help those in need even if you really do not want too or feel that it can help ourselves in any way. He uses the ground principle that “rational nature exists as an end in itself” (Kant, 117). Kant also believes there is a hypothetical imperative and a categorical imperative. A hypothetical imperative is the when a “action would be good merely as a means to something else” (Kant, 113). While a categorical imperative is “if the action is represented as in itself good, hence as necessary in a will in itself conforming to reason, as its principle” (Kant, 113). Kant’s

    Read More

  • Immanuel Kant's Supreme Principle Of Morality

    683 Words  | 2 Pages

    Kant emphasized that this supreme principle of morality required an unconditional statement of one’s duty, and how individuals could rationally will other people to act toward one another. Therefore, this forced individuals to ask and test how things would work if everyone else did what moral actions were being considered. For example, if the maxim in question contradicted itself, then it would be wrong to use that maxim as a basis for one’s action. On the contrary, if the maxim passed the universal test with good intent and good reason, then that maxim should be made into universal law. Furthermore, Kant argued that every rational person should be treated as an end, and never as a means. In making this comment, Kant insisted that individuals shouldn’t treat other people as objects, tools, or resources to accomplish one’s goals, but instead as humans with intrinsic value and dignity because it denies the status of a person as an end in themselves. Thus, the categorical imperative required that ethical decisions be universalized and to treat others as ends and not as means to an

    Read More

  • Kant's Categorical Imperative

    1532 Words  | 4 Pages

    Kant's Categorical Imperative Deontology is the ethical view that some actions are morally forbidden or permitted, regardless of consequences. One of the most influential deontological philosophers in history is Immanuel Kant, who developed the idea of the Categorical Imperative. Kant believed that the only thing of intrinsic moral worth is good will. Kant says in his work Morality and Rationality “ The good will is not good because of what it affects or accomplishes or because of it’s adequacy to achieve some proposed end; it is good only because of it’s willingness, i.e., it is good of itself”.

    Read More

More about Kant's Second Formulation Of The Categorical Imperative

Open Document