Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Women portrayal in movies
Gender representations in media
Gender representations in media
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In “Body Talk”, Kaja Silverman states, “The identification of the female voice with the female body thus returns us definitively to the scene of castration” (62). When the female voice and body are united, they pose a threat to both the masculine being and those structures in power. In the movie Singin in the Rain, Silverman marks what she calls the “remarriage” of the female body and voice as when Kathy is revealed to be the voice of Lina. However, I would argue that in this moment the female body and voice are not remarried, but instead a coexistence that serves to benefit the masculine power. Lina was a mannequin placed on the movie screen to sell beauty, glamour, and movie tickets. Kathy was but a puppet summoned to speak and sing as if …show more content…
the words emitting from her mouth are truly hers. Therefore, the fear of castration in the masculine figures in Singin’ in the Rain prevents the female voice and body from remarrying in the film, leaving the portrayal of the female figures as mannequins and puppets. The female characters in Singin’ in the Rain are perceived as mannequins. Mannequins are lifeless figures used to display and sell garments, accessories, or anything else dictated by the owner. Mannequins are only a body, with some mannequins existing without a face, without a voice. In the film, Lina is only ever complimented on her image. On the set the “Dueling Cavaliers”, the director discusses the semantics of the scene with Don, while with Lina, he states only how great she looked in the large garment. Of course, there is nothing wrong with complimenting someone on their appearance, but the issue emerges when that appearance becomes all someone is. Lina is positioned as a pretty face that looks great on camera, well received by the public, and can sell tickets. Women are literally portrayed as mannequins in the song “Beautiful Girls”, in which the camera spans over multiple women posed in elegant attire frozen in time. This moment in the video last for over a minute, which creates the illusion that both the clothes and the women were on display. The female body is depicted as a “hot” commodity item for interacting with masculine figures. Kathy’s voice would not have been heard, let alone have it remarried with her body, had it not been for the initial appeal of her body to Don. By limiting a woman to only her beauty, the fear of castration is reduced because the likelihood that a beautiful image would be threatening is low. Therefore, the perception of women as mannequins cripples the complete marriage of the female voice and body. This dynamic between the female voice and body is further affirmed by the synonym for mannequin, which is dummy. Beauty and brains has always been depicted as existing on two distinct sides of a spectrum and the existence of both characteristics in a woman is seen as unfathomable. In Singin’ in the Rain, Lina is depicted as an “airhead”: she reads magazines to learn things about her own life and she believes that Don loves her, even though he tells her that her affection is unwanted. In one scene, Lina asks Cosmo, the producer, and the publicist if they believed that she was dumb, and they responded through silence and by moving in a way that suggest that the answer to that question is not a no. This appearance as a “dummy” creates an environment for which Lina’s words are not taken seriously and she is presented as comedic. In the song “Beautiful Girls” one of the characteristics that a beautiful woman is described to possess is intelligence. Yet, all the women seemed to only embody beauty; there were no women depicted with a book or anything indication that there was more than beauty at play. And this, in combination with the representation of Lina, dwindles the possibility of the marriage of the voice and body. Lina may be beautiful, but because of her assumed lack of knowledge, the audience nor the masculine powers will not find her voice worth listening to. As such, Silverman’s assumption that the voice brings unity is false in this instance, leaving just a body with a voice that is too low to be threatening to the masculine powers. However, when the female voice and body are “remarried” in the film, the voice does not belong to the female character; she merely transforms from a mannequin to a puppet. Female characters in the movie are rarely ever in control of their body, let alone their voice. Regarding the scene where the man testing the sound-image technology states how perfect the synchronization between his lips and the sounds emitting from them, Silverman proclaims that this claim falls false for the female characters in the movie. Silverman goes on to elaborate on the layering that occurs with the female voice, specifically how Lina’s voice is voiced over by Kathy and Kathy’s postdubbing of Lina’s voice is at one point voiced over by a different actress (46). The mentioned act of layering creates a sense of separation and disembodiment, which creates the need for the “remarriage” of the voice and body. But the word remarriage implies that the voice and body were once united and were then pulled apart. In both the removal of Lina’s voice and the transferring of Kathy’s voice, the female voices were handled like a commodity by the male characters. Lina was willing to let her voice be heard, yet she was denied that opportunity. Throughout the movie, there was always something at play that mediated the speech of the female characters: the industry and the male figure. Like a puppet master, Don and Monumental Pictures mediated when both Lina and Kathy could speak. Even in the end scene where it appears that Kathy’s voice and body are being “remarried”, it only occurs at the expense of the male characters pulling the curtain back. And the voice is only truly acknowledged by the crowd once Don emerges as the hero and tells the audience that Kathy is the real voice they heard in the film. The crowd goes from the act of laughing to applauding at the emergence of Don’s voice and body, and not the presence and union of Kathy’s voice and body. Thus, it is seen that the only way the female voice and body are remarried and divorced is by the hands of an outside agent, as if she is a puppet used for the common good of the male powers at bay. For the puppet master to control the puppet, the puppet master violates the puppet’s personal being as if it is just property.
This dynamic is seen in the film when Don makes unwarranted flirtatious advances towards Kathy while she in the car. When Kathy rejects Don’s advances, he begins to speak the following lines in a mockery tone: “Fear not sweet lady, I will not molest you. I am but a humble jester”. The deliverance of the previous lines makes its seem as if sexual harassment is so obscure, hard to fathom, and comedic. The use of the phrase “I will not” speaks both to the commonality of the exploitation of the female body, but also to the idea about how almost powerless women are in controlling the destiny of their body. The line could be interpreted as, “I have the power to molest you, but I won’t”, leaving the female body to be easily exploited at the will of a male character. This scene is reflective of the act of castration, but for women in a sense that her power is being taken from her. But one would have supposed that would be accepted if the female body is only but a puppet; a puppet that is property and can manipulated to the desires of the male audience. Here, not only is the body of the female character is being stripped away from her, but also her voice. When Don moves closer into Kathy’s personal space, Kathy yells “Stop. Keep away from me.” A voice that was filled with both strength and fear echoed on the dark night. A voice that was then mocked by Don’s imitation of the concerns echoed in her speech. It was as if Don dubbed over Kathy’s voice and re-expressed her words from his perspective of her, just like a puppet master. Puppet masters create voices that they believe to be suitable for the body of the puppet, and then they articulate from the perspective of the puppet. Therefore, although the female voice and body are at times “married” as Silverman states, they are mediated and controlled by the voice and body of the male powers, or puppet
master. One distinguishing characteristic of both a puppet and a mannequin that aligns with perception of the female character is that they are disposable, especially when body and image unite and threaten the security of the masculine power. A mannequin is just plastic on a stick, while a puppet is just a wooden or cotton toy. Both objects are easy to make, find, and dispose. And these characteristics prevail in the treatment of women. In the song “Make Them Laugh”, Cosmo dances with a mannequin that has the figure of a female. Once the mannequin becomes of no use/ fails to cooperate, Cosmo tosses the mannequin to the side. Lina was the “it” woman adorn by fans and graced by beauty; one fan even commented during the first movie that “She’s so refined. I think I’ll kill myself.” Yet once Kathy was “discovered” by Don, they were ready to discard Lina, as if she was “a great work of art” that went out of style. And when we finally see the “remarriage” of the female body and voice, which in my opinion is not where Silverman suggests, but when Lina takes charge of her career, the fear of castration causes the speedily disposal of the union. When the female body and voice are united, they are presumed to be a threat to the male figure and power, and are therefore disposed like plastic, wood, or cotton. Literally, I do agree with Silverman that Kathy’s voice and body are remarried at the end of Singin’ in the Rain, but figuratively the voice and body are not in union. They are mediated only at the will of the male figure. The fear of castration that Silverman mentions restrains the union of the female body and voice. The benefits of accessing the female body and voice in pieces for the masculine powers surpass the risk of marrying the two, which is why the female body and voice are portrayed as mannequins and puppets Therefore, in Singin’ in the Rain the female voice and body are not “remarried” because it is easier for masculine powers to control mannequins and puppets.
Stargirl was not like everyone else in Mica High. She was a unique individual with no restrictions to her own identity. But when Leo stressed the fact that she was so different, she undertook the task to change herself, for Leo’s sake. Even though Leo was euphoric with the new Susan Caraway, her shunning was not ebbed. The change did nothing for stargirl but cripple her jovial personality. Stargirl shouldn’t have changed herself for someone else’s motive, but should’ve kept herself the way she was, as your own happiness should be put before others, and there’s always someone that stays by your side no matter the notions made of you.
Since a child, Stargirl had always seemed a bit… off. Her parents seemed to adore her weirdness, they even seemed to encourage it at times. To demonstrate, her parents called her Pocketmouse. They used it to so much that even she started referring to herself as Pocketmouse instead of Susan. But did her parents ever do anything about it? Of course not. She kept the nickname, until she changed it to Mudpie. Then Hullygully. And then Stargirl. But at the time, I knew her as Mudpie.
So many people in modern society have lost their voices. Laryngitis is not the cause of this sad situation-- they silence themselves, and have been doing so for decades. For many, not having a voice is acceptable socially and internally, because it frees them from the responsibility of having to maintain opinions. For Janie Crawford, it was not: she finds her voice among those lost within the pages of Zora Neale Hurston’s famed novel, Their Eyes Were Watching God. This dynamic character’s natural intelligence, talent for speaking, and uncommon insights made her the perfect candidate to develop into the outspoken, individual woman she has wanted to be all along.
...le dominance over female acquiescence. His goal is to ascertain that those qualities identified as feminine are used to undermine those qualities considered masculine. Kesey minimizes the mental suffering of the male patients while focusing on the inability of a woman to have control over men and keep it without resorting to emasculatory tactics. This is a social commentary on the representation of a woman or an institutional system that abuses power (Leach; Termpaperwarehouse.com).
The robot was seen as a creation of technology and femininity and sexuality through the male imagination. This creation of the robot was to reflect the fear that men have of women and of technology. Women, machines, and nature raise fear in men because they threaten the male dominance and control. The female robot rose fear about threatening male control because of the idea that technology could become so large and advanced that it would go out of control of man and destroy humanity. Maria also posed as a threat to Frederson because of her emotions and nurturing. As seen in the movie, the scene where Rotwang leads Frederson down to the catacombs to watch Maria preach about peace is a direct depiction of the male fear of femininity. This fear comes from Frederson not having any control over this situation because he did not know about the catacombs, which scares him. Men need to control these women because of these insecurities about their own dominance.
Throughout history women have learned to find a voice against men through writing. Writing has been a medium where women have learned to speak their minds and allow their ideas to be broadcasted to the world. Women have used writing to discuss issues, such as discrimination, inequality, sexual frustrations, and many more that they have dealt with. In the poem, “A Loyal Woman’s No”, written by Lucy Larcom. She gives power to women to say no to men. Her poem discusses the issues that many women face. They face issues of men taking advantage of them, men objectifying them and using them. However, Larcom’s poem shows a clear progress of women standing up against men, and being firm in saying no to them. Larcom has given women the ability to stand up to man and show the true power that women have over men. Many women fear standing up to men due to the repercussions of their actions, however, Lucy Larcom uses the symbolism of nature and her rhetoric to show a woman’s true power against men and say no and to free themselves of the rigid grasp that so many men have over women.
The submission of women is demonstrated in the text through the symbolic colors of the couple’s bedroom. Indeed, as the young woman’s husband is asleep, the wife remains wide-awake, trying her best to provide the man with comfort, while enjoying her newlywed life. As she opens her eyes to contemplate “the blue of the brand-new curtains, instead of the apricot-pink through which the first light of day [filters] into the room where she [has]
Throughout West’s music video, offensive lyrics, and disturbing scenes are used to show the viewer the dominance of men. West characterizes women to either be dead, insane, or vulnerable to the actions of men. A scene portrays West up against a caged off area, while women are reaching through to touch his body, singing, “I’m a motherfucking monster” (West ). As West is describing himself as a “monster”, he is showing the viewer the traditional views of how society sees men to be more “powerful” than women. West is using these women to illustrate reaching towards gender equality in society. West is portraying how women tend to be viewed to please the needs of a male once they come home from their occupation, and this is displayed when West states “I put the pussy in a sarcophagus now she claiming that I bruise her esophagus” (West ). West conveys that men see women for pleasure, and that they are just a “stay at home mom” waiting to do whatever the male desires. Women struggle with this idea in society due to the power men contain not only in strength, but with dominance as
As the women narrate the harm caused by men, they lose track of the beings that they once were and become different people in order to cause a reaction in others. These women are hurt in ways that cause them to change their way of living. The Lady in Blue becomes afraid of what others will think of her because a man impregnated her: “i cdnt have people [/] lookin at me [/] pregnant [/] I cdnt have my friends see this” (Shange, Abortion Cycle # 1 Lines 14- 16). Instead of worrying about the life of her child, she worries about how her...
The Elizabethan society in which Shakespeare lived during his life held a misogynistic ideology in high esteem. ‘Much Ado about Nothing’ was written in 1598-9, during a time when women were second class citizens compared to males and were considered to be inferior to males in every way. As soon as she was born, a female was her father's property until she was married off by her family when she then became her husband's property. A woman was expected to be seen and not heard, she was to be chaste and submissive. Women were uneducated and undervalued, they were not their own person.
Sexism is an ever changing concept in today’s world. Every day the concept morphs a little bit, changing the entire definition of what is sexist and what is not. In The Taming of the Shrew by Shakespeare, the male characters lie to and abuse their women in order to have the women marry them. Lucentio come to Padua to study, but when he sees a beautiful girl, he pretends to be a teacher in order to marry Bianca. Petruchio on the other hand forces a woman to marry him and then trains her to follow his every command. Although the The Taming of the Shrew is frequently regarded as a particularly sexist play, it is not sexist and demeaning towards women.
Throughout history society has been controlled by men, and because of this women were exposed to some very demanding expectations. A woman was expected to be a wife, a mother, a cook, a maid, and sexually obedient to men. As a form of patriarchal silencing, any woman who deviated from these expectations was often a victim of physical, emotional, and social beatings. Creativity and individuality are dirty, sinful and very inappropriate for a respectful woman. By taking away women’s voices, men were able to remove any power that they might have had.
...o the male monster since she may not be “feminine” enough, or c) not find the male monster attractive and mate with ordinary males. All of these things center around a fear of a female’s ability to reproduce and a fear of a female’s ability to choose her own path. Shelley suggests that the impact of these things is what frightens men, making them feel like they must dominate women to avoid any of the negative implications of them.
A Shakespearean scholar expanded on this, “The play enacts the defeat of the threat of a woman’s revolt; it does so in a comic form – thus so offers the audience the chance to revel in and reinforce their misogyny while at the same time feeling good” (Gay). The Taming of the Shrew at many points is just praising the men in the novel despite their behavior and putting down the women for being anything but perfect. The novel makes the actions happening comedic and the reader does not get upset at the things happening, but in reading further into it and comparing it to modern day, it is not hard to see the plain and simple abuse. Although gender roles are still prominent in today’s society, they are toned back. In contemporary versions of The Taming of The Shrew, such as 10 Things I Hate About You and Kiss Me Kate, the character Kate is always mitigated.
Rape is sensitive subject. People avoid talking about it at all costs and even try to pretend that it does not happen. But rapes are reported every six minutes in the United States. (Jaffe, Lansing & Kaplan, 1988) The Accused does not dance around rape. The movie centers around Sara Tobias, a young woman who was the victim of a rape. The rape occurred in a bar filled with men, multiple of which committed the crime. The movie then follows Sara as she is hospitalized and is assigned a lawyer, Kathryn Murphy. Kathryn Murphy does get the criminals in jail, but not for a sentence appropriate to the crime. Sara Tobias demands justice. So Kathryn and Sara go after the other men that were present in the bar for encouraging the rape under the charge of criminal solicitation. Although justice was eventually served, this movie shows just how much misogyny, patriarchy, rape culture, and gender roles impact our society.