More handpicked essays just for you.
Influence of shakespeare on english language
The influence of Shakespeare on english language
Shakespeare and the language he used
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Queen Elizabeth I was one of the first, successful female monarchs in English society, leading her country to a time of peace and economic security. During the first year of her forty-five year term, her people were under threat of invasion by the Spanish Armada. Not yet having won over the trust and spirits of her troops, she delivers a preparatory speech to boost their morale. Her use of ethos and certain elements of figurative speech establishes a confidently passionate tone, which helps her to lead her troops to victory. To begin her speech, Queen Elizabeth utilizes word choice that will convince her troops to trust her in leading them into battle. Specifically, she addresses her subjects as “my faithful and loving people”, calling them …show more content…
loyal and good-willed, as well as talking about people who need to be “careful of our safety”, thus creating a sense of reliability between The Queen and her people. Moreover, to emphasize her purpose and establish credibility for herself, as well as her battle, she often refers to the enemy with negative diction. Consequently, The Queen’s certainty about the need to fight the Spanish Armada is reflected onto her troops, which establishes a sense of confidence, trust, and passion within her troops. Her later word choice, however, establishes her confident tone different.
In order to present a passionate argument, she speaks to her troops with such valor and determination that it truly shows how she led them to victory. She tries to relate herself to our troops, telling them she will “live and die amongst [them] all”. Her use of juxtaposition with life and death within battle exemplifies the great extents in what she's willing to fight for her country. In addition, she establishes tangibility for herself, making herself a less of a faraway head of state, and more of a confident leader ready to fight and die for her …show more content…
people. The next portion of Queen Elizabeth’s speech carries the same tone and message: that she is far more credible than one would normally consider for a monarch.
She's confident and honest when she acknowledges that she has “the body of a weak and feeble woman”, which could create doubt for those who believe that women are the inferior gender, as many men did at the given period. But, by addressing this so-called issue directly she creates an intrepid town for herself, not to mention the fact that she shares of confidence with her subjects as she says that she has “the heart and stomach of a king, and a king of England too”. By using the same confidence in her diction, Queen Elizabeth appeals to her audience through targeted arguments and rhetorical strategies, such as emphasizing that she is more than just a monarch or fragile woman. The Queen assures her people of her determination and willingness to fight, exemplified when she says “I myself will take up arms, I myself will be your general, and rewarder of every one of your virtues in the field.” This particular phrase has a strong effect on achieving Elizabeth is purpose because she uses strong parallel structure that is useful in creating strong emotion particularly and
speech. The Queen promises to reward her troops for the sacrifices and valor, which she emphasizes in the final sentence. Her repetition of the word “your” shows how much she values the troops, as well as asserts her willingness to repay them materially. This is The Queen’s final assurance, as it is likely that many will not return for battle. Further, she wants to convince her troops to rise to occasion and defend their country, whether it be for England’s honor or for their own personal gain. The speech ends with conviction, when Queen Elizabeth promises a victory over their enemies. This conviction, however, is carried throughout the entire speech,and helps to The Queen’s confidently passionate tone. Her tone, regardless of passion, was created by The Queen’s elaborate use of an ethos argument, establishing credibility for herself, as well as trust between her and her people. As a result, the morale of her troops were heightened, which helped them to defeat the Spanish Armada.
To apply this rhetorical strategy, she incorporates several crucial phrases and words to which one can appertain. One example of Thatcher’s use of diction occurs in line twenty-three of her eulogy when she refers to Reagan as “Ronnie.” While to the reader, this name is but a sobriquet Thatcher uses for Reagan, one must identify her use of diction to understand her intention for using this name. After analyzing the word’s connotation instead of its denotation, the reader can discover that she incorporates this word into her eulogy to give the reader a thorough comprehension of the friendship they shared. For the reader, this diction permits him or her to identify Thatcher’s credibility, and for Thatcher, she strengthens her claim by validating her relation with Reagan. Thatcher, however, goes beyond reinforcing her claim through credibility; upon analysis of her eulogy, one can recognize her use of diction to depict historical occurrences surrounding Reagan’s presidency. The reader can identify an example of this tactic when Thatcher states in lines five and six, “[Reagan] sought to mend America’s wounded spirit” (Thatcher). On a superficial level, this
Margaret Thatcher’s eulogy of the deceased president, Ronald Regan, had a purpose which was to comfort the people of the United States, and to brag on all of his policies that he created in his term. Thatcher uses various tactics such as antithesis, anaphora, and hyperbole to make her speech as appealing and comforting as possible for the American people. Using these rhetorical devices she is appealing to the mourning nation.
She was aware of the situation of women in her times, especially being a puritan woman. They were restricted to certain modes of behavior, speech
task of speaking to secure her own freedom when she was placed on trial for obstructing the draft in 1917. The country was awash in patriotism, and she was prosecuted as an enemy of the state. When preparing her speech, she realized that a seated jury would be a microcosm of the country's national spirit. Jurors may have had children or loved ones committed or lost to the Great War. Her position, though heartfelt and eloquently expressed, with an attempt to express her own patriotism, was subversive and threatening to the population.
Through her speech, Queen Elizabeth inspired her people to fight for the country of England against the Spaniards. Queen Elizabeth persuaded the English troops to defend their country with rhetoric devices such as diction, imagery, and sentence structure to raise their morale and gain loyalty as a woman in power.
In Shakespeare's The Tragedy of King Richard the Third, the historical context of the play is dominated by male figures. As a result, women are relegated to an inferior role. However, they achieve verbal power through their own discourse of religion and superstition. In the opening speech of Act 1, Scene 2, Lines 1-30 Lady Anne orients the reader to the crucial political context of the play and the metaphysical issues contained within it (Greenblatt, 509). Lady Anne curses her foes, using strong language to indicate her authority. She speaks in blank verse, by which she utilizes imagery to emphasize her emotions and reinforce her pleas. Her speech clearly illustrates the distinction between the submissive female role within the male sphere of war and the powerful female voice within the realm of superstition.
Queen Elizabeth I, also known as the “Iron Queen”, was a remarkable woman of her time, she ruled with great power and longevity. She was one of the greatest feminist of time. Coming to the throne in 1558, she took the place of her father, Henry VIII. She was given one of the most difficult jobs fit for a man or King, ruling England. At the time women were second class citizens, they could not vote nor own properties and such. Surprising England with her intelligence and fierce rulings, she changed herself to make better decisions. She proved through her rulings, to everyone that females were strong and could rule just as well as a king. She refused to marry, giving a feeling of “I don’t need a man for anything.” The Queen was responsible for giving females a voice in literature and it is shown through Shakespeare’s writings.
Persuasion is a difficult skill to master. One has to take into account the ideologies held by the audience and how those relate to one’s own intentions of changing minds. In order to encourage her troops to fight courageously in defense of England, Queen Elizabeth I utilizes Aristotle’s principles of effective communication that include logos, pathos and ethos in her Speech to the English Troops at Tilbury, Facing the Spanish Armada.
It seems that only Queen Elizabeth, shrewd and headstrong, could provide a female presence strong enough to counter certain aspects of a male-dominated Renaissance culture. The Elizabethan sonnet provides a paradoxical example of woman's inferior status. Although she has all the idealized virtues--"meekness, constancy, beauty, and, of course, chastity" (155), the sonnet itself functions as a measure of "masculine vitality" (156). It is the male who eme...
As in his portrayal of Desdemona, here too Shakespeare has presented a woman of beauty and culture. Her demeanor is gentle and refined though not lacking in strength or determination. Her emotions are deep, pure, loyal and e...
Queen Elizabeth I’s gender appears as one of the main topics in her speeches. Elizabeth’s common mention of her own female gender, despite the fact that she could refer to herself with masculine terms, allows her to use gender stereotypes. Using these stereotypes along with mentions of motherly love and her knowledge of literature and when to manipulate her gender, she can rally others to her side, explain why she delays her answers to Parliament, and explain why she cannot knowingly harm her subjects, but by doing this, she provides people with evidence that women are unintelligent and incapable of ruling.
When Elizabeth was young she was treated unfairly, she was thought of as a joke. She would watch her father, King Henry the VIII of England rule. She remembered how her father would be so sure of the decisions that he made, it seemed as though he would do anything to protect his nation. Even if it meant putting his life on the line. When she was young, Elizabeth wanted to rule just like him. Queen Elizabeth I is deserving of the praise that she receives as a powerful female ruler. One of the reasons Queen Elizabeth I is deserving of the praise that she receives as a powerful female ruler is because of the way Elizabeth was able to deal with religious strife. Another reason Queen Elizabeth I is deserving of the praise that she receives as a
Elizabeth is, initially, quick to make judgments and just as quick to hold fast to those preconceptions. In effect, Elizabeth represents both aspects of the novel's title, being both proud and prejudicial. It is not these factors, then, that endear her to readers, but rather the depth of her character in that she develops into a more even-minded person with a rare capacity for self-awareness. For though at one time she has the highest regard for Mr. Wickham and a low opinion of Mr. Darcy, later, though it is her "greatest misfortune" (Austen 61), Elizabeth amends her former thinking by "feeling that she had been blind, partial, prejudiced and absurd" (135). It is evident that she matures into a fully developed woman who can admit, "'Till this moment, I never knew myself'" (135, emphasis mine).
The way both Elizabeth and Catherine lived during their youth had an impact on their life ambitions. Raised by an exasperated father, a single-minded mother whose only goal was to have each of he...
...th a call from her ladyship, and nothing escaped her observation…" Lady Catherine noticed flaws in everyone and used her position and title of "Lady" to rise above everyone and make herself seem superior to them. Her position gives her pride and she flaunts it in a negative way.