Justifying the Killing of Animals for Research

600 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Should Animals Be Used In Medical Research

Justifying the Killing of Animals for Research

Works Cited Missing

Can killing animals for medical research, cosmetics, food and sport be

justifiable? For what reason can they be killed or should they not be

killed at all. Not killing animals at all would lead to overgrowth in

population which could cause damage to the environment. Experimenting

on animals for cosmetics is not needed because if there were no beauty

products being sold then humans would like each other for the way they

naturally are. Then comes using animals for sport. Torturing innocent

animals for entertainment. What pleasure does anyone get from watching

animals killing each other?

I believe that using animals for food is the only reason for killing

animals. Some people may argue that meat is not needed in a balanced

diet and alternatives of vegetables, fruits, pulses and dairy produce

can be consumed for protein instead, but we have canine teeth. We are

suited to eating meat like other carnivorous and omnivorous predators.

Meat is also the best source of protein and iron which are used alot

in the body. With vegetables, fruit, and dairy produce alot must be

eaten to achieve the same amount of protein and iron consumed with a

smaller amount of meat. Eating too much vegetables or anything becomes

hazardous to the body therefore eating meat could prevent this problem

and also leave more room in a diet for more food. Understanding this

concept can help us to make use of our natural features and kill

animals for justifiable reasons. OK, but what is meant by justifiable

reasons?

In Islam there are a very few justifiable reasons as animals are

considered as the creation of Allah and so must be treated equally

with all other living creatures created by Allah. Some justifiable

reasons are; hunting for food and if there is no other course of

action, testing on animals for medical purposes although it is not

encouraged by most muslims. 'Whoever kills anything bigger than a

sparrow without a just cause, Allah will hold him accountable for it.

Show More
Related

  • The Ethics of Animal Use in Biomedical Research

    1849 Words  | 4 Pages

    Both in and out of philosophical circle, animals have traditionally been seen as significantly different from, and inferior to, humans because they lacked a certain intangible quality – reason, moral agency, or consciousness – that made them moral agents. Recently however, society has patently begun to move beyond this strong anthropocentric notion and has begun to reach for a more adequate set of moral categories for guiding, assessing and constraining our treatment of other animals. As a growing proportion of the populations in western countries adopts the general position of animal liberation, more and more philosophers are beginning to agree that sentient creatures are of a direct moral concern to humans, though the degree of this concern is still subject to much disagreement. The political, cultural and philosophical animal liberation movement demands for a fundamental transformation of humans’ present relations to all sentient animals. They reject the idea that animals are merely human resources, and instead claim that they have value and worth in themselves. Animals are used, among other things, in basic biomedical research whose purpose is to increase knowledge about the basic processes of human anatomy. The fundamental wrong with this type of research is that it allows humans to see animals as here for them, to be surgically manipulated and exploited for money. The use of animals as subjects in biomedical research brings forth two main underlying ethical issues: firstly, the imposition of avoidable suffering on creatures capable of both sensation and consciousness, and secondly the uncertainty pertaining to the notion of animal rights.

    Read More

  • Pros of Animal Experimentation

    921 Words  | 2 Pages

    Although not as strictly addressed, there is still a schism when it comes to the matters of experimentation involving animals. Those in opposition of it see it as being against the will of the animal, because animals have no say in the matter. However, through animal experimentation there has been vast medical advances in hospitals and veterinarians , research has led to cures for various diseases that would normally take many more years to cure, and the use of animals is highly ethical considering what could be the alternative, although there is progress being made to change these measures. This is how animal experimentation is of use to society for humans and animals.

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On Animal Testing

    1116 Words  | 3 Pages

    Animals are used as a part of experimentations in order to accomplish new openings. A few individuals think that it is satisfactory, while others contend that it is not moral to sacrifice animals for science. Estimated, that fifty to one hundred million of animals are used for tests in the world. Despite the significance of experiments, the quantity of animals and purpose of research are not under any control. Animals testing should be banned under a few circumstances; we can enhance the situation by using alternative ways such as replacement, reduction, and refinement according to International Society for Applied Ethology.

    Read More

  • Opposing Views On Animal Experimentation

    1212 Words  | 3 Pages

    Lastly, there is refinement where researchers need to filter their animal use for their experiments. Another point of agreement is the Animal Welfare Act. The Animal Welfare Act puts restrictions on experimenting, transporting, and researching on animals. “The intent of congress in passing this act... ... middle of paper ... ...

    Read More

  • Animal Experimentation

    940 Words  | 2 Pages

    For centuries scientists have used animals to study the causes of diseases; to test drugs, vaccines and surgical techniques; and to evaluate the safety of chemicals used in pesticides, cosmetics and other products. However, many scientists amongst animal- right activists forbid the use of animals in scientific research regardless how many illnesses are eliminated through the use of animals in scientific research. Amongst animal right activists, David Suzuki also raises concerns towards animal experimentation. In his article, The Pain of Animals, Suzuki argues that humans have no right to exploit animals because--much like humans--animals also experience pain. In contrast to Suzuki, Haldane, in his article, Some Enemies of Science, argues because animals are very similar to humans, scientists have no choice but to use animals in scientific experiments. Both authors greatly contrast their opinions towards animal experimentation; however Haldane has a more explanatory approach towards animal experimentation. He argues animal experimentation should be acceptable because other forms of animal exploitation are acceptable in society. Secondly, unlike other forms of exploitation which seek pleasure in killing animals such as leisure sport, scientists, most likely do not harm animals; if pain is intended on an animal it is strictly for the purpose of scientific advancement. Thirdly, although, animal experimentation may cause some extinction, it is only one of many other causes of extinction, if other causes are not condemned; then neither should animal experiment...

    Read More

  • The Unseen Cruelty: A Critique on Animal Testing

    1045 Words  | 3 Pages

    Hurting an animal is better than hurting a fellow human being right? Well imagine a child being ripped away from his mother in today’s society, for no reason. Would that be considered okay, or kidnapping? Imagine humans being forced to breed, just so their children can be tortured for makeup or a new facial wash. Would that be considered okay, or morally incorrect? People do not see animals as fellow living things, because they do not have the power to say no like a person can. They can’t stand up for themselves, leaving the people of the world to do it for them. Seeing that there are other ways to test out consumer products, why harm defenseless, breathing, loving, beings? With all things considered, animal testing “has no place in science today” (Goodall, 1).

    Read More

  • Persuasive Speech Outline For Animal Testing

    642 Words  | 2 Pages

    Every year, over 100 million animals are killed for experimentation, biology lessons, medical/military training, and cosmetic, drug, and chemical testing. Animals are tortured all over the world and still lack lawful protection.

    Read More

  • Ethical Ethics Of Animal Testing

    700 Words  | 2 Pages

    Every year approximately 100 million animals are killed as a part of scientific research in the United States alone. Animal testing is a highly controversial practice in the modern world. There are records of animals being used in biological and medicinal research as far back as 384 BCE with the ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle. Many people believe animal testing is unethical as it is bringing harm to animals in order to benefit humans. Ever since the beginning of this practice, animal testing has been used for a variety of purposes, all of which are inhumane and unethical.

    Read More

  • The Morality Of Animal Experimentation

    2404 Words  | 5 Pages

    Animal testing has been a highly debated topic in recent years. There are many people who have finally started to speak their minds and tell how they feel about testing on animals. But just as there are those who oppose animal testing, there are those who fully support it. A majority of people who do not support animal testing provide valid facts and information for why it is not needed. Some of the facts that they provide revolve around the conditions that the animals have to endure in the testing labs. The Animal Welfare Act lays out rules about how animals are allowed to be tortured, beaten, maimed, and all sorts of other things as long as they get pain relief. Those who oppose animal testing also provide facts that show how unreliable the

    Read More

  • Unmasking the Cruelty in Animal Research

    802 Words  | 2 Pages

    The morals of a modern society entails protections for all species of life. Humans do not have the nature to not inflict harm on innocent animals around the world.Animal research is unjust and neglectful to species in every animal kingdom.The animal kingdom has been disturbed since men step foot on this earth. Some people are so selfish that the only thing that look over is about their own selves and not other humans or living things in this world. Animal rights is a big thing to some people and to others it not this paper talks about how it's cruel to research on animals, how research doesn't improve health,and how it's not regulated.

    Read More

  • Animal Ethics Case Study: Animal Experimentation

    737 Words  | 2 Pages

    A major ethical concern that has been under speculation for many of years is focused around animal ethics, and whether or not certain animal practices are just or inhuman. There are many questions that focus around fundamental issues concerning the moral status of animals. It is critical to understand the difference between a concern for animal welfare and a concern for animal rights. A current issue that is important to understand and analyze is animal experimentation, and although many consider it to be an unethical practice, there are many pros and cons to the controversial topic. Although animal experimentation has been very beneficial medically, the argument can be made that using animals to experiment is not always necessary.

    Read More

  • Ethics Surrounding Animal Testing On Animals

    212 Words  | 1 Pages

    Household objects such as shampoo bottles will often times say the product was not tested on animals. The ethics surrounding animal testing, the use of animals for testing products before they are released to the public for human use, has been debated for years. The main use of animals for testing is to confirm the product being tested is safe for humans, which has to be proven before a product can be released. Cosmetic and household product companies that have moved away from animal testing are consequently “using approved non-animal tests and combinations of existing ingredients that have already been established as safe for human use” (Thew 191). These tests are successful for common products, but are much more difficult to be put into practice

    Read More

  • Should People Become Vegetarian?

    1082 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...ed by law because of murdering others, then it is wrong to kill animals as well.

    Read More

  • Arguments Against Vegetarianism

    615 Words  | 2 Pages

    The second relevant point to make in support of the claim that eating meat is good for people is that eating meat helps provide healthy nutrition. In support of this point, one serving of meat has every key amino acid essential to our health present in it, and in addition, has other essential nutrients. To further support this point, many plant-based foods will not provide this amount of nutrients in one serving. In short, meat is packed with all the healthy nutrition that our bodies need, and therefore is essential to any balanced

    Read More

  • Zoos Argumentative Essay

    1948 Words  | 4 Pages

    The treatment of animals is concept every human being must deal with because animals and humans inhabit the same planet and share space. Civilationas for thousands of years have had different viewpoints on how to treat animals. Eastern religions such as Jainism, Hinduism and Buddhism abandoned animal sacrifice, and the religions focus on nonviolence and non-killing towards animals (Source J). Islam believes that Allah has power over all of the animals and to treat animals badly is to treat Allah badly, which is similar to the Jewish belief that animals were made in god’s image and excessive harm shall not be inflicted upon them (source J). While these old religions and laws were made thousands of years ago, the ethics of treating animals has

    Read More

More about Justifying the Killing of Animals for Research

Open Document