Justice is achieved by telling the truth and being courageous. The path to achieving justice is explored in both the play 'Twelve Angry Men' by playwright Reginald Rose and the film 'On The Waterfront' by director Elia Kazan. While triumph can result through challenges and conflict, it is not possible to achieve without justice. However, when faced with inequality and an oppressed society it can be hard for individuals to act courageously to achieve justice. Lastly, when faced with a lack of remorse and empathy it can be difficult to achieve justice. Each text demonstrates the difficulties individuals can be faced with when striving for justice. Triumph can result through challenges and conflict, it is not possible to achieve without justice.
As Stephen Covey once declared, “Just as we develop our physical muscles through overcoming opposition- such as lifting weight- we develop our character muscles by overcoming challenges and adversity.” This may seem like no sweat, but in reality it is laborious to do. Nevertheless, there are many people who embody this quote in our everyday lives and even in literature. The short story The Truth About Sharks by Joan Bauer, depicts such a person. In this anecdote, the experience that the protagonist, Beth faced, taught her to stand up for herself and therefore feel empowered. She went from a sullen teenager who was unable to stand up to her uncle and one who felt insecure in the shadow of her cousin, to someone with the confidence to rise above. The Truth About Sharks portrays a vital change that happened to Beth as a result of her being falsely accused of shoplifting and the challenges she faced to clear her name. This article renders a dynamic change that occurred in the main character, Beth who demonstrated the theme stand up for what you think is right.
For some, finding the good life requires them to rise above their subjugation, regardless of their consequences. This struggle is illustrated in Letter from Birmingham Jail by Martin Luther King Jr, who argues the necessity of peaceful protest to find a future of equality free from persecution, and in Hobson’s Choice by Harold Brighouse, where a woman must rise above her father’s tyrannical will to find a good life.
The theme of finding one’s voice and speaking out against violence and victimization is developed through the use of conflict, plot, and characterization in Speak, The Art of Resilience and If. Throughout the texts the theme is revealed through conflict, plot, and characterization. All in all, the three texts are about struggling in life and the only people you have turn against you. In addition, when life gets rough, you are strong enough and capable to overcome any conflict you
In literature, "evil often triumphs but never conquers." By definition, a triumph is only short- term. For example, something short- term would be an achieved title, a victor in a battle, or a winner in a game. These three things are only temporary, as triumphs usually are in novels. By definition, when something is conquered, it remains conquered perpetually. Usually the evil force is unable to conquer, because of the opposite side's mentality. Because of these definitions, this statement is showing that even though evil characters or actions prevail in battles or events, the feat would not last forever, especially in the hearts and minds of the opposite side. I agree with this statement because there is proof that this is true in novels that I have read. Many novels have this common theme: good versus evil. This theme is unquestionably shown in two works, Macbeth and To Kill A Mockingbird.
During the course of our class we have encountered plenty of important topics and vital information that is essential to the field of the Criminal Justice system. Such as; Crime and justice including laws, Victimization and Criminal behavior, Laws, Police officers and Law enforcement and the criminal justice system in itself. These topics are daily situations yet individuals are oblivious to what's going on and that in it can be a major problem to the community. On that note this paper will express the ignorance and selfish values of twelve individuals by fully explaining the movie "Twelve Angry Men"
Discuss the ideas developed by the text creator about the role self-respect plays when an individual responds to injustice.
In the play “Twelve Angry men”, the story line presents a variety of perspectives and opinions between twelve very different men. Some are more likely to be pointed out as prejudice, and others are more focused on reaching fair justice. Clearly, it is quite difficult for different people to vote ‘guilty’ or ‘not guilty’ in unity when coming to a fair decision. In all of the twelve jurors, I have chosen Juror 3 and Juror 8 for contrast and comparison. I believe that Juror number 3 is a very opinionated man, with more differences than similarities comparing with Juror number 8.
The jurors had several conflicts in disagreeing with each other and it didn't help that they would shout over one another. The very first conflict is when juror 8 voted not guilty against the 11 guilty votes. The other 11 jurors don't seem to want to hear this man out; they don't want to hear why he has voted not guilty. Some of these men, jurors 3 and 7, just want to get this case over with so they can get on with their lives. They don't think it is imperative enough to look over the evidence and put themselves in the place of the defendant. They get upset with this man and try to get him to vote guilty.
Later on, Beth did not like the way this security guard disrespected her at the store. Beth took the actions into her own hands and drove back to the store. Beth went into her car seeking justice and an apology protecting her right. As she entered the store the first person she interacted with was the security guard Madge P. Groton. Beth demanded an apology and she got her independence, priority, and immunity received from the security guard. An analysis of a dynamic character like Beth from “The Truth About Sharks” demonstrates the theme of “Justice will prevail when it comes to protecting your rights and independence.”
In society we often regard someone who has conquered a certain aspect of their life as successful. Whether that be building an empire worth billions or finding their one true love.
Women have suffered as the result of harassment and discrimination for centuries. Today, women are able to directly confront their persecutors through the news media as well as the legal system. Three important literary works illustrate that it has not always been possible for women to strike back. In Raise the Red Lantern, The Handmaid's Tale, and A Doll's House, the main female characters find ways to escape their situations rather than directly confronting the problem.
Anthony Trollope’s “The Warden” is a classic piece of literature which depicts a very popular and interesting theme: “justice” and “injustice” aren’t always necessarily separate things. The preconceived notions of these two ideas that we have as individuals, do not present a clear and transparent definition of “justice” and “injustice”, as our own subjective beliefs have the potential to influence our opinion more than the truth itself. On top of this, actions taken in the name of justice don’t always result in the same. These ideas are very evident in Anthony Trollope’s “The Warden”, a story about a reverend who is accused of one of the most atrocious injustices; one he does not even consciously realize he is committing.
Told from the fresh viewpoint of a young girl approaching womanhood, readers will undeniably find themselves engrossed in Thomas’s brilliant novel, given both a chance to learn with Starr and see the world from a new perspective. The message The Hate U Give communicates is the main reason women are able to vote today and slavery was abolished. Starr had been in the same position as many activists had been in: the position to speak up while others would or could not. As the story progressed, she transformed from a bystander to someone who spoke up on a population’s behalf. A population consisting of bystanders, unable to speak up for itself, is the equivalent of oppression. Had Starr not spoken up, people would have ignored Khalil’s death. Had historical revolutionaries not spoken up, the world would have moved on, oblivious to the injustice happening. Those who are enlightened by Thomas’s beautiful and insightful work will undoubtedly be capable of creating societal
From goals that people want to accomplish, to minor victories, to even little things like finding a dollar. These are all different ranges of success. It should also be noted that one’s failure could be another’s success. An example being, how previously mentioned winning a soccer game. With two competing sides needed in a soccer game, there must be a victor and a loser. Now one could say that the side that won the game succeeded, but if anyone even the losing team were happy playing the game and happy about the game or about the result then it would be considered a success on whoevers part. As long as one enjoys themselves whether they win or lose and are happy, they can consider whatever they were aiming for a success. With many different types of success it is easy to get it confused with something that isn’t a
The play "A view from the Bridge" by Arthur Miller shows the tragic demise of its protagonist "Eddie Carbone" and towards his demise we are presented with two different yet similar concepts; justice and the law. Although the two words usually stand side by side, "A view from the Bridge" shows how they are sometimes not synonymous with one another through: a belief in communal law or community values, the American system of justice and the analogy of settling for half.