Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Plato's homer odyssey
In the dialogue-driven The Republic, the element of justice being self-moderated and internally constructed has conflicted with ideas and concepts manufactured by emotion, such as poetry and music. Mainly, in chapters three and ten, the protagonist goes in great dialectical lengths to contend that these products of art consequently drives humans to acts of iniquity such as unnecessary pleasures. In the heights of the Peloponnesian war, such sentiment of lust and emotion grew strong after the publication of Homer’s Greek epics, The Odyssey and Iliad, which dramatized a discreet understanding and image of Greece, much to Plato’s dismay. There wasn’t much conflict Plato had with the fictitious association of Homer’s canon, which he himself have …show more content…
Likewise, Socrates denoted, “"With one tongue, [all poets] chant that moderation and justice are fair, but hard and full of drudgery, while intemperance and injustice are sweet and easy to acquire, and shameful only by opinion and law." (364a). Plato reinforce the contrast the power of poetry and truth-influenced writing. In Socrates’ perspective, poetry forestalls the moral expectations of order and justice that he enumerates. He denotes those who adhere to poetic concepts for understanding are inevitable tragedies, as poetry is an imitation of the true being. Imitation devastates the human psyche by fixing the mindset on what is believed to be the truth rather than the actual truth itself. If one base their fundamentals by imitation, they are oblivious to the differences between justices and injustices. Such can be affirmed by Socrates’ example of an uneducated man, feeble enough to follow what is taught to him, which can possibly be malevolent. Succeedingly, Plato furthers in his criticism by orating, “Then this will also be true of a tragedian, if indeed he is an imitator. He is by nature third from the king and the truth, as are all other imitators”. By designating imitation as a tragedy, …show more content…
Referencing his idealized evolution of government, he chronologically initiates in the following order: aristocracy, where high class societies hold hereditary offices; timocracy, those who loved to be honored; oligarchy, ruled by a coterie of those who know confidential political intel; democracy ruled by the people; tyranny, the absolute agency of all citizens in the city government. Succeedingly, the moral philosopher stressed aristocratic government as the most preferential due to the preservation of guardianship, critical law, and self-sufficiency. Socrates fear that all of those elements of aristocracy may possibly be devastated by the power of poetry. Furthermore, his entropic association with democracy lines up with the fear of emotional sentiment and individualism that may sprout from poetry and Homeric language. Plato suggests that the authority of poetry in directing one’s thought could disobey the truth of forms, thus shifting its perception of morality and justice. Moreover, the protagonist of the philosophical manifesto notes how dangerous art could be through the power of influence and individual consciousness that may fade from the ideal conception of a Socratic society. Homeric language became extremely popular, contributing the
...purpose is “to unmask the hypocrisy and show how the meaning of Justice is being perverted” . He is not prepared to argue, leaving Socrates victorious. Here, Socrates’s method of argumentative questioning is insufficient and naïve against a stubborn, powerful and philosophically certain moral skeptic. This is confirmed by the change in investigative approach in the latter books. Thus the ‘earlier’ Plato cannot adequately respond to Thrasymachus’s immoralist view of Justice.
For these two articles that we read in Crito and Apology by Plato, we could know Socrates is an enduring person with imagination, because he presents us with a mass of contradictions: Most eloquent men, yet he never wrote a word; ugliest yet most profoundly attractive; ignorant yet wise; wrongfully convicted, yet unwilling to avoid his unjust execution. Behind these conundrums is a contradiction less often explored: Socrates is at once the most Athenian, most local, citizenly, and patriotic of philosophers; and yet the most self-regarding of Athenians. Exploring that contradiction, between Socrates the loyal Athenian citizen and Socrates the philosophical critic of Athenian society, will help to position Plato's Socrates in an Athenian legal and historical context; it allows us to reunite Socrates the literary character and Athens the democratic city that tried and executed him. Moreover, those help us to understand Plato¡¦s presentation of the strange legal and ethical drama.
Similar to an elaborate dish, a literary genre consists of multiple necessary “ingredients,” called epic conventions, which classify a text into a particular category. Homer follows an impeccable recipe in his magnificent work. Labeled as an epic, The Odyssey by Homer portrays the Greek hero Odysseus years after his victory in the Trojan War and his awaited journey back to Ithaca. As the plot develops it is evident it is no effortless feat for our hero to return home. The godly Odysseus encounters adversities in the forms of Cyclops, sea monsters, alluring flowers and formidable Greek gods with varying conceptions of him. These characteristics distinguish the Odyssey and its episodes as an epic and bestow Odysseus with the title of an epic
The rattling story of Joseph told of a man who must struggle with the most horrid betrayal from his family in which he learned to forgive them and even helped them flourish in later life. Justified by a need to make them properly atone for their sins, Joseph put his brothers through hell and back. In the end, Joseph ended up feeling happier for reconnecting with his family and saving them from the ominous hands of the famine that plagued Canaan. Although it may seem that the Bible suggests exonerating those who have deeply wronged one shows weakness and too much leniency, forgiveness allows one to become a stronger person and allow for the restoration of bonds amongst once-close companions.
As former first lady Michelle Obama once said “You should never view your challenges as a disadvantage. Instead, it's important for you to understand that your experience facing and overcoming adversity is actually one of your biggest advantages,” (Michelle Obama). Odysseus faced much adversity in his journey back from troy and in his home life back on Ithaca. The Odyssey is an epic poem created by Homer that highlights Odysseus's journey from Troy to Ithaca. “Ulysses” is a poem by Lord Tennyson Alfred about Odysseus's thoughts after he returns to Ithaca from Troy. Homer and Tennyson both use figurative language when speaking of Odysseus’ travels, and his thoughts when he get back home. People undertake journeys to immerse themselves in the
The Greeks, as portrayed by Homer, are a very vengeful people. Throughout The Odyssey, a theme of vengeance is dominant. These displays of retribution come from different entities for fairly different reasons. So why is revenge such a factor in The Odyssey? Fear and the overwhelming feeling of payback are two answers. Homer gives numerous examples of how certain characters demonstrate their power in a fury of rage. He writes of the payback Zeus gives to those who break the rules, of Poseidon’s hatred towards Odysseus, and of Odysseus’s revenge to those who have dishonored his home.
The epic poem called The Odyssey, which was written by the poet Homer, is one of the many classical stories from Ancient Greek culture. It tells the story of Odysseus, King of Ithaca, and his journey back home from the war with Troy, which had occurred in Homer’s other epic Greek poem, The Illiad. Odysseus faces many trials and quests in his journey home and to take back his kingdom from the suitors, such as meeting the witch Circe, blinding a Cyclops named Polyphemus, dealing with Poseidon, and staying with the goddess Calypso. The poem has many themes that are relevant to it. One such theme is the factor of redemption. Redemption is usually a typical subject in any kind of religion, like the Greek religion and Christian religion. The story of Odysseus has an underlying message of him receiving redemption from the Greek gods. The Odyssey is a tale of redemption because it deals with Odysseus being forgiven by the gods after having to go through many trials and wrongs to rightfully claim back his wife and the throne of Ithaca.
The second book of the Republic shows the repressive quality of Plato’s society. Plato, talking through Socrates, wants
Socrates evaluates four city constitutions that evolve from aristocracy: timocracy, oligarchy, democracy and tyranny. As a result that these four types of cities exist, four additional types of individuals who inhabit them also exist. Although these city constitutions evolve from aristocracy, Socrates deems aristocracy to be the most efficient, therefore the most just, of the constitutions because the individuals within it are ruled by the rational part of the soul.
In Plato’s The Republic, we, the readers, are presented with two characters that have opposing views on a simple, yet elusive question: what is justice? In this paper, I will explain Thrasymachus’ definition of justice, as well as Socrates’s rebuttals and differences in opinion. In addition, I will comment on the different arguments made by both Socrates and Thrasymachus, and offer critical commentary and examples to illustrate my agreement or disagreement with the particular argument at hand.
The Odyssey embodies a range of emotions and judgements based off the laws of the gods. Odysseus formulates decisions solely off of an individual’s violation of the laws. During the slaughter of the suitors, Odysseus showed no remorse to the suitors pursuing his wife, but he did show a strain of mercy to Phemius, the singer and the herald Medon for their lack in threatening his reign as king. However, this type of justice was not given to the women in the house who were engaging in intercourse with the suitors. When examining these parallel incidents, one may say Odysseus as a fair leader.
In the epic poem, The Iliad, Homer, the author, embeds numerous literary devices into the text in order to deepen the meaning of the work as a whole. The Iliad focuses on a single story regarding Achilles rage in the ninth year of the Trojan war. By depicting the story of Achilles rage with literary devices, Homer displays the horror of war through the eyes of a Homeric society. Homer’s use of graphic imagery and sympathetic backstories illustrate the brutalization of war.
In his philosophical text, The Republic, Plato argues that justice can only be realized by the moderation of the soul, which he claims reflects as the moderation of the city. He engages in a debate, via the persona of Socrates, with Ademantus and Gaucon on the benefit, or lack thereof, for the man who leads a just life. I shall argue that this analogy reflecting the governing of forces in the soul and in city serves as a sufficient device in proving that justice is beneficial to those who believe in, and practice it. I shall further argue that Plato establishes that the metaphorical bridge between the city and soul analogy and reality is the leader, and that in the city governed by justice the philosopher is king.
References to Greek literature can be found all throughout time and in western culture. Greek mythology is thought to have influenced arts, literature, sciences and language. Historians have considered Ancient Greece to be one of the most influential societies on modern day life. Greek literature poems, tragedies, and comedies have challenged authors in the past to strive to be as great the Athenian authors, but none have been able to match. Tragedies such as, Oresteia and The Odyssey, gives readers an inside look into life in Ancient Greece.
Plato, a greek philosopher and friend of Socrates,stresses his perspective on why certain literature can be hurtful to a society in The Republic. Through his essay, Plato’s study in philosophy saw it to be an opposition to both poetry and rhetoric. One ironic thing about Plato’s The Republic is its relentless hostility towards poetry, despite Plato’s fame coming from his own poems. In The Republic, Plato stresses two main points on the effects of poetry within a society. One focus is how poetry triggers certain emotional responses that can be hurtful to society because it leads to irrationality, while another focus is the mistaken nature of poetry overall.