More handpicked essays just for you.
Introduction for alexander the great
Analytical history of alexander the great
The life and times of Alexander the great
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
By forming a Triumvirate with Octavian Lepidus and Antony; Caesar created another power of three potentates (Ferrill, 2). Only this one was sanctioned by the Roman Senate. He never forgot about the people of Rome and forming relationships along the way, Caesar accomplished great exploits. He provided the groundwork for the Roman expansion of the empire. His brilliance in positioning his armies in the right place at the exact right times, Caesar had his name on just about anything to do with the expansion process. The Roman empire worked its way into Europe and Great Britain. Egypt turned out to be a sore spot for the power of three. Cleopatra offered herself to both Caesar and Antony and sparked an incredible rivalry that ended in suicide …show more content…
for both Cleopatra and Antony. History is always stranger than fiction. Power, sex, and greed have always been part of any political machine even in today’s world; it is what makes the world go round. Caesar was murdered on the steps of the senate on March 15 forever known as the “Ides of March” (Vernon, 1). Caesar was mourned by many of the common folk and Rome was split into civil wars The new triumvirate was a rocky relationship as each man was out for their own piece of the Roman pie. In the end, it was Octavius that survived and lived on to rule Rome and its empire. Those who took out Caesar assumed life would go back to the olds ways. The senate honored all of his acts and had Caesar entombed at the Roman expense. Even before his death he put his likeness on the Roman coins but refused to be king and accepted the dictator for life offer. Many historians felt it is what brought on his murder. As was then and as it is today, leaders are overthrown all the time and for the very same reasons. It always about what is right and what is easy. It is the common people who lost the most because they have no one to stick up for them. Caesar was one of those people when it suited him, but could be very ruthless when the situation warranted it. He could be reckless and decisive and was not afraid to make bold moves for luck seemed to be on his side. He rode into battle with his armies, not fearing death and it made him fearless to his troops and they would follow him. Any who tried to run was forced back by Caesar. He was a leader to be reckoned with. Who thought nothing of fighting alongside his troops and had no thoughts of safety. This earned him great respect and perhaps that is why he was more successful at conquests than any other tyrant of the times (Wyke, 10). He was the first to use unorthodox methods like coming up on the target from behind sending them into chaos making him the conqueror. Even after two thousand years, Caesar left his stamp on the world. He was both destroyer and founder. A liberator, who used unusual methods to defeat his opponents, it makes him infamous and unforgettable. Even after he was assassinated his exploits lived on in Roman minds. Conclusion Of all the takeovers in this world, the rise of the empire of Rome was the most spectacular by far and most of it is all owed to Julius Caesar and those who followed him.
Caesar proved he was the most successful. This was due to careful planning and implementation. It seemed everything he put his mind to accomplish he did so with ease. This was truly a great leader and certainly changed lives both for the better and worst, depending on which side, you were either winners or losers. Of course, all the bribing he did along the way definitely greased the skids. This made him some real serious enemies along the way. Caesar always had an eye out for promising recruits and never failed to single those men out and reward them. This earned him many friends along the path to the temporary dictator. There should be no doubt on Caesar’s importance in the history of the empire as he was that guy who never wanted to rest on his achievements, but someone who always had a plan on just how to get things done. He was never defeated as a general. Caesar rarely failed at any task he chose to undertake. He just somehow knew how to get things done and he never really stopped thinking about how to improve the city and it roads. Caesar was the best as dictators go but were never afraid to be brutal and ruthless if the times called for it. He was never one to show mercy unless it was unavoidable. Love him or hate him, he was one of the best leaders of all time. Politicians today can still learn a thing or two from Caesar. Bribery is definitely frowned upon, but it is still happening all over the world. The more things change, they seem to stay the same and it is because it
works. Politics were then and still is a murky corrupt for a career path. Back then he greased the right palms better than anyone or since. It was the end of a political era but the rulers that followed Caesar were successful because they followed his teachings because they worked and some still do so today. I don’t see that much has changed in how Superpowers interact in the world today. If we stop to consider what is happening in the world today, the same countries are still fighting with each other today, only the names have changed but the politics are generally the same.
Julius Caesar was very heroic to the Roman people. He did a wonderful job in conquering
Julius Caesar, an important figure in Roman history, lived during the end of the Roman Republic. His actions would shape the world around him forever. He was an important figure because he grew the Roman Empire, he brought about the end of the Roman Republic , and was able to grow his status within his lifetime and become dictator for life.
The triumvirate gained power that was intended to be in the hands of the Senate and Roman Assembly. This paved way to a situation in which a single man could sweep up the political power that previously belonged to the entire Senate. Julius Caesar would use this tactic, following his campaigns of Gaul and Britton, to take sole dictatorship over Rome. While there were previous cases in which individuals had been appointed as dictators, usually by the Senate, to serve for six months in a time of war, Caesar was appointed dictator three separate times.. After declining his first dictatorship, Caesar was awarded two more reigns as dictator for one and ten years, respectively.
The Roman Republic can be explained as the period from 509 – 27 BCE, which the ancient Roman civilization exemplified a republican form of government; where the supreme power is held by the people and their elected representatives. During the Roman Republic, the 2 most powerful, and main branches of government included the Consuls and the Senate. It was the Consuls who held supreme civil and military control over Rome; however the republic had precautions in place to avoid one of the consuls from exercising too much power, such as short one year terms, veto and the notion of 2 consuls to divide authority. The republic then also included the senate; where at first, senators were only chosen from the patrician class, but in time, plebeians joined their positions (Bradley, 1990). Throughout the history of the republic, the evolution of government was driven by the struggle between the aristocracy and the ordinary citizens. The demise of the republic resulted through a series of civil wars and powerful dominance of significant historical figures (Princeton.edu, 2014).
For thousands of years people have been talking about the great powerful Caesar. He is one of the greatest known dictators known to people today mostly because of all of the things he was able to accomplish during his rein as emperor. After reading primary sources about Caesar, it has given me a better understanding of what other people thought of him during this time period. It’s safe to say that Caesar was obsessed with power and respect from other people that would explain his thirst for war and land, which is one of his greatest strengths and helped in making Rome a great empire.
roles such as; Pontifex, Governor, and Praetor. As a result of the power and admiration he
In the antique land of Rome, a shattered visage of a man lies. This statue, in frigid stone, represents a man who built one of the most formidable empires in human history, all while setting the course for its eventual downfall. As the morning sun rises over the horizon in a blaze of glory, the statue illuminates and reveals the somewhat melancholic ivy as it slowly envelops the forgotten emperor. Beside the statue, hanging on a ruined stone wall, is a painting of the city that once stood tall and proud. The painting depicts a beautiful scene that shows a joyous crowd watching in awe as colossal wooden galleons triumphantly enter the city on a river. You stare into the painting and as you look deeper you find yourself transported back in time to an Empire long since lost.
The Roman Republic began in 509 B.C.E. with the overthrow of the Etruscan monarchy. In 27 B.C.E the Roman Empire began with Octavian Caesar becoming the emperor, this ended almost 500 years of republican self-government. There is much debate over why Rome became so powerful so quickly. Many think it had to do with Rome’s military strength. Others think that it was because Rome knew of and controlled most of the trade routes. Still others believed it had to do with the technology that was advanced during the Roman Republic. All of these factors played significant roles, but which one played the most important role?
He fights until Pompey is murdered in Egypt. As Rome is “shattered,” Julius Caesar should rule. He avoids having a monarchy by becoming a dictator instead of a king. Although his intentions seem honorable, he controls the government and the elections. However he makes changes to ensure financial stability of Rome and is able to make allies with enemies by showing grace instead of vengeance.
Julius Caesar can only be seen as a destroyer of the Roman Republic as he was arrogant, egotistic, and manipulated the government to his advantage. The Roman Republic’s republican form of government was intended to represent the needs of all Roman citizens. Yet Caesar’s arrogant actions during his reign turned the government into an organization dedicated solely to his personal gain of power, fame, and glory. At the height of his reign, Caesar had received every honor the Roman Republic could give him. He was the high-priest, a high-ranking judge, and pro-consul (Source 1). Caesar believed he also deserved to be dictator of Rome for life so he requested the title and was granted it. He was also made consul of Rome for ten years even though this position was only supposed to be held for a year (Source 4). But even this was not enough for Caesar; he wanted to be “king of Rome” and his arrogance led him to dedicate his life to achieving this title (Source 1). His arrogance then reached the point where he believed himself to be descended from Venus, the goddess of beauty; he used his power to have a marble forum bearing his name and a temple for Venus built. He was determined to be considered “godly” (Source 3,...
“If you must break the law, do it to seize power: in all other cases observe it,” said Julius Caesar (Julius Caesar). Ironically, this motto led Caesar to both his rise, and fall. Caesar gained power and popularity through his military might and tactics, making him a dangerous foe. He defeated everyone he faced on the battlefield. Including winning a brutal civil war between him and his once ally, Pompey. As a result, he was thrust into the position of king in Rome in all but title as Rome was still a Republic and only had temporary dictators in time of crisis (Ushistory.org). The senators and other politicians feared for their political careers and the livelihood of the Republic because Caesar was adored by the Roman public so much that they would have made him king. Additionally, the Senators had allied themselves with Pompey to ward off Julius in the civil war. However, they didn’t surrender to
Julius Caesar Essay: Caesar, a champion of the common people and his enduring legacy Julius Caesar has consistently remained as a prominent, well-known figure throughout our history. His legacy continues to live on, even after two thousand years since his abrupt assassination. Even the modern terms of "Tsar" and "Kaiser" are considered depictions of "Caesar." Even to this day, the name "Caesar" alone brings images of the glory of ancient Rome, along with the conspiracies, envy, and betrayal. Due to recognition by Shakespeare, most people are aware that Caesar was betrayed and killed by his colleagues and fellow senators.
Imagine being your countries hero, imagine all the people loving you and adoring you, imagine being the best at everything – now imagine Julius Caesar. It seems as though the last one doesn’t fit, does it? However, wasn’t Caesar one of the most influential people during the time of the Roman Empire AND didn’t he influence our world today? As well as in reality, in the play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, this man has a very interesting role. Despite the fact that he is immensely influential during his life, after his assassination it seems as though Caesar is still influential – or, more specifically, his spirit is.
An opposing issue is whether Caesar’s characteristic traits worked for the good of the people or really just for his hubris. Julius Caesar, known for the creation of Roman success, was infamous for his ego and tyrannical policies. As a military leader it was incontrovertible that Julius Caesar achieved his power and success by annihilating his enemies. He also used his military power to advance and endure the position of consul and finally to become a dictator and supreme ruler of Rome. His hubris would not allow him to share the glory with his fellow leaders, which led to the tragedy of Julius Caesar.
Tragedies most often refer back to the actions of men. The play Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare, provides a good example to how the quote is shown to be accurate." The calamities of tragedy do not simply happen, nor are they sent [by the gods]: they proceed mainly from actions, and those actions of men." This statement is profoundly proven through the past and present actions of the conspirators throughout the play. From the beginning of the play, the reader can identify who will necessarily betray and plot to murder Caesar.