Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays on the death of julius caesar
Analysis of Julius Caesar
The life of Julius Caesar
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essays on the death of julius caesar
Julius Caesar Essay: Caesar, a champion of the common people and his enduring legacy
Julius Caesar has consistently remained as a prominent, well-known figure throughout our history. His legacy continues to live on, even after two thousand years since his abrupt assassination. Even the modern terms of "Tsar" and "Kaiser" are considered depictions of "Caesar." Even to this day, the name "Caesar" alone brings images of the glory of ancient Rome, along with the conspiracies, envy, and betrayal. Due to recognition by Shakespeare, most people are aware that Caesar was betrayed and killed by his colleagues and fellow senators. And despite Shakespeare writing the play fifteen hundred years preceding Caesar's death, how has what some would consider
…show more content…
However, Caesar always had the goal in mind of becoming part of the consul, the highest and most esteemed position and status of the Roman political ladder. To achieve the office of consul, however, he needed a significant amount money and plenty of connections and influence. He acquired most of the necessary funds for his political campaign by striking down a rebellion in Spain, as well as earning an honorary parade known as a “triumph.” Caesar could not, however, run both for the position of consul and have a triumph which would provide him with years of glory and popularity amongst his peers, since Roman law stated that any generals awaiting "triumph" were required to remain outside the city's …show more content…
The Senate refused Caesar’s request as it was obviously corrupt. Even at this early stage in Caesar's rise to power, the Senate still felt threatened by Caesar and his Populist ideology. The Roman Senate was hoping that Caesar would pick the “triumph,” an honor that would have Caesar’s actions and legacy remembered and celebrated for years, over the position within the consulship. The vast majority of Roman generals would merely have taken the triumph, and just waited one more year for the chance to run for consul. Nonetheless, Caesar did something completely unexpected. He decided to forfeit his “triumph” for the consulship. In which he won the election by a landslide for the position of Senior Consul of the
It all began in 59 Bc when Cato interacted with Caesar when Cato attempted to block Caesar’s bid for the consulship of Rome. Plutarch explains that Caesar returning from this military expedition in Spain wished to hold a triumph while running for the consulship in absentia. To prevent the Senate to vote, Cato filibustered on the Senate floor. Due to this event, Caesar had to choice between consulship or a triumph. He picked to run for the consulship .
At this point Caesar was praised by the Roman people for his various military victories and had been awarded several awards and honors by the senate. Having conquered much of the surrounding territories, spanning from northern Africa to Greece, and enacting several reforms, Caesar was in the process of acquiring the most power a single man had ever documented in the Roman republic.
Originally, it is thought, there was a law that prevented second consulships, and another that prevented holding another consulship until ten years had passed from the end of the prior. Marius bypassed both of these rules, maintaining the title of consul for five terms (104-99BC). Plutarch, the historical biographer, writes that “the people would tolerate no opposition” [to Marius’s second consulship], which shows us that Marius gained his power through support of the masses rather than support of the senate, which is what would be expected. Plutarch gives more evidence that Marius won his power by gaining the affection of the military and the plebeians, rather than the aristocracy whom he offended with his “violent speeches, full of contempt and arrogance” . From this we learn that Marius was not only supported by the people, but he was opposed by the higher class, and more important figures in Roman society.. The picture that Plutarch paints gives the impression that Marius gained his consulship in ways that were unconventional, much like the nature of the consulship itself. Breaking the mold like this paved the way for more fortunate ambitious men, like Sulla and Caesar, as he was showing that great power could be achieved without necessarily adhering to the preference of the
“His birth marked the beginning of a new chapter in roman history”. By 31, Caesar had fought in several wars and become heavily involved in politics; being appointed dictator and consul on multiple occasions (Biography.com, 2014). It was Caesar’s assassination and following events that ultimately brought an ...
Shortly before his death Caesar was given several warnings throughout ActsⅡand Ⅲ , however he still went to meet with the Senate due to the fact he thought he was needed. He had an alliance with his adopted sons and valued soldiers Octavius and Antony. The play is about the events that follow his death making him an important secondary character that also portrays a protagonist. Caesar faced many conflicts throughout his lifetime, some internal and some external. He fought a war against Pompey ,which lead to conspirators plotting his death, and he was troubled by the fact that his wife could not provide him with a child. He showcased this by publicly asking Antony to touch her as he passed her, hoping that this would bring healing to her barren womb. He also went through several character changes. When he returned from war, he returned believing that the people would be ecstatic to have him as an emperor. Nonetheless when the people of Rome did not respond the way he expected he knew he had to play on their emotions. He did this by refusing the crown three times and by offering to kill himself to prove his honesty and trustworthiness. This gave him the desired effect, so he returned to knowing that the crowd wanted him as a king. The driving force of the play was the unfortunate murder of Caesar or what happened afterwards. Throughout this play many of the characters go through many unique changes, although Julius Caesar experienced some very significant character changes. The theatrical work exhibits Julius Caesar’s actions, alliances, character developments, and internal and external conflicts which in turn showcase his various changes. The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare is a brilliant piece of work that thoroughly covers the story of Julius Caesar, a protagonistic secondary character. Julius Caesar was the unofficial emperor of Rome. He was a war General and he fought
Caesar was born into a traditional influential and respected family. It is this influence that he used to make his way to the top of the Roman leadership. His use in warfare and military conquests are legendary although he had at first concentrated in pursuing political actions. He won the first elections in his political career at the early forties. He was el...
In Shakespeare's "Julius Caesar", Caesar is displayed as a powerful and dynamic figure in Rome because of his many accomplishments in previous wars as well as battles. When Caesar returns to Rome from a recent victorious defeat in battle, he receives a warm welcome by all the citizens of Rome. They consider and see Caesar as a hero and a strong individual, which is why they attempt to crown him King three times. A group of generals in Caesar's army are jealous and concerned with the amount of power Caesar has; they make arrangements to kill him. "Power is said to be a man's greatest desire he'll do whatever it takes to achieve his goal, even to kill." In comparison to Shakespeare's "Julius Caesar" and the film Julius Caesar, we see many similarities. Furthermore, I will discuss these similarities in great depth.
Caesar's military eminence helped Rome prosper into one of the greatest and most memorable civilizations in history. His campaigns helped Rome grow larger in size and in power. His victories in Egypt, Pontus, Gaul, Africa, and parts in the Asia Minor were some of Caesar's greatest honors, (Bruns 99) and is considered "the most powerful national leader in history"(Nardo 73) because of his conquests. The major reason for his strong army was due to the fact that the senate favored him. The senate gave him three provinces for the span of five years, instead of one province for one year. With this ruling, he had "a chance to build a stronger personal army"(34). The strategies and tactics used by Caesar made his death even more tragic because of his excellent leadership and planning. Caesar planned wars by legionary battles.
“Caesar was a brilliant general, a clever engineer, and administrator of genius, and a leader who demanded and commanded loyalty. He also was a corrupt politician” (Dando-Collins 4). Caesar would go on to be a dictator and his gain in power would corrupt him. He often bypassed the Senate, taking their power away. With Caesar’s growing power the Senate feared that they would soon lose their political relevance.
Relevance of Julius Caesar to Contemporary Society. & nbsp; & nbsp ; Symbolism is a major aspect of writing. Whether obvious or subtle, authors use it as a way to extend their work beyond just the time period they're writing their piece in. Also, it allows the reader the opportunity to substitute his own ideas into the story, which makes the story more personal.
Caesar had three major goals mind when he decided to free Rome, the greatest Empire since the Alexander the Great’s, from corruptive and dangerous practices of patricians unfit to hold and exercise immense power responsibly: to suppress all armed resistance in the provinces, and thus bring back order to the Empire; to create a strong central government in Rome and for the Empire; and to weave together the entire Republic into a single cohesive unit.
But Caesar’s ambitions were higher, he wanted to run for the highest position in Rome, the Consul. Caesar due to his impervious nature was willing to further bury himself to debt for his campaign as Consul. He teamed up with two of Rome’s most prominent senators, Pompey and Crassus, which is known as the First Triumvirate. He won the Consulship with a large margins and became Consul. This man is so charismatic that many of the Senators even the older ones listen to him.
Cicero, upon hearing of these plans, used his position as consul to warn the Senate and expose these plans. Due to the pending danger, on October 22, the Senatus consultum ultimum was passed by the Senate, giving Cicero absolute power. On 8 November, he delivered his first of four speeches against Catiline, who fled Rome later that night. These speeches led to Catiline’s defeat and death and Cicero ordered the conspirators to be executed without trial. Considered to be the ‘saviour’ and pater patriae (father of the fatherland) for his defeat of the Catilinarian conspiracy, this was the climax of his political
Missing persons cases raise fundamental questions about justice, human rights, and moral obligations. Missing persons cases are not merely statistical figures or legal dilemmas; they represent profound human tragedies that test the integrity of justice systems and societal norms. The equitable handling of these cases, ensuring unbiased attention regardless of circumstances, is a topic of continuous discourse and scrutiny. The primary concern of this discussion is whether or not cases involving missing persons are treated equitably. In these situations, equitable treatment includes not only the allocation of resources but also the upholding of moral and legal requirements as well as respect for moral standards.
	Shakespeare illustrated Caesar as a tragic hero by showing that he was a noble man of high rank. Every Roman followed his leadership and Caesar also defeated the great Pompey. First of all, At the Feast of Lupercal Caesar manipulated the commoners and made himself look noble to the commoners. Casca said, "Why there was a crown offered to him;...people fell a-shouting" (I,ii,221-223). Next, To show how noble and great Caesar was, the Romans would stand along the street sides to watch him pass by. "Madam not yet, I go to take my stand; /To see him pass on to the Capitol," said the soothsayer (II,iv,25-26). Finally, Caesar had the greatest rank possible as he would have been crowned king if it wasn’t for the conspiracy’s plot. As Casca said, "Indeed they say senators tomorrow; /Mean to establish Caesar as king..." (I,iii,87-88).