Julius Caesar Rhetoric Analysis

1235 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Theme of conflict in julius caesar

The central theme of Act III, Scene ii of “Julius Caesar” by William Shakespeare is the power of rhetoric because it shows the effect of two funeral orators’ on the crowd. In this scene, Antony and Brutus have similar purpose in talking to the public, which is to gain the support of the Plebeians according to their conflicting views about Caesar’s assassination. This essay focuses on comparing the orations of the two speakers in this part of the play according to Aristotle’s rhetoric system. According to Aristotle’s writings, Antony’s speech is more persuasive than Brutus’ speech, because he is able to provide logical, emotional and ethical appeals to his audience. Firstly, in comparison to Brutus’ logic, Antony provides more evidence to prove that Caesar was not ambitious. Secondly, Antony’s emotional acts and speech moved his audience more than Brutus. Finally, Antony acts more noble than Brutus does. …show more content…

Antony mentions about the battles Caesar had won that gave more wealth to the country, “he hath brought many captives home to Rome whose ransoms did the general coffers fill”. Further, he also reminds the people when he offered Caesar a crown, but Caesar rejected it in his statement, “You all did see that on the Lupercal I thrice presented him a kingly crown, which he thrice refuse: was this ambition?” Lastly, he tells the people about Caesar’s affection to the poor, “When that the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept”. Unlike Mark Antony, Brutus does not provide any evidence to prove his point that Caesar was ambitious. This information illustrates how logic reasons alter the people’s opinions. Thus, since Antony provide more evidences to support his opinion, people sided him instead of

Show More
Related

  • Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis Essay

    686 Words  | 2 Pages

    In William Shakespeare's, Julius Caesar, rhetorical devices are used throughout Decius Brutus’s speech to Caesar to persuade him to attend the senate, and ultimately meet his demise. Decius Brutus uses repetition to directly play into Caesar’s ego and convince him to show at an event he was previously very unsure of. Decius first uses repetition to make Caesar feel as if he were an irreplaceable addition to the senate. He addresses Caesar as, “most mighty Caesar…” (2.2.74) multiple times throughout his oration. The repetition of “mighty” draws Caesar’s attention away from the fact that he really must not go to the senate and instead focuses on why he must. Caesar is known to be easily persuaded by the promise of attention or rewards. Decius

    Read More

  • What Are The Rhetorical Strategies In Julius Caesar

    995 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the Shakespearean play Julius Caesar, the speech recited by Mark Anthony for Caesar’s death was far superior to Brutus’s because it appealed to the audience's primal emotion while simultaneously relating

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis Essay

    535 Words  | 2 Pages

    Antony asks rhetorical questions and lets the audience answer for themselves. Brutus uses ethos by stating that he a noble man and that is why the people should believe him but infact Antony questions his nobility by saying what Brutus said,” Brutus is an honourable man”(III.ii.79). In a way, Antony states what Brutus states to convince the audience by using examples that Brutus is wrong. Antony himself knows what kind of man Brutus is but lets the people figure it out on their own. In addition, Brutus uses logos by expressing that fact that Caesar died because of his ambition. This argument is severely under supported because his reasons are invalid and simply observations. Antony uses “did this in Caesar seem ambitious” to question Brutus’ argument (III.ii.82). Antony gives examples backing his argument like when Caesar refused the crown thrice to prove his humbleness. The way Antony convinces the people to rebel is by using pathos. He brings the audience in by stepping down to their level and showing them the body of Caesar. While Antony talks at Caesar's funeral, he pauses because” heart us in the coffin there with Caesar “(III.ii.98). When Antony becomes emotional, he reminds the audience about what injust event happened to the much loved

    Read More

  • Brutus vs Antony

    1056 Words  | 3 Pages

    The most predominate and important aspect In the play Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare are the speeches given to the Roman citizens by Brutus and Antony, the two main charaters, following the death of Caesar. Brutus and Antony both spoke to the crowd,using the same rhetorical devices to express their thoughts. Both speakers used the three classical appeals employed in the speeches: ethos, which is an appeal to credibility; pathos, which is an appeal to the emotion of the audience; and logos, which is an appeal to the content and arrangement of the argument itself. Even though both speeches have the same structure Antony’s speech is significantly more effective than Brutus’s.

    Read More

  • Ethos Pathos Logos In Julius Caesar

    905 Words  | 2 Pages

    However, Antony’s small amount of logos is just as strong, if not stronger than Brutus’s excessive amount. While in the first of calming the crowd, Brutus inquires, “Would you rather Caesar live and die all slaves, / than that Caesar were dead and die all free men?” (JC 3.2.23-24). This is a botched logic; he does not ever present actual evidence of this tyrannical behavior in Caesar or his actions. However, in the minds of the king-fearing Romans, the words, flimsy though they are, are enough. In disproving Brutus’s claims that Caesar was ambitious, Antony uses many examples to prove the opposite. The following brings the welfare of the people into it, showing that with Caesar alive they were given much: “He hath brought many captives home to Rome, / whose ransoms did the general coffers fill; / did this in Caesar seem ambitious?” (JC 3.2.89-91). Antony provides solid evidence and a sound argument to explain that Caesar’s seemingly ambitious actions were rather to help the people of Rome, which is not ambitious in the

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

    254 Words  | 1 Pages

    In Shakespeare's The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Cassius encompasses ethical and emotional appeal to persuade Brutus that something should be done about Caesar's aspirations for sovereignty. For instance, Cassius cleverly references himself as "Aeneas, our great ancestor,/ Did from the flames of Troy upon his shoulder,/ The old Anchises bear, so from the waves of Tiber,/ Did I the tried Caesar" (1.2.23-26). Cassius skillfully employs vivid imagery to depict how he once rescued Caesar when they were swimming in the River Tiber, while heavily suggesting that Caesar is a feeble man compared earlier to the event from Roman history. Cassius also explains to Brutus how it is ironic that Caesar appears to be an omnipotent figure since Caesar is no better

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis Essay

    384 Words  | 1 Pages

    Throughout his speech, Antony repeats the words “[Caesar] was ambitious” and “Brutus is an honorable man” to create a contrast between the two statements. (3.2.95-96). Through this repetition, Caesar successfully undermines Brutus. Everytime he calls Brutus an honorable man, he lists a positive trait of Caesar that contradicts Brutus’s claim that he was too ambitious. He tells the crowd about the times when Caesar showed compassion for the people and when he refused the crown thrice. Antony’s sarcasm about Brutus’s honor brings into question as to whether his honor deserved. This leads the audience to doubt their feelings upon Caesar’s ambition. Near the end of his eulogy, Antony uses apostrophe when he claims that “judgment ... art fled to brutish beasts” as a reason for why the Roman people believe Brutus. (3.2.114-115). Antony indirectly shames the crowd for their belief in Brutus in that Caesar was a tyrant. Fearing alienation of the crowd, he attributes this belief to a lapse in judgement that beasts have taken. Antony also makes a pun upon Brutus’s name when he comments “brutish beasts.” Antony implies Brutus has caused a lapse in judgement within the Roman people through his oration

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

    984 Words  | 2 Pages

    Playwright, William Shakespeare, in the play Julius Caesar, utilizes many instances of rhetorical devices through the actions and speech of Caesar's right-hand man, Mark Antony. In the given excerpt, Antony demonstrates several of those rhetorical devices such as verbal irony, sarcasm, logos, ethos, and pathos which allows him to sway the plebeians. The central purpose of Mark Antony’s funeral speech is to persuade his audience into believing that Caesar had no ill intentions while manipulating the plebeians into starting a rebellion against their new enemies, Brutus and the conspirators.

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

    653 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the play, Julius Caesar, which was written by William Shakespeare, there is someone named Caesar. He had been offered to be crowned king three times but he denied. Cassius felt that Caesar should not be king and he tried to convince Brutus of this. The conspirators also felt this way. They felt Caesar would not be a good king. There had to be a way to stop Caesar from being king. Yes, it happened……… they killed Caesar. The conspirators convinced Brutus that Caesar should not be king, so Brutus eventually joined them on their plan to kill Brutus. One day Caesar is heading to the Senate House with all the conspirators around him. The ides of March have come. When he arrives at the Senate, Trebonius managed to pull Mark Antony away from Caesar so they could attack him, then Brutus and the conspirators came up and they began to stab Caesar. Caesar asks, “Et tu, Brute? then fall Caesar,” and he dies. A servant of Antony comes and asked Brutus if he could meet with him to learn why Caesar had to die and Brutus promised Antony would not be harmed. Brutus tells him that he had to die because he was destroying the republic. Brutus gives Antony

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

    726 Words  | 2 Pages

    “Sometimes the people who you love the most do the most damage.” This theme is seen in the play when Brutus, one of Caesar’s most faithful companions, literally stabs him in the back. Leading up to the murder, Caesar is unaware of Brutus’ true intentions. He has no idea that one of his best friends is plotting to kill him. Ultimately, this shows Caesar’s naivety. The warning signs regarding his murder were obvious, but he chose not to see them. If it were anybody else, perhaps they would have been able to see who their true friends were. (7)

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis Essay

    1960 Words  | 4 Pages

    He gives them facts that they cannot dispute. He retells about how Caesar has “brought many captives home to Rome,/ Whose ransoms did the general coffers fill,” or that Caesar wept when the poor cried, but an ambitious man would be made of “sterner stuff” (III.ii.86-87 & 89). Antony then also used pathos within this section, to weaken the hold of Brutus’ words. Telling the people of how Caesar was always “faithful and just” to him (III.ii.82). Of how Caesar himself “wept” when his people cried (III.ii.88). Following even this, Antony shifted to using pathos. He spoke of how the crowd used to love Caesar like no other, and they loved the man with good reason, yet now they hate the man without reason. And that unjust loss of love to such a man was too much. It killed his heart. Hurt him more than any wound. Such is the thoughts behind the line of “bear with me,/ My heart is in the coffin there with Caesar “ (III.ii.102-103). To his respect, it worked as well as Antony spoke. The crowd began to question Brutus. Questioning whether he was true about the ambitions of Caesar. True about there being no reason to mourn him. The crowd was with Antony for his thoughts, and for the pain he suffered. For the fact that Antony is speaking to the crowd not moments after the death of his dearest friend shows the crowd how much Antony hurts. This sympathetic connection helps strengthen the affects of

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar Rhetorical Devices

    508 Words  | 2 Pages

    In William Shakespeare’s play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, a character named Mark Antony gives a speech to the citizens of Rome in regard to Caesar's unfortunate death. The purpose of his speech is to expose one of killers, Brutus, for his wrongful actions towards the deceased Julius Caesar. Throughout Mark Antony’s speech, rhetorical devices including sarcasm, emotional appeal, and metaphors are used to enhance the effectiveness of the speech by provoking negative emotions towards Brutus to emerge from the audience. Sarcasm with repetition is one of the devices used most often in the speech to enhance the influence of Mark Antony’s words.

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

    584 Words  | 2 Pages

    In Shakespeare's “Julius Caesar”, Julius gets murdered. So the consequence of that somebody needs to take over the country and rule it. There are two options that can rule the country, Marcus Brutus and Marc Antony. Marc Antony is the better option. He brings in better points like, he says that Brutus is an honorable man being sarcastic and using parallelism.

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

    1154 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the play Julius Caesar, the author Shakespeare depicts a persistent controversy between Caesar and his conspirators that turned against Caesar. Brutus remained a great friendship with Caesar for a very long time until he became a disguised rival that was joined by many other conspirators which involved Cassius. Through many struggles and schemes, they achieved their goal to bring Caesar down and assassinated him when the chance was given. “E tu Brute?” were the last words of Caesar that left a mark even in today's history because Brutus turning against Caesar depicts that not everyone can be fully trusted for what they portray to be. But, this play highlights also the importance of real friends such as Antony that tried to bring the best

    Read More

More about Julius Caesar Rhetoric Analysis

Open Document