Julius Caesar Rhetorical Devices

508 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Was brutus honorable

In William Shakespeare’s play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, a character named Mark Antony gives a speech to the citizens of Rome in regard to Caesar's unfortunate death. The purpose of his speech is to expose one of killers, Brutus, for his wrongful actions towards the deceased Julius Caesar. Throughout Mark Antony’s speech, rhetorical devices including sarcasm, emotional appeal, and metaphors are used to enhance the effectiveness of the speech by provoking negative emotions towards Brutus to emerge from the audience.
Sarcasm with repetition is one of the devices used most often in the speech to enhance the influence of Mark Antony’s words. For example, he continually mentions that Brutus is an “honourable man” in a form that shows the lack

Show More
Related

  • Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis Essay

    686 Words  | 2 Pages

    In William Shakespeare's, Julius Caesar, rhetorical devices are used throughout Decius Brutus’s speech to Caesar to persuade him to attend the senate, and ultimately meet his demise. Decius Brutus uses repetition to directly play into Caesar’s ego and convince him to show at an event he was previously very unsure of. Decius first uses repetition to make Caesar feel as if he were an irreplaceable addition to the senate. He addresses Caesar as, “most mighty Caesar…” (2.2.74) multiple times throughout his oration. The repetition of “mighty” draws Caesar’s attention away from the fact that he really must not go to the senate and instead focuses on why he must. Caesar is known to be easily persuaded by the promise of attention or rewards. Decius

    Read More

  • What Are The Rhetorical Strategies In Julius Caesar

    995 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the Shakespearean play Julius Caesar, the speech recited by Mark Anthony for Caesar’s death was far superior to Brutus’s because it appealed to the audience's primal emotion while simultaneously relating

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Charms in Shakespeare's Julius Caesar

    1126 Words  | 3 Pages

    Imagine yourself listening to a political debate, undecided as to which leader you agree with. One candidate begins to speak about unjust societal issues, such as the horrifying amount of people in the world that do not have food on their table. The candidate also begins to touch upon the topic of taxes and how he will lower them if he is elected. You find yourself being persuaded in the direction of emotions and morals. The power of language used to appeal others is not only present in the modern world, but also in the play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, written by famous English playwright William Shakespeare. The Tragedy of Julius Caesar portrayed a story of how an aspiring leader, Julius Caesar, is assassinated by a group of schemers, lead by Marcus Brutus, who disagreed with Caesar’s decrees and ways of governing. Over the course of the text, it demonstrated the use of two rhetorical charms: ethos and pathos. While ethos refers to the moral and ethical appeal and pathos invokes to the emotional aspect, each one was evidently shown in the funeral speech for Caesar given by his best friend, Mark Antony. Prior to Antony’s speech, Brutus had given the plebeians a synopsis of what had occurred. However, Mark Antony knew that what Brutus had told the plebeians was false. In such manner, he allured the plebeians onto his side of the tragedy by touching upon ethical and emotional appeals.

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis Essay

    535 Words  | 2 Pages

    Brutus’ approach to the Roman people suggest his extreme amount of self confidence. He attempts to relate to the people by speaking alike the plebians in prose. His constant use of ethos in his speech shows the audience how highly he thinks of himself. Brutus states

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis: A Persuasive Balance

    912 Words  | 2 Pages

    In this day and age, persuasion can be seen on almost any screen. The average American views thousands of advertisements every week. Most ads are simply pushed out of a person’s mind, but the successful advertisements are the ones that resonate with people. Some forms of ads are very annoying to those who put up with them constantly. Online pop-up ads, for example, are proven to do worse for products and business than no advertising at all! This is because this form of advertising does nothing to convince or persuade the person viewing the ad, and no effort is put into actually put into proving what it’s worth to make a point. Pop-ads make zero use of something known as “rhetorical devices”. In Julius Caesar, Brutus and Mark Antony both try to convey their point of view to a large audience of Roman citizens. One had a better speech than the other since he used “rhetorical devices” more effectively. Logos (logical; what makes sense), Ethos (ethics and morals; portraying similar beliefs and values), and Pathos (emotions; natural feelings that can be counterintuitive to logos) are the rhetorical devices that Aristotle

    Read More

  • Quotes Of Manipulation In Julius Caesar

    531 Words  | 2 Pages

    Every person has their own individual beliefs and values that they live by. There is a line that one believes they will never cross. However, people can also be easily persuaded to abandon these values if the reasoning is fair enough. This is human nature. To manipulate someone is to use or change them for a specific purpose. In Shakespeare's play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, he illustrates how easily people can change their minds through manipulation. He conveys how people can be manipulated, how they manipulate themselves, and how they manipulate others.

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

    503 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Ides of March have arrived. A soothsayer and Artemidorus wait anxiously outside the Capitol to warn Caesar of the conspirators. Artemidorus hands his warning letter to Caesar, begging him to read it instantly, “Delay not, Caesar. Read it instantly” (98). However, Decius offers Caesar a petition Trebonius wants him to look over, getting in the way of Artemidorus’ warning.

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

    608 Words  | 2 Pages

    Similarly with Anthony when he addressed the commoners on the assassination of Caesar, his use of the dialectical technique undid the impression Brutus created, and succeeded at weakening Brute’s justification of killing Caesar, claiming that his death was for the sake of Rome. Brutus’s clever strategy to use Caesar’s ambition and overthrow him without any obstacles in the way has failed, because the dialectical examination technique exposed the contradictions in his argument. Being ambitious back in Rome must have been a negative trait for a leader to have, and Brutus successfully branded Caesar as an ambitious man. “The noble Brutus Hath told you Caesar was ambitious/ If it were so, it was a grievous fault/

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis Essay

    384 Words  | 1 Pages

    Throughout his speech, Antony repeats the words “[Caesar] was ambitious” and “Brutus is an honorable man” to create a contrast between the two statements. (3.2.95-96). Through this repetition, Caesar successfully undermines Brutus. Everytime he calls Brutus an honorable man, he lists a positive trait of Caesar that contradicts Brutus’s claim that he was too ambitious. He tells the crowd about the times when Caesar showed compassion for the people and when he refused the crown thrice. Antony’s sarcasm about Brutus’s honor brings into question as to whether his honor deserved. This leads the audience to doubt their feelings upon Caesar’s ambition. Near the end of his eulogy, Antony uses apostrophe when he claims that “judgment ... art fled to brutish beasts” as a reason for why the Roman people believe Brutus. (3.2.114-115). Antony indirectly shames the crowd for their belief in Brutus in that Caesar was a tyrant. Fearing alienation of the crowd, he attributes this belief to a lapse in judgement that beasts have taken. Antony also makes a pun upon Brutus’s name when he comments “brutish beasts.” Antony implies Brutus has caused a lapse in judgement within the Roman people through his oration

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

    873 Words  | 2 Pages

    The process of swaying a majority can and will be highly facilitated by taking advantage of the ideals of those to which you are speaking. Applying appeals through the use of rhetoric is inevitably prominent in most, if not all speeches that look to persuade, with Mark Antony’s speech to the Plebeians from shakespeare's famous play, “The Tragedy of Julius Caesar”, being no exception. As Antony plans to discredit and punish the conspirators for wrongfully slaughtering Caesar (The ruler of Rome earlier accused of possible corruption and latent tyrannical intentions), emotional and logical appeals to the crowds psyche are put into play. This was in the hopes of conjuring an effective opposing ideology to Marcus Brutus’ speech given prior, and

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

    510 Words  | 2 Pages

    We have all tried to convince someone that we are right and another person's wrong.Sometimes you win and sometimes you lose it all depends on how strong your argument is. Other times you're even trying to win over a crowd like in a debate. Well in the tragedy Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare Antony and Brutus both give a speech to the people of Rome trying to convince them to side with either Brutus or Antony. Antony says the murder of Caesar was not justified and Brutus thinks it was. Mark Antony gave a more effective funeral speech than Brutus.

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

    984 Words  | 2 Pages

    Playwright, William Shakespeare, in the play Julius Caesar, utilizes many instances of rhetorical devices through the actions and speech of Caesar's right-hand man, Mark Antony. In the given excerpt, Antony demonstrates several of those rhetorical devices such as verbal irony, sarcasm, logos, ethos, and pathos which allows him to sway the plebeians. The central purpose of Mark Antony’s funeral speech is to persuade his audience into believing that Caesar had no ill intentions while manipulating the plebeians into starting a rebellion against their new enemies, Brutus and the conspirators.

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

    652 Words  | 2 Pages

    Betrayal is the action of betraying one’s country, a group, or a person; treachery. With that being stated, it could be known that people are not always who they say they are, or who they may choose to be. In this epic play written by Julius Caesar, it can be determined that the same people who may catch a bullet can be the same ones behind the trigger. Brutus and Antony played various roles in their speech, trying to convince their people that killing Julius Caesar may or may not have been the best ideal conclusion. As strong as both stories may appear to be, one has a considerable justification the other making that one more powerful. The fact that Cassius was plotting against Julius Caesar is the inevitable, given the circumstances. Brutus

    Read More

  • Comparison of the Two Speeches in Julius Caesar

    888 Words  | 2 Pages

    In William Shakespeare's play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, two speeches are given to the people of Rome about Caesar's death. In Act 3, Scene 2 of this play Brutus and Antony both try to sway the minds of the Romans toward their views. Brutus tried to make the people believe he killed Caesar for a noble cause. Antony tried to persuade the people that the conspirators committed an act of brutality toward Caesar and were traitors. The effectiveness and ineffectiveness of both Antony's and Brutus's speech to the people are conveyed through tone and rhetorical devices.

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

    796 Words  | 2 Pages

    There is no doubt that Brutus thinks very highly of himself, and wants others to think so too. At Caesar’s funeral, he begins by asking the audience to “...believe me for mine honour, and have respect to mine honour that you may believe…” (Shakespeare 3.1.14-16). This example of ethos was meant to remind the people that despite what he’s done, Brutus truly is an honorable man. He purposefully started with establishing his reliability to reassure the audience that he has their best interest at heart. Later on, Brutus tries to appeal to the plebians’ emotions by asking them, “Had you rather Caesar were living and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all free men?” (Shakespeare 3.2.23-25). Brutus knew the answer to that question already, but he wanted to make sure the listeners knew the answer as well. Also, by asking this question alone, the plebeians automatically feel betrayed and taken advantage of by Caesar, and no longer want to mourn for him. Similarly, Brutus makes the audience feel angry and slightly pressured when he interrogates them by saying “Who is here so vile that will not love his country? If any, speak; for him have I offended. I pause for a reply” (Shakespeare 3.2.33-35). Not a single person attending the funeral accepted this dare to speak out against Brutus. Someone listening to this might feel trapped and that their

    Read More

More about Julius Caesar Rhetorical Devices

Open Document