Rome experienced periods of great power and periods of downfall when it came to the emperors that conquered the land. It takes many positive traits and confidence to rule a land as great as Rome. There were a variety of different emperors that ruled the land but they were exceedingly divergent. A healthy Roman emperor should possess traits such as courageousness, being a strong leader, and having exceedingly amounts of patience.
Julius and Augustus Caesar are examples of successful emperors that ruled over Rome. They contained positive traits that allowed them to excel Rome into being a country of great improvement and triumph. On the other hand Tiberius and Nero, also Roman emperors, were terrible leaders that rather than being a leader, they were an enemy to Rome. Many leaders have different ways of running a country and they expressed through different actions and the growth of Rome over the years.
…show more content…
Julius Caesar was an example of a leader that improved Rome over his reign and helped the growth of Rome through his creations and actions.
Julius Caesar contained positive traits that a leader should encompass, he was generous, intelligent, and energetic. Through his actions, Rome was in a period of development where new inventions were being made such as the Aqueduct, a concrete pipe that helped cleanse water that flowed through the city. Julius was responsible for being triumphant over all the battles he was in, being a dictator of Rome, never leading his army into an ambush, and becoming Governor of cisalpine and transalpine. Despite having all these sucessess he has some failures such as invading Britain and never annexing it, letting too many political enemies live and being responsible for his own death by not listening to the assassination
attempts. Augustus Caesar is the ideal image of what a leader should be. He was extremely patient and efficient along with being naturally talented with military associations. Augustus was loved by many citizens with Rome along with all of his soldiers. Augustus was credited for keeping Greco-Rome in peace and prosperity for the longest time. Along with keeping Rome in peace, he successfully doubled the size of Rome, expanded roads and founded postal service, and beautified Rome. The qualities that Augustus possessed is a good model for all leaders to follow. With good leaders, there are also the bad. Tiberius was one of those leaders that failed to help Rome prosper. Tiberius was associated with all his negative traits, lacking positive ones. Tiberius was a pedophile, pervert, and was very anxious. Although having bad traits he did manage to create a few successes during his time was emperor. He was about to restore Armenia, safeguard the country, and cut down costs of entertainment all around Rome. Tiberius lacked the confidence that a sturdy leader should have, this resulted in him not being able to benefit Rome as much as some of the other leaders. When also talking about bad emperors, Nero, was one of the worst. Nero contained characteristic traits not of a leader but of a pedophile. He was a horrible leader and contributed little to nothing to Rome. All the citizens of Rome despised Nero and didn't feel like he was meant to be a leader. Bad enough, almost everyone in Rome couldn't wait till he died. The bad traits that Nero possessed were greediness, paranoia, drunken, being a pervert, and had a twisted mind. Nero contributed more failures to Rome than successes. One of the successes that Nero was able to accomplish was improving theatre, as he had a passion for the arts but that's about it. Nero is the perfect example of what leader should never be. With all the different traits and characteristics out there, only a moderate amount are suitable for a Roman emperor, or any leader. A Roman emperor should be charismatic, patient, fair, and a loving and compassionate person. Though the four different Caesar’s are very different and contrasting, each one of them helped model what a good leader should be and should not be. Rome has benefited from each leader one way in another teaching them a lesson on how the country should be ruled in the future.
Julius Caesar was very heroic to the Roman people. He did a wonderful job in conquering
Augustus Caesar was very ambitious leader. He is best known for bringing peace to Rome. Augustus was considered the first great roman emperor, because He didn’t care about wealth and fortune. Augustus cared about the people of Rome. He was a great military leader and was successful in most of his missions. He showed people that being a good ruler requires a lot of hard work and dedication. He was a very generous man. Augustus was greatly admired by the Roman people.
The Emperor Claudius was both a successful and significant ruler of the Roman Empire. His control of the Senate and new bureaucratic reforms led him to improve the efficiency of the government. His most dramatic reform was the expansion of the empire and the extension of who could be granted Roman citizenship. These new reforms gained him a lot of support. Although Claudius was easily influenced by those close to him, such as his two wives and freedmen, his rule was successful and one which paved the way for other rulers after
Who would have been the best suited leader of Rome in sixth century B.C.? Many believe it could have been Marcus Antonius, Marcus Brutus, or the great Julius Caesar. Marcus Brutus is known to be the most honorable man in Rome at the time and was well respected. Caesar is the ruler and has a successful military. He also seeks wealth and power. Antony is Caesar’s right hand man and good friend. He later acquires the position that Caesar had and also seeks wealth and power. All three men are after the job, but Brutus is obviously the one who was most suited for it and also the only one who never got the chance.
For thousands of years people have been talking about the great powerful Caesar. He is one of the greatest known dictators known to people today mostly because of all of the things he was able to accomplish during his rein as emperor. After reading primary sources about Caesar, it has given me a better understanding of what other people thought of him during this time period. It’s safe to say that Caesar was obsessed with power and respect from other people that would explain his thirst for war and land, which is one of his greatest strengths and helped in making Rome a great empire.
If there were to be a villain in the Tragedy of Julius Caesar Cassius would be it. Cassius is the character who first thought up of the conspiracy against Julius Caesar. His motives weren’t as noble as Brutus’ but he made Brutus believe they were. Cassius did whatever it took to get Brutus to join in the conspiracy. We can clearly see Cassius’ true nature by what he does and says in the play.
Upon evaluating each empire, there are likings between both the Carolingian Empire and the Roman Empire, along with their leaders, Charlemagne and Augustus. Both leaders in their own veneration were experienced military men with dexterity in engaging in war to expand their sway and authority. Each had attained an abundance of land at the beginning of their sovereignty, and during their walk of life had exponentially accumulated an extensive empire. The crucial variance that permitted the Roman Empire to continue to withstand itself was the supervision of the
The five good emperors’ goodness was determined by their relationships with the Roman Senate and people as well as the positive contributions that they achieved for the empire as a whole. They each provided their own way of running the empire and despite the majority of the emperors only able to maintain one of the above qualities, they were able to do a very good job in that one aspect
... the Five Good Emperors won the support of the senate and they improved Rome in many ways.
When the name Julius Caesar is heard, it can only trigger the image of a great leader that led Rome into prosperity. Caesar's military excellence brought more power and more land; that lead to the increase of size and strength in Rome. His dictatorship helped the stability and prosperity in Rome. Caesar's assassination lead to a monarchy that was ruled by Octavin. His death lead to a domino effect ending in the ultimate collapse of the Roman Empire. Many people of the 21st century follow the path of Julius Caesar and try to be as great as he was. The assassination of Julius Caesar was a tragedy due to the contributions he made to Rome's prosperity during his life, and the chaos that occurred in Rome after his death. The contributions that Caesar made towards the strength of Rome's success, and the chaos and collapse of Rome after his death made the assassination of Julius Caesar a tragedy.
The Roman Empire In 27 BC, Augustus became the first emperor of Rome, thus creating a strong leader figure, which could shape and mold the Republic system into what was best for the empire or themselves. During the reign of the emperors, the political policies for Rome would vary according to, which emperor was in power. Not only were politics shaky, but there never was a clear-cut method of succession for the man who controlled those politics. Rome had created the position of emperor in hopes that men like Augustus would continue to lead her into prosperity, however the office of emperor struggled in attempting to find great men to lead Rome. The office never truly evolved into something greater than when it had been created, but rather the office varied according to the personality of the man in the position.
Rome has experienced both its good and bad leaders throughout its stint as a monarchy. Cincinnatus and Superbus both emerged as standout examples for both ends of the spectrum. Their actions and decisions exemplified what it takes to be either a good or bad ruler. Their legacies and remembrance have survived the ages for a reason. Both rulers committed acts that affected Rome greatly whether it was in a positive or negative way. Cincinnatus cared for Rome and his actions showed that through his valiance and loyalty. Superbus will forever be deemed as a bad leader because of his greed and disregard for the Roman law. Rome experimented with people and experienced the best and worst of times, icons emerged.
When one thinks of Ancient Rome, many images may come to mind. Perhaps gladiators fighting for the glory of their emperor, or the impressive Colosseum. For many others it is simply an image of a great and powerful city. Throughout the centuries it has maintained this legacy, still thought of as one of the greatest empires to ever rule. Rome was able to go from the small Italian city to the conquering empire that it is known for today through strong leadership and consistent warfare.
Steaming bathhouses, giant temples to the gods, perfectly paved roads, and piles of golden coins, stamped with signs of peace, equality, and security. Even the dazzling civilization of Egypt pales in comparison to the greatness of Rome. Though Rome was known for many corrupt and incapable leaders, one of them stands out in a good way. A born leader, Octavian conquered Egypt, and turned Rome into a shining marble metropolis. Octavian was an effective and relatable leader because he had good character, ruled with kindness and fairness, tried to improve the living standards in Rome, and protected his empire with a strong, successful army.
Is Julius Caesar a hero or a villain? Many think Julius Caesar is a villain. Overall Julius Caesar is a hero, he helped the poor, expanded their territory,and brought peace to Rome.