Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Rhetoric analysis feminism
Feminist rhetorical analysis essay
Rhetoric analysis feminism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Rhetoric analysis feminism
Analyzing a Feminist Rhetorical Response to a Misogynist
As a very left wing politician, Julia Gillard does not hold back when addressing major and controversial topics. Her speeches have highlighted movements and injustices, shedding light to problems occurring in her home continent, worldwide. One of Gillard’s most renowned speeches, the Misogyny Speech is a great example of her aggressive manner in fighting for justice. She uses words to fight for change, allowing diction to be her catalyst for a movement in society. Julia Gillard effectively illustrates her message to her audience through successful use of available means while responding to the proposed problem in a fitting manner. As a result of her appropriate rhetorical advance,
…show more content…
Gillard’s Misogyny Speech is filled with copious examples of these appeals, but most importantly, she heartily creates credibility for herself as a public speaker by using strong examples of ethos throughout her speech. Usually messages from public figures of high authority are more likely to be heard by the audience. Julia Gillard is an example of political authority, being a former Australian prime minister and head of Australia’s Labor Party. Gillard’s authority is an example of formal authority, and in result not only allows her voice to be heard across the continent. In addition, when speaking about such a controversial topic like feminism, listening to injustices from the oppressed group increases credibility. In comparison, if a white man speaks upon the issues women face, it would feel a tad less “real” because they simply do not have personal accounts of this mistreatment. In addition, the prominent use of direct quotes from Tony Abott’s speeches increases her credibility. Using direct quotes to strengthen an argument shows the audience that these are factual, real life accounts of statements from someone. These quotes are not altered, so they really illuminate Abott’s true colors. When Gillard brings up quotes from Abott that state, “What the housewives need to …show more content…
One of these constraints were the societal ideals that Gillard had to write around. At the time of the speech, Australia still was filled with patriarchal ideology. This continent still had a huge wage gap as well as a huge gender education gap. This posed problems in Gillard’s movement. Middle aged and older citizens of Australia had conservative values, since they were raised in such a time. In order to work around these constraints, Gillard collect direct quotes and events, ultimately sending her message to crowds who don’t one hundred percent agree with
People started to open their ears and their hearts. Her overall purpose is to show that there is a gap between men and women that cannot be overlooked and sidestepped for any longer. Women don't only deserve the right to vote, but they deserve the same rights as men. Applying logos, juxtaposition, and strong use of diction to her speech, she connects to her audience and reveals to them the reasons why what she is saying is crucial to the country.
Jarratt, Susan C. “Rhetoric and Feminism: Together Again.” College English. Vol. 62. 3rd ed. National Council of Teachers of English, 2000. 390-393. Jstor. Web.
I chose Emma Watson’s speech at the UN about feminism because I had previously watched a clip on facebook and it stuck with me. Watson uses arguments to inform and to inspire as well as using all three of pathos, logos, and ethos. In the speech, Watson asks men to understand that gender inequality is their issue as well.
The goal of Hillary’s speech is to persuade her audience that her ideas are valid, by using ethos, pathos, and logos. Hillary is the First Lady and Senator, she shows credibility as an influential activist for woman rights. “Over the past 25 years, I have worked persistently on issues relating to women, children, and families. Over the past two and a half years, I’ve had the opportunity to learn more about the challenges facing women in my country and around the world” (Clinton 2).
Overall, Hillary Rodham Clinton gave a convincing speech on women’s rights at the U.N. World Conference by using the key rhetorical techniques ethos, pathos, logos, and anaphora’s. The use of these techniques helped the audience believe in the cause of which Clinton was speaking about, sympathize for situations females were being put through, and working to strive towards equal rights for everyone. Clinton used the same stance throughout her speech and raised her voice at points in her speech that needed
As many of these issues are addressed daily, we have to take into consideration that a lot of these claims can be considered ethical in reasoning. In this instance, Jill Filipovic uses rational arguments to provide examples and studies to build a case that women are not just “playing the women card” but that there are real issues that they face simply because of their gender. Even though there are weaknesses within the evidence and claims being made, Filipovic does not violate any values or falsely misleads her audience. There are no signs of Filipovic attempting to prevent or silence the voices of the other side of the argument. Nor does Filipovic use her article to relay emotional stories of women being discriminated against causing her audience to be overwhelmed, causing them to loose sign in the true issue at hand. It seems that her purpose is to inform the readers in hopes that it will bring about change or awareness. Finally, Filipovic does not, in any way, attack any individuals or groups of people. She does dress the topic of discrimination between men and women but the topic is never addressed
Gender Trouble published in 1990 by Judith Butler, argues that feminism was and still relaying on the presumption that ‘women’ a...
Hillary Clinton’s speech “Women Rights” transmitted a crucial message to the world and that was to do something about gender inequality. Pathos helped transmit an emotional appeal to the audience and make them see the soft side of Clinton.
Clayton-Dye, Amanda. “The Political Economy of Gender.” Lectures at University of Washington, Seattle, 8 April, 2014.
During her early life, Hillary Clinton learned that a huge problem across the globe was gender inequality. Women and men were not equal. Men were making more money than women for the same jobs. She believed she could change this. On September 5, 1995 Hillary Clinton gave a speech at the United Nations Fourth World Conference on Women. Clinton uses powerful rhetoric in order to create an air of sympathy for women among her audience. She is hoping to make the world become more aware of the inequalities women face daily while also making them feel ashamed for their previous actions of discriminating women, which would cause them to change their ways. She uses her speech “Women’s Rights Are Human Rights” to create awareness of the discrimination
...rms of power and source of pride in society. Emphasizing sexism in language and rising the concern with words can be a vital feminist strategy to provoke social change (Weatherall, 2002). Language can produce a false imagination and represents women and men unequally, as if members of one sex were somehow less wholly human, less complex, and has fewer rights than members of the other sex. Sexist language also characterizes serotypes of women and men, sometimes to the disadvantage of both, but more often to the disadvantage of women. (Wareing & Thomas, 2012). As a result, it is necessary that individuals have the right to define, and to redefine as their lives unfold, their own gender identities, without regard to genitalia, assigned birth sex, or initial gender role. Language about women is not a nonaligned or an insignificant issue but profoundly a political one.
The signification of her values and views empower the speech, allowing it to resonate amongst the audience, which included well-educated fiction readers who would be able to respond to the many literary allusions. She further endeavours with rhetorical questions, “women too have multi-dimensions, why doesn’t literature portray this?” Her implication of logos enhances her argument and makes the audience ponder on the question, whilst the linguistic of the text furthers her point that literature must portray women to be as prevalent as men. She concludes that the ‘many-dimensionality’ of women needs to be given literary expression and repeats a quote by a feminist Rebecca West ‘In us’ to reinforce and add credibility to her argument. The speech prospers in the fight for writer’s freedom of expression from criticism of extremist
In conclusion, David Lodge managed to embody the concrete term of feminism. Through the character of Robyn Penrose, he creates the breakup of the traditional Victorian image of woman.“ `There are lots of things I wouldn 't do. I wouldn 't work in a factory. I wouldn 't work in a bank. I wouldn 't be a housewife. When I think of most people 's lives, especially women 's lives, I don 't know how they bear it. ' `Someone has to do those jobs, ' said Vic. `That 's what 's so depressing. ' ”(Lodge
Renowned British actress and activist for the feminist movement, Emma Watson, in her speech to the United Nations, “HeForShe,” argues that gender discrimination is a plague to human civilization. Watson’s purpose is to sway the audience that gender inequality has to come to an end, with the support of men and women as advocates for egalitarianism. Additionally, she enlightens the audience that the problem originated from political affairs, the economy, and social disparity. Watson creates a compassionate tone in order to convey men, specifically those who negatively perceived feminism or did not think that feminist issues affected them. Nevertheless, Watson’s speech is ineffectively persuasive due to the poor description she formulated
These distinctive voices unite the audience through their rhetorical devices that is displayed in their morals and values. This is evident through the use of an innocent voice in the speech “Address to the Plenary Session, Earth Summit” by Severn Cullis-Suzuki, Suzuki demonstrates a use of alliteration in the quote “I am fighting for my future.” She effectively highlights the idea of the urgency that the children have, for what they believe in and how they fight for what is right. Suzuki is trying to unite everyone and bring them together so they can all fight for their future environment as a nation and a team. This displays Suzuki’s morals and values as she is willing to sacrifice her childhood to be apart of the ECO and fight for her environment. Distinctive voices that unite the audience through morals and values can also be seen through the Indian Nationalist voice in the speech “The true Liberation of Women” by Indira Gandhi. Gandhi explores the use of inclusive language in the quote “We need women.” This suggests that women need to come together and unite with everyone so that there can be equality with in society. This demonstrates Indira Gandhi’s morals and values, as she wanted to make a start to equality and by doing so she became first and only female Prime Minister of India. Moral and values can be used within distinctive voices which can essentially unite the audience.