Judicial System In The Crucible

732 Words2 Pages

The Salem witch trials started during the spring of 1692 after a group of girls in Salem, Massachusetts claimed to be possessed by the devil, and accused other Salem women of witchcraft with no evidence. The evidence was strictly based on what the accuser said, and whether or not the accused would lie and admit to witchcraft to save their life. The first to be hung for witchcraft was a local woman named Bridget Bishop. After all accusations of witchcraft came to an end in early 1693, there ended up being 19 hangings and 150 other people being thrown in jail, including men and children. Arthur MIller’s play, The Crucible is an allegory from the McCarthyism era. The judicial system of the Puritan era was unjust; today's judicial system follows strict guidelines in proving someone is guilty of a crime. The Witch Trials held in Salem, Massachusetts was based on spectral evidence, which is evidence that refers to a witness testimony that the accused person's spirit or spectral shape appeared to him/her witness in a dream at the time the accused person's physical body was at another location. This way of finding whether or …show more content…

“Danforth: Mr. Proctor, this morning, your wife send me a claim in which she states that she is pregnant now… There be no sign of it--we have examined her body“ (1140). This type of evidence during the puritan Age is ludicrous because, usually a woman would know if she's pregnant or not and for Danforth to say Elizabeth is not pregnant by looking at her body is outlandish. Today, our constitution requires the rights to applicable defense. Arrest must be based on hard evidence unlike in the witch trials which used spectral evidence. The Salem witch trials changed the way the American system collects evidence. Judges, law enforcement and attorneys can no longer use spectral

Open Document