Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The nuremberg trialsessay
The Nuremberg trial essay
The nuremberg trialsessay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The nuremberg trialsessay
So far, Judgement at Nuremberg is an interesting film. I’ve only seen half of it, but I have a feeling that I already know the general tone of the film which is to prove that not all Germans are monsters, and that many of them were pressured into pledging allegiance to the Fuhrer because of fear of punishment by the government and other fanatical citizens at the time. This is clearly shown through the housekeepers where the Judge is staying, and, whom I believe is his love interest, Mrs. Bertholt. They are characterized as innocent people who did nothing wrong besides being a German in Germany during Nazi rule. This theme is also demonstrated through the drunk German men outside of a bar. We are introduced to these characters during the scene …show more content…
In times of tragedy, both groups are able to still find the silver lining at the end. I dubbed this the “they’re just like us!” moment. This connection between Germans and Americans became even more prominent during one of the court scenes. The attorney Hans Rolfe reads a document to his client about sterilizing the stupid and lame, and then asked if he knew what it was referring to. While the audience in the court and myself assumed that he did know about it, it came as a shock when it was revealed that this document was in fact written by an American judge. Haywood in that moment probably felt even more conviction seeing that the wickedness that he and his peers were prosecuting people like the defendants for originated by the proclaimers of “freedom” and “liberty”; the very same people who helped create the moral standards for all civilized people were also the foundation of pure evil. Now, that is really hypocritical. And speaking of hypocritical, the West was now fighting Russia because of the threat it posed, but condemned Germany for doing the same during the war. What was also interesting to see was that the prosecutor who I presume is American looks like a
Michael Boehmcke Mrs. Vermillion AP Language and Composition 16 March 2018 The Search for A Killer In 1939, Nazi Germany invaded Poland, initiating World War II, as well as laying the ground work for what became known as the Final Solution to the Jewish Question, the German extermination of millions of European Jews. In The Nazi Hunters, Neal Bascomb describes the hunt after the war for Adolf Eichmann, the Nazi who oversaw the deliverance of the Jews to the extermination camps.
Rudolf Vrba uses irony to highlight the absurdity of the reality of life in Auschwitz. Rudolf recounts his memories of July 17th, 1942, his seventeenth day in the camp. The officers and prisoners were preparing for the arrival of Reichsführer Heinrich Himmler, a high ranking SS officer.
The tone and mood of this story is pretty dark when it comes to the main event in the assembly when Georg’s dad and other innocent people were killed. I personally think the main purpose of this book is to teach the reader how not only Jews were affected horribly during this time but many other innocent people and also to show the things these people would of done to be safe, for example, in the book Georg had to stay still in a suit case for a whole night so he could get on a train that is leaving the country, during that time he was not being allowed to move he would be in pain but he cannot make a sound either since he could get caught so he just had to me cramped in a suit case for hours in pain unable to speak. I personally feel like this part truly in depth showed what people went through just to be
The violent actions of the Germans during this event force an image upon them that conveys the message that the Germans had little respect for the life of a person, specifically that of a follower of Judaism, and their capability to act viciously. If the Germans are acting so cruel and begin to act this way as an instinct towards the Jews, they are losing the ability to sympathize with other people. This would be losing the one thing that distinguishes a human from any other species, and this quote is an example of the dehumanization of the victim, as well as the perpetrator. Later on in Night, all the Jewish prisoners discover their fate at the camps and what will happen to people at the crematorium. They respond by saying to the people around them that they “...can’t let them kill us like that, like cattle in the slaughterhouse” (Wiesel 31). This simile develops the theme by comparing the Jewish prisoners to cattle in a slaughterhouse and emphasizes what little value their lives had to the Germans, implying they are not worthy of human qualities. The Germans are once again not able to emphasize with the Jews that are around them and being murdered, which over the course of the novel leads to them being
World War II started because of Hitler’s persuasive words that compelled the German people to follow him into anything. Hitler brought the brainwashed Germans into war against the world that should have never been fought because it made it seem like Germans were always doing the right thing. In Hitlers book Mein Kampf, Hitler writes, "All great movements are popular movements. They are the volcanic eruptions of human passions and emotions, stirred into activity by the ruthless Goddess of Distress or by the torch of the spoken word cast into the midst of the people" (Hitler). The world was given a piece of literature that was a piece of propaganda that benefited the Germans in many ways. They were given a scapegoat and something to believe in
The Germans can only be described as monsters, for their horrific acts of cruelty are wholly inhumane. During the Holocaust, the Germans strip the Jews of everything in their possession, to the point where the Jews are completely dehumanized. This is all a part of the Germans’ scheme to massacre the Jews with...
"She chops up these women 's stories in such a way that she has to reintroduce them to us constantly." She oversells her material to the point where the reader quickly gets frustrated and bored. An accurate summary of her thesis is, “most got away with murder” which she finally mentions at the end of the book. This thesis would have been useful if stated at the beginning instead of her feeble attempt at trying to build up suspense which was supposed to draw readers away from the cliché 's and repetitions, and instead, focus on the outcome of women in the Third Reich. Hence, Hitler’s Furies fails to fit the criteria of an academic resource concerning the History 358
"While fighting for victory the German soldier will observe the rules for chivalrous warfare. Cruelties and senseless destruction are below his standard" , or so the commandment printed in every German Soldiers paybook would have us believe. Yet during the Second World War thousands of Jews were victims of war crimes committed by Nazi's, whose actions subverted the code of conduct they claimed to uphold and contravened legislation outlined in the Geneva Convention. It is this legislature that has paved the way for the Jewish community and political leaders to attempt to redress the Nazi's violation, by prosecuting individuals allegedly responsible. Convicting Nazi criminals is an implicit declaration by post-World War II society that the Nazi regime's extermination of over five million Jews won't go unnoticed.
Botwinick writes in A History of the Holocaust, “The principle that resistance to evil was a moral duty did not exist for the vast majority of Germans. Not until the end of the war did men like Martin Niemoeller and Elie Wiesel arouse the world’s conscience to the realization that the bystander cannot escape guilt or shame” (pg. 45). In The Man in the High Castle, Philip K. Dick writes of a world where Niemoeller and Wiesel’s voices never would have surfaced and in which Germany not only never would have repented for the Holocaust, but would have prided itself upon it. Dick writes of a world where this detached and guiltless attitude prevails globally, a world where America clung on to its isolationist policies, where the Axis powers obtained world domination and effectively wiped Jews from the surface, forcing all resistance and culture to the underground and allowing for those in the 1960’s Nazi world to live without questioning the hate they were born into.
Is Justice worth having to accomplish even from sacrifices you have to make due to that person's crime?
... society, any one that was not an Aryan was inferior to their pure race. This race that included the characteristics of fair skin, blond hair, and blue eyes a pure German blood. Overall this movie should be shown to students so they can learn many things from this. Teach them a lesson about respect to others. So anyone who has disagreements with other people can understand that not everyone thinks the same and people need to learn how to accept others. Not two people think the same way. The question is, why would anyone stay in the place where they are not wanted? This question may have more than one answer, but it is for sure that the hope was never lost. Today’s society is more opened minded but we still have to learn many things in life. This movie is historically accurate because it was based on a true life event. This movie was amazing, any one should watch it.
The Nuremberg Trials was unethically run and violated the rights of the Nazi leaders who were convicted of committing crimes against humanity. Primarily because the Allies sought to use the trials as a way to remind the Germans, who won the war ‘again’. Thus making it similar to the Treaty of Versailles in (19- ), through implying this notion of “Victors’ Justice”. Nevertheless, the Allies did to an extent ‘try’ to make the tribunal as ethical as possible,
Throughout this novel the characters get themselves caught in webs of betrayal and corruption so that, at the end of the war, they may prevail and gain total world domination. Through the experiences of the characters it is learned that nobody can get ahead without causing someone else’s downfalls. Most importantly, this novel illustrates the selfishness of individuals and shows how people are willing to do whatever they need to ensure that they are solely benefited. This is clearly shown in the novel. Although the Duke, von Ribbentrop and Mussolini employed different schemes and methods, they each tried to achieve the same thing: total world domination. As a result, many peoples’ lives were lost or changed forever.
Hitler killed six million people among the people killed are the Franks and Vaan Daans. Before they were caught and killed they went into hiding in a secret annex that was hidden from the outside world. Being hidden from the outside had drastic changes on the characters moods and actions. As time passed, many historical events that occurred outside the annex influenced the moods and relationships of the characters.
Ironically, this is in part both an existential and Christian interpretation of The Trial. The idea that to be human is to be guilty arises from both Christian and existential ideology. The Christian concept stems from a Biblical interpretation that essentially states: When Adam ate from the Tree of Knowledge and fell from innocence, his sin was subsequently inherited by all of mankind from the moment they were born. This is called Original Sin, and the Christian belief is that the only way humans are redeemed from this sin and avoid Hell is, firstly, through Jesus Christ’s sacrifice of Himself and, secondly, through the adoption of Christ’s teachings. The Original Sin doctrine is important in The Trial because the story takes place in an increasingly Christian nationalist Germany, in which the prevalent Christian ideology permeated, at least on a subconscious level, nearly every aspect of everyday life and society. The idea that every human was born with Original Sin would have undoubtedly influenced K.’s and the Law’s perception of guilt in relation to his trial. K. himself even notes the ability of the court to “[pull] some profound guilt from somewhere where there was originally none at a...