Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The morals and ethics of electronic surveillance
Ethics of surveillance essays
Ethics of surveillance essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The morals and ethics of electronic surveillance
The Speaker Juan Enriquez’s main argument is to be wary of your “electronic tattoo”. He says just like real tattoos, electronic ones provide information about who and what you are just like a physical tattoo. It get hard to hide all the information you put onto the internet and programs like facial recognition development make it easier to find an individual across the large span of information. He also says companies like Face.com also implement facial recognition, they have 18 billion faces stored in their systems, and Juan Enriquez uses the example of a shopper going to a clothing store and a camera created by Face.com finds that person online and finds out they like little black dresses. Then the store could use that information to sell each individual on items that they know they like. …show more content…
He uses lessons from Greek mythology to point out possible consequences of our electronic tattoos, like Sisyphus and his bolder, our online mistakes can cause our reputations to plummet and we would have to slowly bring up again, or like Orpheus and his inability to look at his beloved, for us that means don’t look to closely into the past of loved ones or we could lose them. He also discusses Atalanta the great runner who challenged anyone, but was defeated by Hippomenes and his golden apples, for us that represents the many distractions, and narcissus which means for us don’t fall to vanity. Enriquez uses a combination of logical and emotional appeals within his argument, he uses Greek legends, the examples of physical tattoos to help his audience see the permanence and consequences of our electronic foot prints instead of obviously saying so, and he uses facts such as Face.com, and the development of facial recognition, and its commonality to show how easy it is to find out information on anyone in today’s modern
Tattoo’s that are removable are not romantic, and it’s the wuss way to do it. I believe that the main idea of this article is how she got a tattoo that most people would regret because of how much she picked at it, but she didn’t regret it like most people would. In one of the paragraphs she says how even though her tattoo is blurry, scarred, and bad-looking, but she still has no regrets about it unlike 17% of the people in America who have tattoo’s.
Tattoos on the Heart: The Power of Boundless Compassion by Gregory Boyle is one of the most inspirational book I have ever read. The book is comprised of multiple different stories from the life and work of the author himself, which makes this a realistic experience for the reader. These stories are of the Homeboys of Homeboys Industries, an organization founded by Father G, or Greg, in hopes of finding the light for gangs in California.
Kosut, M. (2006). An Ironic Fad: The Commodification And Consumption Of Tattoos. The Journal of Popular Culture, 39(6), 1035-1048. Retrieved November 29, 2013, from http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5931.2006.00333.x
It doesn’t lie really, but tells a dark, hidden truth. As time goes on, it is becoming more easy for the government to track us, for example our phones can be tracked by all sorts of people, hackers included. Records of our life can be stored online too, making it easier for people to find. Also, in their world, there are things like credit cards, but those are becoming less usable in stores, because the tattoo is what you use to pay for things. In our world, we shop online, and stores are having to shut down because of limited money. These are similar because smartphones could be compared to the barcode tattoo in many ways. So, I think you should read this book because it gives you an outlook on a society not to different from ours, and as we go further into the future, it might seem more and more similar to the dystopian
Many people have been getting tattoos lately. People of all ages have been getting them and from all different backgrounds. On a nice day in just about any public place one can spot a tattoo about every five minutes, from the business man who had a portrait of his daughter put on him to a young girl with a butterfly on her ankle and even people with extensive tattoo coverage. What is even more interesting is the rise in the number of people who are heavily tattooed and that they come from all different backgrounds. Not too long ago tattooing did not experience the popularity in mainstream culture that it does now. The question that must be asked in order to understand this fascination that popular culture has had with tattoos is why people get tattoos.
Tattoos are a waste of money, until you put a story to the art. For years’ adults have hated tattoos, and their rebellious teens loved them. Now looking around, more and more people are getting them, including elderly people. What caused this social change today?
A controversial topic today is whether or not body piercings and tattoos should be accepted by professionals working in health care. Currently, tattoos and piercings are allowed in health care as long as they are not visible. According to one of the studies, “Body piercing is defined as a piercing of the body anywhere other than the earlobes” (Westerfield). Therefore, the only visible piercings allowed are small studs in the lobes of the ears for females. The reason body piercings and tattoos are not suggested in health care is that they keep someone from looking professional as well as making them look intimidating. Not everyone sees them that way. The opposing side is that they do not affect
A persons’ image is vital when meeting someone for the first time. Our peers, employers, family, superiors, even strangers that you walk past can automatically judge someone, and imagine how they present themselves to the world. Tattoos have been predominantly linked with a rebellious attitude and pictured on out of control stereotypes such as rock starts, bikers, sailors, and disobedient teenagers who want nothing more than to hack off their parents. With a new coming of age generation and a step into a more lenient and liberal society these types of patrons still participate in body art but so do doctors, lawyers, or just the run of the mill house mom. Tattoos signify religious beliefs, cultural influence, or each individual’s sole style. Body art is no longer socially offensive, employers are more apt to hiring tatted hopeful applicants, parents are warming up to the idea of their children inking their body and no longer a stranger on the street with a tattoo is necessarily prejudged as a criminal or safety hazard. Tattoos have become more evolved over the years because they have become more of a socially accepted element of the general public.
“The impact on the world today through the history and visual reasoning behind tattoos, lead to the inquiry of personal life changing experiences.
That’s My Tracker.”, written by Peter Maass and Megha Rajagopalan, indicates that the, “...tracking device that happens to make calls...” are exploiting our identities far more than we know (Maass and Rajagopalan,P.129). It was shared that cellphone carriers disclosed and “...responded 1.3 million times last year to law enforcement requests for call data...” without warrants (Maass and Rajagopalan,P.129). These reporters enlighten that all the “explosion of GPS technology and smartphone apps...” as well as “...frictionless sharing...”or “...surveillance has caught our attention so much so that it blinded us from the ugly truth (Maass and Rajagopalan,P.129). In actuality, modern technology such as cellphones and surveillance cameras allow the government to know of it 's citizens location, conversations, and actions—“...treasured by police departments and online advertisers...”(Maass and Rajagopalan,P.130). The mania of technology and “...these invasive services have proved irresistible to consumers…” writes Paul Ohm (Maass and Rajagopalan,P.129). He states that the overly advertised technology is like a magnet to consumers because it continues to be bought and sold regardless of the facts
The trend of tattooing grew rapidly as a rebellious act in the early 80’s, however, tattooing actually dates back much further. The earliest record of tattoos was discovered back in 1991 on “the frozen remains of the Copper Age Iceman; scientists have named ‘Ötzi.’ His lower back, ankles, knees, and a foot were marked with a series of small lines, made by rubbing powdered charcoal into vertical cuts,” (Barbajosa, 2004). Despite the change in meaning or purpose for receiving a tattoo, it seems that there is sentimental value and the expression of self regardless of how times have changed. Five-thousand years ago, when the Ötzi’s tattoos were discovered, anthropologists perceived the meaning of his tattoos to be a symbol of accomplishment and an earned position in the community or even population. When a young adult turns 18, it’s a rite of passage to receive a tattoo, so the purpose is still there; however, having a purpose for a tattoo does not make it art.
Are tattoos a kiss of death at a workplace? According to Student Research Center, nearly 4 out of every 10 Americans in their 30s have been inked. ''In April 2000 15% of Americans were tattooed (which is roughly around 40 million people) (The National Geographic).'There are different types of tattoos, from color to black and white, even glow in the dark. Number of tattoo paralos in the U.S. is 21,000'' (Tattoo Statistics 1) and more is being added every single day. People spend about $1.6 billion on tattoos once a year. ''In the U.S. more women than men are tattooed, 36% of the ages is between 18-25 and 40% of those ages are 26-40 that have at least one tattoo.''(Random facts 1) People have been getting tattoos for a while now. It has been said that ''tattoos date back as far as the Neolithic era or around the fourth to fifth millennium BC.''(skinsight.com 1) Tattoos should be acceptable at a place of business because people get tattoos for significant purposes, tattoos can tell stories and build confidence, body art is a way for someone to express themselves, make up, and tattoos are reminders of life time experiences.
One important reason that advancements in technology are bad is Personal identifying information can be found by anyone who has a computer. People’s personal information, like address and medical history can be found, because almost everything is online. ID theft is a growing problem in the United States. “The scope of ID theft has grown so quickly that it now takes up a substantial and growing portion of law enforcement resources.” This means that ID theft is becoming a big problem. Once your ID is stolen it can be very difficult to get back what you lost.“Though the costs of getting your money back have declined, victims aren't getting back all of what was taken”. This means that when people’s things get stolen over the internet, they may not get everything back that was taken.Technology is so advances people’s personal information can be accessed by anyone with a laptop, and that is something that needs to be changed.
They want to explore the ways in which media, television, magazines, the Internet, and the highly publicized lives of celebrities influence the popularization of the tattoos today and the normalization of its practice. These authors start by venturing into the fashion industry and what has happened over recent years. They give a brief history of what fashion encompasses and end with the thought that the ways in which a person covers their body is, at the same time, a way of exhibiting it (Walzer and Sanjurjo 71). The authors then go on to show how in recent years the Internet and popular reality TV shows have influenced not only tattooed individuals but tattoo artists, too. They give examples of how tattoo studios and individual artists find it useful to have their own website and use platforms such as Facebook, Twitter, Tumbler, and Instagram. These websites and the Internet alone have allowed tattoo artists to show off their designs to the world, promote their business, and globalize the tattoo itself. Popularized television shows also helped with the promotion of tattoos. It all started with Miami Ink, LA Ink, and NY Ink. The authors explain that once these shows took off, so did the world. Madrid Ink popped up, London Ink, Ink Master, and shows such as America’s Worst Tattoos (Walzer and Sanjurjo
Security plays an important job in today’s society, which is to prohibit any type of incoming danger. People want to believe that security is accommodating sanctuary, on the other hand, it is just a false belief. In her article, “Trading Liberty for Illusions”, Wendy Kaminer, a lawyer, claims that people are giving up their privacy for security that is essentially non-existent. The reasons for Kaminer’s assertion is because of the problems of fear and distrust that are arising from face-recognition systems. From my perspective, Kaminer wants the readers, after reading the article, to regain their privacy and only trade it in for security that absolutely provides safety to the society.