Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Fate and free will
Fate and free will
Free will vs the influence of fate
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Fate and free will
Anton Chekhov and Joyce Carol Oates created different perspectives on the short story “The Lady with the Pet Dog.” Chekhov’s version offers a less dramatic and more comprehensible approach to the story’s situation.They express their ideas through their own unique structure, concept of fate, and character’s guilt. The unique structure of Oates’s and Chekhov’s story are differentiable. The structure of Oates's story is circular whereas Chekhov’s is linear. Oates's version starts off in later portions of the story and comes around to the same portion at the end. Chekhov’s story goes from point A to point B. The two authors have comparable styles with different layouts. While following the same story, they create their own unique version with contrasting writing styles and structures. Chekhov’s style is much more common and easier to follow for readers. Another comparable topic is the idea of fate. …show more content…
Oates's variant introduces Anna as severely depressed. Chekhov's version presents the character Anna Sergeyevna as risky and more open to cheating. Oates proclaims, “...[Anna] drew a razor drew a razor blade lightly across the inside of her arm, near the elbow, to see what would happen” (Oates 230). On the other hand, Chekhov mentions “Anna Sergeyevna was growing more and more attached to him” (Chekhov 223) and that “[...Anna Sergeyevna began coming to see him in Moscow” (Chekhov 222). Evidently, the two women in the stories have contrasting opinions on their love life. Anna from Oates’s version resorts to self harm and feels overly guilty whereas Chekhov's Anna Sergeyevna appears to do as her heart pleases in disregard to her marriage. Even though both of the Annas are reportedly guilty, they differ in how they take the matter into their own hands. Anna’s unstable emotions are a cause for a downfall in the story, therefore making Chekhov's version more
In the short stories, Marigolds by Eugenia Collier, and The Bet by Anton Chekhov, both Lizabeth and the Lawyer, along with their understanding of life, are similar, as well as very different. While both Lizabeth and the Lawyer develop a deeper understanding and knowledge of their situations by the end of each story, the processes that lead them to these realizations are very different, as race, gender, and social class all play a role in how the two characters develop.
This story mostly takes place in a vacation spot called Yalta. Throughout the whole story Yalta is explained as peaceful, romantic and with magical surroundings. The weather is warm and the scenery consists of white clouds over the mountaintops. The flowers smell of sweat fragrance and there is a gold streak from the moon on the sea. The two main character’s Gurov and Anna visit this vacation spot to get away from the lives that they are unhappy with. Both are unhappily married. The author explains Gurov as a women’s man, women are always attracted to him. However he thinks of women as the lower race. Knowing that women liked him, he always just played the game. He was always unfaithful to his wife. When he sees’s Anna walking around in Yalta with her dog he thought of it as just another fling. The character Anna is a good honest woman. When she is unfaithful to her husband for the first time she starts to cry to Gurov. She explains how she despises herself for being a low woman. This was the first time a person was not happy with Gurov. The soon realizes that she is unlike other women and describes her as strange and inappropriate. The story then takes a twist and Anna is to return home to her husband who is ill. This was their excuse that they need to part ways forever and stop this affair. Yet when Gurov returned home to Moscow he found himself lost without her. The
When we first meet Anna, Tolstoy describes his heroine as quite loving and maternal. She has come to console her sister-in-law Dolly Oblonskaya, who has just learned that her husband is having an affair with their French governess. Dolly is impressed by the fact that Anna not only remembers the names of all her nieces and nephews, "but remembered the years and even the months of their births, their characters, and what illnesses they had had" (79). The aim of Anna's visit is to reconcile Dolly and Stiva, an effort in which Anna's deep concern for family is revealed. So far, Anna's personality seems like that of an ideal 19th century Russian wife. However, as soon as she meets Count Vronksy at a ball, a mean streak seems to develop in her.
It seems as though Pyotr and Alexeich both represent different aspects of Chekhov’s father, and Chekhov himself is Anna. Chekov’s father was aloof from his family and came from a lower class background; like Modest Alexeich, Chekhov’s father also fawned at the feet of his social superiors. Chekhov, in contrast, was an unconventional boy. He eventually broke from his family’s lower class position and became a doctor; however, throughout his school and career he performed additional odd jobs to earn money he could send to his father. Also like Anna, Chekhov loved to be with people (Payne xiii, xvii-xxi). Comparing the two, then, it would seem as if Chekhov identifies with Anna as she struggles to find her social identity and wrestles with her desires and the needs of those she loves. This tone gives the story a melancholy mood and leads to a bittersweet conclusion. The ending seems happy for Anna, yet the reader is left to wonder what the ending represents. Did her father and husband receive the dues for their behavior? Are Anna’s actions a normal product of the transformation from youth to adulthood, or did she come to completely discard respect and
Anton Chekhov and Ernest Hemingway both convey their ideas of love in their respective stories The Lady with the Pet Dog and Hills like White Elephants in different ways. However, their ideas are quite varying, and may be interpreted differently by each individual reader. In their own, unique way, both Chekhov and Hemingway evince what is; and what is not love. Upon proper contemplation, one may observe that Hemingway, although not stating explicitly what love is; the genius found in his story is that he gives a very robust example of what may be mistaken as love, although not being true love. On the other hand, Chekhov exposes love as a frame of mind that may only be achieved upon making the acquaintance of the “right person,” and not as an ideal that one may palpate at one instance, and at the another instance one may cease to feel; upon simple and conscious command of the brain. I agree with Hemingway’s view on love because it goes straight to the point of revealing some misconceptions of love.
“The Lady with the Pet Dog” exhibits Anton Chekhov’s to convey such a powerful message in a minimal amount of words. He uses the element of color to show the emotions as well as changing feelings of the main characters, Dmitri Gurov and Anna Sergeyevna, and the contrast of them being apart to them being together. For example, when Anna leaves and they are apart, Dmitri seems to live in a world of grey. As he begins to age, his hair begins to turn grey, and he is usually sporting a grey suit. Yalta is where they met, and it is described as a romantic spot filled with color and vibrancy and freedom, like when Chekhov writes “the water was of a soft warm lilac hue, and there was a golden streak from the moon upon it.”
People in the world today have problems staying faithful to their loved ones. In the story, Gomov, who was married, cheated on his wife with many women. He also felt that men were an superior to woman: “He had begun to betray her with other women long ago, betrayed her frequently, and probably for that reason nearly always spoke ill of woman, and when they were discussed in his presence he would maintain that they were an inferior race”(81). He felt bitter towards women, and he would always talk bad about them by calling them names around his wife and others: “It seemed to him that his experience was bitter enough to give him the right to call them any name he liked”(81).
Since animals, usually pets, are sometimes an essential part of one’s life, it is not surprising that we find frequent references to its role in works of social realism, such as Wislawa Szymborska’s Poems New and Collected and Milan Kundera’s Unbearable Lightness of Being. Animals in literature could be used to symbolize all sorts of things, but in particular, animals may represent the personality of a character. This is because as humans and animals co-exist in the same atmosphere, certain aspects of a character reveal themselves in the compassion or even hatred towards the animal. Since animals are often known to trigger the interests of humans, the attitude of the humans towards the animals contributes much to character revelation. Both Szymborska and Kundera use animals to symbolize character personality in their works. Therefore, through looking at animals, although it does seem to be a very commonplace topic, we may gain insight to what the writers are trying to convey about the character. This paper will compare the ways the writers use animals to determine a character’s personality or characteristics.
Love is essential to human beings, however at times it fails to surpass certain limits due to a complex reality. In the story; “The Lady with the Dog” by Anton Chekhov, the syntax, tone, and diction all collaborate in order to portray the complications of overcoming temptations. Dmitri Gurov is a banker from Moscow who is fascinated by the appearance of a woman who happens to be walking alone, along the sea of Yalta. Gurov is a married man who also happens to have kids but unfortunately, he despises his wife whom he characterizes as ignorant (Chekhov, 166). Later on, he builds up a strong attraction towards Anna Sergeyevna and develops an affair with her. Chekhov portrays Gurov’s epiphany with a romantic atmosphere but also portrays his moral judgment by describing it as a path that will cause him nothing but misery. His diction and syntax also demonstrates change in the tone of the story, signifying the transformation in Gurov’s attitude towards the adultery he has committed and his attitude towards himself. Chekhov uses a different approach in the tone, in order to demonstrate a development in Gurov’s characteristic which supports the theme; Gurov and Anna’s affair,
It is winter time and “in the morning it was still dark when the children were having breakfast and getting ready for school” , when Dmitri returns to Moscow (Chekhov 171). The cold, dark setting creates a depressed mood, unlike the mood when the two were in Yalta. This glum mood prompts Dmitri to begin to long for his secret mistress, Anna. “When he shut his eyes he saw her as though she were living before him, and she seemed to him lovelier, younger, tenderer than she was” (Chekhov 172). Realizing something was different about his relationship with Anna from the previous women he had cheated on his wife with, he decides to go find her. This is when he understands that he loves Anna. Had Dmitri not missed the woman in the lonesome winter months, he might have not gone to look for her and the two may have never see each other again.
In Anton Chekhov 's story "The Lady With the Pet Dog" the main themes in the story are romance and deception, which both completely contradict each other. In this story there was no climax or conclusion but Chekhov wrote it in a way that keeps readers engaged. There seems to be almost no point to this story by the end, however with Chekhov 's writing technique he was able to create a story that draws readers’ attention. There were multiple internal conflicts in "The Lady With the Pet Dog” that the two main characters faced.
In Miss Julie, by August Strindberg wrote about the naturalistic view of human behavior. He symbolizes the behavior through animal imagery. The animal image Strindberg uses helps him exemplify his naturalistic view. The first animal imagery Strindberg uses is the dog. Jean uses the dog imagery to describe to Kristen how Miss Julie made her ex-fiancé act before the break-up. “ Why, she was making him jump over her riding whip the way you teach a dog to jump.” A dog is mans best friend only because a dog is an extremely loyal animal. Having Jean compare what Miss Julies did to her ex-fiancé with what some one would do to a dog shows Miss Julies drive to be the dominant one or the master. Strindberg again uses the imagery of a dog when he has Miss Julie say, “dog who wears my collar” to Jean. Miss Julie feels that her social status is so much superior to that of Jean that their relationship could be compared to that of a master and his dog. The dog imagery in the play is also used to demonstrate the difference in social classes. In the play Miss Julie’s dog, Diana, is impregnated by the lodge-keepers pug. Kristen demonstrates Miss Julie’s disgust when she says; “She almost had poor Diana shot for running after the lodge-keepers pug.” The sexual affair between the dogs also represents the sexual affair between Jean and Miss Julie and how the two of them look down on each other. Jean looks down on Miss Julie for being surprisingly easy to obtain. While Miss Julie loo...
The story “The Darling” by Anton Chekhov, illustrates a woman that is lonely, insecure, and lacking wholeness of oneself without a man in her life. This woman, Olenka, nicknamed “Darling” is compassionate, gentle and sentimental. Olenka is portrayed for being conventional, a woman who is reliant, diligent, and idea less. Although, this story portrays that this woman, known as the Darling needs some sort of male to be emotionally dependant upon, it is as if she is a black widow, she is able to win affection, but without respect. Only able to find happiness through the refection of the beliefs of her lovers, she never evolves within the story.
Matlaw, Ralph E. Anton Chekhov¡¦s Short Stories: Texts of the Stories Bachgrounds Criticism. New York: W.W. Norton & Company Inc., 1979.
Kate Chopin and Anton Chekhov incorporate imagery, short lived events, and diction into their stories, “The Story of an Hour” and “The Lottery Ticket” to reveal a series of the protagonists’ feelings. Kate Chopin employs: imagery to activate Mrs. Mallard’s feelings, particular diction to show Mrs. Mallard’s past and the possibility of her future, the events that take place in an hour are short lived to show distinct phases of emotions she experiences. On contrary, Anton Chekhov employs: imagery to activate Ivan Dmitritch’s fantasies, particular dictions to show Ivan’s present and hope for future, the events take that place are also short lived in order to reveal Ivan’s distinct inner characteristics. THESIS