Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The giver analytical essay
The giver analytical essay
The Giver book analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The giver analytical essay
Imagine a world without problems, one where everyone is equal and treated the same way. In the book, The Giver by Lois Lowry, Jonas lives in a society that is very much like this world. Clearly, Jonas’ utopian community is a better place to live than Elsewhere for many beneficial reasons. Although some people could argue that living in Elsewhere is better because of freedom of choice, speech, and overall independence for many things. In reality, though, Jonas’ community is the better one to be a part of because of the lack of racism, a good way to deal with population control, the lack of love and attraction, and the way of dealing with job choosing. Overall, Jonas’ Community is the better place to live in.
Jonas’ community is beneficial because
…show more content…
One way that they have done this is by removing color. On page 97, it states that, “ The giver told him that it would be a very long time before he had the colors to keep.” This quote shows that Jonas has never, and would have never known that color exists if he had not gotten memories of them. Although this seems horrifying, just like release, it actually has benefits. Not having color gets rid of racism, and discrimination of color. This way everyone treats everyone equally, and doesn’t neglect anyone. Color also makes something more superior compared to others, which could create conflict. This could make one person’s tunic look better than another’s. But when color is eliminated, equality is maintained. In Elsewhere, though, these problems persist. This could act as a distraction in school, work, or anywhere where interaction is needed. This easy method of getting rid of colors has a slight set-back, but it is for the greater good. So in the end, eliminating color helps everyone put all their effort into helping the community thrive. Another way that Jonas’ community reduces distraction is by getting rid of love and attraction. On page 37, it states that, “ A reminder that stirrings must be reported for treatment to take place.” This quote refers to stirrings, or the wanting. This is a basic form of attraction toward other people. This is a distraction, to the learning environment and tasks in life. And instead of choosing a spouse, just like jobs, they are chosen. The elders take a long time to pair you up with a spouse, so there is no disagreement. This also helps stop attraction, and makes people focus on their lives. In addition, if someone applies for a spouse, they will get one no matter what. On the contrary, in Elsewhere, people might not get the one that they want, nevertheless anyone. Attraction and love is actually very common and is a part of its
First of all, I think The Giver is a dystopia because they don't have color. The article states, “The Giver told him that it would be a very long time before he had the colors to keep.” (Document E) This proves that they have no color, I think that by taking away color there would be no happiness or imagination. If jonas’s community had color there would be more happiness and personal opinions about things like, “ what color do you like”.Without color you would be taking away the freedom to have an opinion towards other people, but in jonas’s community they limit their freedom to do lots of things and the people in the community don’t notice it. Another Example is stated in the text it says, “But
To begin with, in The Truman Show, Truman wanted to go somewhere else. He wanted to go to Fiji. Truman kept on telling himself that he was going to go. He wanted to get out of his place and find somewhere new. Truman kept trying and trying to get a flight or take a bus but because his society was watching him they made sure that there was no way to leave. Than in The Giver, Jonas wanted to go elsewhere. He wanted to experience different things. Jonas wanted to see what else was in the world for him. He did not want to be cooped up in his utopian society forever. The people in Jonas’s society did not know what the difference was between their society and elsewhere. Everyone just grew up knowing what they still know. They both want to leave their utopian societies. They both want
Throughout the history of the world, there has been many societies. All these societies had similar structures and ideas, but they all are different by their own special traditions and ways of life. Similarly, both our society and the society in The Giver share similar ideas, but they are different in certain areas. For example, they both celebrate birthdays and have family units, but they have their own way of doing so. Based on the celebration of birthdays and the formation of family units, our society is better than the society in The Giver by Lois Lowry.
Lois Lowry describes a futuristic world with controlled climate, emotions, way of living and eliminates suffering in her book The Giver. The main character, Jonas, shows the reader what his world is like by explaining a very different world from what society knows today. Everything is controlled, and no one makes choices for themselves or knows of bad and hurtful memories. There is no color, and everything is dull. As he becomes the Receiver who has to know all the memories and pass them down to the next Receiver, he realizes his world needs change. He starts to believe that a world of sameness where no one can decide or make choices for themselves is boring. Lois Lowry is warning readers that living in a world of sameness is not something to create as it is boring and dull, but if the world follows conformity and does not value diversity and difference enough, society could become that of Jonas’s.
“I knew that there had been times in the past-terrible times-when people had destroyed others in haste, in fear, and had brought about their own destruction” (48). In the old days, when people in Jonas’s community valued individual needs, there were lots of terrible happenings: violence; and then the society ended up with general welfare and safety. It is difficult for us to think of a world without color, freedom, music and love, but in The Giver, the society denounces these things in order to make room for peace and safety. In The Giver, by having a society based on general welfare they gave safety to their people. No violence, no criminal activities, nor homicides.
As Jonas receives these memories, he ponders how their community would be different if they could make more choices. For example, after the Giver transmits Jonas a memory of family, Jonas thinks how crazy it is that they have generations and he says about his community, “‘What if they were allowed to choose their own mate?’”...”’Or what if’”...”’they could choose their own jobs?’” (124). Jonas then thinks if people should make these choices, and things that could go wrong if they did. For instance, while he is thinking about how crazy these choices are, he says, “‘I can’t even imagine it. We really have to protect people from wrong choices’”(124). People in his Community don’t choose their own spouse, the Community leaders assign them a spouse and children if they want. Jonas’s Community is brain-washed into not having opinions or choices. Although they have no divorce and wrong choices, Jonas would rather have choices and a real
In this community of The Giver, the advantages get outweighed by the disadvantages. The citizens get harsh punishments for the smallest issues, no one in the community (except Jonas after a while and The Giver) gets to experience real emotions that are actually what they feel-not what they think they feel, and they kill/release innocent newchildren that don’t weigh enough or aren’t maturing fast enough. When you weigh the pros and cons of being in the community, you can see that people would be much better off living out of it, rather than being a part of the
The story in The Giver by Lois Lowry takes place in a community that is not normal. People cannot see color, it is an offense for somebody to touch others, and the community assigns people jobs and children. This unnamed community shown through Jonas’ eye, the main character in this novel, is a perfect society. There is no war, crime, and hunger. Most readers might take it for granted that the community in The Giver differs from the real society. However, there are several affinities between the society in present day and that in this fiction: estrangement of elderly people, suffering of surrogate mothers, and wanting of euthanasia.
Like any child in the community, Jonas is uncomfortable with the attention he receives when he is singled out as the new Receiver, preferring to blend in with his friends. Once Jonas begins his training with the Giver, however, the tendencies he showed in his earlier life—his sensitivity, his heightened perceptual powers, his kindness to and interest in people, his curiosity about new experiences, his honesty, and his high intelligence—make him extremely absorbed in the memories the Giver has to transmit. In turn, the memories, with their rich sensory and emotional experiences, enhance all of Jonas’s unusual qualities. Within a year of training, he becomes extremely sensitive to beauty, pleasure, and suffering, deeply loving toward his family and the Giver, and fiercely passionate about his new beliefs and feelings. Things about the community that used to be mildly perplexing or troubling are now intensely frustrating or depressing, and Jonas’s inherent concern for others and desire for justice makes him yearn to make changes in the community, both to awaken other people to the richness of life and to stop the casual cruelty that is practiced in the community.
Set in a community with no climate, emotions, choices, or memories Lois Lowry tells the tale of Jonas in The Giver. Jonas is selected to be the receiver of memory, which means the memories of generations past, before the community was created, will all be transferred to him to hold. As Jonas receives memories his concept of the world around him drastically changes. Jonas starts out as twelve-year-old boy with perceptions different from those around him, he then begins to see the community for what it really is, and he makes a plan to change it.
The Giver presents a community that appears to be perfect on the surface. Jonas's community is free of warfare, pain, sorrow and other bitterness we suffer in our society. The world seems to be secure and undergoes little conflict. Such a community seems flawless and is the idealistic society that we longed to live in. However, through Jonas's training, the imperfections of the Utopian community are revealed.
Lowry writes The Giver in the dystopian genre to convey a worst-case scenario as to how modern society functions. A dystopia is an “illusion of a perfect society” under some form of control which makes criticism about a “societal norm” (Wright). Characteristics of a dystopian include restricted freedoms, society is under constant surveillance, and the citizens live in a dehumanized state and conform to uniform expectations (Wright). In The Giver, the community functions as a dystopian because everyone in the community conforms to the same rules and expectations. One would think that a community living with set rules and expectations would be better off, but in reality, it only limits what life has to offer. Instead, the community in the novel is a dystopian disguised as a utopian, and this is proven to the audience by the protagonist, Jonas. Jonas is just a norma...
Jonas hates how his society decides to keep memories a secret from everyone. Jonas says: “The worst part of holding the memories is not the pain. It’s the loneliness of it. Memories need to be shared” (Lowry 154). Jonas feels that memories, whether it be good or bad, should be shared with everyone. Furthermore, memories allow the community to gain wisdom from remembering experiences of the past. As for The Giver, The Giver disagrees with how the community runs things. He believes that memories should be experienced by everyone as well, because life is meaningless without memories. The Giver says: “There are so many things I could tell them; things I wish they would change. But they don’t want change. Life here is so orderly, so predictable–so painless. It’s what they’ve chosen [...] It’s just that… without memories, it’s all meaningless. They gave that burden to me” (Lowry 103). The Giver is burdened with the responsibility to not share memories even though that is what he feels the community deserves. In addition, he believes the community lives a very monotonous life where nothing ever changes. Everything is meaningless without memories because the community does not know what it is like to be human without feelings. Overall, Jonas and The Giver’s outlooks on their “utopian” society change as they realize that without
The short story Harrison Bergeron helps support the idea that all Utopias are going to fail. In Harrison Bergeron characters like him find flaws in their “perfect” community and do something about it. In the Giver, Jonas is the character that rebels against the community because he is able to see past the lies set up by the elders and see the bad parts of it. Another reason it failed was because of the pain from the handicaps. Jonas’s community doesn’t experience any pain,except for Jonas and the Giver, Jonas makes a stand by escaping and leaving the memories of pain for the rest of the community.
Jonas’ community chooses Sameness rather than valuing individual expression. Although the possibility of individual choice sometimes involves risk, it also exposes Jonas to a wide range of joyful experiences from which his community has been shut away. Sameness may not be the best thing in the community because Jonas expresses how much he feels like Sameness is not right and wants there to be more individuality. Giver leads him to understand both the advantages and the disadvantages of personal choice, and in the end, he considers the risks worth the benefits. “Memories are forever.”