Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Important court cases in us government
Important court cases in us government
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Chief Justice Roberts An interesting chief of justice is John Roberts. Reason for this being is that he has participated in many important case in which have related to the violation of the first amendment. Chief Justice Roberts has had a successful start to his career and will be known for his very interesting cases and arguments. During his early life, John Roberts was the ideal student by displaying hard work and dedication in all of his studies and also participating in school sports such as wrestling and football where he was given the honor to be captain of the team. He was also very successful in college after graduating from Harvard College and Harvard Law both with honors. Many can find the present Chief of Justice as admirable considering all of his successes in college and how it is understandable that someone with that type of background deserves a position in the supreme court. On September 6th of 2005, President George Bush nominated John Roberts as the Chief of Justice of the United States which considered him to be the youngest Chief of Justice next to John Marshall at age 50. Since then, John Roberts has been serving his people in the supreme court by participating in many cases such as Roe vs. Wade, have been very controversial and regardless of which side he argues, will always leave some people …show more content…
One of which includes Rancho Viejo vs. Norton. Not only was he for making the shopping mall but he ignored the fact that this would interfere with an already endangered species. He was also part of the group that allowed a police officer to unlawfully search a vehicle without a warrant during the US. Vs. Brown case. John Roberts also voted for the Obama care act in which was almost denied as it was considered unconstitutional. Despite having a successful background, John Roberts can considerably be noted as being very controversial as he has made some arguable calls in his
Jarrod J. Rein is an eighteen-year-old with dark brown hair and brown eyes to match the brown arid dirt of Piedmont, Oklahoma. His skin is a smooth warm tan glow that opposes his white smile making his teeth look like snow. Standing a great height of six foot exactly, his structure resembles a bear. He is attending Piedmont high school where he in his last year of high school (senior year). He is studying to be a forensics anthropologist. Also he is studying early in the field of anatomy to be successful in his profession. While not always on the rise for knowledge Jarrod’s swimming for his high school. In a sense it’s like you see double.
Prior to serving as the Chief Justice of the United States, Roberts served in many positions withing the legal field. Upon graduation for Harvard Law School he served as a law clerk for Judge Henry Friendly on the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. After about a year, he clerked for the future Chief Justice, William...
The decision was a 6-3 decision. The Justices that agreed with the ruling of the court were Brennan, Marshall, Blackmun, White, Stevens, and O’Connor. The Justices that did not agree were Powell, Berger, and Rehnquist.
In Francis N. Stites' book, John Marshall, Defender of the Constitution, he tells the story of John Marshall's life by breaking up his life into different roles such as a Virginian, Lawyer, Federalist, National Hero, and as Chief of Justice.
There have been many, many court cases throughout the history of the United States. One important case that I believe to be important is the court case of Clinton v. New York. This case involves more than just President Bill Clinton, the City of New York. It involved Snake River Farmers’ as well. This case mostly revolves around the president’s power of the line item veto.
Chief Justice John Marshall was an intelligent man who served in the United States Supreme Court from 1801 until the year 1835. During this time, Marshall heard over 1,000 cases and wrote 519 decisions (Fox). One of the cases he heard took place in 1824, and it’s known as Gibbons v. Ogden. This case is a rather simple one, but an important one nonetheless. A problem arose when two men, named Thomas Gibbons and Aaron Ogden, found out that they were both operating steamboat ferries along the same route. These men had both received permission to operate their steamboats from two different places. Gibbons received permission from the Federal Government, while Ogden had received his from a state government. When the case reached the Supreme Court,
The judicial power, also known back then as The Weakest Branch, was created to achieve an effective collaboration of the powers, what we call now Check and Balances. One of the framers of the Judicial Power was John Marshall. Chief Justice John Marshall is one of the main figures in the history of the US Judicial System. He was the youngest Chief Justices in the history of the United States and was the developer of the most important power of the Supreme Court, The Judicial Review.
Justice John Paul Stevens initially took a moderate stance on abortion rights prior to and immediately after joining the Supreme Court. When President Gerald Ford nominated then-Judge Stevens, abortion rights were not as politically controversial as they are today. In a sense, Justice Stevens did not have to take a strong stance on abortion in order to make it onto the Supreme Court. As his time on the Supreme Court went on, Justice Stevens developed a more pro-choice stance in deciding abortion rights cases. After the Reagan-era rise of conservative Republicans, evangelical abortion advocates emerged to the forefront of American politics and media. Justice Stevens always recognized the right to choose established in Roe v. Wade, but may not have felt the strong need to preserve and protect it early in his career. As the years went on, Justice Stevens’ abortion jurisprudence developed into a more pro-choice friendly jurisprudence than that which he initially espoused, likely due to the increased controversial nature of the abortion debate. Justice Stevens felt the need to protect and preserve the stare decisis first established in Roe. In some of the later cases, Justice Stevens developed a strategy to approaching abortion cases and realized that some compromise was required in order to preserve the right to choose. In the early 1990s, Stevens acted as almost a mediator between the liberal and conservative Justices. Stevens did what he could to preserve the fundamental rights from Roe.
Whether you agree or disagree with Chief Justice Roberts’s jurisprudence, the fact that he is unique is undeniable. Not only does he hold the highest position in the legal world but he also has a number of non-judicial duties as well, such as leading the Judicial Conference of the United States, Chancellor of the Smithsonian Institution and most importantly administering the oat of office of at Presidential inaugurations. The presidential inauguration of 2009 marked Chief Justices first inauguration of a president. This was the first time a president was sworn in by a Chief Justice whose confirmation he opposed.
The strategic model acknowledges that judges seek to achieve policy goals, but it also acknowledges that they are subject to certain restrictions in doing so. Since they cannot act accordingly to preference, they must act strategically to achieve their goals given by the restrictions. It argues that like politicians, justices make their decisions based off other’s decisions or make their decisions while trying to determine how another person will react from it. This decision style says justices would base their decisions on the influence of other justices.
The present members of the Supreme Court are as follows: William Hubbs Rhenquist, Chief Justice: born 1924 in Wisconsin, graduated Stanford Law School. He was an assistant Attorney General from 1969 till 1971 when President Nixon appointed him to the Court. 1986 President Reagan appointed him Chief Jus...
The Honorable Earl Warren served as the chief justice of the United States Supreme Court from 1953-1969. During his time on the bench, the Court utilized Judicial Review to analyze and overturn both federal and state statues. This was accomplished but applying the provisions set forth in the
Over 30,000 cases have been heard since the Supreme Court existed but only a few have actually been chosen to be ruled on. Many cases not only affect those involved personally but they affect the American people as a whole. Jane Roe was an unmarried and pregnant Texas resident in 1970 who was trying to have an abortion and claimed that Texas law violated her First, Fourth, Fifth Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights . Roe v. Wade was a very important case to all woman then and now because it ensured the right that woman have to choose whether or not to have an abortion. This case impacted the political, social, and economic society of the American woman, men, and families still to this day.
During his time on the Supreme court, he had almost thirty court victories (1). Not only was he a justice, he was a monumental civil rights leader who made major changes to the law during this time. In October 1967, appointed by President Lyndon B. Johnson, he was sworn in as the first black member of the Supreme Court. He remained a stalwart defender of civil rights and individual liberties until his retirement in 1991 (Marshall, Thurgood).Taking a step back to Marshall’s youth, he started to be passionate about civil rights very early in his life and acquired his strongest belief from his mentor, Charles Hudson. Hudson believed in defeat of racial discrimination through the use of existing laws(1). Thurgood Marshall used his understanding of the constitution and the government to call forth change in
Mr. Chief Justice Warren. “Loving ET UX. v. Virginia .” Supreme Court Of The United