Warren Court Case Analysis

The Warren Court refers to the Supreme Court of the United States between 1953 and 1969, when Earl Warren served as Chief Justice. The Warren Courts were the catalyst for change in the areas of discrimination based on factors of faith, race or other categorizations was the catalyst for the evolution of reappointment and voting, established Maranda, and laid the ground work for woman to have the right to make decisions concerning own reproduction rights.
The Honorable Earl Warren served as the chief justice of the United States Supreme Court from 1953-1969. During his time on the bench, the Court utilized Judicial Review to analyze and overturn both federal and state statues. This was accomplished but applying the provisions set forth in the

Bill of Rights. The use of which, created an opportunity for groups who had not previously had the ability to participate in the political process. Dunning the period that Warren served, the Courts approach could be described as “increasingly liberal and activist.” Fueling complaints from those who were consultative, both politically and judicially. Many of these who were conservative felt that Court has overstepped, its constitutional role and had evolved into legislative body. The Warren Court was a “catalyst for change”, in particular for instituting change, instead of folding to applied pressure from other branches of government, who desired that the court remain conservative.
The Warren Court demonstrated its resolve to promote a “libertarian and egalitarian society.” It utilized the Strict Scrutiny test of the constitutional review to make changes to laws that were in direct violation of basic constitutional rights, or lessened the ability to use them, by a large amount of the population. The Court also made great strides in overturning existing legislations that was discriminatory based on factors of faith, race or other categorizations. In cases of stringent examination, the government is burdened with demonstrating that a laws may have been developed to “minimize the restriction on the fundamental right.” This transformed federal courts into mechanisms of change, working to protect the interests, of individuals who were not powerful or popular within society; to protect those who had historically been victimized “pervasive historical, political, economic, and social discrimination.”
Discrimination Based on Race
In what could be argued as the most significant decision made by the Warren Court was Brown V.

Board of Education; in which the court overturned the 1896 Supreme Court decision of Plessy V. Ferguson, which allowed for societal segregation. The Court made its decision based on the violation of the Equal Protection Clause found in the 14 amendment. The overruling of Brown was the catalyst that lead to the advancement of Civil

Rights.
Evolution of Reappointment and Voting
Warren modernized the Voting and Reappointment by removing the state poll tax and property qualification, arbitrary residency requirements.

The Court also created an evolution in legislative reapportionment cases. Reynolds V. Sim lead to State legislatures being forced to be distributed equally, based on population, instead of geographic areas.

Criminal Procedure
Miranda V. Arizona may be considered to the most controversial criminal procedure case. The result was that law enforcement must inform people who are being arrested of their right to remain silent, and their right to have an attorney pressing for questioning.
Right to Privacy
Griswold V. Connecticut may have been the most significant of the Warren Courts Rulings: it struck down a Connecticut statute that banned the dissemination of information concerning birth control, which can be considered the foundation of Roe V. Wade, which provided prochoice rights to women.

Earl Warren was the Chief Justice of the United States Supreme court form from 1953-1969. During his tenure he made efforts to create a more “libertarian and egalitarian society.” The Court during this period contributed to ridding society of discrimination based on factors of faith, race or other categorizations was the catalyst for the evolution of reappointment and voting, established Maranda, and laid the ground work for woman to have the right to make decisions concerning own reproduction

rights.