More handpicked essays just for you.
Lessons learned from writing a personal narrative
Lessons learned from writing a personal narrative
Good personal narratives
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
John Q is a emotional story about a family who is faced with an economical problem that many Americans struggle with. It is about a father whose son is dying from an enlarged heart. He needs a heart transplant in order to survive. This was a problem for the family because they did not have enough money for the hospital to proceed with the operation. John Quincy Archibald, the father, who goes by the alias John Q, tries everything in his power to save his son from dying. John performed actions that can be seen as both selfless and sacrificial and selfish.
John is selfless because he is looking for a heart for is son,committed to his family despite their less than ideal life. He never intended to shoot the hostages and he never had any bullets in the gun.was john choosing the right method to save his son no, he did not,though he thought it was he tried to get the money that they needed by: selling off his possessions, tried to find a job that paid more money and had better insurance plans, church donations, media the time was ticking to get his son on the donor list.
…show more content…
John performed a sacrifical for his son to live.
he was willing to kill himself to save mikey. why did rebecca payne change her attitude towards the archibald and helps them find a donor for their son.because she saw the conversation between john and mikey change her opinion.what change the attitude of Dr.Turner.because john’s pleading with Dr.Turner caused him to change his mind. If John was going to kill himself and there was a good heart available, he would do it .Ultimately, John’s selflessness was what caused both of them to change their mind. There was so much emotion behind his
actions. John is also selfish he did not want to accept that his son would die.john collected door to door donation.he holds people hostage to try to benefit himself (blackmailing the hospital to put his son on the donor list).he uses the media he also tryed everything he does is about his son, he does not make references to anyone else who is waiting to get on the donor list. at the end of the movie do i think the jury’s decision was fair i think yes because they listened to each side before they make the final decision if he was guilty or not guilty. they found him not guilty of “assault with a deadly weapon” and “armed criminal action”, but he was found guilty of “false imprisonment”. This is the only criminal act that he actually committed, therefore it makes sense that this was the only charge against him.When he was not found guilty of the dangerous charges, it further shows that he is not being selfish. He did not bring harm to the other people.
John is a cowboy and as with all cowboys, their lives all revolve around the horse. While he is at home at his grandfath...
John, as mentioned in the last paragraph, is also at fault when it comes to the lack of communication in his relationship with Ann. He’s described by Ann as slow and not good with conversation. He’s a very work driven man, and it makes it difficult for him to sit with Ann and have a nice, relaxed conversation. Ultimately, because he is a farmer, he doesn’t have many chances to have a nice long talk with his wife, so the lack of communication is not solely Ann’s fault. John, after discovering that his wife has cheated on him after 7 years of marriage, doesn’t confront her. He doesn’t attempt to speak with her at all; instead he decides that her happiness is more important, and it’s implied that he walks back out into the snowstorm and kills himself. Obviously, John’s death could have been avoided if he had actually said something to Ann before committing suicide. However, this can be considered as a very crucial moment of the story, as it proves why a lack of communication is important in a relationship, though to a very extreme measure. Because Ann, and John especially, didn’t have experience sharing their thoughts when they were unhappy, John didn’t have the ability to speak his mind when he needed to the most. They could have potentially talked about it and found a result that wouldn’t have ended in John’s death, even if it hadn’t been the happiest of endings. However, because there was very little communication in their relationship, the two couldn’t find a way to resolve their problems, and it ended in John committing
John's decision to commit suicide was the right thing to do to make Ann happy. John thought that killing himself would make it easier for her to stay with Steven, who he thinks that she loves. John made a decision about his own life so he has the right to choose to kill himself. He also just wants Ann to be happy. He is "naively proud of Ann. He had bewildered by it once, her caring for a dull-witted fellow like him: then assured al last of her affection he had relaxed against it gratefully, unsuspecting it might ever be less constant than his own." (Pg.49) In John's mind he was making the right decision, so he was free to make it.
In conclusion, we can see that there were various “bad guys” throughout this movie. In the minds of these “bad guys”, the image of what was truly right and wrong was clouded by policies and money. Without John’s actions these “bad guy” characters may have let an innocent eight year old boy die, due to pieces of paper and coins. On a positive note; more or less of these “bad guys” did end up doing the right thing at the end of the movie. This movie shows the viewers that though there are “bad guys” in the world with selfish and uncivil actions, there is potentially hope for them to correct themselves, if they are shown what is truly right and just.
I chose the movie John Q to apply to the conflict perspective. This movie stars Denzel Washington, Robert Duvall, James Wood, and Ray Liotta. Denzel plays the part of a father, John Archibald, who has been a factory worker for over fifteen years. While attending his son’s, Mikey, softball game Mikey collapses while running to first base. John and his wife rush him to the hospital and discover Mikey’s heart is three times larger than it should be and he will need a heart transplant in order to live. The only problem is the heart transplant costs $ 270,000 and their needs to be a down payment of at least $ 75,000 to put a name on the donor list. With john working in a factory and his wife just being a waitress they clearly do not have that kind of money and are even having a hard time paying their bills at home. They have no stocks or bonds, $ 1,000 in their bank account, and don’t even own their home plus their insurance will not cover the surgery. If Mikey does not undergo surgery he will only have a few months to live. This leads John and his wife to do everything in their power to raise money. They sell their television, car, and furniture along with the church giving them the collection money. Filling for Medicade , welfare, and different insurance does not work and are out of luck at this point. John decides he needs to do something quick or he will lose his son soon. He goes to the head person of cardiology, Dr. Turner, holds a gun to his back and tells him to do something to help his soon. He ends up holding the entire emergency room in hostage and chains the doors shut. He says that if his son’s name is put on the list then he will let the hostages go and no one will get hurt. Rebecca Paine, the hospital manager, lies to Jo...
...rationally, which resulted in “catastrophic thinking.” In order to cope with his tremendous amount of stress, Archibald made an attempt to give up by attempting suicide, so his son could have his heart. Although several people tried to convince him not to kill himself, his catastrophic thinking and behavior was not eliminated until his wife informed him that his son would be receiving a heart within the next few minutes. John Q. Archibald then returned to his normal state of mind, let the hostages go, and turned himself in to authorities.
...ssion and intrusiveness. John’s lack of having an open mind to his wife’s thoughts and opinions and his constant childish like treatment of his wife somehow emphasizes this point, although, this may not have been his intention. The narrator felt strongly that her thoughts and feelings were being disregarded and ignored as stated by the narrator “John does not know how much I really suffer. He knows there is no reason to suffer, and that satisfies him” (Gilman 115), and she shows her despise of her husband giving extra care to what he considers more important cases over his wife’s case with a sarcastic notion “I am glad my case is not serious!” (Gilman 115). It is very doubtful that John is the villain of the story, his good intentions towards doing everything practical and possible to help his wife gain her strength and wellbeing is clear throughout the story.
John’s quest to be closer to God was phenomenal. I too have had a rocky relationship with my father and like John has had to fight the demons caused by that relationship and atoned for them. It is very important to practice forgiveness. I believe that John has done that. Hatred is a heavy burden to bare, and lead to destruction. I believe through his newfound relationship with God, he will forgive then rebuild his relationship with his father. And has proven to me that he’s embarked on his quest with integrity and dignity.
We learn that John is saved from experiencing an awful time in Vietnam because of his friend Owen who chops off his finger. " Maybe. But if she 'd only come, I could make it clear to her." (Beloved), Sethe says this quote in a conversation with Denver about Beloved’s ghost and how she is raising hell throughout the house, but “Sethe is still defending her when Denver criticizes her” (Dramaticfictionquestions).
Although throughout the story I feel that Robby is an okay person and a truthful one at that, there was still something behind John’s thoughts and words. There were some things that he needed to come clean about to himself, Robby, and his mother, but he remained silent. That made Robby look like the better person because if anything their mother taught them to be truthful.
In the end we find out that John had not raped and killed the two little girls he was found with, but instead he had happened upon them and tried to bring them back to life; only it was too late. Seeing the fantastical nature of the situation the guards who knew the truth were unable to free John of the charges he was facing and they had to kill him anyways.
Then tragedy struck the family, John’s grandfather died and John felt so alone that he tried to commit suicide. Throughout John’s childhood and teenage years, he struggled with having a normal life. John’s even reconnected with his mother after her release from prison but her drug addiction and being prostitute lead John into trouble. John’s mother started having him shoplift for her to support them financially. John even started stealing from his high school classmates and he was eventually sent to an alternative school. John life continued to spiral downhill and later he was arrested for breaking into a house after police found his fingerprints on a stolen gun. As a juvenile, John was sent a juvenile facility. He served his time but John became a repeat offender for home evasions and judge finally got tired and sent him to a prison. The adult prison life would change 17 year old John
In addition to the above, John was a go-getter and a calculated risk taker. Even though his act of abduction seemed impulsive, a scene before his act saw him thinking intently about what he was going to do and how exactly he was going to achieve it. He had one goal in mind which was to save his son and he pressed towards that with focus a...
When John sees his dad at the store, his internal conflict develops and this leads to his conflict with Grace. People in relationships tend to get into arguments with each other. It is a very realistic representation of his character. It would be unrealistic if a couple never argues. He accuses her of being a snob and this leads to the argument which is revealed when the narrator says, “They had never talked in this way, and now they were both quickly eager to hurt each other” (4). This illustrates that they were growing as a couple and were opening up to each other about their feelings. John finally lets his inner anger out on Grace and shows that he cares about her opinion on different matters such as how she views people from lower social class (3). John is a hypocrite since he calls Grace a snob when in reality he, himself is a snob because he is embarrassed of his dad’s lower social status. He is assuming that Grace would not like to be associated with him after finding out the truth. This is shown when he asks Grace, “You don 't like the kind of people you bump into here, … he asks recklessly, full of a savage eagerness to hurt her” (3). He is being naive for forcing his anger on Grace and not realizing the reason that is causing it. People tend to make foolish decisions when they are angry; likewise, John is trying to hurt Grace because he thinks he
from his tables, which showed powers of 10 with a fixed number used as a base.