Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Child labour in England in the 19th century
Long essay on child labour in england
Child labour in England in the 19th century
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Child labour in England in the 19th century
John Keith Atkinson was the son of former agricultural labourers James and Mary Atkinson. They moved to Holmeside to work in Outcote Mill when their agricultural employer’s farm was sold by the landowner to another landowner to make his holdings bigger and more profitable. With their jobs gone and their tied home lost, they followed other migrants into the town. John was an infant when they moved.
In Holmeside the Atkinson family, including five children, lived in the fusty cellar of an already crowded house that gave rude shelter to four families besides them. Two families occupied two upstairs bedrooms, and another two lived in a single ground floor room. The parents of all five families and the older children worked at Staithes’ mill. An eight-year-old girl stayed home to care for eleven small children, including John Atkinson.
One Sunday morning as the families rested at home, John and some of the neighbours’ children played out in the filthy street. Without warning, the whole terrace rumbled and fell down in a heap of flying bricks and dust killing everyone inside. John and seven other children were orphaned. Subsequently they were confined in an institution along with two hundred other orphans and pauper children. They were kept until they could be sold as apprentices to clothiers and factory owners. Under the Apprentice Act, they were obliged to labour without pay or care until they reached the age of twenty-one years.
John Atkinson did not live long enough to understand the apprentice system. He took his own life when he was still young. This act was his condemnation of the English child slave system. He remembered little of his father or mother or sisters, all of whom had perished in the collapse. He often wished he ha...
... middle of paper ...
...ildren off their hands as quickly as possible by finding places for them. So great was the need for places in orphanages and asylums that the policy was to keep children no longer than was necessary. If they sent out under age children, well, no one cared a fig.
A hundred and sixteen orphans and paupers left a London orphan hospital on a single day to supply the demands of northern textile mills. While the best orphan institutions made reasonable efforts to ensure that only good masters received children, there was no follow up on the progress and treatment of the infants, and their welfare was unknown to the disinterested that farmed them out. Men altogether unfitted for the care of children were given helpless innocents. Some masters obtained certification of good character by dishonesty, and treated children with barbarity and, in many cases, murderous cruelty.
For the first time in history children were an important factor of the economic system, but at a terrible price. The master of the factories employed children for two reasons. One, because of their small body which can get inside the machines to clean it and use their nimble fingers. Second, the masters use to pay low wages to the children who could be easily manipulated. The average age for the parents to send their children to work was ten. Although, Conventional wisdom dictates that the age at which children started work was connected to the poverty of the family. Griffith presents two autobiographies to put across her point. Autobiography of Edward Davis who lacked even the basic necessities of life because of his father’s heavy drinking habit and was forced to join work at a small age of six, whereas the memoir of Richard Boswell tells the opposite. He was raised up in an affluent family who studied in a boarding school. He was taken out of school at the age of thirteen to become a draper’s apprentice. The author goes further and places child employees into three groups, according to the kind of jobs that were available in their neighbourhood. First group composed of children living in rural areas with no domestic industry to work in. Therefore, the average of a child to work in rural area was ten. Before that, farmers use to assign small jobs to the children such as scaring birds, keeping sheep
Jane’s life at Moor house was the depiction of stability. During her time there she created a name for herself. First, she worked as a respectable teacher, helping develop the minds of young children. Then, she crafted friendships for the first time with
Many businesses and factories hired children because they were easier to exploit; they could be paid less for more work in dangerous conditions. Plus, their small size made many children idea for working with small parts or fitting into small spaces. Children as young as four could be found working in factories, though most were between eight and twelve. Despite the economic gains made by the business that employed them, many children suffered in the workplace. The industrial setting caused many health problems for the children that, if they lived long enough, they would carry with them for the rest of their lives. Children were also more likely to face accidents in the workplace, often caused by fatigue, and many were seriously injured or killed. Despite efforts by reformers to regulate child labor, it wasn’t until the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 that children under 14 were prohibited from
With the gradual advancements of society in the 1800’s came new conflicts to face. England, the leading country of technology at the time, seemed to be in good economic standing as it profited from such products the industrial revolution brought. This meant the need for workers increased which produced jobs but often resulted in the mistreatment of its laborers. Unfortunately the victims targeted were kids that were deprived of a happy childhood. A testimony by a sub-commissioner of mines in 1842 titled Women Miners in the English Coal Pits and The Sadler Report (1832), an interview of various kids, shows the deplorable conditions these kids were forced to face.
Many times the factory owner could get away with paying them nothing at all. The children obviously got little to no education. Many orphans were treated as slaves, they would say that the
Sadly, the children had no choice but to work for very little pay. Their mothers and fathers made so little money in the factory system that they couldn’t afford to let their children enjoy their childhood: “Other working children were indentured—their parents sold their labor to the mill owner for a period of years. Others lived with their families and worked for wages as adults did, for long hours and under hard conditions” (Cleland). The child had no other choice, but to work for these big businesses.
Jane spends her first 10 years of her life at Gateshead Hall, a lavish mansion. She lived with her Aunt, Mrs Reed, and three cousins, Eliza, Georgina and John. During her time in the mansion she wouldn't dare argue with the mistress, and fulfilled every duty. Jane is deprived of love, joy and acceptance. She is very much unwanted and isolated.
The Woodlawn family are American pioneers, successfully chasing after their dream and living in a fairly new town in Wisconsin. Caddie is closest with her father, John, who was given the unusual opportunity to raise one of his daughters; a story which he tells to explain her behavior. He is proud that his methodology worked and Caddie survived because he “would rather see her learn to plow […] if she can get her health by doing so” (Brink 15). John saw that there was a problem with the health of his daughters, which, as a result, some died. Instead of forcing the continuation of convention, he decided that he would rather make sure Caddie lived over being seen as proper to outside people, never regretting his decision. The two have a bond that he does not share with his other children as he took such a vested interest in, and is credited with, helping to save her, which gives them a special connection to each other. John takes full responsibility for Caddie’s actions. In fact, he takes a certain pride because she is still alive to be getting into her scrapes. However, a deal between the parents, similar to that between Matthew and Marilla, left the mother to punish and the father to nurture. The biggest disagreement that Caddie has with her mother results with her in the bedroom set on running away. Her father visits her that night to console his daughter, sensing that she wanted some comfort. John quietly and soothingly without asking Caddie to change her position reminds her of their closeness, how she is his little girl, the one that was allowed to run free. John is trying to broaden Caddie’s perspective that Caddie without ever claiming that her fears are unfounded. He simply reminds her that she can be so much more, she is not going to become what she hates. John smartly brings up and
In the year 1562, there were laws enacted that allowed the placement of poor children into care services until they were old enough to care for themselves. When the idea came to the U.S. not many children liked the idea of being placed into a foster home. They were often abused and exploited. However, this was allowed by law and the homes were considered better for the children because unlike almshouses children were taught different trades, and were not constantly exposed to bad surrounding and immature adults. Various forms of indenturing children persisted into the first decade of the century. Benjamin Eaton became the nation’s first foster child in the year 1636, he was 7 years old.
Stemming from models developed in Rome under Marcus Aurelius and Florence’s Innocenti, orphans were first nursed by peasant women, then adopted or apprenticed by the time they were seven or eight years old (Simpson 136). Care of the orphans (and also the sick, the poor, the elderly, and the mentally ill) was first the responsibility of the church, but with increased legislation, the responsibility gradually fell under the state (Simpson 137). Pennsylvania passed such a “poor law” in 1705, establishing an “Overseer of the Poor” for each township. Each overseer was responsible for finding funds for children and more commonly, for finding positions of servitude or apprenticeship (7). Such a model of short-term care followed by adoption, apprenticeship, or indentured servitude became the standard for dealing with orphaned children. The development of specific orphanages or child asylums, however, did not come until later in the nineteenth century. Orphaned children were first treated in almshouses, first established in Philadelphia in 1731 (7). Poorhouses, workhouses, and almshouses, all essentially the same institution, housed both adults and children without homes. Residents were seen as nearly free sources of labor, working in sweatshops or nearby mines in the case of several British poorhouses (5).
Universally, people regard children as the future of the world. As such, people tend to feel highly protective of them, and do everything in their power to ensure the safety of their young. The idea of an entire country turning a blind eye to children’s misery is appalling, but, in his Washington Post article “The Blood-Stained Indian Child Welfare Act,” George Will contends that most people are overlooking a great source of grief for many children and families. For this reason, Will unearths the atrocities surrounding the Indian Child Welfare Act.
The Children’s Aid Society in 1854 developed the Orphan Train program a predecessor to foster care. Charles Loring Brace believed that this would give children the chance of a good life by giving them the opportunity to live with “morally standing farm families”(Warren,
Dickens’ novel shows people how things really were in the workhouses during the 19th century. A child of the parish “ had contrived to exist upon the smallest possible portion of the weakest possible food, it did perversely happen in eight and a half cases out of ten, either that it sickened from want and cold, or fell into the fire from neglect, or got half-smothered by accident; in any one of which cases, the miserable little being was usually summoned into another world” (Twist p.5). Here Dickens shows how children were starved, neglected, inappropriately dressed, and mistreated. His statement also claims that many of the times, the children died in a result to the poor environment. The encyclopedia provides a more general explanation as it simply states that the “conditions in the workhouses were deliberately harsh and degrading” (The New Encyclopedia Britannica Vol.12 p.755).
If diseases were the reason the infants were dying, then both the hospital and the prison should have poor results. If anything the hospitals should yield better results than the prison because of the sterile environment. However if love mattered, the prisoners’ infants should prevail (it’s the orphanages stupid). Spitz found that 37% of the institutionalized infants died while there were no deaths among those raised in the prison. As a matter of the incarcerated babies grew quicker, were larger and healthier. Those who did manage to survive in the hospital were more likely to contract illnesses. Spitz’s study concluded that more than one in three institutionalized infants died. Moreover, the orphans displayed psychological, cognitive, and behavioral
It is fascinating how far the world has transformed in the past 300 years. The world has evolved in the way labor is accomplished. The innovation of machines, abolishment of slavery and child labor laws have all played a part in this history. 300 years ago, slaves were the main force of labor because they were cheap. Economically, the next major force of labor was the children. Since children were smaller, they were able to do jobs that adults could not, such as sweep chimneys. This was a terrible job for children to be doing. William Blake writes about how miserable the kids were in two poems, “The Chimney Sweeper” (Songs of Innocence), and “The Chimney Sweeper” (Songs of Experience.) In both poems the kids were not happy with the situation they were in because of the harsh conditions. Child labor is extremely harmful to children, and Blake realized how dangerous it was. He criticizes the King, the Church, and the parents for their contribution to a child’s misery. It is evident that parents would force