America and the institution of religion have long complexly intertwined histories, but no religion is more intertwined, nor has played a greater role in the foundation of America and its ideals than Christianity. The relationship between American nationhood and Christianity is so strong that it continues to seep into American culture and legislation centuries after its founding. It is for this reason that the modern evangelical Christian practice of televangelism emerged and thrived for much of modern American history, and, subsequently, became a profound and concentrated embodiment of American values and ideals. No televangelist provides a more compelling or relevant example of televangelism than Joel Osteen, the millionaire pastor and figurehead …show more content…
of the America’s largest megachurch and religious organization. Building his career off these intertwined histories and ideals, Osteen’s career and preachings have greater implications than simply spreading the Christian gospel to millions of eager listeners. His success says a lot about foundational American economic, political and social ideals. His career as a televangelist functions as a feedback loop of American ideals, in which he both capitalizes on and proselytizes the benefits of American capitalism, freedom of religion, diversity, tolerance, and inclusion, essentially exploiting these ideals for personal gain and promoting them in a way that ensures the future success of this business model. To begin, it is necessary to define and briefly map out the origins of televangelism in the United States, and sort through the American values inherent in the medium, primarily the freedom of religion and capitalist commodification and social mobility. According to its root words, “tele” meaning “at a distance” and evangelism, the evangelical principle that the Christian gospel should be taught to others to convert them to Christianity, televangelism is the “propagation of religion over the airwaves.”1 This practice emerged in the early 20th century alongside the emergence of radio technology and spread quickly. The career of Father Charles Coughlin, an early radio televangelist in the 1930s, demonstrates the power that such religious figures have had since the very beginning. He amassed millions of listeners and was a controversial political figure of the era, so much so that by 1939 he was forced off the air for his anti-Semitic commentary.2 The power of such religious figures on a mass media platform that uses airwaves owned by the public raised important questions regarding the separation of church and state, and the freedom of religion. These worries were addressed by the 1934 Communications Act, which established the electromagnetic spectrum as a national resource. As such, the stations that received licenses were obligated to broadcast in the “public interest”, a vague mandate that many interpreted to include religious programming and which has set the precedent for all lax regulations of all future religious programming.3 This interpretation is largely a result of the American ideal and constitutional mandate: freedom of religion. The First Amendment States that “Congress shall make no law … prohibiting the free exercise of religion,” and because of this vague, yet powerful promise, radio and television stations were able to justify the broadcast of low cost, yet popular programs religious programs. By allowing Christians to exercise their religious beliefs by granting millions of Americans access to services via the airwaves, televangelism, as a medium, fulfills America’s promise of religious freedom. Televangelism is also a manifestation of American capitalism because it demonstrates the lucrative possibilities of capitalist commodification and the possibility of social mobility. The position of televangelism within mass communication, has led to a transformation in religious careers. In commodifying religion by placing it on the airwaves where it amasses advertising revenue, as well as donations from viewers and ancillary revenue, ministerial careers have transitioned from a place of moral prestige to a place of moral and socioeconomic prestige. No longer is theology a career with modest earnings, its commodification of religion through mass media, has turned it into a multimillion dollar industry. Because religious leaders can now capitalize on their careers in a way that was previously impossible, the profession upholds the American promise of upward social mobility, through which prominent televangelists, like Juanita Bynum, have been able to rise and achieve much more than the average middle-class aspirations to become millionaires with congregations larger than many nations.4 While televangelism evidently has important implications for American values, Joel Osteen, and the particularities of his career and success, even more completely embodies these values and promises. Osteen’s career is founded on the social mobility that televangelism offered his father, John, who began his ministerial career preaching in a feed store converted that was into Lakewood church, and ended his career as the beloved minister of upwards of fifteen-thousand congregants.5 After John passed away in 1999, Joel was able to build off of the momentum of his father’s success to create one of the largest megachurches in America, boasting an average of thirty-thousand attendees each week, not including the millions of televisual attendees who watch or listen from home. The congregation’s growth, generated by Joel’s succession of his father’s role as head pastor, made Osteen a household name and launched him to stardom. This made his business as a minister and author of multiple New York Times bestsellers, incredibly lucrative, allowing him to surpass the success and wealth of his father, further tying televangelist and America ideals together by embodying the American ideal of social mobility.6 Like the televangelists before him, Osteen has built his career off the commodification of religion, making it into a product and experience that can be bought and sold in the American capitalist economy.
In doing so, he utilizes two foundational American values and ideals: capitalism and the freedom of religion. Televangelism fits perfectly in the constraints of capitalism as the economic system in which trade and industry are controlled by private and corporate bodies.7 In Osteen’s case, he is the private owner and producer of Joel Osteen Ministries. The foundation of Joel Osteen Ministries is the dissemination of religious materials, whether physical products, as with his books, or experiences, as is the case with his sermons and live events. Televangelism’s history also aligns chronologically with the history of capitalism in America. As stated by Wunthrow, "in the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries the market expanded and commodification correspondingly extended in ways scarcely foreseeable.”8 This expanded commodification includes religion, evident in the fact that televangelism reached its pinnacle at the very same time. Furthermore, this occurred under Ronald Reagan’s presidency, which in addition to its hands-off economic policy, helped give rise to the Moral Majority, a conservative movement originated by a televangelist, Jerry Falwell. This commodification of religion works in conjunction with the promise of the First Amendment, which leniently regulates religious entities, like televangelist organizations. As such, Joel Osteen and Joel Osteen Ministries function as a religious figure and religious institutions, respectively, and capitalize on groups’ religious beliefs and desires with even little government interference and with the added protection of being an organization through which Americans exercise religion. It is only through the exploitation of these American conditions, capitalism and the freedom of religion, that
Osteen, has been able to so successfully capitalize on religion.
In the first chapter of Nathan Hatch’s book, The Democratization of American Christianity, he immediately states his central theme: democratization is central to understanding the development of American Christianity. In proving the significance of his thesis, he examines five distinct traditions of Christianity that developed in the nineteenth century: the Christian movement, Methodists, Baptists, Mormons and black churches. Despite these groups having diverse structural organization and theological demeanor, they all shared the commonality of the primacy of the individual conscience.
Southland Christian Church, one of several worship centers in the United States that has earned the moniker “Six Flags over Jesus,” is Lexington’s largest megachurch. With a weekly attendance of 8,000 people and an operating budget that supports a staff of over eighty members, Southland far exceeds most U.S. congregations in terms of financial resources and social clout. In recent years, popular and scholarly studies have attempted to situate the megachurch movement within a broad cultural context. Although the majority of these analyses dispute the precise definition of a megachurch, most distinguish these multiplex sanctuaries from smaller worship communities by using the same criteria—i.e. weekly attendance, campus acreage, annual budget, etc.—that megachurches themselves draw on to represent their own success. [2] However, the essence of a megachurch is not its large buildings, but rather the theology of consumption that informs its programming.[3] In this way, a megachurch ethos has infiltrated even the smallest congregations in the United States and has helped to solidify Christianity’s inextricable connection to consumer capitalism. To those who see megachurches as symptomatic of a flawed Christianity, market-minded church growth confounds one of the faith’s oldest dualities, the contradiction of living in the world without conforming to its ways, as Paul puts it in Romans 12. Megachurches at once reject “the world” and participate in it by seeking to win the lost and wow the consumer at the same time.
Whether people stood for or against the Reverend William A. Sunday, they all agreed that it was difficult to be indifferent toward him. The religious leader was so extraordinarily popular, opinionated, and vocal that indifference was the last thing that he would get from people. His most loyal admirers were confident that this rural-breed preacher was God’s mouthpiece, calling Americans to repentance. Sunday’s critics said that at best he was a well-meaning buffoon whose sermons vulgarized and trivialized the Christian message and at worst he was a disgrace to the name of Christ (Dorsett 2).
Religion of the protestant church was an important factor in the pre-war timeline culture. The Second great awakening, which occurred in the 19th century, greatly impacted American society. This new point of view in terms and matters of faith led northerners to cherish the theory of Christian perfection, a theory that in fact was applied to society in an attempt to eliminate social imperfection. On the other hand, southerners reacted by cherishing a faith of personal piety, which focused mainly on a reading of the Bible; however, it expressed very little concern in addressing society’s problems.1
Dochuk, Darren. From Bible Belt to Sunbelt: Plain-folk Religion, Grassroots Politics, and the Rise of Evangelical Conservatism. New York: W.W. Norton, 2011. Print.
Religious institutions have always been a fundamental piece of American culture, and their influence is evident in many aspects of American life. Especially during the 20th century, the spread of Christianity became more competitive as churches vied against one another to draw in new members. This was particularly evident in the development and growth of conservative Protestant groups. Protestant leaders responded to this competition for followers by developing radically new methods for the worship experience. They used their charisma and entrepreneurial spirit to send their messages to the masses. Protestant leader’s manipulation of these methods of outreach was able to attract many new members to the conservative protestant cause, and encouraged Americans to join these large groups of worship.
Fea, John. Was America Founded as a Christian Nation?: A Historical Introduction. 1st ed. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 2011.
Thenature of this paper, which deals with the presence of a subconscious set ofparticularly American beliefs, inherently involves more reflection than thegathering of data. Whatsimportant is the way we live, not the historical manufacturing of facts whichis more evidence, not description, of the current Religion of the AmericanEconomy. And while most ofthese truths should be self evident (like any good preamble), some statisticswill be cited to illustrate their culmination in everyday life. To set this new dogma in context, Iwill also describe the founding principles of Christian living, with particularattention paid to the economic reality of what such living entails.
Butler, J., Balmer, R., & Wacker, G. (2008). Religion in American Life : A Short History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Eck, Diana L. A New Religious America: How a "Christian Country" Has Now Become the World's Most Religiously Diverse Nation. San Francisco: HarperSanFrancisco, 2001. Print
Thomas, Oliver "Buzz". "How To Keep The 'United' In United States: Coping With Religious Diversity In The World's First 'New' Nation." Church & State Feb. 2007: 19+. Academic Search Premier. EBSCO. Web. 1 Mar. 2013.
Introduction: Neither the resolve of patriots nor the labor of men freed Americans from the hands of tyranny. The fathers of this nation, as well as those who fought for her ability to prosper were united by their unwavering faith and trust in God. The future of this world lay heavily upon their shoulders, yet they carried the burden willingly for the duration of their lives and passed it down from generation to generation. As a result, a new nation was born and grew into one of the most powerful countries of the world. Although America began as a Christian nation, it has pulled away from the fundamental beliefs that held this nation together. Despite their ancient predecessor’s emphasis on faith and Christianity, the current government has taken a more secular path. The legality of abortion and the exclusion of religious references in public institutions are a couple of examples how morality has been corrupted within the government. Society itself also forsakes the religious path, twisting the concept of morality to fit the lifestyles they wish to lead. David Barton uses line graphs to demonstrate the decrease of morality since 1950. Violent behavior, the circulation of sexually transmitted diseases, and the birth rate for unwed girls, has drastically inclined while educational achievement and family stability have dropped at an accelerated rate (242). It is apparent through the government’s choices, the media, and the attitudes present in average society that Americans have drifted far away from the principles on which this country was founded. Without a genuine faith and trust in God, American society will continue to deteriorate until memories of a once great nation are all that remains.
Wells, Ronald. “The Wars of America Christian Views”. Grand Rapids: Willimas B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1981. Print
In the past few years, America has been becoming more and more liberal with its stance on various issues. We are changing laws and practices that have long been in place, and while some view it as progressive, others view it as morally wrong. By encouraging changes in practices that were established with a Biblical mindset, America has begun to subtly alienate the Christian. Although America is still a land where individuals are free to practice their faith freely, it is becoming harder to display...
Preaching That Connects is the book for all who seek to hone their craft to communicate the truth of the gospel effectively. The authors acknowledge the fact that each person is different and everyone has different techniques and approach in preaching the word of God.