Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How are schools preventing bullying
How are schools preventing bullying
Stopping bullying
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Summary: Case study nineteen deals with a situation in which Mr. Hamilton (a teacher) is contemplating between keeping the trust of one student versus keeping the safety of an entire school. This case describes Mr. Hamilton as the teacher students can depend and trust with any issues they may have. Mr. Hamilton worked in an inner-city school in which a good number of students were somewhat involved with gangs and gang violence. The students that the case focuses on is Jessie Brown, a fifteen-year-old student who is timid, isolated, and weird. In Jessie record, it showed that he had trouble with forming relationships which play a role in his isolation. Jessie was not only isolated in school but also at home with his father, the only quality …show more content…
time they had together was in the gun range. Jessie started getting bullied by a club called the Precinct Breakers. Jessie confined this information to Mr. Hamilton believing that Mr. Hamilton will not tell anybody. After the bullying continues Jessie once again trustingly tells Mr. Hamilton that he would take care of the bullying himself. A few days later the school is having continuous bomb threats and false fire alarms. Mr. Hamilton asks Jessie if he has anything to do with the recent alarms and he responded, ‘What do you think?’ At this point, Mr. Hamilton is contemplating if he should say something to the administration of Jessie’s plans. Discussion Topics and Questions to Ponder: 1. The immediate problems described in this case is Jessie stating he is planning to harm the students who are bullying him by “blowing them away.” After commenting this with Mr. Hamilton there are several bomb threats and false fire alarms. Mr. Hamilton does not take action in telling the administration because he promised Jessie that he would never tell anyone. 2. Mr. Hamilton’s problems compared to Jessie’s can be very different but at the same time similar in some ways. Mr. Hamilton is facing a problem of giving up that trust of a student in order to keep in the procedure of school policies of reporting any school violence. Mr. Hamilton wants to be the most liked teacher that he is willing to go against school policies. He did not let the administration know that there are bullies in the school causing a student to want to blow them up. Jessie’s problem is that he is being bullied because he is the weird kid of the school. Jessie has a hard time to make relationship which causes him to be isolated and timid. Jessie and Mr. Hamilton problems are similar by they both may feel isolated. Mr. Hamilton does not have the support and trust of his administration while Jessie’s feels isolated because of his lack of relationship with other students. 3. The personality problems that both Mr. Hamilton and Jessie have is the ability to make a healthy relationship with others. While Mr. Hamilton does have somewhat a good relationship with his students, he seems to have a pushover kind of personality. He lets the students do what they want and won't confront hem or report them to administration. When he saw, the students writing graffiti on the administration door he should have stopped the students and taught them that what they were doing was illegal and wrong. Jessie, on the other hand, does not know how to make any type of relationship. His core relationship that should be his family is not the best. His father does not care much for him and only interacts with his father in the gun range. Being timid and isolated does not help Jessie case in building relationships. 4. I do not believe assertive discipline could have been used by Mr. Hamilton to resolve the problems he faces. Assertive discipline is when a teacher insist on proper behavior from students, recognizing and supporting them when they practice such behavior and utilizing well-organized procedures for when they do not behave (Scarpaci, 2007, p. 69). I believe assertive discipline would be best used in the classroom while Mr. Hamilton is teaching rather than a one on one with students. Since this model demonstrates power inequity, Jessie or other students might not want to disclose their problems to Mr. Hamilton. 5. I do think the logical consequences model could have been employed by Mr. Hamilton to aid him in making decisions. The logical consequences focus used on the idea that children should be given a choice of consequences when they don’t behave rather than being forced to behave as directed (Scarpaci, 2007, p.77). Mr. Hamilton could have used this model to find out what was the wrongdoing in each situation and then choose the most logical consequence. This model would have helped Mr. Hamilton to focus more on the cause before acting. 6. I believe that Mr. Hamilton’s desire to be well-liked is inappropriate because a teacher’s main goal should not be to be the most liked teacher but to educate the students. If a teacher is working hard to be the most liked teacher, then they will most lily do things that are good in the eyes of the students but inappropriate for an educator. For example, when he noticed the student writing graffiti on the door, Mr. Hamilton should have acted by telling the administration. Those students might have taught Mr. Hamilton was the best teacher because he did not snitch on them. Mr. Hamilton should focus more on teaching and discipline students to learn what’s right and wrong. 7. I think Mr. Hamilton should have told Jessie, “I understand that you might be scared and not want to tell anyone else, but it is important to tell at least administration so that we can take the appropriate actions put a stop to this situation” when Jessie asked him to promise not to say anything. 8.
The steps that Mr. Hamilton should have taken was to first break down the situation into sections. One section is the Precinct Breakers and the second section being Jessie’s comment on wanting to blow up the Precinct Breakers. Once he breaks down the sections he must find the problem and their causes. To resolve the problems, he should look for the support of his administration, counselors, and coworkers to build a plan to solve the issues they are facing in school. The first issue to be resolved is the bullying and the second is the comments and threats of Jessie. Once they create a plan they must follow through and keep track of everything. 9. I think it would have been wise to deal with the Precinct Breakers separately from Jessie because they might be causing the same harm to another student. There might be another student thinking the same way as Jessie but has not told anyone. By stopping the bad behaviors of the Precinct Breakers, the threats might diminish. 10. Mr. Hamilton should take immediate action so that problems such as those described in the study do not occur again. The action can vary from making a call home to speaking to the administration. The immediate action can be different for each scenario, but an action must be taken …show more content…
immediately. What Would you Do If…? 1. If the principal found out about the threats from another source and suspended Jessie, then I would meet with the principal and inform them about the causes of the threats. I would tell the principal about the Precinct Breakers and how they would always pick and take away Jessie’s lunch. 2.
If I reported my suspicious only to discover later that Jessie was only an innocent victim, then I would apologize to Jessie for causing him any embarrassment or harm. I would also tell Jessie that this misunderstanding should not stop him from trusting in me with any problems he may be facing. I would also tell him that the vocabulary he was using to describe what he wanted to do to the Prescient Breakers was the cause for the report. 3. If the Precinct Breakers beat up Jessie then I would first make sure Jessie is alright. Then I would assure him that the school and I will make sure the Precinct Breakers receive the appropriate consequence for their actions. Later I would meet with my coworkers and administration to come up with a violence protection program. Violence protection programs aim to teach students how to handle conflict in nonviolent ways and establish school environments that encourage peaceful behavior (Scarpaci, 2007, p.198). 4. If the guidance counselor said to me that I was derelict in my duties in not reporting what I knew, then I would accept their opinion of my action. I would also ask them to give me more information and advice on how I should handle the situation in the
future. 5. If a bomb was actually found in the school then I will first remain calm. would not try to figure out if the bomb is fake or real. The United States Department of Homeland Security (2018) states to never touch or tamper with, or move the package, bag or, item. Then I would notify my administration and based on their response I would call the police. I would then follow any other procedures that I may be given, rather it is to evacuate or stay in the school. If we were to evacuate I would make take my class out in a calm and orderly fashion and take a count of all my students.
A teacher’s most important duty is to protect the students they are in charge of. This duty includes both reasonably protecting students from harm and, when a student is harmed, reporting it to the proper authorities (Gooden, Eckes, Mead, McNeal, & Torres, 2013, pp. 103-109). There have been many court cases that reiterate this duty of school staff. One such case is Frugis v. Bracigliano (2003) where many staff at a school failed in their duty to protect students and allowed abuse to continue for years.
First of all, he realized the stereotyped the white people labeled very early in school and that these labels followed them throughout their education levels. He equally knew that labels have influence on how teachers and staff react to kids and it contribute the quality of the education Trent will obtain. Joe did not want such a thing to happen to Trent; Joe showed enthusiasm when he was authorized by her field instructor to pursue the case. He started by gathering all the information that is relevant to make this case successful. Joe set a goal through research by reading Trent school record and collaborating with Trent’s teacher, psychologist, and all the staff involved in the case. Joe called Trent father over the phone and asked some questions, which resulted in a face to face interview at school. This process helped Joe to understand the genesis of Trent problem. Joe developed a helping relationship with the family that aid her to follow up through home visits, which is where the family was comfortable to open up and talk. In the meeting at the Trent’s father house Joe was able to get the information that aided him to initiate the action plan for the case. Joe carried the plan by having several meetings with the school psychologist, the teacher, the aide, Trent, and his parents. Through these meetings the intervention plan was devised. Joe identified goals that will help Trent maintain the appropriate behavior at school and at home by using a chart. The chart says Trent should keep his hands and feet to himself, using good manners, walk in line, and sits in his seat correctly. Joe equally created a plan of grouping Trent and other five boys in one group which has similar problem like Trent. During evaluation, Joe achieved his goal by maintained regular contact with all the people involved in the Trent’s case which really
Proper chain of command should be implemented and communication should be effective across all levels and the issues must be immediately noticed and addressed.
Another major reason why juveniles are ending up in the juvenile justice system is because many schools have incorporate the zero tolerance policy and other extreme school disciplinary rules. In response to violent incidents in schools, such as the Columbine High School massacre, school disciplinary policies have become increasingly grave. These policies have been enacted at the school, district and state levels with the hopes of ensuring the safety of students and educators. These policies all rely on the zero tolerance policy. While it is understandable that protecting children and teachers is a priority, it is not clear that these strict policies are succeeding in improving the safety in schools.
Daggett, Lynn M. "Book 'Em?: Navigating Student Privacy, Disability, And Civil Rights And School Safety In The Context Of School-Police Cooperation." Urban Lawyer 45.1 (2013): 203-233. Web. 26 Mar. 2014.
In the case study, Jim Colbert, a third grade teacher, struggles to help a boy named Carlos. This Public School 111 was located in a metropolitan, run down neighborhood. The school was surrounded by drug dealers and trash. However, the inside of the school was bright and welcoming. Here the students were placed according to their abilities, and Jim had a 3-A class for the high achieving students. Jim had a routine that he followed every day. He would take the learning and apply it to the student’s lives with practical examples. To begin the day Jim would go through the homework with the students, and here he began to notice that Carlos was misspelling many of his words. Carlos comprehended the readings, but he was behind in his spelling. Jim talked with the other third grade teacher, Paul, about Carlos. Then, he talked to Carlos about the problem, asking him if he could get help at home. Here Jim discovered that Carlos would get little to no help at home. Jim sent home a dictionary with Carlos so that he could check his spelling, and he saw
Thereby, institutions that were intended to nurture youth (schools) have been collapsed into the practice of surveillance and criminalization, often acting as the behest of police and probation officers. In the case of Spider, he was isolated from “regular” school and sent to EOCS, which was a school for students who had already been officially labeled as deviants and delinquents by the school district. There, many of the teachers had a common practice that whenever any student misbehaved, the teachers would threaten either to call the police, to send them to jail, or call their P.O. (sometimes, even for students that weren’t on probation). In the schools attempt to main social order, it used the full force of criminal justice institutions to regulate students’ behaviors with constant threats. Also, Rios accounts that Slick’s beating, a student at an EOC, was the result of the schools impeccable communication between a security officer, the administrators, and police officer Miles. At these types of teaching facilities, stigma, labeling, detention, harassment, and humiliation are just about the only consistent experience that adolescents could count on as they entered the school. If students attempted to resist criminalization by acting up, a police officer lurked nearby ready to pounce. In essence, school was simply an extension where young people were criminalized for their style and culture. As a matter of fact, many of the boys Rios describes, saw no distinction between the school and police officers who constantly lurked around them, like a “zookeeper watching over animals at all times.” Police officers played a crafty “cat and mouse game” in which adolescent boys remained in steady trepidation of being humiliated, brutalized, or detained. Hence, this sort of control is created by a
Schools are safe places. However, the American public has become increasingly concerned with crime in schools and the safety of students. In part, this concern has been shaped by the highly publicized acts ...
The school is to protect the students from any wrong doing towards them. Such act, parents, school official and other authorities will be contacted. The case in Oakland County MI, opens many eyes for students and parents. The school board has responsibility to report such harm. This is not taken lightly, serious offense. Students could face years in prison, or face felonies.
Measures of prevention or intervention that can be taken include creating early prevention programs, collaboration between the school, police, and parents, and policy measures. Programs that focus on increasing positive interactions with peers and encourage self esteem can help deter a child from a lifestyle susceptible to gang recruiting later in life (Simon, Ritter, and Mahendra, 2013). Such programs are vital in the school environment, where a youth spends most of his/her day. Schools must take note of the common signs of a youth with a high risk of becoming a gang member, for instance, poor grades and performance, and social rejection in the form of being bullied or being the bully. Moreover, schools should offer programs that raise awareness
In conclusion, School Violence is a widespread issue that must be addressed. School shootings and bullying are some of the biggest issues in today’s school system. Many times the seed of the issue begins with bullying and ends with consequences like suicide and school shootings. They affect people as early as elementary school all the way to the college level, some even ending with death. Only together can we stop school violence if we take a stand and change the world.
The school setting makes this task quite daunting since “a culture of open communication regarding student information is quite common among educators in school settings” (ARTICLE P337). Even so, it is important to disclose only the most vital information so as to not jeopardize one’s job duties nor compromise one’s ethics. When taking in a situation in its entirety, a school counselor must dissect all of the information given and only release what is absolutely necessary in order to take action – if any action is needed. The relationship of trust between the school counselor and the minor student must be kept intact and remain unaffected at all cost. Releasing too much information would create mistrust and separation between the two, leaving the student with no one else to turn to.
Yet, as a profession (and a society) maybe a little shock treatment now and then is good for us, especially if we ourselves work in relatively “safe” schools and communities. Maybe it’s time to remind ourselves that one school’s problem can become every school’s problem if the profession at large is not watchful and careful. No school is immune to the potential of extreme violence, as many of us, without meaning to, have learned. If you’re a long-time, veteran English teacher, you may never have thought you’d see the day when an issue of English Journal would be devoted to school violence. The idea never occurred to me, either. But here we are, and here that issue is. And, what’s more, it’s high time. While none of us needs convincing that the violence problem is serious in a great many places, some of the statistics are sobering.
Teachers not only must be wary of being inadvertently injured by enraged “students” fighting in the hallway or the cafeteria, a peer might even wind-up becoming a threat to one’s physical safety. I recall one particular eighth grade Washington trip. As usual, I was chaperoning one hundred twenty eighth graders on the Hammonton Middle School’s annual class DC trip. We had just arrived back at the Mt. Vernon Motel after visiting the Jefferson Memorial. The nine chaperones were fatigued, but the “students” were still rambunctious.
The issue of school safety has become a controversial topic in the United States, due to tragic acts of violence occurring on a daily basis. American citizens should never have to cope with the negative impact of school violence, no matter how often they hear about the tragedies (Jones, "Parents" 1). In the past, schools were viewed as a safe place for children to get an education. Recently, the concern over violence in schools has taken a toll on many parents, school administrators, and legislatures (Eckland 1). Studies have shown that there are over 3 million acts of violence in American public schools each year. Not all occurrences are serious and deadly, but they occur on a daily basis throughout our country (Jones, “School” 6). This has caused many parents to worry about the well-being of their children while they are in class. This has also led to an increase in questions and concerns by parents and guardians. Many people have asked, “What are you doing about safety and security on my child’s campus” (Schimke 2). School violence is the cause of elevated worry and fear for their children, and school districts should enforce better security.