Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Grade inflation gone wild
Analysis on the dangerous myth of grade inflation
Grade inflation gone wild
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Learning is no longer the outcome of attending school; the outcome is simply conditioned robots. A robotic mind is conditioned through the grading process at school. “A Young Person’s Guide to the Grading System,” an essay written by Jerry Farber fights the positive thought on grades, and claims for grades to be the reason for lack of knowledge. In agreement with Farber, I believe the grading system is a failing system with an end result of ignorance. Through his essay, Farber argues against the grading system for a multitude of reasons. Farber mentions how comparable the grading scale is to slave work. He fights that slave work causes the thought of dull learning. This is because when forced to learn, as slaves were forced to work, learning
becomes painful and monotonous. Not only are students compared to slaves they are compared to grade junkies. “Convinced that we’d never learn without the A’s and F’s to keep us going”, writes Farber. He compares grades to a drug, and claims grades become addictive which, hides the real meaning behind learning. The comparisons do not stop there; students are compared to children as grades are to candy and spankings. All these comparisons point to students missing the true motivation of learning. Which is not grades, but the furtherment of knowledge. In his essay, Farber’s solution is the credit system. The credit system is similar to the pass/fail system minus the fail. You simply do the required work and earn a credit or you do not and lose nothing but time. The credit system would encourage knowledge based learning, and not grade based learning. Along with the credit system he argues more certificates and more degree based rewards on more meaningful accomplishments. Or, Farber argues, none at all. Just a list of the credits received. He argues that maybe jobs should judge the accomplishments and simply receive the credit information only. I agree with Farber. I agree that grades dull the mind and take the color from learning. I believe I have not learned more in a class because I received an A. No, I believe I played the game and won. I do agree with grades making me comparable to a child. I feel I need an A or I have failed. Just as a child needs candy as a reward for his entire life. My school life is controlled by grades. My financial life is controlled by grades. I play the game to receive an A because I need scholarship money. Grades have affected me negatively, and have starved me from knowledge. I am conflicted on Farber’s solution. I truly believe his solution would change society. However, I do not know if the good outweighs the bad. In a positive light, I believe students would flourish. I believe learning would be colorful and desirable. I think knowledge would become addictive and society would advance to a new, brighter level. However, the chaos of change that would be created could end badly. Society may dislike grades, but they dislike change even more. Also, would our robotic minds be content with an end result simply being knowledge? Would our simple thought process break into havoc if we did not receive a letter to reward us? I think the solution needs a solution. The grading system results in lack of knowledge according to Farber’s view, and I agree. Farber believes grades derail students and lead them to miss the true motivation. In order to begin change, I believe students must also open their eyes and minds to a system besides grades. I believe that will begin cutting the ties of the grading system and begin to build something bigger and better.
In her article, “The Case Against GRADES”, Alfie Kohn discusses the grading system and its faults. She opens her argument with information from an older psychological study that proves the negative impact of the current grading system, and she reinforces this with the proof that “no” research has contradicted this statement. Also, she gives many key reasons including: “Motivation”, “Achievement”, “Quantification”, and “Curriculum”. Kohn supports these topics with other reasearch for why the system is failing the students. She asserts that, “… the absence of grading is a necessary condition for promoting deep thinking and a desire to engage in it.” As support, she offers other solutions and then debunks them by proving that they would not solve
The article written by Michael Thomsen addresses the issue: should we as a society continue using a standardized grading system. Thomsen includes many reasons supporting his ultimate conclusion that we should not continue with any system of standardized grades. However, the reasons he uses to support his conclusion are affected by significant ambiguity which weakens the overall argument.
Wallach, Wendell and Colin Allen. Moral machines: teaching robots right from wrong. Oxford University Press, 2010.
By 1866, several distinct positions on Reconstruction emerged. These were divided into three opposing camps: Conservatives (democrats), Moderates, and Radicals. The Conservatives believed the South should be readmitted into the Union as soon as possible, but the Radicals and Moderates believed there should be consequences for succeeding.
There are many various issues about the education system which are controversial today. One of these common issues nowadays are schools concentrating on raising standards to evaluate knowledge for students. Many students have been working extremely hard just to achieve higher scores on tests. However, asking students to do many difficult tasks in their studies, is really not helpful now, is it? That is why Alfie Kohn wrote the article, “Confusing Harder with Better”, showing his dissatisfaction with the current educational system. In the article, he complains against “raising the bar”, meaning since they raised standards, teachers are making students memorize facts for tests instead of engaging intellectually with them. In other words, with
In today’s society we feel the need to be graded in order to learn. The topic of the grading system has sparked three essays, by three different authors, about the pros and cons of the grading system. First, Jerry Farber, professor at University of California at San Diego, wrote A Young Person’s Guide to the Grading System (333). Next is Steven Vogel, professor at Denison University, who wrote Grades and Money (337). The last two authors in this compilation are Stephen Goode and Timothy W. Maier. They both are journalists for Insight on the News. While each of these authors have their own point of view on the grading system, all three essays talk about how being graded affects learning.
People love to read stories and watch movies of a science-fictional society that include robots with artificial intelligence. People are intrigued with the ability of the robots that seem to demonstrate what we humans consider morality. Eando Binder’s and Isaac Asimov’s short stories, as well as the 2004 Hollywood movie, all carry the title “I, Robot” and introduce possible futuristic worlds where robots are created and integrated within society. These stories challenge our perceptions about robots themselves, and could perhaps become an everyday commodity, or even valued assistants to human society. The different generations of “I, Robot” seem to set out the principles of robot behavior and showcase robots to people in both different and similar ways. How does the Robot view itself? More importantly, how does society judge these creations? The concepts discussed in these three stories covers almost 75 years of storytelling. Why has this theme stayed so relevant for so long?
One of the issues, which Boyer points out , is that teachers and students have different expectations from college education. She says that the teachers are mainly concerned about students’ comprehension of the material, their attendance and attention while students’ hopes are to get good grades and to be well prepared for exams. It seems that the system of grading pushes students to not care too much about what is being taught from an understanding perspective, but only promotes more concern about grades instead. Some students don't really pay attention unless the instructor mentions an exam or something that will be graded. Furthermore, be...
Bar-Cohen, Yoseph, and David Hanson. The Coming Robot Revolution: Expectations and Fears about Emerging Intelligent, Humanlike Machines. New York: Springer, 2009. Print.
As further advances in robotic testing and programming continue to emerge, then robots will be able to perform more difficult tasks. This article depicts the problem of consciousness in which robots may have knowledge yet lack feelings or emotion. Though we as humans are conscious, robots are not capable of feeling emotions this distinction allows us to distinguish ourselves from robots who sometimes resemble us.
By nature, most students are brought up in an academic environment motivated to get A’s and B’s on their report cards. Those grades sometimes don’t thoroughly report how much a student has learned or gained knowledge in each topic. Some instructors throw in factors totally unrelated to learning, when the main objective of academic institutions is to learn. In order to clearly demonstrate how much a student has learned in the classroom, schools should change their current grading system and teach students how to learn.
Grading System Reform Teachers have always used grades to measure the amount a student has learned. This practice is becoming ineffective. Many students have a wide range of grades, which shows that grades may not show what a student really knows. Therefore, the standard grading system should be replaced. Some reasons why grades should be replaced are bad grades can hinder a child’s performance, grades define who a student is in the classroom, and grades are not an effective way to see if students have learned the material.
“People think of education as something that they can finish. And what’s more, when they finish, it’s a rite of passage” (Popova) noted Isaac Asimov, and in his short story ‘Profession’ this is exactly what he explores with the citizens of his constructed universe completing all their education with the turning on of a machine. This process, whilst ensuring that learning is quick and easy, and that people are matched up to jobs that are suited to their strengths, also stops the universe’s citizens from thinking originally and independently, ultimately forcing them into meaningless lives over which they have no control . In analysing Trevelyan’s failure at the Olympics, the economic issues facing Novia and through education day itself, it becomes clear that the downloading process is only able to create a certain kind of citizen; someone
“What makes a child gifted and talented may not always be good grades in school, but a different way of looking at the world and learning.” That’s what the senior United States Senator from Iowa Chuck Grassley once said. When students get a “F” on their exam, that does not necessary means they are stupid, or they do not know the material. It could only mean they have a different way of learning, or a different way of explaining the material which the teacher is not aware of. There are different ways of learning that students have, and there are different ways they apply their knowledge into real life. Therefore, grades are not the best way to judge the students’ standing in their classes, nor is it the best way to judge their learning process. In addition,
The future of education is very promising to younger generations. From Kindergarten though college many changes are brewing. On the horizon are things like smart objects, full-length online courses, and prosthetic devices designed to equalize education.