In the first ten months of 1907, and influx of 8,000 Japanese labourers arrived in Canada, Japanese labour was cheaper than it would to employ Canadians, therefore reports had surfaced stating that the Grand Trunk Pacific Railway had the intention to import and employ thousands of Japanese workers in Western Canada this entail fuelled anti-Asian sentiments. Hostility outside of the war grew as tensions grew within the province, the Asiatic Exclusion League reverted to violence during an organized rally in which targeted both Japanese and Chinese residents resulting to the destruction of personal property. (Canadian Museum of Immigration at Pier 21, 2018) A 1908 agreement to restrict Japanese immigration was negotiated between Canadian Minister of Labour Rodoplhe Lemieux and Japanese Foreign Minister Tasasu Hayashi, the agreement formerly known as the …show more content…
Gentlemen's Agreement. Under the Gentlemen's Agreement a fixed number of Japanese immigrants would allowed into Canada on an annual basis rather than a constant and unrestricted migration. (Canadian Museum of Immigration at Pier 21, 2018) The Canadian government deemed a restriction on Japanese immigration was a necessity due to the influx of Japanese labourers who immigrated to British Columbia.
Another policy established by the Canadian government was instituted by Prime Minister William Lyon Mackenzie King, the policy of 1486 known as Order-in-Council which calls for the removal and detainment of "any and all person" from any "protective area" in the country, the week following the Security Commission of British Columbia established and began to carry out Japanese internment. (Marsh, 2016) In 1944 Prime Minister Mackenzie King addressed a new policy in which stated that Japanese Canadians were restricted from the Western Coast specifically the province of British Columbia those who did not adhere to the policy regulations would be subject to repatriated to Japan following the end of the Second World War. However, the lasting effects on Japanese Canadians were not because of the policy restrictions rather the conditions of the internment camps as families were detained and separated from one
another. The separation of families disregards cultural and social norms, as in many Asian cultures it is often a patriarchal family structure, asserting that the husband was at the center of the family thus causing social and cultural divisions amongst those within the camps. (Marsh, 2016) Freedom of movement was not granted on Japanese-Canadians until 1949 after the Second World War had end, similarly to the instance involving a remedy regarding the Chinese Exclusion Act, an official apology was not provided until 1988 when the Canadian government Prime Minister Brain Mulroney extended an apology as well as a compensation package. (Marsh, 2016) The anti-multicultural views stated in this section assert that Canadian policy discriminated against a singular ethnic culture based on a singular perception, the Japanese and Chinese within Western Canada were targeted and had their rights taken away by the government, a government that waited until many of those individuals affected by their actions and policies passed before responsibility was taken for the discrimination and racist actions of a state.
The Canadian Pacific Railway was the first transcontinental railway built to connect Canada from coast to coast. (Canadian Pacific Para. 9) The construction almost delayed completely because of John A. MacDonald losing power, but it was finally continued with the help of a syndicate. (Canadian Pacific Para. 4) Due to the insufficient amount of adequate workers in British Columbia, Chinese contract workers were imported to help construct the track with minimal pay and harsh conditions. (Canada Para. 1) Chinese-Canadians were discriminated by being given the most dangerous job, no food or shelter provided, and the least pay. Unfortunately, when the track was completed, the Exclusion Act for Chinese immigrants was established to stop immigration from China, (Calgary Chinese Cultural Centre Para. 5) while also making it impossible for family members from China to immigrate. (Calgary Chinese Cultural Centre Para. 11)
The unjust punishment of citizens that was allowed by the War Measures Act was iniquitous. When it was used in World War One, World War Two and the October Crisis, it led to the unjust punishment of Canadians by causing the internment of “enemy aliens” as well as the forced to registration with the government. In World War One, Canada had been in war with Germany, Austria, Hungary and Ukraine therefore immigration from there was suspended and people from there were considered “enemy aliens” and were interned. This meant that they had to register with the ...
The history of Canada was flooded with many influential and incredible events, particularly during World War 1 and World War 2. During the 20th century, Canada got more involved in worldwide events. It was a very important period for Canada; it was where they gained their independence and progressed as a country. After this century, Canada was considered an important and powerful country. The three main 20th century events in Canadian history are the battle of Vimy Ridge, the change of woman’s rights and the battle of Juno Beach.
The War Measures Act, which had been created for the protection and benefit of Canadian...
Labour leaders in Canada in the late 1800s and early 1900s were strongly opposed to the idea of Asians immigrating to Canada. In “Constructing the Great Menace” by David Goutor, it outlines the oppression of Asians by labour leaders which does not conclude that labour leaders hated all immigration and had a prejudice against all racialized groups. The unionists’ main argument for this opposition is based on the stereotype that Asians were claimed to have “accepted low wages and degraded working conditions” thus proving that they will diminish the standard of living for Canadian workers. These Labour Leaders were prejudice to Asians in an effort to supposedly protect Canadian workers and their jobs. However, it is not fair to say that labour
The tendency to racially discriminate and victimise against certain minorities or a specific nationality was a long-lasting sting of racism which was a part of Canadian history. The discrimination by Canadians directed towards Japanese-Canadians during WWII was a significant historical event that needs to be addressed. After the Pearl Harbour attacks in Hawaii by the Japanese navy, 24,000 Japanese-Canadians were placed in internment camps, where they were stripped of their identity and freedom of rights based upon their racial origin. In the aftermath of the internment, many Japanese-Canadian natives were left without life savings, as all of their belongings were confiscated and never given back. This internment of the Japanese-Canadians occurred
The Asian Exclusion Act of 1924 eventually superseded the Gentlemen’s Agreement and was quite possibly the most exclusionary immigration policy the the US had ever enacted. The Immigration Act of 1924, otherwise known as the Oriental Exclusion Act, was signed on July 1, 1924, banning all Asian immigrants into United States and effectively ending the first wave of Korean immigration until the end of World War II (Son I). The 1924 Immigration Act stemmed from nativists who petitioned for implementing “immigration restriction” as means of bottlenecking the influx of “undesirable foreigners” (Lee 134). The objective of this Act was to significantly decrease the inflow of “eastern and southern European immigrants” and outright banned Asian immigration
Lee, Jeff. "Vancouver Council Apologizes to Japanese-Canadians for 1942 Support of Internment." Www.vancouversun.com. N.p., n.d. Web. 8 Jan. 2014. .
...ilroad and mining companies had depended on cheap Chinese labor for the majority of their profits and were still unwilling to pay higher wages to white American workers. These businesses increasingly depended on Japanese immigrants to replace the prohibited Chinese workers. As the Japanese came, the Americans told the same story that they had with the Chinese. They were once again arguing that the Japanese were taking their jobs and not absorbing the American culture. The United States took action yet again, by creating an informal treaty with Japan, restricting Japanese immigration to the U.S.
The horrors of racial profiling during World War II had always seemed to be distant to many Canadians, yet Canada was home to several xenophobic policies that were a violation of many rights and freedoms. One of the cruelest instances of this was the Japanese Canadian internment. At the time, the government justified the internment by claiming that the Japanese Canadians were a threat to their national defense, but evidence suggests that it had nothing to do with security. The government made illogical decisions in response to the mass panic and agitation in British Columbia. To aggravate the situation, Prime Minister William Mackenzie King reacted passively to these decisions, as it was not in his best interests to be involved. Moreover,
In the First World War, Japan joined the Allied powers, but played only a minor role in fighting German colonial forces in East Asia. At the following Paris Peace Conference of 1919, Japan's proposal of amending a "racial equality clause" to the covenant of the League of Nations was rejected by the United States, Britain and Australia. Arrogance and racial discrimination towards the Japanese had plagued Japanese-Western relations since the forced opening of the country in the 1800s, and were again a major factor for the deterioration of relations in the decades preceeding World War 2. In 1924, for example, the US Congress passed the Exclusion Act that prohibited further immigration from Japan.
The life in camps was a bitter experience for the Japanese community as it presented them with some of the harsh things to cope with. This brought tectonic changes to their relationships specially the gender relations, for instance, between 1908 and 1924, many of Japanese women; that is, over 33,000 immigrants entered the United States with various reasons. The “Gentlemen’s Agreement” of 1908 limited access of Japanese laborers into the country, although it authorized immigration of wives, parents, and children of laborers already staying in the United States. Altogether, the immigration Act (1924) eliminated immigration of Japanese altogether.
Even before the attack on Pearl Harbor, there was still tension between Japanese-Americans and other United States citizens. Laws like the “Gentlemen’s Agreement,” a way of restricting Japanese immigration, was put into place in 1908 in fear of a “future Japanese ‘takeover’” (Hata and Hata, 7). After the attack on Pearl Harbor, growing hysteria filled the country and Japanese-Americans feared for their future. About a year later, Franklin D. R...
Canada's immigration policies changed many times after the end of WWII. Before WWII the immigration policies were "picky" on the people who wanted to come to Canada, but after, it was fair and equal to everyone. Canada's immigration policies changed drastically from being discriminative to being fair and equal to everyone, every country and race after WWII. This act to eliminating discrimination was successful because of; the introduction of the Point System, the introduction of New Immigration acts/policies, and finally the changes made in accepting Refugees. These action completely changed the immigration policies.
The 21st Century has witnessed Asia’s rapid ascent to economic prosperity. As economic gravity shifts from the Western world to the Asian region, the “tyranny of distance [between states, will be] … replaced by the prospects of proximity” in transnational economic, scientific, political, technological, and social develop relationships (Australian Government, 1). Japan and China are the region’s key business exchange partners. Therefore these countries are under obligation to steer the region through the Asian Century by committing to these relationships and as a result create business networks, boost economic performance, and consequently necessitate the adjustment of business processes and resources in order to accommodate each country’s employment relations model (Wiley, Wilkinson, & Young, 2005). Cognizant of the fact that neither Japan nor China has given up on its external (protectionism or parity) adjustment tools, it is posited that they can nonetheless coexist since both “produce different things and in different ways” and as such avoid the cited perilous US and Mexico competition; but due to globalization, the operating environment portends a convergence or divergence of Industrial Relation (ER) strategies between China and Japan (Lipietz, 1997; Zhu & Warner, 2004).