Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Old Testament theology: The law
Old Testament theology: The law
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Old Testament theology: The law
Essentially, at least to the modern day reader, the wording in James 2:8-11 is clear and unambiguous, making it imperative to search for the most important words within the passage, i.e. the words “keep”, “law,” and “commit.”
While the overarching theme of the passage is to love one’s neighbor as oneself, James is speaking about the “law.” Ordinarily, laws are “kept;” and if they are not kept, sins are “committed.” Webster’s defines commit as “to carry into action deliberately;” keep as to “take notice of by appropriate conduct;” and law as, “the revelation of the will of God set forth in the Old Testament; the first part of the Jewish scriptures.”
Researching those words via the Greek of Biblical times reveals many meanings for the word law, but, as James used it in Chapter 2:8-11, it is the rule of action prescribed by reason and approved by God; or the moral instruction given by Christ, especially the precept of love. (G 3551). In James’ time,
…show more content…
We must remember this passage is in the New Testament after Jesus came and “filled” the law with further meaning. (The Commandments, 1978). In this passage James quotes OT law, Leviticus 19:18, while referencing the “royal law,” the law of love. By means of the cautionary “but,” he contrasts that royal love with favoritism, which he tells us is a sin; just as the “so” connector points out that the result of failing to keep one portion of the law, while keeping another, is to be a lawbreaker. Eerdmans notes that “In the world of the Bible, the basis of law was not philosophy, but crisis.” (Matthews, 2000). James is responding to a time of crisis, a time when rather than loving one another, people were judging the sins of others while committing sins themselves. It is only James who refers to the “law of freedom,” i.e., not the law of Moses, but the law of love written on people’s hearts by the Holy Spirit, the essence of the entire passage. (Wiersbe,
Much like the laws in the Old Testament, the law is God solving a problem before it occurs (Maxwell, 2010). As Reggie Joiner reminds us: “Relationship comes before rules” (Maxwell, 2010, 176). If a relationship forms, rules are easier to embrace. Rules are a tool to keep the ship and everyone on it going in the same direction. Shared systems of values strengthen partnerships minimizing the possibility of comprise. Values determine our actions. Our conscience can be a fickle thing if not tended to. A good study of 1 Timothy 1:5 will sharpen the cause for keeping the conscience in order and know that a good conscience is the product of a pure heart. Finally, we trust fully in God’s promises to comfort us, but need to share that same comfort through an empowerment to do so from God himself. Kept promises are the glue that holds all the guidelines together and shuttles them into the heart and soul of mankind by building
because it is showing that God shows no discrimination between the reason or color that you are because he loves you no matter what. James eventually does figure out that race isn't a big deal at all throughout his journey in life. So that's why this quote has an significant meaning to me.
James states that the human nature can be only concluded through the profound judgment as it were. He expresses his opinion as openly “No” on the individuality of human nature and on the lives of men whether they share an identical religious element. The reason that he has mentioned is that he does not see how can it be possible for human with different nature and different culture can share exactly same duties and power. Every person has his own views and believes when we are taking such a strong topic into account. Everyone has their unique way of dealing. Religion can be dealt in two ways either it can be
From my reading of Galatians, I would say that we should not follow the Jewish Law. If the Jewish law were the only way a person can be saved, then there would be no need for Jesus’s death. The apostle Paul also noticed this error because he tells the readers that because of his new understanding of the Law, he has come to reject the Law (Galatians 2:19). The Law is not the “end-all-be-all”, it is simply a filler until Jesus. Before the time of Jesus, people needed a moral code to live by, but they have a new Law to follow: the teachings of Jesus Christ!
According to James, belief is measured by actions of people within the society. Hypothesis and options are used in the description of beliefs. Hypothesis can be named to anything that proposes beliefs. It can be further classified as dead or alive. A live hypothesis is something real and viewed as true for anyone who proposes it. For example, in his submission, belief in Mahdi makes no electric connection with nature of any individual. This according to James is a dead hypothesis because beliefs are imaginary and does not produce light like electricity does. On the other hand, the hypothesis is alive according to followers of Mahdi. This is because the hypothesis among the believers is in their minds. Therefore, wherever there is willingness to act, beliefs are dominant.
One cannot expect to take verses out of context (which we love to do) and understand the separate, yet intertwining theology of these two books. I believe Martin Luther was wrong to wish to remove James’s letter from scripture. Each book has a different message concerning the trigger topics of faith and works, yet they both work together to create a picture of what God’s work in our lives is meant to look like. Putting our faith in Jesus and his sacrifice saves us. When true conversion takes place His Holy Spirit inhabits us and helps us to truly fulfill the law in what was otherwise forever beyond our capabilities. Although in different situations, both Paul and James point to how God accomplishes for us what we cannot do on our
"violation of God's law," which is the law that he is totally dedicated to and
The book of Romans was written by Paul. It is actually a letter that Paul wrote to the Romans telling them about his understanding of the Gospel. In this book his explains our sins and how we can achieve forgiveness through Christ. The most specific sin that he explains is that of judging one another. He helps address the problem of religious disagreements about different customs or religious convictions. These customs or religious convictions include the days on which people worship the Lord and the things that people will and will not eat. He wrote about the fact that we should not judge each other for God is going to judge us all in the end.
-without error, without contradiction. Seeing that there is a topical contradiction between the statements of Paul and James, and knowing that there are no contradictions in God's word we must reconciliate the two opposing views. In order to
In his article “Applying the Old Testament Law Today”, J. Daniel Hays brings out many positive and negative reasons why some believers tend to ignore many Old Testament Laws and embrace others. Hays emphasize how different evangelical scholars use moral, civil and ceremonial laws to help believers know whether a particular Mosaic Law applies to them. (Hays, 22) Ironically, we were taught in church and Bible study different ways to apply Matthew 25:39, “Love your neighbor as yourself”, to our daily living. Once an individual put this into action, they will begin to understand the true meaning of giving and how to love the way Jesus directed us to in the Bible.
Grayston, Kenneth. The Letters of Paul to the Philippians and to the Thessalonians. CBC. London: Cambridge U.P., 1967.
The Old Testament law is seen as irrelevant by most modern Christians today. Christians are now under the blood of Jesus Christ which is said to abrogate the Law. Galatians 6:2 says, “Bear one another's burdens, and thereby fulfill the law of Christ.” The law of Christ is to love God and your neighbor as yourself. This does not mean, however, that the Old Testament Law does not apply to Christians today. Author J. Daniel Hays expounds on this topic in his article, “Applying the Old Testament Law Today,” and focuses on the hermeneutical approach of Principlism. This approach allows the Old Testament Law to be viewed in light of the New Testament.
She begins with stating one of James’s main analysis, that every citizen is a pragmatist. Pragmatism is an important term to James. He describes it as a method of making decisions based off of the consequences, to all, that follow. Simon argues that James, yet another theorist, supports the fact that they project their own community’s ethical systems. James is a firm believer that Americans act with the consequences of their actions in mind, or by a pragmatist method. Not one soul is forcing Americans to be violent, it is simply in their nature. The difference between The child and the “suffering servant” is that one does not act altruistic. The child will never have feelings of satisfaction or redemption for its purpose in life. James, alike Girard seems concerned with the actual meaning of God. Since the truth can be guessed, and debated endlessly. Every critic has their standpoint, but James states that God has a strong ethical voice that is “tragically challenging.” Humans inevitably, are guilty of committing countless sins to each
Furthermore, James and other Evangelicals assumed that the freedmen could not care for themselves and thus distrusted them with their liberties, which kept them in a state of dependency. James saw the African American’s “elevation as a race” as a task given to him by God. Thus, he viewed himself as a savior of the African American race, bringing them “liberty and laws, art and enterprises, learning and pure religion”. This view was common among Evangelicals coming to the South who were often engaged in pedagogical exercises, trying to impose their Northern, white values upon the former slaves while simultaneously training them in religion. Men like James viewed African Americans as “poor creatures” in need of salvation, not as independent human beings deserving of rights and respect.
Luther states “the law is spiritual. If the law were for the body, it could be satisfied with works. Because it is spiritual, however, no one can satisfy it- unless all that you do is done from the bottom of the heart” (Luther 77). What Luther really means by this is that law can only be fulfilled where there is a spiritual heart and where that spirit is absent from the heart then there is sin and dissatisfaction with the law. A law is achieved by doing works which God decides if we are performing these tasks with the will of God from the heart. However, one will be punished by God for performing deeds when there is no heart because God is not satisfied by individuals who only do good works when others are watching or to get something in return. (Luther 76). Laws are meant to keep the sinful attributes of individuals under control through the fear of punishment. The law shows anyone that compares their life to Christ’s life who was without sin that he or she is sinful. God gave us law not because he is harsh but to help society maintain order and is also a guide so that we can know what good works will please God. The book of laws are found in the Old Testament which teaches what individuals can and cannot do. The Old Testament is comprised of the demanding of good, stories of how laws can be maintained or broken, and promising the forgiveness of sin (Luther 98). The apostles use the