Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Old Testament theology: The law
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Old Testament theology: The law
J. Daniel Hays debates two avenues for us to take in interpreting and applying the Old Testament Law. The first view is called the traditional approach (Hays 2001, Pg 22). This approach suggests the Bible reader can selectively choose the moral laws, while practically ignoring the civil and ceremonial laws. The problem is the distinctions into these three types of laws can be personally random; like the saying goes, “to each their own”. The author brought up a very good point in quoting Leviticus 19:18-19: “Love your neighbor as yourself” (Lev 19:18) “Do not wear clothing woven of two kinds of material” (Lev 19:19)
The author attests which verse should we take literally and which should we not. Does that mean that we can be mean to our neighbors as long as we strictly wear one animal, or vice versa? Is being a good neighbor a moral issue or is it a civil duty? It takes the Law out of its literary context.
The second view is called principlism (Hays 2001, Pg 30). With this approach to applying the Old Testament Law, Hays identifies five steps. The first step identifies what the particular law means to the audience. Every word in the Bible has a meaning, and meanings could change as societies change throughout time. Second, Hays says we should differentiate between the original audience and today’s believers. Third, we should develop a universal principle from the timeless meaning of the text. Fourth is to incorporate the principles within the New Testament teachings. Lastly, the reader personally should apply the modified universal principle to life today.
The issue with the fourth step is that the New Testament, at times, contradicts itself in terms of how to follow the Old Testament Law:
“Do not think that I came to...
... middle of paper ...
...ts omens, or a sorcerer, or one who conjures spells, or a medium, or a spiritist, or one who calls up the dead. For all who do these things are an abomination to the Lord, and because of these abominations the Lord your God drives them out from before you. You shall be blameless before the Lord your God.”
This passage is great for us today. It preaches us that though the world may be going one way, we are commanded by God to go the right way. Though there may be people who are cheating on their spouse, we should not be living in this sort of environment ourselves. We, as Christians, are ordained to be a lighthouse of morality from God. People look to us as an example and sometimes wait and hope for us to slip. Slipping is easier if we live of the world and not in accordance of God’s will. We know God’s will by reading and applying the Old Law into our lives.
From my reading of Galatians, I would say that we should not follow the Jewish Law. If the Jewish law were the only way a person can be saved, then there would be no need for Jesus’s death. The apostle Paul also noticed this error because he tells the readers that because of his new understanding of the Law, he has come to reject the Law (Galatians 2:19). The Law is not the “end-all-be-all”, it is simply a filler until Jesus. Before the time of Jesus, people needed a moral code to live by, but they have a new Law to follow: the teachings of Jesus Christ!
^ John Arthur Thomas Robinson (1919-1983). "Redating the New Testament". Westminster Press, 1976. 369 halaman. ISBN 10: 1-57910-527-0; ISBN 13: 978-1-57910-527-3
The Old Testament and the Bible itself has been studied extensively for centuries. Archeologists and Scholars have labored and pondered over texts trying to decipher its clues. It does not matter how many times the Old Testament has been studied there will always be something new to learn about it or the history surrounding it. In the book Reading the Old Testament: an Introduction, the author Lawrence Boadt presents us with a few different authors of the Old Testament that used different names for God and had a unique insight into the texts. These four sources are titled P for priests, E for Elohim, J for Jehovah, and Y for Yahweh (95). These four unique sources help us realize that there is more than one author of the Pentateuch. These authors took the text and adapted for their culture. This independent source is used by scholars to help gain insight into what was behind the texts of the bible so we are not left with an incomplete picture of what went into the creation of the bible. Julius Wellhausen used these four sources to publish a book to able us to better understand the sources and to give it credibility with the Protestant scholars at the time (Boadt 94). These sources that is independent of the bible as in the DVD Who Wrote the Bible? and the Nova website aide in shedding light on the history that surrounded the writers who wrote the text and what inspired them to write it in the first place. The DVD shows the discovery of The Dead Sea Scrolls and the extensive history of the texts and all its sources in an effort to try to find exactly who wrote the bible (Who Wrote). These scrolls have aided scholars immensely by giving us some of the oldest known manuscripts of the bible in the world today. It shows that the bible w...
authority, then humans ought to obey the laws of the Bible. By this reasoning, the Biblical norm
The traditional approach to the Mosaic Law is categorized by moral, civil, and ceremonial laws. Hays mentions this is not the correct approach as it has three major weaknesses: no textual support, ignores the narrative context, and fails to reflect the changes from the Old Covenant to the New Covenant. Hays postulates the correct method is Principlism, a five step approach to applying the Law.
In the days of Christ’s life on this earth, believers did not have access to the Bible in its entirety as we know and are familiar with today. Believers in this ancient time period only had access to the Old Testament. However, through their access to the Old Testament, believers were provided a foundation for New Testament times. This foundation provided New Testament believers with the Lord’s established principles of right and wrong they were expected to follow. In addition, the Old Testament is overflowing with accounts of people whose lives exemplified the future life of Christ on this earth. These pictures allowed the Israelite nation to begin to have an understanding of why Christ needed to come as their Messiah and the work He needed to do on earth. Finally, there are common themes that are interwoven throughout the entire Old Testament. Three of these themes: transgression, redemption, and consummation point to the purpose of Christ’s atoning death on the cross. These themes portray God’s work both in the lives of Old Testament believers, but they also foreshadow God’s desire and plan for believers in New Testament times and beyond.
...of defense into a triumphant presentation of gospel in the Letter to the Galatians. The requirement of Galatians to follow the Law of Moses in order to convert to Christianity is proven invalid by Paul, who teaches that faith in Christ and living by the Spirit is essential to the religion—not following gratuitous rules of the flesh. Paul offers guidance for the audience on how to follow the gospel he teaches in contrast to the strict and changeable rules his opposition forces upon the Galatians. By using an appeal to ethos to build his credibility with the audience, an appeal to logos to explain the triviality of the traditional laws of Judaism, and allegories to provide the innovative interpretation of God as a father to his followers, Paul is able to successfully spread his gospel of faith in Christ and living by the Spirit to the Galatians and other audiences.
One of the main themes in Chapter Fourteen is that of morality. Cari Barney defined morality as “conformity to the rules of right conduct” (lecture). Man is “a moral being” obligated “to act according to moral principles” (McDonald, 2007, p. 165). Deep down within man’s conscience, there is the sense of knowing right from wrong and knowing God’s requirements (Romans 2:14-15). This awareness should cause all humans to strive to adhere to what God requires of us. The moral consciousness of man is within the heart (Proverbs 4:23). McDonald (2007) stated, “So man is in himself a moral being with moral obligations and responsibilities (p. 165). Man’s lifestyle should resemble biblical principles that have been instructed by God.
...rtance. They felt that before proceeding to other biblical texts, children should first be educated concerning the sanctity of God and his responsibility of each individual to live a holy life.” (The Spirit-Filled Life Bible, NKJV, p. 146) In Leviticus, God is present with his people. In Israel’s worship, all sacrifices and ceremonies took place before the Lord. This teaches Jews that God is always there and that everything they do must be done in light of His presence. For human beings to develop a relationship with God, they must first be forgiven and cleansed of sin. (Lev 1:1-7, 11:1-15:33) Lastly, the Book of Leviticus teaches the Jewish community to obey God, worship, serve and obey only God, recognize His blessings, be as concerned about every aspect of their lives as God is, and to deal justly with each other, just as God deals justly with His people.
Religious texts have been one of the main sources for laws and social customs since the conception of organized religion. Each religious text provides its followers with a code of conduct they are expected to apply to themselves, their actions, and their institutions. This code of conduct applies to the individual, as well as to the government and society to within which the people exist, and ultimately defines what a "just society" is in the context of that religion. Using stories and proverbs this code of conduct, and thus "just society", is not only set, but also shown in examples. In The Bible, the essence of a "just society" is laid out within passages that serve as "the laws", including Deuteronomy, and the Psalms, and in the stories, such as the stories of Job, David, Samuel, and the Family of Adam. The actions and nature of God in these stories are meant to be an example of the values and personality favored by God. In these passages, a structure for a just society is presented, and the values and examples, which are to be referred to and followed in the creation of this "just society", are discussed. However, even within these passages, there are discrepancies between the structure of the ideal "just society" and its values, and the following of these examples by the stories presented in The Bible. One of the most noticeable of these is the difference between the presentation of the ideal "just society" and values that are supposed to be implemented by the people, and the actual justice and values presented in the stories. This is particularly pertaining to the stories of the rulers appointed by God, and the vengeful nature of God himself presented in these stories.
To put it a simpler way, it is one’s own way of understanding a text, and the understanding vary, not concrete. As a 21st century individual, the passages above encompass a picture of how to live life in harmony with others. Growing up in America, institutions such as school did not teach me about moral ethnic. Usually, the things that I see as right and wrong came from the values I derived from my family’s lifestyle and my religion. School is only tool to give me knowledge, but it did not give me moral. The Precepts are important in the way that its teachings blend in with the values that I hold dear. Reading the passages as Thou enable me to find deeper meaning to the text. Instead of trying to understand the text in the modern day, I try to place and imagine that myself I am from that particular period. By doing so, I am putting on another person’s culture and belief, which will help me to understand why his culture and belief affected his thought. Additionally, I try to find what certain words meant during that time, because I know that certain words provoke different meanings, depending on their usage. For example, in the 21st century, “ taking life” definitely mean that you do not kill anyone, but that only apply to humans. However, “ taking life” in the passage also meant not killing the tiniest creatures on Earth, even if their lives seem so insignificant. Trying to read the passage was
Unfortunately for Christians, there is actually very little law in the Bible -- either Old Testament or New -- that is original. Consider the Torah of the ancient Jews. The laws of the Babylonians, Assyrians, Sumerians, Hammurapi, Eshnunna, Hittites, Mishnah, and Israelites all bear a striking resemblance to each other, due to widespread copying of laws. Shared social norms produced identical laws against sorcery, kidnapping, sale of an abducted person, false witness, business dishonesty, bribing judges, property right violations, shutting off irrigation canals used by others, etc. The complete list of identical laws and customs is quite extensive. & nbsp; Nor is the New Testament's approach to the law unique.
...cting humanity is achievable, but requires tremendous determination to stray towards the path of temptation. Stated in the beginning of the poem by the Lord, “Impelled in this direction, then in that one, A good man still knows which way is the right one.”(pg.104)
The rule of Biblical interpretation that has been broke here is that no doctrine is to entirely be based off one passage of Scripture from the Bible. Along with that no verse or phrase can or should be allowed to have a meaning when isolated that it would not have if it was kept in its original context.