Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Why did the metropolitan police find it hard to catch jack the ripper
Jack the ripper analysis paper
Why did the metropolitan police find it hard to catch jack the ripper
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Jack the Ripper
Source Related
In August 1888 a killer who became known as Jack the Ripper committed
the first of a sequence of murders. To this day the description of the
killer remains a mystery. A mad person who is violent and dangerous
who emerge to kill without warning and with no guilt, horribly killed
five women in the East End of London.
1. Study Source A, What can you learn from Source A about the murders
of the Martha Tabrum and Polly Nicholls?
Source A is part of an article in the East End observer describing the
murders of Martha Tabram and Polly Nicholls. It is therefore a primary
source of evidence with a fairly reliable purpose of informing the
public of the east end. Clearly it is written by somebody living in
the area at that time and therefore helps us to see the people's
opinion of the murders at that time. Most importantly we can learn
that people linked the two murders together, 'both crimes are the work
of a demented being' this statement is purely the writers opinion as
no further evidence ever proves this to be the case however the
article informs us there were similarities to the murders.
We can also learn the context of the murders, 'the victims have been
the poorest of the poor, and no adequate motive in the shape of
plunder.' From this statement we can notice that the murders were done
in cold blood and not considered robberies. It could also be suggested
that the Polly Nicholls and Martha Tabram did nothing to defend such
an attack but were murdered suddenly ...
... middle of paper ...
...only good for policing crowds and keeping order rather than
detective work. He was especially criticized for not offering a reward
for capturing the Ripper. The city police officers made crime scene
illustration, took many photographs of two of the victims. This proves
that the police did try all their best to capture the Ripper, but it
was difficult as the murders were cleverly continued and not a trace
was left of the murderer, so in a way the police were not too blame,
also other than medically examining the victims to discover the cause
of death and taking statements from everybody who might know something
there was little, also that the Metropolitan police force did, and
looking at all the sources there wasn't much more the police could do
in that time when comparing to the present(2004-2005) police force
tactics.
Only Graham Stafford and Melissa Holland had keys to the boot of his car. There was enough evidence to support that Melissa had nothing to do with the deceased
Police also had fingerprints from the buick the was used in the South Braintree crime. But the fingerprints didn’t match and the police instead questioned them on their religion, political beliefs and associates, instead of the crime. The prosecutors used witnesses, but the witness accounts made no sense. Meaning it didn’t match the descriptions of the men and the stories weren’t the same and had loopholes. One witness said she saw the shooting from 60 feet away and said one of the men, which she said was Sacco, had big hands but he had small hands.
...lice or lawyers used their integrity. The police skirted around the law and use evidence that the witnesses said was not correct. They had a description of the suspect that did not match Bloodsworth but, they went after him as well. They also used eyewitness testimony that could have been contaminated.
We were presented with many facts that all pointed to Mr. Washburn as the murder. In the house all of the entrances were thoroughly inspected by authorities, and they found no sign of ransacking. “[They] examined all the locking mechanisms, all the doors and windows. In [their] opinion there was no evidence of any forced entry” (P.81). When police looked for fingerprints, “They were all of the Washburn family and the maid” (P.81). There was no trace of an outside party; somebody usually in the Washburn house committed the murder. While in the living room, an officer found a drop of blood. The evidence technician was called the next night to run some tests. “He sprayed the living room carpet with luminol. It is a luminous spray, and when it comes in contact with blood it illuminates” (P.82). To both men’s surprise the whole living room was illuminating. After spraying further the men found a trail from the living room through the kitchen to the garage. In the closet the men found a wet mop, which was tested for blood and also came back positive. Somebody tried to clean his or her bloody mess, and try to save himself. The physical evidence proves the killer was somebody who was familiar to the Washburn household.
brother, did the actually killing, but his mother in father aided in the coverup of the crime.
The town of Halifax in West Yorkshire had never experienced such a manhunt in it’s history (Glover 3). During a short, but long lasting in feeling, time period in late November through early December in the year 1938, the town of Halifax underwent a period of mass hysteria. A mysterious “slasher” hid in the shadows and lunged out with a razor blade at people who passed by (Halifax Slasher).
Two detectives were assigned to the case: Harry Hanson and Finis Brown. [2] When they and the police arrived at the crime scene, it was already swarming with people, gawkers and reporters. The entire situation was out of hand and crowded, everyone trampling all over any hopes for good evidence. [2] One thing they did report finding was a nearby cement block with watery blood on it, tire tracks and a heel print on the ground. There was dew under the body so they knew it had been set there just after 2 a.m. when temperatures dropped to 38 degrees.
In the case of Alois Dolejs the crime control model, was swift and took the criminal off the streets. The police had a lot of circumstantial evidence, for example, bloody cloths and two different types of blood. On the advise of his attorney, he was instructed not to disclose the location of the bodies, until after the trial.
When the first responder got to the scene he adimatately meet the 911 caller, who lead him to a car in an apartment parking lot. The car doors were closed and all of the windows were fogged. The police officer used his flashlight to see inside of the car before opening the door. He found a young African American woman who had been shot several times. The officers quickly called for backup, investigators and medical personnel. While awaiting for their arrival he secured the crime scene with caution tape, creating an initial perimeter setup as discussed in lecture two. Once everyone arrived he left it to them to search the car while he talked to the 911 caller, witnesses and others who had information on who had been present in the car. The investigators were able to collect physical evidence of bullets and cartage casings that were found outside the vehicle and inside the vehicle on the floorboard of the driver’s side. The team determined the bullets came from a 40 caliber. Other types of physical evidence that were found on the scene were the bloody clothing on the victim, the victim’s cell phone and fibers in the car from the driver’s side. personnel at the scene crime took several photographs, powered test for finger prints and did a blood spatter analysis. Stewart’s autopsy revealed that she had been shot at close range in the left hand once and in the
The issue here I believe is with the justice system itself and not the direct actions of the prosecution or the police involved. The blame isn’t really so easy to point out honestly. If anyone is to blame at all it would be the people who tampered with the crime scene and the potential failure/inability of the police in preserving the scene if it was possible.
Jack Merridew is the devil-like figure in the story, Lord of the Flies. Jack is wicked in nature having no feelings for any living creature. His appearance and behavior intimidates the others from their first encounter. The leading savage, Jack leans more towards hunting and killing and is the main reason behind the splitting of the boys. It has been said that Jack represents the evilness of human nature; but in the end, Jack is almost a hero. With his totalitarian leadership, he was able to organize the group of boys into a useful and productive society
The impulsivity in Jack’s commands, usually fire back on him and he is immediately self conscious about not being taken seriously and acts off of those actions with no remorse. While on the island, Jack, who has had trouble with asserting his dominance in a confident way, lacks stability in himself when he fails to succeed trivial tasks. “He licked his lips and turned his head at an angle, so that his gaze avoided the embarrassment of linking with another’s eye”(Golding 127). Jack, has challenged Ralph’s authority as a leader by assembling a vote to see whom believes who should be leader of the tribe. Neither the Biguns or Littluns reflected approval towards Jack’s tyrannical party, which immediately confounds Jack’s expectations as leader.
...hen he was asked a series of questions about the murder he had no opinion or a reasonable answer to why exactly he had killed the man.
“Jack the Ripper”, an alias given because someone sent and signed a letter in that name, is the infamous serial killer that harmed the streets of Whitechapel district in East End London during 1888. The Ripper murdered, from what is known, at least five prostitutes in an unusual medical manner that helped provide the police with a hint that the killer might have been educated in the human anatomy (Biography.com). The killer became and remained famous for numerous reasons, one of them being that the media romanticized him. Media transformed the Ripper from a “sad killer of women” into a “bogey man”, becoming “the most romantic figures in history” (Barbee). Jack the Ripper was never caught, letting him remain as one of the world’s most infamous
At the beginning of the third chapter in Lord of the Flies, Jack Merridew is out hunting for a pig to eat. This phrase and the surrounding paragraphs show some crucial characterization of the future savage chief, and describe him as “dog-like”(48), naked besides weapons and fraying shorts, and his eyes appear to be“...bolting and nearly mad”(48). Jack is tensed, frustrated, and searching for something to kill. The word still typically does not have a negative denotation, but the zeugma at play in this circumstance modifies it in its meaning relating to Jack, or he. The framework of the forest in this chapter is a more commonplace way to imagine the verb still. The air is warm, and the thick trees are all around the character at hand. The two