Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Case study leanne tiernan
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Leanne Sarah Holland born 1st October 1978 was a 12year old girl from Goodna Queensland found murdered. Her body was discovered 8.9 kilometers from her home in nearby Redbank Plains down a dirt track on 26th September 1991. Holland lived with her dad Terry, older sister Melissa and sister’s de-facto partner Graham. Graham Stuart Stafford was a 28year old sheet metal worker from Goodna Queensland. On 25th March 1992, he was sentenced to 15years to life in prison for the murder of Holland. On Monday 23rd September 1991 was the last day Holland was seen alive by her family when they left to go to work. Holland had started school holidays and was home with Stafford who was on a rostered day off from work. Stafford said Holland went to nearby shops …show more content…
c) Human blood was found in the boot, lid and lip of Stafford’s red Gemini sedan 539 OXB. Was alleged body was transported in the trunk. d) Three items found in Stafford’s car: a blanket, a red and black sports bag and a CHUX cloth were found to have the same blood type as the deceased on them. This blood type is uncommon and only shared by 0.00005% of the population. e) A strand of hair found in Stafford’s boot believed to match the deceased hair. f) A maggot found in the boot of Stafford’s car was found that matched the same one taken from the deceased body on the 26th September when she was found. The maggots were of same age and type. g) Injuries inflicted on Leanne’s body suggested that whoever caused her injuries intended to cause death or grievous bodily harm. h) A hammer that is alleged to have caused blows to the deceased head, was reported missing after 23rd September 1991, by Melissa Holland. It is reported that Stafford kept it in their bedroom. i) Only Graham Stafford and Melissa Holland had keys to the boot of his car. There was enough evidence to support that Melissa had nothing to do with the deceased
Jonbenet Ramsey was murdered on December 26, 1996. Her body was found in the basement of the Ramsey's house. When the autopsy of her body was made they found some interesting details. The police suspected she died of suffocation but later they find that she was already dead when the rope when around her neck. A blunt hard object struck her head which cause her to be brain dead. This could have been something similar to a flashlight they found at the scene. The autopsy also showed that Jonbenet ate a piece of pineapple before she died. There were two small marks on her back as well. The Ramsey didn't want her body to be examined or look in there house for more evidence. They didn't really cooperate with the police to help
Gail Miller was a 22-year-old nursing assistant living in Saskatoon. She was found in an alley way between 6:45 and 7:30am on January 31st 1969. She had been raped, stabbed twelve times and left for dead. The rape was found to have occurred after she died. The police had little evidence; few clues had been left behind. There had been other attacks in the same area. Authorities tried to suppress the information that linked the Miller rape and murder to the two other assaults.
found behind the guest house was proven by DNA testing to have O.J.'s blood and
The Web. 28 Feb 2014 Christopher, Liam. “Mother ‘vindicated’ after girl’s murder suspect held.” Daily Post. 18 Aug. 2006: 19:. Proquest Newsstand.
"TRANSCRIPT OF INQUEST HELD ON THE BODY OF ELIZABETH SHORT."VioletArojo. N.p., n.d. Web. 12 May 2014.
In September 2014, Picstorius was found guilty of culpable homicide. Barry Steenkamp, Reeva Steenkamp’s father stated in an interview with an Australian channel SBS One that, “He could have gone to the balcony and shouted for help knowing that somebody was there. He could have pressed the alarm system [and] all this would have been prevented,” he said. “I feel that there’s still a missing link somewhere. I think there’s quite a bit more to the whole thing than has been produced so far.” (this week article)
She then went back into cardiac arrest and she died. The doctors stored her carcass into ice and put her under an air vent. Her funeral was on September 6th, 1997 at 9:08 am in London.
The stabbing resulted in severe mechanical and structural changes to her body that caused her to lose excessive amounts of blood, culminating in death. This is similar to Combs in that the injury was incidental to an event that occurred in the workplace, and from that incidental event, mechanical and structural changes to the body resulted. Combs at 508-509. Hannon’s injury also fits the second definition offered by the Virginia Supreme Court in Haddon that the injury be unusual and unexpected. Haddon at 399. Much as Haddon would not have expected to be harassed or discriminated at work, Hannon likely did not expect to be stabbed at her workplace. Haddon at 399. While we cannot know for sure that Hannon did not expect to be stabbed at work that day, it seems to be a reasonable deduction given that she voluntarily was watering the flowers and did not know the assailant. Accordingly, Hannon’s injury constitutes an accident under the Workers’ Compensation
When Barnes was interrogated he confessed to the murder of Jamie Silvonek, and tried to insist that his girlfriend had no prior knowledge of the murder. Jamie was charged with “Solicitation of murder” and Barnes was charged with First Degree Murder.
Those two heirs were Turtle Wexler and Judge Ford. Judge Ford thought this already and she figured out that Turtle thought the same when she was interviewing her about the fireworks. Turtle, then, had said that when she found the body in the Westing house, it looked like a wax dummy and not a real life dead body. J.J, earlier during the reading of the will, had thought the same thing, that the body did not look real. Following up on that fact, always if someone is murdered, especially someone of that importance, an autopsy is performed to figure out the murderer. This ALWAYS happens, the police should have been all over the case. But, the body did not get an autopsy, even the Judge thought it was not unlawful to have an autopsy, and the only reason the cops came was because of the bomb cases, but those came later. So, since the autopsy didn’t happen, the body must be fake!
The main question that appears from the crime scene is how can this one suspect place the body in the trunk of the car by himself and is it even possible for the suspect to be able to lift and carry the suspect to the trunk of the car. The victim was a larger man approximately 250 pounds. The medical examination states that the suspect could of had help or may not of had help placing the victim in the trunk of the car. There were minor abrasion and scrapes found on the body possibly from dragging the body down the stairs. This was unconfirmed and the medical examiner said it was possible that he placed the victims body in the trunk by himself. There was no physical evidence proving that there was another suspect tied to the case. No other fingerprints
Mary was playing with her brother Peter and her brothers friend Peter. The two boys had left Mary at 2:30 pm. Peter (the brothers friend) dad arrived on the shore at 3:45pm and saw no sight of Mary. At 4pm that same day Mary's father went to collect Mary from the beach, but she was not in sight. Mary's body was found at 12:30 am the following day. In the autopsy report it stated "Mary was sexually assaulted and murdered". Marys body was found in a small cave and near the cave there was a situated rock pool, claimed where the murder washed his hands to remove Mary's blood. There were also footprints leading from the rock pool to the local carnival had been situated the previous day. Robert Maxwell Stuart, was running a carnival booth for Mr and Mrs Norman Gieseman, both had gone drinking during the daytime. Stuart disappeared at 10pm and 1pm. Stuart was arrested due to intoxication. The next day Stuart was fired after getting a 15 year old Moir drunk. After Moir was questioned by the police he stated that he saw Stuart that night with some fellow darker skin citizens around the scene of the crime where Mary was murdered. Police contacted Stuart to question him about the murder, the police matched the footprints that were located near the Rockpool as Stuart's and locks of hair in Mary's hand as Stuart's as well. I believe that from the forensic evidence that was
On 15th of September around 1.45pm police were called out to a property in Springbank located only 20 kilometres outside of ballarat after a body (believed to be Ken Handford from other media reports) was discovered by his neighbor around 1.25pm who was dropping by to wish the elderly man a happy birthday. It is thought that it would of been the man’s 90th birthday.
Blood stains are one type of evidence that can be found at a crime scene. Blood that is still in the liquid form should be picked up on a gauze pad. Once the blood is dried thoroughly it should be refrigerated and sent to the Laboratory (Andrus et al., n.d., para. 1). If the blood stain is found dried on clothing, the officer should wrap the piece of clothing in clean paper and place it in a sealed and labeled container. An object with dried blood stains needs to be sent to the Laboratory if it is small enough. If the object is too large to send, then using a clean knife the stain needs to be scraped onto a clean piece of paper, which then can be folded and placed in an envelope (Andrus et al., n.d., para. 2). When collecting autopsy blood samples, the officer should request that the pathologist obtain the sample directly from the heart and place it in a yellow or purple stoppered vacutainer. If the victim is still alive but in serious need of a blood transfusion, then the pre-transfusion blood sample needs to be obtained promptly before the hospital discards it (Andrus et al., n.d., para. 4). It is important for the Laboratory to receive all blood samples within 48 ho...
The interview seemed to confirm that the family was not involved in the murder. The foster home investigation was closed.[7] A DNA test showed that the stepdaughter was not the boy's mother.[1]Another theory was brought forward in February 2002 by a woman identified only as "M." Police considered "M"'s story to be plausible but were troubled by her testimony, as she had a history of mental illness.[8][9] "M" claimed that her abusive mother had "purchased" the unknown boy (whose name was Jonathan) from his birth parents in the summer of 1954.[4][10] Subsequently, the boy was subjected to extreme physical and sexual abuse for two and a half years. One evening at dinner, the boy vomited up his meal of baked beans and was given a severe beating, with his head slammed against the floor until he was semiconscious. He was then given a bath, during which he died. These details matched information known only to the police, as the coroner had found that the boy's stomach contained the remains of baked beans and that his fingers were water-wrinkled.[4]"M"'s mother then cut the boy's distinctive long hair (accounting for the unprofessional haircut which police noted in their initial investigation) in an effort to conceal his identity.