On March 20th, 2018, I conducted an interview with J2018-0568B at the Butler County Juvenile Office. Prior to any questioning, J2018-0568B was read and explained the juvenile Miranda Warning by Juvenile Officer Salyer. J2018-0568B was accompanied by his grandmother (legal guardian) and his brother's girlfriend (power of attorney) during the interview. During our conversation, 2018-0568B explained that he came to school and the bill was already being passed around. J2018-0568B said another student named Justin handed him the bill. He does not know Justin and the bill was handed to him outside of the building. J2018-0568B said Justin asked him if he wanted the bill but he felt something was not right so he handed the bill to J2018-0568A. The group told J2018-0568A to take the bill to the office and Justin told J2018-0568A that he would split …show more content…
After passing the bill J2018-0568A came back to the group and gave $50.00 to Justin and J2018-0568A kept some money and the other kids kept handing out the change. J2018-0568B said he and another student split twenty dollars of the change. J2018-0568B then said he received the twenty dollar bill and he split it with the other student later. J2018-0568B also said J2018-0568A was the one who did the internet research to learn the consequences of their actions not him. J2018-0568B said he didn't figure out the bill was counterfeit until after third hour when J2018-0568A told him the bill was fake. J2018-0568B said that he was just trying to get rid of the bill because he knew there was something wrong but he couldn't figure it out. J2018-0568B said J2018-0568A was the person
I. Facts: 15-year-old delinquent, Gerald Gault and a friend were arrested after being accused of making a lewd phone call to a neighbor. Gerald’s parents were not notified of the situation. After a hearing, the juvenile court judge ordered Gerald to surrender to the State Industrial School until he reached the age of minority (21). Gerald's attorney petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus challenging the state of Arizona for violating the juvenile’s 14th Amendment due process rights. The Superior Court of Arizona and the Arizona State Supreme Court both dismissed the writ affirmatively deciding that the juvenile’s due process rights were not violated.
This case is about a 15 year old kid, along with a friend, who made an erotic call to a neighbor's house. The alleged incident took place on June 8, 1964 by Gerald Gault and Ronald Lewis. Mrs. Cook, the neighbor, filed a complaint which resulted in Gerald Gault’s arrest. Gerald was indeed on probation for something he had done prior to this incident. The officer who made the arrest did not leave notice for the juvenile's parents and did not endeavor to advise them of their child's arrest, however, they found out about the arrest from Ronald Lewis later.. “After arresting a juvenile, an officer must notify the juvenile's parent or legal guardian regarding: the whereabouts of the child, the nature of the charges, and the police department's planned course of action” (O'Neil, 2010). Gerald’s mother was giving information on when the hearing for her son was after arriving where he was
On a normal work night at Pete’s Pizza, two co-workers decided to switch shifts. Kayla Cutler asked Gabie Klug to work a Wednesday evening, so she could have Friday evening off. That night Kayla and Drew are working, a man named “John Robertson” called in to order three large meat monster pizzas to be delivered to 1091 River Road which is a fake address. He asked if the girl in the mini cooper was making deliveries, the one driving the mini cooper is Gabie, but since Gabie isn’t there, Kayla had to go make the delivery. Kayla takes the order and never comes back, so Drew got worried and decided to call the police and file a report, for a missing person. As time passes, Drew told Gabie that the guy who ordered had asked for the girl driving
Mark was so confused and could not answer the child that the teacher scolded him, stating that this behavior was inappropriate. Mark did not know what to do.... ... middle of paper ... ...
On March 7, 1980, a teacher at Piscataway High School in Middlesex County, N.J., found two girls smoking in the school lavatory, which was a violation of school code. The teacher took them to the Principles office where they met the Assistant Vice-Principle Theodore Choplick. Under questioning the first girl admitted smoking in the lavatory. The second girl, 14 year old freshman T.L.O., denied that she had smoked in the lavatory. Mr. Choplick then asked to search the girl’s purse. He found a pack of cigarettes. Upon pulling the pack of cigarettes out Mr. Choplick discovered cigarette rolling papers, which is closely associated with marijuana. He proceeded to search the purse to find a small amount of marijuana, a pipe, small empty plastic bags, a substantial amount of money all in one dollar bills, and two letters that implies that she is a dealer. Mr. Choplick notified her mother and the police and told her mother to take her to the police headquarters. A New Jersey juvenile court admitted the evidence, saying that the search of the purse was reasonable under the standard of enforcing school policy and maintaining school discipline. The court found the student, T.L.O., to be a delinquent and sentenced her to a years probation. The appellate Division affirmed the courts decision that there had been no Fourth Amendment violation, T.L.O.
The students' families were awarded approximately $63,000 per victim and the defendants agreed to state for the record that they regretted their actions.” This award
Situation: Tom is supposed to white was a fence as punishment for ditching school the previous day. As kids walk by, Tom tricks them into paying him to do his work for him.
The mechanics behind this new process set in the Florida Juvenile justice System start with the officer, as sta...
3. What does Alma’s plan for the twenty dollar bill show about her? What does the discussion about both the money and the paperboy indicate about their own
One of the issues that were brought up was an upset parent who mentioned that his child suffers from narcolepsy. He was addressing that he wants the school board to help him because he feels as if the principal is penalizing his daughter. He mentioned that the principal mentioned that he will penalize the girl because of her lateness. He also mentioned that the principal refused to acknowledge his daughter’s sickness and how the principal bullied him. Following this one of the members from the board address this issue by mentioning that this issue that the parent has addressed is a personal issue that really should not be mentioned in this meeting. The school board member also mentioned that this should not be acceptable from a principal to be uninvolved. And how no child should be treated like this. He would also mention that this issue will be
To begin with, after sending a ransom note, the two men get a return message back from the father of the boy, stating that he will gladly take the boy from the men if they pay him 250 dollars. In his note, the father writes that if “you bring Johnny home and pay me two hundred and fifty dollars in cash, and I agree to take him off your hands. You had better come at night, for the neighbours believe he is lost, and I couldn’t be responsible for what they would do to anybody they saw bringing him back” (TRORC, pg. 14, par. 3). This is contrary to what the men originally want, as they are expecting payment, rather than having to pay the father of the boy. They were originally sure that they could get easy money out of the deal. They believe all of this based on the fact that the father, and not on the boy himself. In addition to getting a return message that dashes their hopes of getting easy money, the two men decide to return the boy and pay the 250 dollars, contrary to their original plan. After receiving the note, Sam, the other kidnapper, is angry at first, but his accomplice Bill says, “What’s two hundred and fifty dollars, after all? We’ve got the money. One more night of this kid will send me to a bed in Bedlam. Besides being a thorough gentleman, I think Mr. Dorset is a spendthrift for making us such a liberal offer. You ain’t going to let the chance go, are you?” (TRORC, pg. 15, par. 2). Sam eventually agrees with Bill, and they both return the boy and pay the 250 dollars. Their plan to make easy money has failed due to the fact they went on the original appearance of the boy and his father, and not the actual temperament of the boy. Along with returning the boy and paying 250 dollars, the two men make a very quick get away. Sam comments
In chapter 4, John and Lorraine lied to Mr. Pignati about the L&J Fund. In chapter 11, John told a police officer that he and Lorraine were Mr. Pignati’s Children. They also lied to the hospital by stating that they were Mr. Pignati’s children. In chapter 13, Lorraine lied to her mom by telling her that she was going to go do homework at Jane’s house.” John told Mr. Pignati that only they only invited two people when they clearly knew they invited many more people because they felt like it was a good time to pay all the people back for the parties they were invited to. According to the text, “Lorraine and I want to apologize for that party. We had only invited two people, but those others stopped by, and before you knew it things got out of
The people that were paid twenty dollars felt comfortable lying to the next subject since they were getting paid a better amount. The subjects that were paid a dollar had to convince themselves that it was ok to lie to the next subject in order to actually be able to; the subjects that got paid twenty dollars did not. Furthermore, the subjects that were paid one dollar talked to the next subject to be nice. The subjects that were paid twenty dollars talked to the next subject for the money without a
The student that the car is registered to is called to the office to speak with the Principal and the Dean of Students. The student reveals the names of the other students and claims that they are all involved. Those other students are then called down to speak with the Dean of Students about the incident and their knowledge of what took place.
Three people in the one dollar and two people in the twenty-dollar condition felt that they were suspicious getting paid out to tell a girl that the experiment was fun. Two people both in the one-dollar condition told that girls that they had been hired. One person in the one-dollar condition and two people in the twenty-dollar condition refused to take the money and be hired. One person in the one-dollar condition immediately told the girl that something was up and demanded her number so he can explain the situation later