More handpicked essays just for you.
Social interaction affects development
How does the society shape the behavior of an individual
Social interaction affect a childs development
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Certain individuals respond and take initiative differently than others. William Golding, through the variation of characters and personalities, demonstrates the different methods to ensure success for themselves as well as the group. The use of force is a constant reoccurring scheme frequently to confirm personal success as a priority over a community’s success. Order and its essential qualities begin once the environment of pure isolation arises. Lastly, the need to hold on to ones values presents itself once a situation begins to clash with their morals. “The Lord of the Flies” written by William Golding establishes how, one will take responsibility for themselves or others to avoid moral confliction, or to pursue either power or …show more content…
order. Simon as a character never lost sight of his values despite the environment and situation that surrounded him.
It was clear in the novel that he put himself responsible for everyone as a whole rather than having himself as a priority. This is clear when Simon speaks to Ralph about getting rescued stating. “You’ll get back to where you came from”. Simon was able to restore hopes even when the leader of the group began to lose faith. Simon also consisted of generosity as he comforted the littluns when they feared the beastie, and gives meat to Piggy when Jack does not allow Piggy to eat. This presents the endless amount of human nature that is in Simon. Lastly, Simon’s desire to safeguard and relieve others is clear when he learns via The Lord of The Flies that the beastie is only inside them. He instantly decides that the others must know that they are safe and that in the island, there is “only us”. Because of Simon’s morals, he was able to restore faith in the group while also generating …show more content…
hope. Greed and personal craving is all that consisted in Jack’s mind. His forceful desire for power and blood was all he needed to lead his team of hunters. Throughout the book, he is determined to benefit personally to the extent that he begins to be isolated from his true self. This is presented when he ironically states “After all, we’re [the English] not savages”, when in reality, he kills and punishes individuals unfairly for personal gain. Jack’s character also lacked a sense of remorse and morality as he creates a violent chant, which says, “Kill the pig! Cut his throat! Kill the pig! Bash him in”! His blood thirst evolves to the extent that the lives of Piggy and Simon diminish with his charge. As his priorities begin to shift from the goal of rescue to hunting, he becomes a “blood thirsty snarling”. His greed affects many members of the tribe, and this is clear when he restricts the littluns and Piggy stating that they cannot eat meat, even though there was plenty for all. Lastly, the whole tribe recognized his lack of human nature when his hunting group killed Piggy. After Piggy’s death, he viscously notified Ralph stating, “That’s what you’ll get! There isn’t a tribe for you anymore”. Jack’s dictatorial methods and greed presented his priorities and responsibilities solely towards himself. Essential leadership qualities made up Ralph, as he knew how vital order and the need to govern were for the tribe. Shelter and getting rescued was his primary concern, as he knew having a roof over everybody’s head and signaling the world with a fire would benefit the whole tribe. To gain a sense of order and government in the tribe, he introduces the Conch stating that you need the conch to speak. Regularly, he used the Conch to call meeting and get everybody together to ensure every individual was all on the same page. By calling the meetings, he ensured democratically that everybody could speak. When Jack begins to drift away from Ralph and pursues his own interests, Ralph begins to notice and worry for the tribe. The violence and loss of innocence was clear to him as he states, “I’m frightened. Of us”. He notices the lack of innocence multiple times, especially when Jack and his tribe violently killed Piggy with a boulder. Ralph “wept for the end of innocence, the darkness of a man’s heart, and the fall through the air of the true, wise friend called Piggy”. Such events caused his belief of keeping himself responsible for others clearly present itself. Overall, throughout the text and the evidence given, it is clear that Ralph’s goal of freeing himself and others based itself on his responsibility for individuals. Through characterization, “The Lord of The Flies” confirms that one’s quest to gain either supremacy or order as well as to uphold their moralities can drive an individual to take initiative and responsibility for individuals.
Instantly in Jack’s first impressions, his greed for power and thirst for blood presents itself as a main priority. As a result, due to Jack’s power, childhood innocence, human lives on the island and a sense of morality ceased to exist. The wish for a governing system and order caused Ralph to take obligation for others. Through the symbolization of order by using the Conch, calling of meetings, and construction of shelter, his desire reach success as a team arises. Lastly, the overall morality of Simon results in his accountability for others. Through his sharing of meat and goal of informing the tribe about the beastie, Simon clearly wished for the betterment of others. Many individuals may place themselves accountable for others, yet it is ones desire, which fuels their
responsibility.
he may lack in the athletic field, but his brain made up tremendously for that loss. In the first couple chapters, Ralph thought a fire would be beneficial in order to get rescued so, Piggy utilized his glasses, directed the lenses towards the sun and fire appeared. Thirdly, Simon represented the good on the island. All the young boys turned to Simon as their leader because Simon did not see age difference, he welcomed all with open arms. He also helped Ralph with the unstable shelters when the rest were distracted with antics, Simon is an overall warm hearted kid.
The Lord of the Flies by William Golding is a novel about human nature and the functions of society. One of the main characters in this novel is Ralph, who is chosen to be the leader of a group of boys. He assigns tasks to the boys and tries to keep them accountable for it. However, the boys begin to slack because they can no longer see the point of these tasks and rules. As a result of the constant slacking the boys soon turned into savages. Ralph’s struggle to maintain order amongst the boys shows how without rules it is human nature to descend into savagery due to the avoidance of authority.
Simon was the first and only one to realise the real beast on the Island. He could be compared to someone like a priest or a good samaraton – someone who tries his best to convince everyone of what’s right.
1961, Stanley Milgram conducts an experiment on participating adult males utilizing the power of authority and electric shocks to examine two common underlying principles in humanity: blind obedience to authority and the fear of the repercussions of contravening. Similar to the focus of this study, the dreading of consequences and trusting higher authority are the basis of the plot in The Lord of the Flies, where William Golding depicts a large group of boys (aged twelve and under) stranded on a desolate island that are left to configure their own law and order. The essence of this novel is clear; the blind trust of authority in societal situations, which will tarnish the conditions of a person’s life, and the
“I’m not going to play any longer. Not with you.” (127). Jack leaves Ralph’s tribe because Ralph is a coward and he makes the rules. Jack’s leadership qualities comes back with a force and he makes his own tribe. Jack does like anyone telling him what to do and he is frustrated because of Ralph taking over him. Another reason to make his own tribe is that Ralph does not appreciate Jack hunting and he accuses him to let the fire out. His leadership skills become stronger but in a negative way. His behavior has changed because of hunting and by spending time on the island. Jack has become a sociopath. Even his hunting style has become more violent. After hunting a sow, he tortures the pig physically until the pig has a painful death. He also cuts the throat of the pig and places the head on the stick as a sacrifice. This action shows psychopathic tendency and how he was not able to kill the pig in his first attempt in hunting and now he abuses the pig and sacrifices the head. “He squirmed and looked down.”(160). When Stanley, a member of Jack’s tribe asks Jack about the death of Simon, Jack replies him by nervously saying no. This response by Jack portrays that Jack is trying to tell himself that he his not responsible for his own actions. During Simon’s murder, Jack was wearing a mask on his face and that makes him not responsible for Simon’s murder. During the end of the novel, Jack starts wearing his mask all the time because he does not want to be responsible for his own actions. ““He’s going to beat Wilfred.” “what for?” Robert shook his head doubtfully. “I don’t know. He didn’t say. He got angry and made us tie Wilfred up. He’s been”-he giggled excitedly-”he’s been tied for hours, waiting-”” (159). This quote from the novel clearly shows how Jack has been treating his tribe members. He is beating them for no reason by tieing them up for hours. Jack shows no emotion and he has become cold blooded. The
When viewing the atrocities of today's world on television, the starving children, the wars, the injustices, one cannot help but think that evil is rampant in this day and age. However, people in society must be aware that evil is not an external force embodied in a society but resides within each person. Man has both good qualities and faults. He must come to control these faults in order to be a good person. In the novel Lord of the Flies, William Golding deals with this same evil which exists in all of his characters. With his mastery of such literary tools as structure, syntax, diction and imagery, The author creates a cheerless, sardonic tone to convey his own views of the nature of man and man’s role within society.
While Jack and Ralph represent the distinct polarization between civilization and savagery. Simon is separated from both of these dimensions. Simon represents built-in goodness. The other boys who hold on to their sense of morality only do so because society has conditioned and trained them to act in a certain way. They do not have an innate sense of morality. Unlike the other boys on the island, Simon does not act morally because an external force has compelled him to do so, instead he finds value in performing good actions.
The lack of civilization and human goodness leads the young children to evils and a bad environment that they have never faced. Simon, a “skinny, vivid boy, (pg. 24)” is a member of Jack’s choir but soon leaves his tribe and joins Ralph because he is not able to deal with the cruel leadership. As all the other characters fail to maintain responsibilities and their commitments to the rules of the island, Simon is the only person who dedicates to them as things begin to fall apart. He is a character with a respectful, spiritual personality and has a human goodness with nature as he deals with the littluns and the older boys. For example, he helps the littluns pick fruit to eat, recovers Piggy’s glasses when they fly off his face, gives Piggy his own share of meat when he was refused a piece and gives ...
There are many aspects that determine how humans behave around one another. This is shown throughout William Golding’s novel, Lord of the Flies. This book is about a group of British boys that are stranded on an island without any adults due to a plane crash. At first, all goes well; the boys cooperate in attempting to maintain the fire signal, gather food and making shelters. However, human nature takes over and their democracy that they have created fails. This leads to the majority of the boys becoming complete savages when the evil within them takes over. Different qualities help determine whether a person is a good or a bad leader. Although, Piggy and Jack have some leadership qualities, Ralph is the best leader.
At the beginning of Lord of the Flies, the boys create a democratic government. As the story progresses, the initial democracy on the island is ignored, and a dictatorship rises in its place. This dictatorship fails to keep the boys in order. The author, William Golding, shows that without the institution of a strong government and set of rules people will become impulsive and seek instant gratification. In the absence of order, people tend not to become disciplined of their own accord, but rather dissolve into destructive chaos.
In the end, even though he failed to inform the other boys of it, Simon through his use of spiritual power was able to recognize the truth. He stood strong against evil even though it consumed the island after his death. People can look to him as an example of how to act in real life. And to be honest, Simon is an important character to Lord of the Flies by William Golding, not just for all this, but because he is what every person should wish to be. In the book the others bully him because they do not quite understand him, but Simon in all reality is a role model for the world. Don’t you think that the world would be a much better place, if we all tried to act a little bit like Simon?
He holds his ground upon the thought that the boys, or at least Ralph will survive the ordeal. “You’re batty” says Ralph, Simon retorts, “No, I’m not. I just think you’ll get back alright,” (Golding 111). Even plagued with controversy, Simon stays static, much like Jesus, who holds the precedence of love above all. Peter, a disciple of Christ, speaks such things “Beloved, do not be surprised at the fiery trial when it comes upon you to test you, as though something strange were happening to you. But rejoice insofar as you share Christ's sufferings, that you may also rejoice and be glad when his glory is revealed,” something so similar to Simon’s resolve throughout Lord of the Flies (1 Peter 4:12, KJV). Another similarity can also be inferred from the prior excerpt from Golding’s Lord of the Flies. Never does Simon reference him escaping the island, him escaping the world plagued in sin, only the others, the just ones. Simon’s ultimate fate is to leave the world to rise it, as Jesus did for the sins of the
One of the main themes in William Golding's 1954 novel Lord of the Flies is that without civilization, there is no law and order. The expression of Golding's unorthodox and complex views are embodied in the many varied characters in the novel. One of Golding's unorthodox views is that only one aspect of the modern world keeps people from reverting back to savagery and that is society. Golding shows the extreme situations of what could possibly happen in a society composed of people taken from a structured society then put into a structureless society in the blink of an eye. First there is a need for order until the people on the island realize that there are no rules to dictate their lives and take Daveers into their own hands. Golding is also a master of contrasting characterization. This can be seen in the conflicts between the characters of Jack, the savage; Simon, the savior; and Piggy, the one with all the ideas.
People are privileged to live in an advanced stage of development known as civilization. In a civilization, one’s life is bound by rules that are meant to tame its savage natures. A humans possesses better qualities because the laws that we must follow instill order and stability within society. This observation, made by William Golding, dictates itself as one of the most important themes of Lord of the Flies. The novel demonstrates the great need for civilization ion in life because without it, people revert back to animalistic natures.
William Golding’s Lord of the Flies is an author’s painting of the evil that resides in all of the human race. The tropical island setting presents an environment free from civil order introducing a battle ground for the war of good and evil. Showing different side of human nature one can ponder the question “What would I do?” Golding explains the good, bad and balance of human nature, revealing that in times of despair man can easily regress to a primitive state, leaving the strong willed to promote civil order, but often be extremely out numbered.