Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The position of Syria on the refugee crisis
The position of Syria on the refugee crisis
The position of Syria on the refugee crisis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The position of Syria on the refugee crisis
Due to the situation the US has found itself in recently it is necessary to look at all the options before going forward. Many of the things to take into consideration is the past and how it will affect the future. For example looking at Iraq and Syria and how they are today because of the past. Another thing to keep in mind is the present and what’s going on right now in the world and how those things play into international relations like the most recent use of chemical weapons on the people of Syria. Then there’s also looking into the current situation and the past to decide what to do next, like deciding to bomb Syria for their actions or to used diplomacy instead. There are many factors to take into account before making that choice such …show more content…
ISIS uses the Sunni/Shia divide to recruit people to their group but what strengthens the people’s wants to join the group is the mistreatment the citizens face in their country from their political leaders. For example one of the biggest causes for people to join ISIS in Iraq was the Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki. Because he was a Shia Muslim he treated the Sunni population of his country poorly which caused citizens to want a change, and ISIS gave them hope. Most of the members of ISIS share this same background. ISIS is also heavily integrated in Syria as well for the same problems. Many of the citizens of Syria joined their group looking for support to overthrow to regime that’s been treating them poorly during the Syrian crisis. ISIS is also greedy to get numbers in Syria because that then gives them the opportunity to cover more ground there allowing them to stock up on their artillery as well as get more money. Another reason for the group to favor Syria is because the Syrian leader Bashar al-Assad doesn’t see them as a big threat and therefor doesn’t put any effort into fighting them (Vox₁). This is one of the biggest problems for the US in deciding how to suppress them. Another problem the US has is really pinpointing their location and where they are. Because they …show more content…
A decision should be made rather quickly all while still taking these things into account. There are ultimately two ways to go about this. Either with military or without military. Either way could have a possibility of working if planed correctly. One of the more likely military directions the US could take to eliminate ISIS is using conventional forces. Of course there are other options like irregular forces or to go even as far as using weapons of mass destruction but the first wouldn’t be as effective and the second would be way over the top. If the US used conventional forces they could go into the more heavily terrorist areas and use martial law to lock some of the areas down and prevent the terrorist groups from growing and expanding all while controlling what goes in and out which would cut off their resources and deplete them. This is a realist approach to suppress ISIS until it does out. However there is no for sure way of eliminating the extremist group altogether. It also will conflict with the states governments and states like Syria will be less than impressed with the US. This could then lead to problems with Russia down the line which the US is ultimately trying to avoid. Another realist approach to the situation would be using forces to take out the corrupt leaders which would then cause less suppression on the citizens making them want to rebel less. There are a few problems with this
Over 500,000 troops were in the Gulf at the beginning of Desert Storm.(Persian Gulf War Britannica) In 1990 USA made their way into Kuwait to defend them from Iraq.(Persian Gulf War Britannica) The Iraqis were very poor from the war they had just suffered and they needed money. (Persian Gulf War Britannica) So they decide to invade Kuwait for their oil supply so the Iraqis could sell oil to make money. (Persian Gulf War Britannica) What they didn’t know was the U.S. were buying the oil from Kuwait and the U.S. wanted Kuwait to have oil. (Persian Gulf War Britannica) So the U.S. defended Kuwait and attacked the Iraqis. (Persian Gulf War Britannica) They did this by sending over 100,000 troops
Steven Hook and John Spanier's 2012 book titled “American foreign policy since WWII" serves as one of the most important texts that can be used in understanding the underlying complexities on American foreign policies. Like the first readings that are analyzed in class (American Diplomacy by George Kennan and Surprise, Security, and the American Experience by John Lewis Gaddis), this text also brings history into a more understandable context. Aside from being informative and concise in its historical approach, Hook and Spanier also critiques the several flaws and perspectives that occurred in the American foreign policy history since World War II.
In conclusion, this extensive review of American foreign policy is just very broad. This topic is his shortened summary of a broad topic in a narrative arrangement, if they contributed anything to the historical understanding of this book. Ambrose and Brinkley made the topic very fascinating and easier to comprehend than a plain textbook. By writing Rise to Globalism and narrating stories without including unnecessary truths and statistics. Thanks to this book, I gained a more thorough understanding of the struggles in the Middle East after Vietnam and a new perception on where American presently stands in the world.
...he basic concepts that should be the foundations of foreign policy. America's position in the world evolved from being a world power that was unconcerned about international security in 1900 to 1950 when America was still a world power, but Americans had to contend with the fear of annihilation by the Soviet Union. Williams states that the ultimate "tragedy of American diplomacy" was the failure of the Open Door Policy. This failure, according to the author, resulted not from its misapplication or inherent weaknesses, but rather its successes. This culminated into the Cold War, as Truman demanded resumption of the Open Door Policy without providing economic assistance to the Soviet Union. These perspectives have relevance in the contemporary international environment and could be utilized in an examination of American involvement in Afghanistan and Iraq.
...hat involve the situation but also the people of the country they are dealing with, because they might cut off aid to a country because the leader of the country might be a dictator the people would have to live in poverty. (14) I think this would be the best position because everyone would benefit from the situation. (15)In the Geneva Conference the U.S should have stayed out of Indochina’s business. The Chilean Revolution they United States should have never cut off aid to Chile for the reason being that the citizens of Chile would live in poverty. In the Panama Canal the United States did the right thing because they built it and owned it for several years and then in the year 2000 it passed it to the government of Panama.(16)in conclusion the United States should keep working on being the leading country of the world and not bring anymore problems upon themselves.
It is indeed sad that some people have to pay the price of criminals. However, when we see it from another perspective we might understand the reasons that may support it. The tragically events of 9/11 have change many things, in particular the safety of our people and policies of national security, as for instance the Anti-terrorism Act. The US government claims that this act is supported by several claims: one, this law is necessary to fulfill international obligations; two, many allied countries had ratified similar laws. And third, this Act provides greater protection than other legislations, (Boccabella, 2003). These legislations are not passed overnight, but after much study and critical thinking of possible consequences. What does not
Following the war with Vietnam, America foreign policy saw a new shift. This shift is marked by the decline of containment to a policy of a ‘here and now’ approach. That is, the United States’ new policy was to deal with each situation on a case by case basis rather than treating every threat of communism as a threat to containment. This reclaimed part of the old policy of objectivity in international affairs. As the past shows, controversies and wars alike have the power to dramatically shift a countries foreign policy. One can only wonder what will cause the next change.
America as the new superpower, the economically and military strongest nation on the globe had to meet new challenges. The Kuwait threat by Saddam Hussein definitely posed a first example. The Bush administration had to act on an Iraqi dictator that had attacked one of their allies in the, to U.S. interests very important Middle East region.
When the constitution of the United States was formed, the framers specifically designed the American Government structure to have checks and balances and democracy. To avoid autocracy the President was give power to preside over the executive branch of the government and as commander –in –chief, in which a clause was put into place to give the president the power to appeal any sudden attacks against America, without waiting for a vote from congress. While the president presides over the executive branch there has been ongoing debate over the role of the president in regards to foreign policy. Should foreign policy issues be an executive function by the president or should congress play a much greater role? With the sluggishness of our democracy, foreign policy issues most times need quicker response compared to how domestic policy is decided in the United States. Many believe to maintain openness and democracy both the president and congress need to agree on how the United States handles issue abroad. Although the president has been given much power, his or her power and decisions are sometimes limited based on decisions by congress and challenged and shaped by various bureaucracies throughout the government system. I shall discuss the Presidents role and the role of governmental bureaucracies (Department of Defense, Department of State and the National Security Council) that work together and sometimes not together to shape and implement American foreign Policy.
What are terrorist attacks? Terrorist attacks are unexpecting attacks using violence against innocent people. Terrorists Cause harm to others in a cruel manner or kill people in cold blood giving them no mercy or feeling no pity for people who sit hopelessly begging for their lives.Terrorists also destroy many infrastructures or civilian population to prove they are high in political and social strength. Terrorists attack people to attain political or religious aims.
It’s astounding how easy it is to forget that we are at war. Just recently, the Obama administration has declared war against ISIS. During his ISIS war speech, he refers to the enemy as “barbarians, terrorists and monsters”. He also promised to defeat ISIS, without the use of ground troops (Winsor). We do not like to watch our fellow Americans deployed to dangerous oversea locations. The President bashes ISIS and promises not to get completely involved with the conflict in order to gain support for the war. Unfortunately, his tactics are ineffective. A survey conducted by CNN shows that about 57% of Americans disapprove of how Obama is conducting his war on ISIS (CNN). Additionally, about 40% of Americans don’t believe we should fight ISIS
The term “cyber terrorism” refers to the use of the Internet as a medium in which an attack can be launched such as hacking into electrical grids, security systems, and vital information networks. Over the past four decades, cyber terrorists have been using the Internet as an advanced communication tool in which to quickly spread and organize their members and resources. For instance, by using the instantaneous spread of information provided by the Internet, several terrorist’s groups have been able to quickly share information, coordinate attacks, spread propaganda, raise funds, and find new recruits for their cause. Instantaneous and unpredictable, the technological advantages these terrorists have obtained from using the Internet includes
What needs to be done to stop this new threat that is ISIS? Many have argued that President Obama is to blame for the rise of ISIS. Some say that President Obama’s administration has not done enough to stop this new chaos of terror. One is the pulling out of troops for Iraq. By the pulling out troop from Iraq allow ISIS to gain power and ran their reign of terror. With no troop in Iraq ISIS was free to do what they want.
When we speak about policies in the middle east there are many options to choose from. But, all of these options have positive and negative effects. Overall I think the best option for the United States would be to step back from the Middle East. Stepping back has a handful of positive effects on The United States and its citizens. A few of those things would be not having to worry about controlling another country. We could use the money spent over there to fund research on other natural resources. Stepping back from the Middle East could bring some of our troops home. This could be both positive and negative depending on how you look at it. I'd like to take this topic a little further into detail with my following reasons.
1. Based upon your research and what you have read about the trait approach, what personality characteristics does this leader display? Benjamin Netanyahu is the Prime Minister of Israel. One of the personality traits that Benjamin portrays as a leader is his drive. When this man believes in something he is out-spoken and shows tenacity in his decisions.