Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Introduction of oligopoly
Strength and weaknesses of oligopoly
Essay on oligopoly
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Introduction of oligopoly
Is the Watch Industry dominated by an Oligopoly*, which is beneficial
to both firms and consumers?
*= See glossary for meanings.
Hypothesis
==========
I believe that the watch industry is dominated by an oligopoly, which
is beneficial to both firms and consumers. The watch firms are both
price makers*, which is good for the watch firms, and price takers*,
which is good for consumers.
Aim
In this investigation I shall be examining the watch industry. I will
use a Mintel report of the watch industry produced in 1995 and
information worksheets to test my hypothesis.
Findings and Application of Theories
Five companies, or the 'C5 ratio', dominate the watch industry. They
have 40% of the market share* (see fig.1.). Zeon Ltd. is the market
leader*. There have been no recent take-overs or mergers in the watch
industry, so the market leadership is slight. The growth of the
industry has been organic*.
GRAPH
This representation makes the watch industry an oligopoly, as opposed
to being perfect competition*, imperfect competition, or a monopoly*.
There are a number of reasons why the watch industry is an oligopoly.
Firstly are there barriers to entry* as opposed to free entry*. One
barrier to entry for other prospective watch manufacturers is
economies of scale*. The larger, more established firms have a number
of cost advantages, such as being able to buy raw materials in bulk or
borrow large sums of money. Their production costs are therefore
cheaper and therefore they will probably be able to sell their watches
at a lower price than smaller, newer firms. Another barrier to entry
is branding. All of the firms in the oligopoly have very established
names in the...
... middle of paper ...
...a novelty/ luxury item. The success of this strategy
depends on maintaining low costs at low volume on a high quality image
with few or no competitors.
- Price Makers: In a monopoly situation where there is only one, or
very few suppliers. The industry can set its prices at whatever level
they want without the chance of being undercut by competition (because
there is none).
- Price Takers: In an industry where there is a lot of competition
(ideally perfect competition), the sellers must have the prices of
their product low in order to sell them. If they did not have low
enough prices, customers would go elsewhere as there will be many
substitutes that are cheaper.
Bibliography
1) The Watch Industry Mintel Report- 1995 (obtained from Sheffield
Hallam University's 'Adsett's Centre')
2) Business and Economics class worksheets
One of the factors contributing to the barriers to entry is the high capital requirements that are needed in order to compete in the market. Large investments are required in acquiring facilities and maintaining them, along with purchasing the expensive equipment relative to manufacturing welding products. Purchasing the equipment is not enough, but new companies are also required to develop the advanced technologies before effectively competing in which is really time consuming. With these asset specificities, potential entrants are discouraged from committing to obtaining these specialized assets that have no other means of use or profitability if the venture fails. When existing firms acquire these specialized assets, they are more inclined to resist efforts by other competitors from stealing market share, therefore enhancing the competitive disadvantage for new entrants.
The reason for this is that there are barriers to entry and exit to potential clients to the firm. Examples of these barriers would be, high capital. costs i.e. start up costs for new firms because the existing firms are already operating in a large market and are well established, they. would have created a brand image and would have brand loyalty. therefore, new firms will find it hard to capture the market.
While the new entrants only need a relatively simple GUI and a supplier in order to enter the market, the federal and local regulations will require significant investments prior to any positive cash flow. Again, the differentiation is practically non-existent and the new entrants will have to compete with financially established enterprises capitalizing on competitive advantage.
An oligopoly is defined as "a market structure in which only a few sellers offer similar or identical products" (Gans, King and Mankiw 1999, pp.-334). Since there are only a few sellers, the actions of any one firm in an oligopolistic market can have a large impact on the profits of all the other firms. Due to this, all the firms in an oligopolistic market are interdependent on one another. This relationship between the few sellers is what differentiates oligopolies from perfect competition and monopolies. Although firms in oligopolies have competitors, they do not face so much competition that they are price takers (as in perfect competition). Hence, they retain substantial control over the price they charge for their goods (characteristic of monopolies).
This organization belongs to the oligopoly market structure. The oligopoly market structure involves a few sellers of a standardized or differentiated product, a homogenous oligopoly or a differentiated oligopoly (McConnell, 2004, p. 467). In an oligopolistic market each firm is affected by the decisions of the other firms in the industry in determining their price and output (McConnell, 2005, P.413). Another factor of an oligopolistic market is the conditions of entry. In an oligopoly, there are significant barriers to entry into the market. These barriers exist because in these industries, three or four firms may have sufficient sales to achieve economies of scale, making the smaller firms would not be able to survive against the larger companies that control the industry (McConnell, 2005, p.
“Oligopoly is an imperfect monopoly” by John Kenneth Galbraith. As we all know the presence of monopolies is just giving the owner an opportunity to control an unfair market for everyone participating. Mr. Galbraith’s quote is strictly stating that oligopolies are just a different way of drawing up an identical game plan to control a particular market. This falls right into the conversation about the Packers and Stockyards Act of 1921 as it relates to why it was created, its relevance today, and how we can apply it to today’s marketplace.
Since the Apple Watch is not a necessity and relatively expensive for even its lower end models, the economic environment could certainly negatively impact Watch sales in present and future markets. One thing Apple has on its side with the release of the Watch, is “the constant thrill that will make the Apple Watch compelling” (Elgan, 2015). To reach another market segment, Apple has succeeded in marketing the Watch as a fashion piece that caters to the “makers that are high achievers who eat, dress, and live well” (Kotler & Keller, 2012, p. 79).
The ease with which firms can enter into a new market or industry is a critical variable in the strategic management process. In some industries the barriers to entry are minimal. In oth...
Orr , D. (1974). An index of entry barriers and its application to the market structure performance relationship. Journal of Industrial Economics, 23(1), 11-39. Retrieved from http://eds.a.ebscohost.com.proxy-library.ashford.edu/eds/detail?sid=25f46629-86ce-4fba-b338-6ba319c80f42@sessionmgr4004&vid=1&hid=4210&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLW xpdmU=
Again, in both monopoly and oligopoly market structures there is no freedom of entry and in both, the firms involved have some control over the price. In both the monopolistic and perfect competition market structures, we have many sellers and buyers. Monopolistic and perfect competition market structures we also have easy entry and exist hence less barriers of entry and exist.
The second market structure is a monopolistic competition. The conditions of this market are similar as for perfect competition except the product is not homogenous it is differentiated; thus having control over its price. (Nellis and Parker, 1997). There are many firms and freedom of entry into the industry, firms are price makers and are faced with a downward sloping demand curve as well as profit maximizers. Examples include; restaurant businesses, hotels and pubs, specialist retailing (builders) and consumer services (Sloman, 2013).
There are high entry costs to enter the market. The large industry competitors already have captured the market share.
Monopolies have a tendency to be bad for the economy. Granted, there are some that are a necessity of life such as natural and legal monopolies. However, the article I have chosen to review is “America’s Monopolies are Holding Back the Economy (Lynn, 2017)” and the name speaks for itself.
The four market structures: perfect competition, monopolistic competition, oligopoly, and monopoly entails various characteristics that exemplify the level of competition within the market. These distinct features include having a number of sellers, producing a homogeneous or differentiated goods or services, pricing power, a level of competition, barriers to entering or exit the markets, efficiency, and profits. Due to the high profit and revenue some firms face within the various market structure, barriers to entry are put in place to restrict new competitors from entering. Natural, artificial, and governmental barriers play a vital role in firms ability to stay in a market, be productive, efficient, and competitive. Firms reaction to price changes, the government’s ability to create a price, and the influence of international trade on the market structures, are essential factors that economist evaluate the various market structures. Overall, the competition between market structures may not always result in the same outcome, due to the behavior and interaction between consumer’s and buyers, but in the end, both the buyer’s and seller’s are needs are
An oligopolistic market has a small number of sellers dominating market share and therefore barriers to entry are high. These sellers are highly competitive and do not act independently of each other. Access to information is limited so sellers can only speculate of their competitor’s actions. Sellers will take advantage of competitor’s price changes in order to increase market share.