Is The Validity Of A Valid Argument

505 Words2 Pages

Arguments are a constant in human life, unfortunately, not all are well designed. Simply stated, an argument is a set of reasons leading with a premise and intended to persuade others that an idea is correct. (Merriam-Webster, 2016) In order to establish a strong and viable argument it must move in a reasonable and logical manner. Sound arguments are based on empirical fact, not influenced by emotion, and will ultimately lead to only one conclusion. Understanding the concept of logic, using it correctly, and analyzing and identifying faulty arguments is necessary in order to develop valid arguments.
Originating in ancient Greece, the theory of logic is based on the teachings of Aristotle. Known as the Father of Logic, he was the first person to teach that the validity of an argument is based as much on its structure, as the content of the argument. (Fieser & Dowden, 2016) Consisting of propositions, or statements, an argument must contain two or more ideas. These premises shape the content; …show more content…

Applying this idea is more complex. It is important to be able to recognize poorly crafted arguments as well as sound, valid arguments. Most arguments are composed of facts, yet lack cohesiveness and relatability to the final conclusion. The conclusion cannot be reached if the facts are unrelated. Many people use facts to persuade others that their view is the correct one. Rhetoric is the use of language to influence another person’s opinion. It is used in defense of a position to win people over to their side. However, it disregards opposing facts, possibly even overwhelming evidence, without providing proof. Some examples of these devices are: hyperbole (exaggeration), euphemisms (down-playing information), and sarcasm (insulting). (Boss, 2012) According to the rules of logic, rhetoric supports the view but does not lead to the correct conclusion, thus leaving the argument

Open Document