Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Journalism ethics
There are thousands of information that people can get out there. There are also a lot of ways and source for people to search for information. Unfortunately, not all information is true. So, how to know if the information is reliable or credible?
The first way is to know the author of the information. Referring to unclear sources, for example, "a few people say" or "specialists guarantee" doesn't demonstrate anything. Who are these individuals? Who are these specialists? Search for specifics and expertise. People can ensure the actualities are right. Unclear data just prompts to more ambiguous data. Genuine names move down genuine realities.
The second way to know if the information is reliable or credible is by the publisher. If the article is found on the unknown website, search for the publisher. Does the website or publication have a good reputation for presenting facts without a lot of spins? Do they take responsibility for the content? These are the sources to trust. Do not blindly accept an article as fact, always consider the source. The publisher also needs to be acknowledged and most likely need to be a well-known publisher.
…show more content…
The information must present fair and balance information. Does the article seem like an emotional article? Does it seem like the creator is attempting to drive traffic or promote a product or service? It's presumably not a dependable article. A decent article will be even in tone without attempting to influence the readers to the other side or the other. Certain writers building trust among their readers. Great writers offer newspapers, magazines, books and drive traffics to sites. If an author has a reputation for presenting a fair, balanced and reasonable point of view, it is easier to trust their articles as containing reliable
Having the author’s purpose is vital to knowing how informative, opinionated, or factual the arti...
...ant issues facing our world today. At the end of the day, every one could learn much from a writer that was never afraid to share his opinion on any subject no matter what anyone else thought about it. This goes to show, no matter how much an opinion differs from the majority, or the popular opinion, everyone still has a right and responsibility to let it be known.
...to interpret the material up to the reader, but the use of these appeals help persuade the audience member to think a certain way. These analytical tools prove just how effective and in depth writers go into their material to make their work come across more powerful and influential, and each of these authors did just that.
Authors are able to impact their readers through non-fiction literature, and through specific ways, such as the importance of
For example, if the author provides statistics to prove their case, it's important to check the date, location, etc., of when this data was collected. Just because authors may have an eyewitness, survey, or results from a scientific study, doesn't mean that their data is reliable. Their info may be subjective and therefore, not trustworthy. Moreover, some writings can include broad generalizations, assumptions, and omission of facts. This can mislead you into believing something that is not true which is why you should make your own inferences whilst reading. When making an inference, figure out the author's purpose, take note to the details, address the facts they give, inspect their usage of words, and back your inference with
In addition to interacting with the author, the different appeals also help the reader feel and gain trust in the author. The diverse appeals illustrate how people tend to react when the author has gained his or her trust. Many writers tend to use one of the three appeals to encourage their audience to understand and agree with their argument.
Reliability: The website is reliable but can still have wrong information as it is wrote by different people (before publishing someone’s update to the website it is verified to be true or false)
An author’s main focus when writing a nonfiction piece is to persuade its audience of their beliefs, using claims to support them. With the effect of close consideration of claims and fallacies when reading non-fiction, the author is unable to persuade the reader due to inaccurate statements made by the author himself. The fallacies detected by a close reader discredits the author as well as their piece.
What determines a good' article from a bad' one? In the Des Moines Register on February 3, there was an article titled, More parents, doctors refuse to put kids on antidepressants," was written by Marilyn Elias. Elias is a well-known writer from USA Today, and has written on topics such as stress, marriage, and health. The article was about the effects on children, ages 18 and younger, taking depression pills. There are many elements that establish a good' article from a bad' one. Some of these elements would be the content, reader, and credibility.
Relevant is the relevance attached to or associated among a proceeding with direction. Reliable is corroboration which occupies acceptable amplitude containing creditability, which can be if confirmation would be honest and legitimate. Competent includes relevant and reliable evidence anything else that is not concluded objectionable ((Gardner & Anderson, 2013).
readers can rely on to tell the truth, as he sees it. However, not only the
Are assertions in the source based on reliable evidence? Are sources cited? How are you able to tell? They do list where they get their info from within the paragraphs or quotes.
The health reporters must not include bias in their argument. Some writers might have unconscious bias regarding a certain topic due to their personal connection to it, or a motive behind writing about a certain topic. However, when writing the essay, they must ensure that they bring no bias to their research, but instead objectively evaluate the argument using the scientific method as accurately as possible. Even if they might not agree with the results of a certain analysis, or perhaps it doesn’t match up to their hypothesis, they cannot alter it incorrectly just to do so. As I mentioned above, an incorrect article can seriously affect an individual’s lifestyle, so keeping the article unbiased is vital when writing health journals and articles. Health reporters must also use the scientific method accurately when doing their research. This method includes creating a hypothesis, testing variables, recording them with certain guidelines, and creating a conclusion that is in terms with the data. If this method is used incorrectly—if a health journalist measures his variables incorrectly, or doesn’t accurately record his data, the results might be skewed and the information presented would be inaccurate. Finally, most importantly, health journalists must ensure that their data is simple and
The introduction of the internet to modern society has brought about a new age of information relation. Since there is no longer a need to wait until the next print day, news from all over the world is available at a person’s fingertips within hours or even minutes of the event. With this advent of such easily accessible information, new problems for the news media have also arisen. Aside from potentially losing good economic standing because newspapers are no longer being purchased in the quantities they used to be, the credibility of the information itself is also put into question. No one would argue that credibility of news sources is unimportant, but there is a discrepancy in what takes precedence; economy and speed or getting the information out correctly at the first publishing by taking the time to make sure all facts are checked. The importance of having a system of checks on all information submitted is paramount. People trust what they read and believe it to be so without always questioning. If all information were to not be checked thoroughly, there would be instances where people read an article only for information included to be wrong and they go on believing such information. This can be very dangerous as misinformed people make misinformed decisions. With an increase in errors being made by citizen bloggers and even major publications, many are worried that journalistic ethics and credibility in the news media are being sacrificed in order to maintain swiftness in the news circuit and to retain personal profits. Though getting information to the masses quickly is a major part of the media’s importance, this should not mean that the credibility of that information being presented should be sacrificed for it...
After much article, video, and textual evidence based off many