Survival Of The Wrongest Summary

693 Words2 Pages

Just as Hymowitz discusses this “child-man” ethic and its negative influence on society, in “Survival of the Wrongest”, written by David H Freedman, the author discusses the ethics health journals must follow and their effects on the public. Though many health reporters write on a variety of topics, they owe their public credible articles which follow the scientific method, are unbiased, and ensure that their data and evidences are easy to understand. Health reporters owe their public accurate and credible articles and journals. If an argument/article is incorrect, it can negatively impact the readers’ health. For example, if an article stated incorrectly that “weight loss is an impossible task” (398) people might think that being health …show more content…

Though writing a certain controversial topic might make the author more money, or attract more readers through clickbait, this can cause severe consequences. The argument mentioned above might have been interesting to read, because it presents a unique take on the topic. By seeing a certain title, a reader browsing through news stories might click on it, simply out of curiosity. In clicking this, the writers would make much more money than writing an article that mentioned boring or dry results. However, these inaccurate articles can have negative impacts on the people reading it. If someone was beginning to make differences in their lifestyle, by exercising and eating better, more nutritious foods, then read this essay, they might stop their efforts, because “a scientist” said that it wasn’t worth it. In this way, this incorrect article would affect this individual’s health in a negative manner. These health reporters must realize that they have an important job—they …show more content…

The health reporters must not include bias in their argument. Some writers might have unconscious bias regarding a certain topic due to their personal connection to it, or a motive behind writing about a certain topic. However, when writing the essay, they must ensure that they bring no bias to their research, but instead objectively evaluate the argument using the scientific method as accurately as possible. Even if they might not agree with the results of a certain analysis, or perhaps it doesn’t match up to their hypothesis, they cannot alter it incorrectly just to do so. As I mentioned above, an incorrect article can seriously affect an individual’s lifestyle, so keeping the article unbiased is vital when writing health journals and articles. Health reporters must also use the scientific method accurately when doing their research. This method includes creating a hypothesis, testing variables, recording them with certain guidelines, and creating a conclusion that is in terms with the data. If this method is used incorrectly—if a health journalist measures his variables incorrectly, or doesn’t accurately record his data, the results might be skewed and the information presented would be inaccurate. Finally, most importantly, health journalists must ensure that their data is simple and

Open Document