Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Keeping animals in captivity
Why shouldn't animals be kept in captivity
The consequences of zoos for animals
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Keeping animals in captivity
Argumentative Essay:Is keeping animals in captivity wrong?
Everyone would love to go on a trip to zoo...playful monkeys, circus elephants, exotic animals and clapping seals. People says that zoos are a very helpful way of learning and educating the next generation.On the other hand, some people is arguing that zoos are animal abuse and I am also saying that zoos are animal abuse. Think !If you were an animal you would like to be in captivity you would feel like running around the grass plains in Africa with peace instead of living in a ‘prison’ being gawked by random strangers?
We must treat them equally as they are also living creatures.Having animals in captivity is bad for their health not only losing their natural instincts the will have stress, shorter life span, repetitive movements, becoming lazier….etc they are all because of us! Have you heard of anti-depressant? People is using even drugs and violence to animals to make them calm down, do you think this is the right way to treat animals? When people sees a cheetah in a zoo not running, in fact, no enough spaces to run.Children wouldn’t get educated they might just mistake it as a jaguar or leopards.If cheetahs don't show their speed they will not know…their specialty….otherwise they won’t get educated
…show more content…
In addition, captive animals don’t get to choose their mates, and they are sometimes artificially inseminated so that their babies can be sold or traded to other zoos. This often results in miscarriages, death at birth, or the mother’s rejection of her young. The Chinese government sell and rent pandas to zoos worldwide and earns around $600-700k for just every
Considering the many challenges animals face in the wild, it is understandable that people may be eager to support zoos and may feel that they are protective facilities necessary for animal life. In the article “ Zoos Are Not Prisons. They Improve the Lives of Animals”, Author Robin Ganzert argues that Zoos are ethical institutions that enrich the lives of animals and ultimately protect them. Statistics have shown that animals held in captivity have limited utilitarian function resulting in cramped quarters, poor diets, depression, and early death for the animals thus, proving that Zoos are not ethical institutions that support and better the lives of animals as author Robin Ganzert stated (Cokal 491). Ganzert exposes the false premise in stating
I will now move onto arguments supporting the use of animal captivity. I am starting with Kant, who provides a strong argument for animal captivity. Kantian Ethics holds the view that we do not have any direct ethical duties to non-human animals. We only owe ethical duties to rational beings, and non-human animals are not included in this group. The value humanity comes from our capacity to be governed by autonomous, rational choices. Since non-human cannot be part of this, Kant believes we can do as we please with them. This can be demonstrated in Kant’s ‘Political Writings’ when he argues,
I will now provide arguments against the use of animal captivity. Firstly, I will use Peter Singer, who I believe delivers the strongest argument against animal captivity. Singer is a consequentialist who argues for animal rights and the position that animals should not be held captive. Singer reminds us that humans are animals but language makes us overlook this. As a utilitarian and hedonist, Singer looks towards the end result, where like human beings, other animals choose pleasure over suffering. Singer regards interests of consciousness rather than self-consciousness. Therefore since animals are conscious beings and animal captivity causes pain and suffering, it is wrong. Robert Garner
The truth can be a bit overwhelming, it is clear and simple, wild animals should not be held in captivity. With all this researching and finding the dirt on what really happens behind closed doors, it is hard to believe some people, who are aware of what really goes on, continue to support these programs. It is not morally correct to take advantage of a being, who is incapable of standing up for itself, for the pleasure of mankind. We have no right to do such a thing because we are all the same, under it all we are just another set of bones to lay to rest. If we would not hold our fellow humans captives and force them to entertain then why do we do it to animals? What if the roles were reversed and we were the defenseless ones? Say what you want, in the end keeping wild animals captive is wrong and needs to be stopped.
The difference between right and wrong is not always perfectly clear. A long-standing part of cultures across the world, zoological and animal parks have been around for hundreds of years. While in the past concerns and issues regarding the ethical problems zoos seem to impose were less prominent, in recent times the rise of animal rights activist groups and new generational values have influenced the way people view these parks. Critics believe that zoos are an unnatural habitat for animals and force them to live in captivity, having a negative impact on their health. Yet, there are still many who fully support zoos, citing business and educational reasons.
Do you think animals should be put into zoos? Well they shouldn't, because they are put into misery and they also suffer in their cages.
In the film, Madagascar, zoos are depicted as a sanctuary in which all the exotic animals are kept safe and are open for the public to view. But many would argue that zoos are inhumane, the caging of animals for our personal entertainment is unjustifiable. Those who believe that zoos are wrong and should be destroyed are animal rights activist; they believe that animals should be allowed to choose their own destiny. Those that believe that zoos are an important part of our lives are scientist and zoologist. This debate has gone on for generations and average folk are stuck in the middle, not knowing which side to stand on. The animals being kept in captivity could not be interviewed; their side of the story will be based on interpretation on their movement and interaction with animals in the zoo and in the wild. Are animals better suited to live in the harsh conditions of the wild or are they better suited to live their lives safely in captivity?
In the legal issue titled Employment discrimination, it describes a situation where abc corporation decides to respond to what it sees as a moral obligation to correct for past discrimination by adjusting pay differences among its employee. This raises a lot of ethical conflict with abc’s employees and its shareholders for numerous reasons. Employees were treated unfair, Abc company can no longer be trusted as a good work ethic company, they have a bad reputation for discrimination and there might be a likelihood the company will go out of business due to its actions.
Animals should not be kept in captivity for any reason unless they have been harmed and need to receive treatment, but they should be released as soon as they are healthy and capable of taking care of themselves again. The use of a captive animal for research, education, or entertainment is just wrong; no creature deserves to have their life taken away for our benefit. Would you want to be captured and put in a tiny box, or a fake little ecosystem, or abused and tortured because apparently that’s the only possible way to train an animal? How about just knowing that your real life is over and now all you get to do is put on a show for people? That is what we put these animals through for our entertainment, we tear children away from their parents.
There are billions of animals in captivity around the world. These animals are in zoos, breeding centers, and research laboratories. All those animals lead to out lash because of the stress of being in a small confinement habitat. Is it ethical to keep animals in captivity for research, breeding, or for our enjoyment? Over the years keeping animals in captive has not changed in safety and the well-being of the animal.
What do you think about zoos? Children standing in front of big cages, feel excited to see those lovely animals and share the joy with their parents. Parents will then read aloud the information on the signs to educate the children. At lunch hour, animals in bonds wait for delicious dishes provided by zoo keepers and live happily ever after. It seems that zoos are really a heaven to us and animals. It gives us a place to keep close to nature, saving those little pitiful things in wild. Unluckily, that is not the truth we wished. Indeed, zoos magnify their contribution to educational circle, exaggerating the importance of role play in conservation work, in order to cover those disgraceful secrets behind.
Animals should not be held captive in zoos because it is inhumane and unfair to the animals. There are so many records of terrible things that have happened to animals in zoos over the past few centuries, the go under the radar too often. Too few people even know about these animal care atrocities, and therefore the New York Times decided to bring light upon this situation. The Times did a first-of-its-kind analysis of 390 elephant fatalities at accredited U.S. zoos over the past 50 years (Berens 3). It found that most of the elephants died from injury or disease linked to conditions of their captivity, from chronic foot problems caused by standing on hard surfaces to musculoskeletal disorders from inactivity caused by being penned or chained for days and weeks at a time.
Supporting claims The standard supporting claim to justifying captivity is that they maintain populations through ex situ breeding and then reintroducing some back into the wild. This technique has established notable successes . However, in recent decades, many animal rights critics such as PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of animals), say that captive breeding programmes are biased and focus on the ‘cute’ and that the practices create surplus animals that are then exploited in inferior facilities.
Animals Should be Kept in Captivity Though it is clear that there are many negative effects of keeping animals in captivity, there are those who argue that it can be beneficial for the animal and for society. Zoos can protect animals from the dangers found in the wild, such as habitat loss, poaching, climate change, and disease (Kelly, 2016). Some animals have also proven to live longer in captivity than they would in the wild, such as ring-tailed leopards and lemurs (Evans, 2010). Being cared for by humans, therefore has an overall positive effect on such animals by allowing them to live longer lives.
A lot of people have been to the zoo, or to an aquarium at least once, sometimes for fun sometimes for school, but a lot of the time they don’t stop to think about the treatment of the animals. Sadly the U.S. government allows the capture of wild animals for public display and entertainment. The capture and captivity of animals for zoos and aquariums is cruel and unjust and should be prevented and banned. Animals in captivity suffer from stress and boredom in confinement. Family bonds are broken when individuals get sold or traded to other zoos, and no pen or even drive-through safari can compare to the freedom of the wild.