Is It Infringing On People's Right To Free Speech?

649 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Essay on freedom of speech and expression in cyberspace

As par techcrunch.com on December 18, 2107 “Twitter stated; that they will begin enforcing new rules around hate speech and abusive language”. I will be talking about if I feel this is an appropriate step, or is it infringing on people's rights to free speech? Are there any other social media platforms that have taken similar actions? Also, is it the responsibility of these companies to protect users, and if so, how far should they go? Do you feel that this is an appropriate step, or is it infringing on people's rights to free speech? I feel that this step is an appropriate step and it isn’t violating people's rights to free speech. This is because the right to free speech or the freedom of speech includes the fact that it shouldn’t harm …show more content…

Has also taken similar action. According to help.instagram.com, Instagram states; “we remove content that contains credible threats or hates speech, content that targets private individuals to degrade or shame them, personal information meant to blackmail or harass someone, and repeated unwanted messages”. This sums up to hate speech and abusive language. Instagram also states; “it's never OK to encourage violence or attack anyone based on their race, ethnicity, national origin, sex, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, religious affiliation, disabilities, or diseases”. “When hate speech is being shared to challenge it or to raise awareness, we may allow it. In those instances, we ask that you express your intent clearly”. These rules enforced against hate speech and abusive language by Instagram are established to hopefully prevent hate speech and abusive language and affecting the mental health of the people receiving unwanted speech (indicating any hate, insults, abusive language, …show more content…

In the terms and conditions of some companies. It could possibly state that it isn’t the responsibility of the company to protect users against hate speech and abusive language. However in this state, if matters get too intense the users will likely not chose to use the media platform provided by that company. Which can eventually cause an immense loss of the company. Therefore I believe that most companies do (and should) take on the responsibility to protect users against hate speech and abusive language. However, it doesn’t define that every single company and media platform has to take on that responsibility but not taking it on may cause a

Show More
Related

  • Annotated Bibliography Should A Person's Freedom Of Speech Be Limited In Any Way?

    1153 Words  | 3 Pages

    This source supplies my paper with more evidence of how freedom of speech is in a dangerous place. American has always stood by freedom of speech, and to see how social media platforms try to manipulate and take off as the choose to increase slight bias is unpleasant. The article establishes a worry to the fellow readers that hold freedom of speech so high and that it is at risk. The article manages to explain why freedom of speech is in danger, and why there should be no limits to free speech.

    Read More

  • We are Free to Be You, Me, Stupid and Dead by Roger Rosenblatt

    1178 Words  | 3 Pages

    Freedom of speech has been a controversial issue throughout the world. Our ability to say whatever we want is very important to us as individuals and communities. Although freedom of speech and expression may sometimes be offensive to other people, it is still everyone’s right to express his/her opinion under the American constitution which states that “congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or the press”. Although this amendment gave people the right express thier opinions, it still rests in one’s own hands as how far they will go to exercise that right of freedom of speech.

    Read More

  • First Amendment Rights of Public School Students

    1088 Words  | 3 Pages

    This is just down right wrong because it’s unwarranted to give the right to do such a thing to schools and not to government. Thesis Schools have more rights than the government to affect and restrict the 1st Amendment and freedom of speech. Annotated Bibliography Hudson, David L., JR. " First Amendment Center. "

    Read More

  • Limiting Students Online Speech

    865 Words  | 2 Pages

    Background- Well limiting a person’s speech online certainly isn’t a thought that just came out of the blue. It started as people, particularly young students, and their use of technology to freely share their thoughts on social media sites. And what became of it was more of bullying one’s peers online than just sharing one’s innocent opinion. But schools are meant to be a safe learning

    Read More

  • Freedom of Speech

    1581 Words  | 4 Pages

    Imagine a time when one could be fined, imprisoned and even killed for simply speaking one’s mind. Speech is the basic vehicle for communication of beliefs, thoughts and ideas. Without the right to speak one’s mind freely one would be forced to agree with everything society stated. With freedom of speech one’s own ideas can be expressed freely and the follower’s belief will be stronger. The words sound so simple, but without them the world would be a very different place.

    Read More

  • Hate Speech is the Price We Must Pay for Freedom of Speech

    2303 Words  | 5 Pages

    Living in the United States we enjoy many wonderful freedoms and liberties. Even though most of these freedoms seem innate to our lives, most have been earned though sacrifice and hard work. Out of all of our rights, freedom of speech is perhaps our most cherished, and one of the most controversial. Hate speech is one of the prices we all endure to ensure our speech stays free. But with hate speeches becoming increasingly common, many wonder if it is too great of a price to pay, or one that we should have to pay at all.

    Read More

  • Freedom Of Speech

    1364 Words  | 3 Pages

    Limiting freedom of speech is not a good idea because the pros outweighs the cons. Censorship would not work because there isn’t an individual,

    Read More

  • The Fairness Doctrine

    942 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...of nations, countries, cities, towns, and individuals can be severely harmed and damaged if there is no control on the information being disbursed through the vast communication devices available. While everyone cites the right to freedom of speech, it is sometimes forgotten about the part that states as long as it doesn’t harm another person is often overlooked.

    Read More

  • Jemele Hill's Debate

    402 Words  | 1 Pages

    On September 11th, 2017, ESPN commentator Jemele Hill tweeted “Donald Trump is a White Supremacist who has largely surrounded himself w/ other white supremacists.” Because of the tweet’s polarizing nature, it caused controversy nationwide. Margaret Hill of The Washington Post defends the tweets legitimacy and ESPN’s decision to keep Hill as a commentator. Jemele Hill’s tweet made questions regarding free speech and constitutionality naturally arise. The United States provides the right to free speech barring obscenity, slander, or clear and imminent danger, but corporations are not held to this same standard.

    Read More

  • Why We Should Hate Speech Be Banned Essay

    905 Words  | 2 Pages

    Our textbook clearly says that, “everyone has the right to an opinion – even if it is a horrible opinion. We can punish criminal behavior. We should never punish people for simply expressing their views.” The First Amendment made it possible for people to voice their opinion whether it be hurtful or not.

    Read More

  • Freedom Of Speech Should be Limited

    1338 Words  | 3 Pages

    Topic: Do you believe that free speech as proscribed under the first amendment of the constitution should be limited?

    Read More

  • Why Is Hate Speech Necessary

    1683 Words  | 4 Pages

    Is Censorship of “Hate Speech” Necessary? Current Issues: Civil Liberties defines hate speech as speech that degrades “a person’s ethnicity, language, religion, political views, or socioeconomic class” (Roleff, 27). Jeremy Waldron, a professor at New York University, wrote his book, The Harm in Hate Speech, on the thesis that hate speech “undermines the equal dignity of individual members of vulnerable minorities” (Mchangma). Waldron, who wants to see societies ban hate speech, defines hate speech too narrowly, since he defines hate speech as speech that is primarily harmful to minorities.

    Read More

  • Social Media Informative Speech

    771 Words  | 2 Pages

    Social media can cause some great trouble for some people. Some people can become bullies over the internet, while others are the innocent victims for these emotionless

    Read More

  • The Importance Of Freedom Of Speech In Vietnam And Vietnam

    1338 Words  | 3 Pages

    First of all, freedom of speech on social media. Social media is strongly developing nowadays. On social media, free speech is everywhere. Noel Diem demonstrates “it is a way for some people to vent their anger without feeling self-conscious, nervous, or upset without resorting to violent actions” (3). Americans feel free to speak out their opinions and feelings at everywhere, even on social media. Everyone can acknowledge that people might

    Read More

  • Why I Write George Orwell

    880 Words  | 2 Pages

    Words are very powerful, and sometimes the words we use can offend people. Freedom of speech is highly valued but what happens when

    Read More

More about Is It Infringing On People's Right To Free Speech?

Open Document