Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of art to you as an individual
Psychological impact from art
Importance of art to you as an individual
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of art to you as an individual
Topic4: The attitude as a viewer
Nick’s “NippleJesus” describes different interpretive community’s attitude to
a controversial artwork. And the author uses irony way to narrate an
interesting but thought provoking story. From the protagonist Dave, the
“nutter” Lisa and the artist behavior and words, I can see they hold various
belief about art. All of their belies represent a group, I could not judge they are
right or false. However, I can divided which one’s opinion is similar to mine.
Dave, the protagonist, who has the most complex and fascinating
personality that lead the story goes a tortured way. From Dave’s words and his
job, as a bouncer, I suppose that he is not good educated person. His attitude
and
As he said: “…Because it makes you think, and I don’t often
think about things like that. I haven’t been anywhere near Jesus since Lisa’s
sister got married three years ago.” Clearly, Dave is not the person who has
religious. Besides, he is also holds a wired opinion that he would like to
support the traitorous art works. From he thought: “ Because that is offensive,
isn’t it, a Jesus made out of nipple? That’s out of order. In this story, there are
many ideas intertwined in Dave’s mind, so he changes his attitude many
times by different reasons. Overall, I believe that Dave is a easily change
mind person. And if without other influence factors, Dave’s belief on art is just
because it is thoughtful and traitorous.
Lisa, as Dave’s wife, holds a opposite belief to Dave. She thinks the
NippleJesus is a awful artwork. As the text shows: “ …she said it was
disgusting, and how come it was on the wall in a famous gallery.” From the
story, Lisa even does not see the real art work herself. But she set herself
against NippleJesus; so I can see that her belief of art is the artworks must
Therefore, Martha is an artist who think the art should have a provoke
and interaction with viewers.
As for me, Martha’s belief is the closest to mine. But there is a little different between mine and her opinion. I believe that art have to have a interaction
with people, but more importantly, art also can influence people. That is
reason why we create the artwork. Last year, I have seen an news on the
Internet. The label said: The crazy artist’s freak artwork. Then I searched the
artwork create by Maurizio Cattelan who always made irony and controversial
pieces. This untitled work was using fabric and steel to made three boys hang
on the tree.
At first, I was shocked by this piece, it is so tragedy that three child hang on
the tree. I thought most of people would feel disgust, uncomfortable and
oppression. However, after a few minutes, I felt I respect for this work and the
artist. Admittedly, it is an unique work of art, it makes lots of people debate.
Then I think the artist is brave and clever, because he wanted to take a risk to
impel people to think about the children suicide and safety problem. Is it
disgust? Yes, it is! Is it makes you uncomfortable? Yes, It is! Is it makes
Dave was born in 1801 in Edgefield, South Carolina. Dave was different from other slaves, he could read and write. In Dave’s era it was illegal for slave stop read and write, one of Daves’ owners exposed Dave to the Bible. Dave wrote scripture and poetry on many of his pots. However, in 1846-1857 Dave had a dark time of repression and didn't use his literacy skills at all. We also know that Dave dated many of his pots
Georgia O’Keefe is a famous American painter who painted beautiful flowers and landscapes. But she painted these images in such a way that many people believed she was portraying sexual imagery. “O’Keefe’s depictions of flowers in strict frontality and enlarged to giant scale were entirely original in character . . . the view into the open blossoms evoked an image of the female psyche and invited erotic associations.” (Joachimides 47) O’Keefe denies these allegations and says that she “magnified the scale of the flower only to ensure people would notice them.” (Haskell 203) O’Keefe’s artwork was misinterpreted because of cultural prejudice, her non-traditional lifestyle, and gender bias art criticism. But despite these accusations, Georgia O’Keefe’s artwork was not based on sexuality.
People can have many different opinions depending on a topic, but what is truly difficult is getting a complete level of understanding from every opinion, or understanding the point of view of each opinion. Even accepting the points of view can be difficult for some people, who believe that their opinions are right. Luckily, people can learn about the other person’s frame of reference, and at the very least understand the topic or the person a little better. This particular topic is art, which is known for its multiple possible perceptions or its many different messages that it can send a person or group of people. In this way, people can learn more about the thought processes and feelings of others. Unfortunately, with differing opinions,
She uses sources from researchers and historians from different areas of study. Some art historians she quotes from include Fredick Antal, Fritz Novotny and A M Hammacher whom explains Van Gogh’s artwork based on his emotions and feelings. She also quotes researchers such as doctors, philosopher like Karl Jaspers, Rey and Peyron as well as writers such as Meyer Schapiro who tries looking at his works on a psychological level. The quotes she takes are relatively long and can take up as much as half a page and are quotes which she later disregards and argues that it is incorrect. By doing this, she is proving her point that she is right and those researchers have to look deeper into the meaning.
Is there something that recognizes an artist as the creator of an artwork? Of which rules the distinctive connection of authorship, to the extent that the work must be understood in relations of the artist’s significances (or at least in relation of significances the artist might have had) is composed of? Notoriously, the concept of the author fell into inquiry in the 20th century with theorists like Roland Barthes, who finishes his tribute of the author with the idea that the origin of the reader should be at the price of the demise of the Author. Michel Foucault approves, claiming that the notion of the author is an oppressive one that does no m...
When first approaching this work, one feels immediately attracted to its sense of wonder and awe. The bright colors used in the sun draws a viewer in, but the astonishment, fascination, and emotion depicted in the expression on the young woman keeps them intrigued in the painting. It reaches out to those who have worked hard in their life and who look forward to a better future. Even a small event such as a song of a lark gives them hope that there will be a better tomorrow, a thought that can be seen though the countenance by this girl. Although just a collection of oils on a canvas, she is someone who reaches out to people and inspires them to appreciate the small things that, even if only for a short moment, can make the road ahead seem brighter.
...the woman holding out the light in the upper portion of the mural. The woman holds an old, oil lamp in the presence of electricity. The outdated lamp brightens the scene with genuine light. Gottlieb argues that the woman holding the light is an allegory representing righteousness and the integrity of the Spanish people.
The painting was created to help individuals understand that," True beauty comes from within; it’s about being kind to others and not only thinking about yourself..
In the scene where Theo is escaping with Kee in a wheelchair through the ruined streets, the camera focuses on the main story, following Theo and Kee running for safety, but is preoccupied and caught by a woman in the background cradling her dead son on the ground. This image can also be referenced as a citation to a piece of art previously mentioned in the “Ark of the Arts” scene as Michelangelo’s La Pietà. The image of the mother holding her son is attributing to the statue with Mary holding the recently crucified Jesus Christ, drawing on the similar question regarding the cruelty of men. This image also invokes Picasso’s Guernica, also previously seen in the “Arts Scene”, which depicts a woman crying out as she holds her dead child in the lower left hand corner, which is sectioned off and highlighted in one of the shots from the scene. While the “Ark of the Arts” scene shows the extracted art placed in a symbolic ivory tower, Cuarón puts art back on the ground where it belongs and brings it alive through ancient and current contexts as well as a background for the main
views it. Every eye may have a different view of the piece of art and have
If people can give an accurate concept of art, then it is better to say that art gave the artist a definite goal and motivation. Any work of art is needed imagination to be created and completed. I always love to draw, but when I really put the painting as a major, I feel very confused. Because I think I am too lack of imagination, and there is no way to create the ideal work for me. Until I see Andre Masson’s art work “Man in a Tower” in the Guggenheim museum, I know that creative ideas could be inspired by many basic and normal elements of our life. Gradually I have a deeper understanding of art and have the confidence to complete the painting.
Art is a form of creative expression in once unique innovative form. This form can be looked upon in various ways. While, art may come in multiple forms by articulating its solitary purpose. As it has been understood that, individuals receive comfort from art either by creating it or as an alternative by assembling it. In addition to, in today’s society, the purpose of art serves as historical momentum. This helps us to look back in history and makes us able to distinguish if a collector of artifacts is different than an artist or they both serve the same purpose.
...ow everyone could be a critic of art. People were free to form their own opinions. Jacques realized this and instead concentrated on depicting emotion and patriotism in his art.
When the narrator finds the painting of her, he immensely admires the beauty and the elegance by seeing “The arms, the bosom, and even the ends of the radiant hair” that were vividly drawn. The elegance of the woman is further explained when the narrator reads the volume in which the paintings are discussed and explained. The first line of the volume explains the woman’s finest quality by saying that “she was a maiden of the rarest beauty” (“The Oval Portrait”). However, it is in this instance where there is an important shift in the story. The story shifts from explaining and admiring the beauty of the woman to elucidating her imminent death and decay. Subsequently, the narrator learns about how her life turned bitter when “she saw, and loved, and wedded the painter” (“The Oval Portrait”). Even though she loves the painter, she abhors and even despises his work because it “deprived her of the countenance of her lover” (“The Oval Portrait”). This idea of loneliness and neglect is further explained when the painter paints a painting of his wife. Even though he loved his wife and wanted make a masterpiece by working with
create sculptures that explore the tensions between functionalism and formalism. However, quoting other sources is not simply about "shifting an item from one context to another; in her hands it became a form of translation with all the distortions and misunderstandings that this implies."' These works are not readymades: even when she maintains the scale of the original, she alters its material, bringing new connotations to the form. As she once declared: "Materials are not just