Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Physical and chemical changes
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Physical and chemical changes
Aim: To investigate, the corrosion of Iron nails in different levels of Sodium Chloride (NaCl) concentrations. Hypothesis: An increase in the level of concentration of Sodium Chloride (NaCl) will increase the level of corrosion on the Iron nail. Equipment: Safety Glasses Safety Apron x4 Iron nails x4 4.5ml Test Tubes x4 25ml Beakers Distilled Water Ruler Pipette Digital Bench Scale Stirring Rod Watch Glass Test tube holder x8 Labels 10ml Measuring Cylinder Sodium Chloride (NaCl) Method: 1. Measure out 12ml of distilled water using a 10ml measuring cylinder and pour into a 25ml beaker. 2. Weigh out 0.6g of Sodium Chloride onto a watch glass with a Digital scale and pour into the beaker in step 1. 3. Stir …show more content…
To minimise this risk handle the nails carefully and if you drop it, pick it up straight away. Results: The results that will be collected include; The weight of the Iron nails before and after the experiment. o These results will be collected by weighing the nails on a digital bench scale. The lengths of the iron nails before and after the experiment. o These results will be collected by measuring the nails with a ruler. Photos of the Iron nails before, during and after the experiment. o These results will be collected by taking photos on a camera. Written observation of the Iron nails before, during and after the experiment. Discussion: Throughout this practical experiment both chemical and physical changes had occurred, these were observed by the changes in the colour of the solutions, and on the iron nails and by the precipitation of an insoluble solid forming. The iron nails, when put into the sodium chloride solution immediately started to chemically react together. This reaction rapidly caused the iron nails to form an orange/brown coating and for an element to precipitate at the bottom of the test tube, an orange/brown coating also formed around the test tube near the top of the sodium chloride solution. Suspended throughout the solution were small dark particles and also dark particles …show more content…
Another error could have been that the measured amount of distilled water in the beaker may have been inaccurate due to an incorrectly measured and marked measuring cylinder. This would have affected the concentration of the sodium chloride solution and in turn made the nail corrode at a different rate then what was expected. An error concerned with the pipettes could have been that different pipettes may have been used throughout the practical; this would have produced an issue as the drop sizes of the used pipettes may not have been the same and caused more solution to be in one test tube then the others. Another error could have been that over time some of the water in the solution could have evaporated, this would have caused an increase in concentration of the negative and positive ions and in turn speed up the corrosion process
My goal in this experiment was to determine the amount of zinc (in grams) on 5 different galvanized nails to see if this specific box was up to standard, as well as how consistent the weight of the zinc is on each nail and do so by measuring the weight of the nail initially, then take the zinc off with the hydrochloric
Start with the hot water and first measure the temperature. Record it. 8. Then pour 40 ml into the beaker. You can measure how much water was used by looking at the meniscus.
A: The reaction with water and vinegar was the most useful in this experiment. The physical properties were very self explanatory because the texture of the powders was all different expect icing sugar and cornstarch. Also the Ph levels were very similar of six and seven for corn starch and icing sugar respectively. d) Q: How confident do you feel about your identification of the
Each subsequent trial will use one gram more. 2.Put baking soda into reaction vessel. 3.Measure 40 mL vinegar. 4.Completely fill 1000 mL graduated cylinder with water.
3.) Divide your 30g of white substance into the 4 test tubes evenly. You should put 7.5g into each test tube along with the water.
Prepare the nails by removing any old nail polish present on the nail. Clean the nails with hand sanitizer.
2. Put the test tube inside a beaker for support. Place the beaker on a balance pan. Set the readings on the balance to zero. Then measure 14.0g of KNO3 into the test tube.
of distilled water. For the 1M solution I added 50 cm3 of HCl and 50
For this project you need many things. The first things you need are three plastic cups. The rust may stain on the cups so I recommend plastic ones. You want three nails covered in rust. All the nails must be the same size. You need a camera to take pictures of the changes that occur to the nail. Also, you need to get water, coke, and vinegar. It doesn’t matter what type of vinegar but I recommend regular coke. I would also appreciate it if you use tap water. The last thing you need is paper and a pencil.
Plan 1. Collect 4 different sized beakers 2. Boil some water in the kettle 3. Pour 50ml into each beaker 4. After 1 minute check temperature 5.
2. In the large beaker, put water and boil it completely. After that, remove the beaker from heat. 3. Sample tubes (A-D) should be labeled and capped tightly.
The beginnings of modern processing of iron can be traced back to central Europe in the mid-14th century BC. Pure iron has limited use in today’s world. Commercial iron always contains small amounts of carbon and other impurities that change its physical properties, which are much improved by the further addition of carbon and other alloying elements. This helps to prevent oxidation, also known as rust.
First, the mass of the beaker being used was recorded, then about 1g of baking soda was added and the mass recorded. Next, the mass of just the baking soda was found and recorded. Then, the contents were boiled until dry then weighed and mass recorded after cooling off. Finally, the mass of jus the salt, or sodium chloride, was found and recorded.
The results of this experiment showed that there was little to no change in the physical properties, which include the flake surface color or cortex color. There was only a slight change to the surface luster, but that could even be from the quality of the Knife River Flint and not a result of heat-treating it. The results of the structural changes were a little more promising. There was a noticeable change in the knappability of the heat-treated Knife River Flint compared to the raw/unaltered samples. Neither the hypothesis nor the null-hypothesis that were laid out in this paper was fully proven. There were aspect of both that were correct. There was only a noticeable change in the structure of the Knife River Flint, so that part of the hypothesis is true, while there was not noticeable change in the physical properties of it, which is true for the null-hypothesis. The hypothesis and null-hypothesis where not proven or disproved fully. I think this experiment could eventually prove the hypothesis right or wrong; further steps would need to be taken. Increasing the time and temperature could potentiality yield better results. If that were the case then the use of a kiln would be need as they can reach high temperatures then a household oven can.
For simple distillation, I added 4 mL of a 10-20% ethanol-water mixture to a 5 mL round-bottomed long-necked flask. I joined the flask to a distilling head fitted with a thermometer through...