Iranian Male Dominance

498 Words1 Page

This paper illustrates a different side of male domination in an Iranian modern fiction. That is, even the effort to picture women suffers, passes through a filter of the main male character’s mind. In the story of Prince Ehtejab, women do not have a voice and even if the reader realizes how they are being tortured, it would be through the male narrator’s view. This condition can be observed in most of the Iranian modern literature such as Buf-e kur (The blind owl) by Sadegh Hedayat, Barreh-ye gomshodeh-ye Ra’i (Ra’I’s lost lamb) by Houshang Golshiri, Shab-e Howl (The Night of Terror) by Hormoz Shahdadi and many others. Within fictions as such, the matter of women as a victim in a male-centered society shifts to issues that are more fundamental. Critics discuss the fact that these works represent a male Iranian psyche and the illusionary portray of women from their writer’s point of view. Under the pressure of cultural changes in Iran, novelists indicated their inner tensions in the shape of a woman since they became the most controversial issue at that time. Seemingly, in Iranian modern novels, women are stocked in a man’s imagination and are represented by a masculine organized language. …show more content…

Feminism, on the other hand, modifies psychoanalysis in a way that it reconsiders the process of one’s growth not as a biological fact but as a cultural construct that can be changed. Since Golshiri invites the readers to go beyond the surface of his words in the novella, Prince Ehtejab, psychoanalytic feminism aids to understand and analyze how the writer uses four women without a voice to explain one central male character's conflicts, tensions, and

Open Document