Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Cause and Effect of War
Cause and Effect of War
Explain the causes of war
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Cause and Effect of War
Iran-Iraq War
The eight year Iran-Iraq War was, by the standards of international conflicts, a very long one. It lasted longer than both World War I and World War II. In this conflict, the two most powerful states in the Persian Gulf, Iran and Iraq, who were the world’s largest producers of petroleum, were locked in mortal combat and appeared intent on destroying each other. The war began when Iraq invaded Iran, simultaneously launching an invasion by air and land into Iranian territory on September 1980 and ended with a United Nations brokered ceasefire in 1988.
The causes of the war are deeply rooted in the ideology and ambitions of the leaders of the countries to gain and maintain control over internal and regional politics, as well as by concerns over internal security, which was tied with notions of nationalism and territorial boundaries. The personal ambitions of the leaders concerned the issues of consolidation of their political power at home and projecting an image of strength in the region that would assure dominance over neighboring countries. Saddam Hussein, during the mid-1970s, had formally secured his position as leader of Iraq. His regime was fundamentally secular, though he did sometimes try to appeal to the religious sentiments of all the Iraqis. Saddam envisioned himself as a great leader and modernizer who would make Iraq into the leading state in the Middle East. During this time, Iraq’s primary competition for regional dominance was its neighbor Iran, and Iran seemed vulnerable because of the Iranian revolution, which was occurring at this period of time, that had not yet ended. Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini was still in the process of being the unchallenged Iranian leader, but he had not yet ...
... middle of paper ...
...4. "Iran-Iraq War (1980-1988)." GlobalSecurity.org - Reliable Security Information. Web. 09 May 2011. .
5. Karsh, Efraim (2002). The Iran–Iraq War, 1980–1988. Osprey Publishing. p. 22.
6. Levy, Jack S., and William R. Thompson. Causes of War. Chichester, West Sussex, U.K.: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010.
7. "The Iran Iraq War and WMD." Conservative Blogs, Websites and News Media. Web. 09 May 2011. .
8. "The Iran-Iraq War." Jewish Virtual Library - Homepage. Web. 09 May 2011. .
9. Workman, Thom. THE SOCIAL ORIGINS OF THE IRAN-IRAQ WAR. Mar. 1991. Web. .
10. http://www.oup.com/uk/orc/bin/9780199289783/01student/cases/iran_iraq_war.pdf
All causes of the Great War calling and bickering to be the main cause yet it was the combination of the main causes that made the war even possible; the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand with it’s nationalistic origins, then the alliances that created a larger web of support, and lastly imperialism that had created the passion of revenge, militarism, and nationalism. Though looking back many may not believe that the four years of trench warfare was not the most brilliant war in history, but they do have to agree that the causes are the most important aspects of the war in its entirety. For if people see why terrible events happen then they can prevent the future from new world wars that could’ve been solved without the need of war.
Dodds, Joana and Ben Wilson. "THE IRAN-IRAQ WAR: UNATTAINABLE OBJECTIVES1." Middle East Review of International Affairs (Online) 13, no. 2 (06, 2009): 72-94. http://search.proquest.com/docview/220899524?accountid=8289.
Saddam was trying to make the people fear him using terror, “His rule is based on fear”. He wanted the people to obey him without thinking and without saying no on anything he does believing that he has a divine power. But because he used terror to be respected by everyone he was decieved a lot, sometimes his subordinates lied and did not tell him the truth because they were afraid of getting mad and turing against them, so they would just tell him what he wants to hear. Even his guards were not loyal to him not because they wanted to but becasue they feared him “Their loyalty is governed by fear and self-interest, and will tilt decisively if and when an alternative appears.” Saddam was very suspicious he did not trust anyone and he was also weak but he never wanted to show it, for that he was trying to appear strong and powerful to hide his weakness and insecurity. From the things he used to hide his weaknesses was brutality and violence. An example that shows his savagery was when he wanted to capture U.S. soldiers and tie them up around Iraqi tanks to use them as human shields during the war over Kuwait. This actually shows that he knew he made the wrong decision in invading Kuwait but he did not want to admit it infront of anyone, so he was trying to find any solution that could make them win instead of taking the blame for their defeat. And here one can notices that fear and brutality kind of overlap or connect to each other, because Saddam used violence to make everyone fear him, a good example on that would be when Saddam’s regime accused some people of taking bribe and sentenced them to die, the colleagues, families and friends of those people were ordered to attend their hanging and everyone was compelled to attend because they knew that refusal could turn suspicion on them and end up hanged like
In September 1980, a very destructive war with Iran was started by Saddam Hussein. This was a result of an invasion in Iran. This invasion spurred an eight year war. Saddam used c...
It may seem like wars start abruptly, with little cause, but usually there is a bigger story. New policies, lack of equality, military influence, and too much government involvement usually stir up the peace initially. These turn the country or area into a ‘powder keg’, ready to explode into war at the smallest spark. Although the assassination of Archduke Francis Ferdinand was the spark of World War I, policies at the time like nationalism and militarism were the underlying causes of the war.
...nt variables. It can deal with the interests within a country and interests out of it. It can occur due to ideological differences or religious differences. It can occur due to a power grab, and in the cases of a failed brinkmanship, can be a complete accident. Each war throughout history has its own unique set of reasoning for occurring, which makes studying the causation of war so fascinating: in every war you study, you are guaranteed to find so many unique characteristics that it possesses.
Martel Gordon. The Origins of the First World War. Malaysia: Pearson Education Limited, 2003. Print.
Levy, Jack S., and William R. Thompson. Causes of War. Chichester, West Sussex, U.K.: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010. Print.
The Iraq war, also known as the second Gulf War, is a five-year, ongoing military campaign which started on March 20, 2003 with the invasion of Iraq by U.S. troops. One of the most controversial events in the history of the western world, the war has caused an unimaginable number of deaths, and spending of ridiculous amounts of money. The reason for invasion war Iraq’s alleged possession of weapons of mass destruction, which eventually was disproved by weapons inspectors. Many people question George W. Bush’s decision to engage a war in Iraq, but there might be greater reason why the decision was made. The ideas of George W. Bush might have been sculpted by one of the greatest works of all time, "The Prince."
The Origins of the Second World War, by A.J.P. Taylor, proposes and investigates unconventional and widely unaccepted theories as to the underlying causes of World War Two. Taylor is British historian who specialized in 20th century diplomacy, and in his book claims that as a historian his job is to “state the truth” (pg. xi) as he sees it, even if it means disagreeing with existing prejudices. The book was published in 1961, a relatively short time after the war, and as a result of his extreme unbias the work became subject to controversy for many years.
The war between Iraq and Iran initiated in 1980 and it lasted eight years (3). The invasion of Kuwait started on the second of August 1990. There are reasons and consequences for this invasion that I am going to talk about in this essay
Pre-invasion Iraq reflected the views and policies of its leader, Saddam Hussein, who made his first political appearance as a supporter of the Ba’ath Party. He was jailed in 1967 for this, and after his escape quickly rose to power within the faction. (Saddam Hussein Biography, 2008) Saddam became known for his political talent and progressiveness, and soon became a popular politician. After working on extensive unification and expansion efforts for the Ba’athists, the man rose to vice chairman of the Revolutionary Command Council. Faced with a tremendous amount of religious, racial, social and economic divisions, Saddam launched a campaign of total control to bring about stability.
...aq. The British now needed to control Iraq through more circuitous methods, primarily by introducing previous authorities well disposed to the British government. They inevitably chose to introduce Faysal ibn Husayn as King of Iraq. Faysal had worked with the British before in the Arab Revolt throughout World War I and he reveled in great relations with certain vital authorities. British authorities additionally thought introducing Faysal as ruler might keep Faysal from battling the French in Syria and harming British-French relations. For Iraqis the rebellion served as a feature of the establishing of Iraqi patriotism despite the fact that this conclusion is discussed by researchers. It additionally demonstrated remarkable co-operation between Sunni and Shi'a Muslims in spite of the fact that this co-operation did not last any longer than the end of the rebellion.
Whitelaw, Kevin, Mark Mazzetti, and Thomas Omestad. 2002. "Why War?." U.S. News & World Report 133, no. 14: 16. Academic Search Premier, EBSCOhost (accessed November 12, 2013).
Griffith, William E. “The Revial of Islamic Fundamentalism: the Case of Iran.” International Security. Volume 4, Issue 1, 1979, 132-138.