Evidence-based practice is important to consider when researching for interventions, further knowledge, or help to guide a new idea in the health professions. Evidence-based practice is comprised of three significant concepts: respect and awareness for the targeted population’s values, previous clinical practice or experience with that population, and systematic research to establish a better understanding of what is already known about the study’s focus. These concepts are all taken into consideration when designing and conducting a study because it provides a more valid and credible source for others. When we seek out interprofessional evidence-based practices, we find successful studies that take into consideration the three concepts …show more content…
but also have more than one discipline involved. A study created to test a specific intervention for children with stutters aged 5-10 conducted by only speech language pathologists may seem credible and very informative. Speech language pathologists have an immense amount of knowledge and skills to provide individuals with interventions or forms of therapy to treat their stutter. However, what if this study involved not just one discipline area but other disciplines as well like occupational therapy, for example. Instead of professionals from the same educational backgrounds, it seems the collaboration and insight from numerous backgrounds of higher education would be more beneficial to the study’s formation and outcome. In comparison to discipline specific evidence-based practice, interprofessional evidence-based practice has a few advantages. One, is there is simply more brain power. Using the scenario above, the speech language pathologist may plan the intervention for a child with a stutter, but need they could use the expertise of an occupational therapist to seek creative processes for success or alternatives for communication. The more heads combined can integrate not only different backgrounds of education but research and clinical experience as well, making the study more concrete. Second, working within a group of different educational backgrounds gives many opportunities to become a more competent health care professional. Skills such as communication, role changing, cooperation, and confidence. Most importantly, this multidisciplinary technique can increase productivity and efficiency. Lastly, the mixture of diverse perspectives may influence your own based on what you learn throughout the process. The integration of all disciplines and their specialized knowledge can increase the competency of each discipline, itself. A study published in the Nursing and Health Sciences Journal using both quantitative and qualitative measures evaluated the effectiveness of a music-with-movement intervention for people with dementia and their families.
The participants were recruited based on the qualifications of being older than 65 years, scoring 0.5-1 on the Clinical Dementia Rating scale, and a primary caregiver willing to volunteer in the study (Cheung, Ho, Lai, Lai, & Wong, 2015). Staff for the study, consisting of social workers and occupational therapists, were recruited by posters (Cheung et al., 2015). The staff took a training course and all came up with a protocol for the music-with-movement intervention, with the aims to promote the wellbeing of people with dementia, and also their primary caregiver. A music therapist constructed various songs for specific activities for the people with dementia to engage in with their …show more content…
caregiver. Interestingly, this study involved more than one discipline. Not only was a music therapist, but also occupational therapists, nurses, and social workers. The music therapist was included to produce his songs and attempt to do this to treat a person with dementia. The occupational therapists were included to share their insight about the occupations at hand and how the participants would adjust or need modifications within the intervention. Social workers give guidance and counseling services and pay attention to the relationship and enjoyment of each participant and their caregiver. Nurses were assumedly included in the study for medical purposes and emergencies. Without such an integrated team, much less knowledge and feedback would be given regarding the study and the participants volunteering. Thankfully, many areas for improvement were suggested to the music therapist from each discipline of expertise. The justifiable complaints about the intervention were that it was too structured, the participants lacked a choice in the songs, and it did not cater to individual needs of each participant (Cheung et al., 2015). Corrections were acknowledged and made to the protocol to ensure the staff were motivated and enjoying the intervention so they could better motivate the families to implement music-with-movement. One major limitation to this study, noticed by a social worker, was the practicality of this intervention for a participant that possibly had a stroke, for example, restricting movement in the whole left side of his body (Cheung et al., 2015). As you can notice more now, this is why multiple backgrounds of higher education are integrated to ensure more safety and potentially better success. In my future area of expertise, occupational therapy, I will use studies like this one to learn from.
This study, for instance, could enhance my knowledge on client-centered practice, considering the intervention did not fit as a meaningful occupation for all participants engaging in it. The understanding needed for the disability’s capabilities would be crucial for me to bring about if I was ever a part of a study like this. Also, I can humbly recognize other areas of expertise, like doctors, art therapists, and nursing home staff that could be involved in this study or greatly benefit from the idea of it. However most of all, getting the privilege to work with a multidisciplinary team for a study like this would allow me to learn more about myself as a health professional, educator, and a cooperative, intelligent
teammate.
Evidence Based Practice emerged in the late 20th century, becoming widespread in the 21st century. According to Research and Practice: The Role of Evidence-Based Program Practices in the Youth Mentoring Field ( 2009) “The concept of Evidence Based Practice (EBP) actually has its roots in the medical field, where the work of Archie Cochrane (1972) and others examined the key role that the substantial body of medical research and literature could play in how doctors make decisions in patient care” (para 6); Thus, a doctor’s decision would be an “educated” decision, based on evidence gathered (patient symptoms), history of cases they have overseen, or research of previous case diagnosed by another doctor, with a related case. Evidence Based Practices are defined as “ integration of: (a) clinical expertise/expert opinion, (b) external scientific evidence, and (c) client/patient/caregiver perspectives to provide high-quality services reflecting the interests, values, needs, and choices of the individuals we serve” (“Evidence Based Practice (EBP),” 1997-2014); often described as the “Best Practices”. The evidence itself is not the basis of decisions made, but it does help support the process of care given to our clients.
Evidence Based Practice (EBP) is useful to practice because it aids practitioners development and widens their knowledge and insight, therefore enhancing the experience of the practitioner. This ensures that the best quality of care is given to the patient (Duncan, 2006).
Evidence based practice is the basis for needed change in practice and function. It is a sound method for scientific, fact-based change. Changes which have no evidence to support them are fragile, unscientific, and subjective. These changes don’t effect real change over time, as they aren’t able to be proven to a more general population.
It is essential that when using evidence-based practice guidelines to choose a treatment, that variety of research methods are applied so that the best relevant data can be produced. Such methods include qualitative/quantitative research, randomised controlled trials and systematic reviews. Both qualitative and quantative methods produce valuable data. Quantative research produces numeric evidence that is necessary for practice and can be measured and qualitative research produces descriptive data about the subject by using patients views etc. which can also be applied to clinical practice (Broeder et al, 2010)
It is obvious that a great deal of interprofessional research has been aimed to educate practitioners and nurses over the past decade for interprofessional practice (Orchard, King, Khalil & Beezina, 2012). The Institute of Medicine (IOM) “The Future of Nursing Leading Change, Advancing Health” (2010) recommend that private and public organizations, nursing programs and associations increase opportunities for nurses to lead and manage collaborative teams. Health care reform has created a shift in the healthcare delivery to place more emphasis on interprofessional health care teams (Sinfield, Donoghue, Horobi & Anderson, 2012). New implications are directed towards continuing education for health care workers to understand the meaning of interprofessional collaboration to support the changes in collaborative practice to improve patient outcomes (Orchard et.al, 2012). Encouraging health care professional to collaborate as a team more effectively may seem as the answer to improve the quality of care, but ineffective communication from team members to collaborate on the care needs often attributed to patient safety issues. Consequently, even when professional collaborative teams work together, there is no means to validate and measure the impact on continuing education for nurses about interprofessional collaborative practice (Sinfield, et al., 2012).
Evidence-Based Practice is a methodology, framework, gathering of ideas or concepts, adopted principles and strategies supported by research (Fixsen et al.,
Evidence-based practice integrates best current evidence with clinical expertise and patient/family preferences and values for the delivery of optimal health care (qsen.org). Like most medical professions, nursing is a constantly changing field. With new studies being done and as we learn more about different diseases it is crucial for the nurse to continue to learn even after becoming an RN. Using evidence-based practice methods are a great way for nurses and other medical professionals learn new information and to stay up to date on new ways to practice that can be used to better assess
Within this essay Evidence based Practice will be identified and the significant effect it has on the nursing profession, barriers will also be explored in the implementation of Evidence Based Practice.
Johnson, J. K., & Chow, M. L. (2015). Hearing and music in dementia. Handbook of Clinical
Over the last 10 years evidence-based practice (EBP) has grown substantially and is changing the nursing care delivered to patients along with the nursing work environment. Nurses are more involved in the decision making process, and are making clinical decisions with better patient outcomes (Good, Fink, Krugman, Oman, & Traditi, 2011). With technology growing at such a fast pace, new and more effective medicines, medical devices, and procedures are developed daily. Digestible sensors that monitor your bodily systems and 3D printing of embryonic stem cells, blood vessels, and sheets of cardiac tissue that actually beat like a real heart, are significantly impacting the future of healthcare (Honigman,
The Consensus on Evidence Based Practice The idea behind conforming to evidenced based practices is that research is the most likely tool to improve patient treatment outcomes. [2] Duly, care provider organizations are aligning policies and procedures with evidenced based practices to improve service quality. Public health advocates hope that this movement will standardize
One feature of evidence based practice is a problem-solving approach that draws on nurses’ experience to identify a problem or potential diagnosis. After a problem is identified, evidence based practice can be used to come up with interventions and possible risks involved with each intervention. Next, nurses will use the knowledge and theory to do clinical research and decide on the appropriate intervention. Lastly, evidence base practice allows the patients to have a voice in their own care. Each patient brings their own preferences and ideas on how their care should be handled and the expectations that they have (Fain, 2017, pg.
This essay paper will demonstrate reflection on a health care scenario and paper article; it will critically appraise the evidence provided in paper 1. Using the principles of evidence based practice, it critically allows analysing research and gaining an understanding to utilise skills and knowledge in practice. The main aim of evidence based practice is to greatly improve the quality of information and research. It provides health professionals and audiences to find the best quality information to answer a range of clinical questions (De Brun, Pearce-Smith 2009). Strengths and limitations of paper 1 will also be addressed throughout and factors will be discussed which influence the use of evidence in practice.
Evidence-based medicine (EBM) has been described as “the conscientious, explicit, and judicious use of current best evidence in making decision about the care of individual patients” . Evidence-Based Practice is a thoughtful integration of the best available evidence, coupled with clinical expertise. It enables one to address healthcare questions with an evaluative and qualitative approach. It is about applying the best available research evidence in provision of health, behavior and education services to enhance outcomes. Evidence-Based practice is about performing the best possible practice in order to provide the best possible care .
The importance of Evidence-Based Practice is to ensure the best possible care is provided for patients. Evidence-Based Practice functions by measuring the effectiveness of a treatment and differentiating findings between high-quality and low-quality. It also helps with health development and improves the reliability and facilitates students to become reflecti...