Interpersonal Functioning Assessment Report

699 Words2 Pages

The only other tools mentioned were in the section where it asks the TRS if any other tests were administered. In the realm of assessment tools there are several that state short and long-term goals, so this section may be a component of other tools. There are many assessment tools that go into more detail certain sections of the VCUHS tool such as the interpersonal functioning section. Also there are several tools in the TR realm that go over leisure and recreational activities the client is involved in one tool is the Leisure Interest Measure. This measure is used to see what domain is ranked highest out of physical, social, outdoor, mechanical, artistic, service, reading, and cultural domains. Information gathered from the LIM can be used …show more content…

The TRS made a fully rounded conclusion in the “assessment of recreation/leisure function” section. The summary of the client includes all parts of the VCUHS tool. The TRS first identified the type of injury, which is important to note because that is the reason they are at the facility and taking this assessment. The TRS forms the assumption “Pt is motivated in rehab and have + leisure interests” which is fair to make because the TRS previously asked the client what leisure activities they like and the client only named positive interests such as basketball and football. Also, the client answered all questions under the interpersonal functioning section with positives inferring the client self directs in unstructured tasks, they demonstrates a desire to win without hostility, and has an acceptable appearance in social settings. If the client had answered differently to any of these questions the TRS may make an inference such as “the client enjoys positive leisure interests but lacks the ability to control aggression in competitive based activities.” If an inference like this was made it is safe to assume the treatment plan would …show more content…

The TRS states in the assessment summary “Pt will also benefit from community reintegration to focus on barriers in the community.” The client did not or could not name any social or church organizations they belong to. The assessment tool also showed a – sign for allocation of time in spiritual/religious activities and volunteer work. Both of these sections helped the TRS form the conclusion the client would benefit from community involvement interventions. In the barriers section the client did not indicate any form of barriers to their leisure participation, all of the questions were answered N indicating not a barrier to leisure participation. Because the client is not involved in many community based activities the TRS made sure to expose the client to barriers they may come across in the future. The TRS will also help the client be able to adapt and work around those barriers they may encounter when becoming reintegrated in the

More about Interpersonal Functioning Assessment Report

Open Document