Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The impact of internet in our daily lifes
Effect of the internet on society
The importance of Internet censorship
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The impact of internet in our daily lifes
"In 2018 the internet is a vital part of people's everyday lives. Almost everyone has a smart phone glued to their side and is constantly surfing the web for information or using social media. Kids, teens and adults all use the internet for one reason or another. The rise of social media in recent years with websites like twitter, Instagram and Facebook has expanded internet use greatly. People use social media to share pictures and fun information about their lives. People also use the internet for endless purposes other than social media, like to read informative articles, looking up the weather, or searching for the newest viral video. The important question that has arose from this internet takeover is how much should the government monitor …show more content…
What exactly is the extent of this freedom? The idea is that people should be able to say what they want as long as it does not harm anyone else or infringe on their rights. On the internet, people exercise their freedom of speech all the time. For example on social media a person may use their freedom of speech to express how they may not like the current president and his policies. However, if a person begins to make threats towards the president then they have gone beyond their freedom of speech. The government has the duty to monitor internet content when it has gone past this line of freedom of speech and becomes dangerous to others. The federal government should also be able to monitor the website when it comes to issues that are national threats like terrorism. According to a statement made Before the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, groups like ISIL and al Qaeda use the internet to communicate with followers and recruit followers (Steinback). The government should be able to monitor internet use when it comes to issues like terrorism. The federal government should flag keywords involving terrorism and monitor that
place. It should be left up to the users to decide what is broadcast. Most
Tears begin to fall down a child’s face. Her body goes into shock out of fear. Her mother warned her about watching inappropriate content, and there it was, right on her computer screen. This could not have happened though. All she was doing was casually browsing the internet before a pop-up appeared. Although it may seem hard to believe, the major cause of events such as this is the lack of censorship on the internet. Internet censorship relates to the removal of offensive, inappropriate, or controversial content published online. The current problem with the internet is that there are few restrictions on what can be published or viewed. Several sites on the internet only offer a warning about inappropriate content that can easily be bypassed by agreeing to the terms. Other websites provide access to private or military information. More dreadfully, however, are websites that use their explicit content as a promotion. These factors bring the conclusion that anybody of any given age can view and publish inappropriate or dangerous content. The current problems with the internet serve for clarification as to why the United States should create a nonpartisan assembly to censor the internet in order to protect its citizens from the mental, emotional, and physical harms the internet creates.
“While most teenagers (60 percent) spend on average 20 hours per week in front of television and computer screens, a third spend closer to 40 hours per week, and about 7 percent are exposed to more than 50 hours of 'screen-time' per week”(Many Teens Spend). Many parents agree that they would rather not have their children view indecencies on the Internet and television, and the government should control the obscenities on the Internet. Others believe that it is the parent’s responsibility to control and censor what their children are watching on the Internet and television.
"Internet Censorship." What does this mean to us? What is restricted? Censorship is summarily defined as the suppression of objectionable material. That means that material such as pornography, militant information, offensive language, anti-religion, and racism would be restricted in use. Freedom would not only be restricted to material placed on the web, but also what you could access, and where you could explore. Should the right of Freedom of Speech be taken away from us on the Internet? Having stated this, should there be any restrictions and if so, what's the limit of censorship?
On 16th of December 1949, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights was signed. Although we want governments and regimes to abide with the articles not all do. Our government is formed to protect us and to provide every citizen, infrastructure in order to make the person able to live. However our governments also care for themselves as well. They want to stay in power thus they have to protect their reputation. This is where internet censorship steps in. Although censoring some sites is reasonable, some are not. If a site on the internet criticizes the government and if this happens in a country where the government is somewhat oppressive, the site is blocked to access. I believe the level of tolerance towards criticism of a government can be found by the internet censorship in that country. We can categorize these types of governments into five: No or few censorship, normal amounts of censorship, above normal, high amount of censorship and extreme amounts of censorship. I am going to focus about the last three levels. For these levels Republic of Turkey, People’s Republic of China and Democratic People’s Republic of Korea are examples I am going to talk about. These examples would be coinciding with the levels respectively.
Today, many people invest much of their time online whether it is to read the news, be on social media or check bank accounts, but little do they realize there is no control and no security online. On January 11, 2017, Thomas L. Friedman’s New York Times article, “Online and Scared”, argues how cyberspace lacks control and regulations and therefore it makes the internet a scary place for many people. Friedman starts by alarming his audience of a recent event, telling some personal opinions, and backing up his claims with many examples and reliable sources. First, Friedman began his article by reminding the audience of winter 2016 about the technology meeting with Vladimir Putin, Donald Trump, Mark Zuckerberg, and Jeff Bezos. As these men are very powerful, they have a huge impact on technology and the world.
"In the United States and other countries around the world, our governments are hard at work creating laws, commanding a military, and just keeping the country running smoothly in general. But there are some aspects of people's lives that the topic of government involvement is still up for discussion. One of the most controversial aspects is how much, if at all, our governments should monitor our internet. Some say that the government should get out of their personal lives, while others feel the need for the monitoring to keep them, and others, out of trouble. I don’t think that there is just one simple answer. It all depends on the situation of each individual citizen.
"The U.S government is currently abusing its power to monitor our use of internet content and the privacy we receive. There is a definite _ÑÒline_Ñù in the government system that shouldn_Ñét be crossed, yet they don_Ñét have a problem stepping well over it. It is understandable that deep web content such as child pornography, copyright infringement and drug trafficking networks needs to be monitored, considering the circumstances. But personal content such as emails and Facebook messages are where the line between the government and its citizens needs to be drawn. The government should not have the power to monitor personal content because it clearly denies several fundamental rights of the Constitution.
However, government agencies, especially in America, continue to lobby for increased surveillance capabilities, particularly as technologies change and move in the direction of social media. Communications surveillance has extended to Internet and digital communications. law enforcement agencies, like the NSA, have required internet providers and telecommunications companies to monitor users’ traffic. Many of these activities are performed under ambiguous legal basis and remain unknown to the general public, although the media’s recent preoccupation with these surveillance and privacy issues is a setting a trending agenda.
" In the United States, the government carries out internet surveillance on its citizens mainly because of security concerns. Before the terrorists' attacks on the United States on September 11th, people and especially those in the private sectors were not comfortable with government's surveillance on their internet activities because they saw this move as interfering to their privacy. Despite this discomfort, the government increased its surveillance on the internet and to all other avenues which may be used to cause security threat in order to curb any future incidence that may occur. Since the attack, there was a significant change on the people's attitudes because the main concerned become about the security and therefore it required them to work together with the government to help improve the state of security in the country.
"Benjamin Franklin once said, “Without freedom of thought, there can be no such thing as wisdom - and no such thing as public liberty without freedom of speech.†The principle of freedom has been put to test as speech and means of communication have changed over the centuries. However, we must never compromise our fundamental principles for convenience or false security. Liberty is the cornerstone of American society. The First Amendment to the Constitution guarantees us five essential freedoms: freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of religion, freedom of assembly, and freedom of petition. When faced with the 21st century problem of internet control, we must stay true to our Constitution.
Internet privacy and security has become the concern of many individuals throughout recent years. There are a very limited amount of laws that have been enacted to combat computer or cyber related crimes. This has become an issue because as the internet grows increasingly popular so does the criminal and immoral behavior that abounds on it. With these crimes gaining in impact, effectiveness, and frequency, there needs to be more repercussions for these crimes. The United States government needs to increase restrictions on the amount and type of data on individuals from the internet, to prevent the government from invading privacy of citizens and to prevent companies from storing browser histories of individuals, to then sell that information to ad agencies and other companies.
Today, society is affected by the many advances in technology. These advances affect almost every person in the world. One of the prevalent advances in technology was the invention and mass use of the Internet. Today more than ever, people around the world use the Internet to support their personal and business tasks on a daily basis. The Internet is a portal into vast amounts of information concerning almost every aspect of life including education, business, politics, entertainment, social networking, and world security. (idebate.com) Although the Internet has become a key resource in developing the world, the mass use of Internet has highlighted a major problem, privacy and the protection of individual, corporate, and even government security . The argument over whether or not the Internet should be controlled by the government has developed into a controversial issue in almost every country in the world.
The Internet is an extremely educational and communicative tool. Everyone can access a tremendous amount of information and connect with people on the other end of the planet; it is capable of doing everything. Nowadays, the society is facing a variety of challenges and controversies which are mostly related to religion, morality, the economic crisis, etc., and the most talked-about issue in today’s world is “Internet censorship”. Although the Internet is very useful, many people are suggesting the idea of censoring the Internet; however, the government should not censor the Internet because a free and open Internet usage has many positive impacts on people’s lives.
Internet Censorship Position We live in a world with many technological advances, such as cell phones, iPods, MP3 players, DVD players, and many major medical advances, too many to name. Perhaps the most important technological advance is the World Wide Web or simply the Internet. Of course like any good thing, the Internet comes with its ups and downs.